Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 171945, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/171945
Review Article

Cellular Responses Evoked by Different Surface Characteristics of Intraosseous Titanium Implants

1Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria 0204, South Africa
2Schulich Faculty of Chemistry, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel

Received 14 November 2014; Accepted 29 January 2015

Academic Editor: George Babis

Copyright © 2015 Liviu Feller et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. A. Puleo and A. Nanci, “Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface,” Biomaterials, vol. 20, no. 23-24, pp. 2311–2321, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. G. Coelho, J. M. Granjeiro, G. E. Romanos et al., “Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 579–596, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. Z. Schwartz and B. D. Boyan, “Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 340–347, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Wall, N. Donos, K. Carlqvist, F. Jones, and P. Brett, “Modified titanium surfaces promote accelerated osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro,” Bone, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. D. Boyan, V. L. Sylvia, Y. Liu et al., “Surface roughness mediates its effects on osteoblasts via protein kinase A and phospholipase A2,” Biomaterials, vol. 20, no. 23-24, pp. 2305–2310, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. L. Raines, R. Olivares-Navarrete, M. Wieland, D. L. Cochran, Z. Schwartz, and B. D. Boyan, “Regulation of angiogenesis during osseointegration by titanium surface microstructure and energy,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 18, pp. 4909–4917, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Feller, R. Chandran, R. A. Khammissa et al., “Osseointegration: biological events in relation to characteristics of the implant surface,” Sadj, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 112, 114–117, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  8. P. Decuzzi and M. Ferrari, “Modulating cellular adhesion through nanotopography,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 173–179, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Z. Schwartz, K. Kieswetter, D. D. Dean, and B. D. Boyan, “Underlying mechanisms at the bone-surface interface during regeneration,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 32, no. 1, part 2, pp. 166–171, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Ivanovski, S. Hamlet, G. E. Salvi et al., “Transcriptional profiling of osseointegration in humans,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 373–381, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Z. Qu, X. Rausch-Fan, M. Wieland, M. Matejka, and A. Schedle, “The initial attachment and subsequent behavior regulation of osteoblasts by dental implant surface modification,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research—Part A, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 658–668, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. A. Vogler, “Structure and reactivity of water at biomaterial surfaces,” Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 74, no. 1–3, pp. 69–117, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. P. Woodruff, Surface Alloys and Alloys Surfaces, vol. 10, Elsevier Science, 2002.
  14. P. G. De Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart, and D. Quéré, Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves, Springer, 2002.
  15. M. E. Schrader and G. I. Loeb, Modern Approaches to Wettability: Theory and Practical, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
  16. A. Marmur, “Penetration and displacement in capillary systems,” in Modern Approaches to Wettability: Theory and Practical, M. E. Schrader and G. I. Loeb, Eds., chapter 12, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. Bico, U. Thiele, and D. Quéré, “Wetting of textured surfaces,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 206, no. 1–3, pp. 41–46, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Bren, L. English, J. Fogarty et al., “Effect of surface characteristics of metallic biomaterials on interaction with osteoblast cells,” in Proceedings of the 7th World Biomaterials Congress, p. 1121, Sydney, Australia, May 2004. View at Scopus
  19. P. Kanchanawong, G. Shtengel, A. M. Pasapera et al., “Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions,” Nature, vol. 468, no. 7323, pp. 580–584, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. N. Elias and L. Meirelles, “Improving osseointegration of dental implants,” Expert Review of Medical Devices, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 241–256, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Anselme, A. Ponche, and M. Bigerelle, “Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 2: biological aspects,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 224, no. 12, pp. 1487–1507, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. Geiger, A. Bershadsky, R. Pankov, and K. M. Yamada, “Transmembrane extracellular matrix—cytoskeleton crosstalk,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 793–805, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Nanci, “Cytoskeleton, junctions, fibroblasts, and extracellular matrix,” in Ten Cate's Oral Histology: Development Structure and Function, A. Nanci, Ed., pp. 57–78, Mosby Elsevier, Maryland Heights, Mo, USA, 7th edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  24. E. Cukierman, R. Pankov, and K. M. Yamada, “Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 633–639, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. A. Bourdon and E. Ruoslahti, “Tenascin mediates cell attachment through an RGD-dependent receptor,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 1149–1155, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. A. Wozniak, K. Modzelewska, L. Kwong, and P. J. Keely, “Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1692, no. 2-3, pp. 103–119, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. K. Mattila and P. Lappalainen, “Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 446–454, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Vlacic-Zischke, S. M. Hamlet, T. Friis, M. S. Tonetti, and S. Ivanovski, “The influence of surface microroughness and hydrophilicity of titanium on the up-regulation of TGFbeta/BMP signalling in osteoblasts,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 665–671, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Ponche, M. Bigerelle, and K. Anselme, “Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 1: physico-chemical effects,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 224, no. 12, pp. 1471–1486, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Albrektsson and A. Wennerberg, “Oral implant surfaces: part 1—review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 536–543, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. M. D. Ehrenfest, P. G. Coelho, B.-S. Kang, Y.-T. Sul, and T. Albrektsson, “Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 198–206, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. P. Lang, S. Jepsen, and Working Group 4, “Implant surfaces and design (Working Group 4),” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 20, supplement 4, pp. 228–231, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Zhao, A. L. Raines, M. Wieland, Z. Schwartz, and B. D. Boyan, “Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 18, pp. 2821–2829, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. Rupp, L. Scheideler, N. Olshanska, M. de Wild, M. Wieland, and J. Geis-Gerstorfer, “Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 323–334, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  35. S. C. H. Kwok, J. Wang, and P. K. Chu, “Surface energy, wettability, and blood compatibility phosphorus doped diamond-like carbon films,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. B. G. Keselowsky, D. M. Collard, and A. J. García, “Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 17, pp. 5953–5957, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Wennerberg and T. Albrektsson, “Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 20, supplement 4, pp. 172–184, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. le Guéhennec, A. Soueidan, P. Layrolle, and Y. Amouriq, “Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration,” Dental Materials, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 844–854, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. F. Schwarz, M. Wieland, Z. Schwartz et al., “Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 544–557, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. D. Bobyn, R. M. Pilliar, H. U. Cameron, and G. C. Weatherly, “The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 150, pp. 263–270, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. V. Karageorgiou and D. Kaplan, “Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 27, pp. 5474–5491, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. E. Davies, “Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing,” Journal of Dental Education, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 932–949, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Y. Park, C. H. Gemmell, and J. E. Davies, “Platelet interactions with titanium: modulation of platelet activity by surface topography,” Biomaterials, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 2671–2682, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. Y. Park and J. E. Davies, “Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 530–539, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. Feller, Y. Jadwat, R. Chandran, I. Lager, M. Altini, and J. Lemmer, “Radiolucent inflammatory implant periapical lesions: a review of the literature,” Implant Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 745–752, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. J. E. Davies, “Bone bonding at natural and biomaterial surfaces,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 34, pp. 5058–5067, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. Mendonça, D. B. S. Mendonça, F. J. L. Aragão, and L. F. Cooper, “Advancing dental implant surface technology—from micron- to nanotopography,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 28, pp. 3822–3835, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. F. Schwarz, M. Herten, M. Sager, M. Wieland, M. Dard, and J. Becker, “Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 481–488, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. P. T. de Oliveira, S. F. Zalzal, M. M. Beloti, A. L. Rosa, and A. Nanci, “Enhancement of in vitro osteogenesis on titanium by chemically produced nanotopography,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 554–564, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. J. Dalby, D. McCloy, M. Robertson et al., “Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies,” Biomaterials, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 2980–2987, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. V. Bucci-Sabattini, C. Cassinelli, P. G. Coelho, A. Minnici, A. Trani, and D. M. D. Ehrenfest, “Effect of titanium implant surface nanoroughness and calcium phosphate low impregnation on bone cell activity in vitro,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 217–224, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. G. Mendonça, D. B. S. Mendonça, L. G. P. Simões et al., “The effects of implant surface nanoscale features on osteoblast-specific gene expression,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 25, pp. 4053–4062, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. P. Tambasco De Oliveira and A. Nanci, “Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 403–413, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus