Clinical Study

Medial Calcar Support and Radiographic Outcomes of Plate Fixation for Proximal Humeral Fractures

Table 3

Characteristics between patients with osteonecrosis and those without osteonecrosis.

VariablesPatients
w/ONa
Patients
w/o ON
value
( = 20)( = 69)

Age, mean years (SDb)68.4 (10.2)66.0 (10.5)0.362
Female gender16 (80.0)55 (79.7)1
Right side lesion 11 (55.0)29 (42.0)0.305
AOc/OTAd type
 A4 (20.0)33 (47.8)
 B9 (45.0)31 (44.9)
 C7 (35.0)5 (7.2)
Neer type
 2 parts 4 (20.0)34 (49.3)
 3 parts8 (40.0)30 (43.5)
 4 parts 8 (40.0)5 (7.2)
Shoulder dislocation3 (15.0)5 (7.2)0.372
Timely operatione10 (50.0)21 (30.4)0.106
Locked plating 8 (40.0)29 (29.4)0.871
Varus collaps11 (55.0)18 (26.1)0.015
Comorbidity
 Diabetes mellitu12 (60.0)16 (23.2)0.002
 Arterial hypertension11 (55.0)35 (50.7)0.736
 Coronary heart disease2 (10.0)6 (8.7)1
 Stroke 1 (5.0)5 (7.2)1
 Chronic kidney diseas11 (55.0)13 (18.8)0.001
 Chronic liver diseas8 (40.0)9 (13.0)0.019

Note: data are number (%) of lesions, unless otherwise indicated.
Pearson chi-square test, unless otherwise stated; independent -test.
aON: osteonecrosis; bSD: standard deviation; cAO: arbeitsgemeinschaft für osteosynthesefragen; dOTA: orthopaedic trauma association; etimely operation: operation performed <8 hours after fracture; fvarus collapse: >20° varus on immediate postoperative follow-up radiographs.
Statistical significance ( < 0.05).