Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 198268, 15 pages
Review Article

A Comprehensive Review on Cyclodextrin-Based Carriers for Delivery of Chemotherapeutic Cytotoxic Anticancer Drugs

University Institute of Pharmacy, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur 492010, India

Received 18 April 2015; Revised 2 June 2015; Accepted 15 June 2015

Academic Editor: Spyros S. Skandalis

Copyright © 2015 Bina Gidwani and Amber Vyas. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Most of the cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents have poor aqueous solubility. These molecules are associated with poor physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties, which makes the formulation difficult. An important approach in this regard is the use of combination of cyclodextrin and nanotechnology in delivery system. This paper provides an overview of limitations associated with anticancer drugs, their complexation with cyclodextrins, loading/encapsulating the complexed drugs into carriers, and various approaches used for the delivery. The present review article aims to assess the utility of cyclodextrin-based carriers like liposomes, niosomes, nanoparticles, micelles, millirods, and siRNA for delivery of antineoplastic agents. These systems based on cyclodextrin complexation and nanotechnology will camouflage the undesirable properties of drug and lead to synergistic or additive effect. Cyclodextrin-based nanotechnology seems to provide better therapeutic effect and sustain long life of healthy and recovered cells. Still, considerable study on delivery system and administration routes of cyclodextrin-based carriers is necessary with respect to their pharmacokinetics and toxicology to substantiate their safety and efficiency. In future, it would be possible to resolve the conventional and current issues associated with the development and commercialization of antineoplastic agents.

1. Introduction

Poor aqueous solubility and rate of dissolution are the two critical factors that affect the formulation and development process of drugs and limit their therapeutic application [1]. The administration of drugs through different route especially of those, which are poorly soluble and belong to class II or IV of biopharmaceutical classification system, represents a major challenge [2]. Also, it is remarkable that most of the cytotoxic anticancer drugs belong to the BCS class IV which comprises substances with both low solubility in aqueous fluids and low apparent permeability [3]. Although several techniques like solubilization, [4, 5] cosolvency, [6] and solid dispersion [79] can enhance drug’s solubility, bioavailability, and dissolution properties, these methods suffer from various disadvantages such as low drug loading and large dose. As an alternative, cyclodextrin (CD) complexation came into existence and presented a great interest [10, 11]. In 21st century, the concept of utilizing dual approach (cyclodextrins and nanotechnology) has emerged as a novel plan to tackle such formulation problems [1214]. The purpose of this review is to discuss and summarize some of the potential findings and applications of cyclodextrin-based nanocarriers for effective delivery of anticancer drugs. This paper simultaneously explores the utility of cyclodextrin complexation and nanotechnology as unique approach for development of drug delivery system. Through this system, it would be possible to move the drugs of BCS classes II and IV into class I with certain limitations.

2. Cyclodextrins: Types and Complexation

Cyclodextrins are chemically and physically stable macromolecules produced by enzymatic degradation of starch. They are water-soluble, biocompatible in nature with hydrophilic outer surface and lipophilic cavity. They have the shape of truncated cone or torus rather than perfect cylinder because of the chair conformation of glucopyranose unit [15].

Cyclodextrins are classified as natural and derived cyclodextrins. Natural cyclodextrinscomprise three well-known industrially produced (major and minor) cyclic oligosaccharides. The most common natural cyclodextrins are α, β, and γ consisting of 6, 7, and 8 glucopyranose units [16]. They are crystalline, homogeneous, and nonhygroscopic substances. Amongst these, β-cyclodextrin is ideal for complexation due to perfect cavity size, efficient drug complexation and loading, availability, and relatively low cost [17]. Figure 1 shows the structure and conformation of natural cyclodextrins. Various hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and ionic derivatives have been developed and utilized to improve the physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties of drug and inclusion capacity of natural cyclodextrins [1822]. Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD), randomly methylated-β-cyclodextrin (RM-β-CD), and sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBE-β-CD) are mostly preferred for complexation [23, 24]. Polymerized cyclodextrins are high molecular weight compounds, either water-soluble or insoluble. They offer the advantage of amorphous state and complexation without toxic effects [25, 26]. The examples of polymerized cyclodextrins are soluble anionic β-cyclodextrin polymer, soluble γ-cyclodextrin polymer, and epichlorohydrin β-cyclodextrin polymer [27]. Due to superior solubilizing and complexing abilities exhibited these are nowadays most preferred for complexation [28, 29]. Table 1 enlists the characteristic features and properties of different types of cyclodextrins.

Table 1: Characteristics features of different types of cyclodextrins.
Figure 1: Structure and conformation of natural cyclodextrins.

Inclusion complexes are formed when the “guest” molecule usually a drug is partially or fully included inside the “host’s cavity” [30, 31]. Owing to the hydrophobic cavity, cyclodextrins as host offer the guest a suitable environment for interaction. The outer sphere of cyclodextrins is compatible with water, which allows hydrogen bonding cohesive interactions [3234]. Due to this feature, CDs form inclusion complexes with a wide variety of hydrophobic compounds and change the physicochemical and biological properties of guest molecules [3538]. These changes may enhance the therapeutic potential of drugs by diminishing their decomposition before they enter tissues and by altering how they enter tissue. The ability of a CD to form an inclusion complex is a function of steric as well as thermodynamic factors. The driving force for complexation involves the removal of water molecule from hydrophobic cavity and formation of Vander Waal forces, hydrophobic, and hydrogen bond interactions [39, 40]. The approach used for complexation is phase solubility study as described by Higuchi and Connors, which examines the effect of cyclodextrin (solubilizer/ligand) on the drug being solubilized (substrate).

3. Cyclodextrin Complexation with Anticancer Drugs

Chemotherapy for cancer, particularly for recurrent and metastasis disease, has limited therapeutic effect. Limited aqueous solubility (hydrophobicity), degradation in gastrointestinal fluids, insufficient in vitro stability (shelf life), low bioavailability, short in vivo stability (half-life), affinity for intestinal and liver cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in the intestinal barrier, poor intestinal permeabilities, and strong dose dependent side effects of promising anticancer drug candidates have long been obstacles in treatment of cancer [41]. Lack of selectivity and short blood circulation time which cause various toxic side effects are also issues of major concern [42]. The narrow therapeutic index of some anticancer drugs and the fact that these cytotoxic drugs damage not only cancer cells but also normal and healthy tissue is a major challenge. Multidrug resistance, due to increased efflux pumps such as P-glycoprotein (Pgp) in the cell membrane, which transport most of anticancer drugs out of the cell, is also major problem [43, 44]. Thus, there is a need to develop such a delivery system, which combines safety, efficacy, and convenience. Cyclodextrins are competent enough to overcome certain forms of above associated drawbacks of anticancer drugs. The lack of efficient treatment has created the need to develop and implement novel technology based on combination strategy of cyclodextrin complexation and nanotechnology with a view to make the therapy more useful and acceptable. Figure 2 enlists the different approaches used for delivery of anticancer drugs.

Figure 2: Approaches used for delivery of anticancer drugs.

The formation of inclusion complex with nontoxic agents leads to improvement in physicochemical properties of drug. Most of the anticancer drugs have been complexed with cyclodextrin and their derivatives to improve/enhance the solubility and stability, increase the bioavailability and dissolution, reduce the toxicity, and modify the physicochemical characteristics [4557]. Complexation of doxorubicin with γ-CD and HP-γ-CD led to an increase in permeability across blood brain barrier, due to the disruption of the membrane [58]. Similarly, the β-CD-PEG folic acid conjugate increased the solubility of chlorambucil. Complexation of 9-nitrocamptothecin with HP-β-CD led to significant enhancement in antitumor activity with low toxicity [45]. Table 2 enlists the complexation of various anticancer drugs with cyclodextrins and their derivatives.

Table 2: Complexation of various anticancer drugs with cyclodextrin and their derivatives.

4. Cyclodextrin-Based Nanocarriers of Anticancer Drugs

The use of pharmaceutical carriers provides a loom, which is more time and cost-effective than new drug development [69]. Progress in nanotechnology and cellular/molecular biology has contributed to advancement in chemotherapy and gene therapy of cancer, optimistically avoiding the toxic doses of nonspecific agents. The development of new delivery system or new administration schedules offer less expensive, but more effective treatment with negligible/rare side effects [70]. Nanoparticles, with the size of about 100–10,000 times smaller than human cells, offer unique interaction with biomolecules, which may revolutionize cancer diagnosis and treatment. They have engorged surface area-volume ratio and can overcome both cellular and noncellular mechanisms of resistance, thereby increasing selectivity of drug towards cancer cell and reducing toxicity towards normal tissues [71]. Moorthi et al. described the use of nanotechnology to overcome the limitations associated with conventional cancer therapy. Some of the recent development includes the biodegradable methoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (lactide) nanoparticles for controlled delivery of dacarbazine, cross-linked nanoparticles of cytarabine and microspheres of BCNU [72].

One of the major advantages that nanotechnology offers is targeted drug delivery to the site of disease. The aim of targeted therapy is to target the chemotherapeutics drugs to cancer cell, which ultimately reduce the side effects. Active targeting or affinity targeting involves conjugation of targeting molecules (like the antibodies, ligands, and nucleic acids) on the surface of nanoparticles with receptors overexpressed on a tumor cell surface [73]. In passive targeting, liposomes, macromolecular carriers, and nanoparticles exploit the EPR effect, which is a consequence of the increased vasculature permeability and decreased lymphatic function of tumors, to target the drug to the tumor [74]. Most of the cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents are distributed nonspecifically throughout the body and affect both the normal and tumor cells [75]. The abnormal vascular structure plays a vital role for EPR effect in tumor for targeting of certain macromolecules at the tissues. The EPR effect is different from nontargeted, passive uptake of tiny molecules. Figure 3 shows the effect of EPR in tumor targeting. EPR is the mechanism by which a high-molecular-weight nontargeted drug/prodrug accumulates in tissues with increased vascular permeability such as in inflammatory sites and cancer. Nanotechnology based delivery system can reach tumor passively through leaky vasculature by EPR effect.

Figure 3: Role of EPR effect in tumor targeting.

Cyclodextrin-based nanocarriers are prepared by utilizing the concept of dual approach, which involves combination of two different approaches in a single delivery system. This covers two aspects firstly; the anticancer drug is complexed with suitable cyclodextrin and secondly encapsulation of complexed drug into carrier. The encapsulation of chemotherapeutic anticancer drugs in specially designed, multifunctionalized cyclodextrin-based carriers would be a step toward their successful application in this challenging field. In drug delivery, entrapment of cyclodextrin complexed drug into nanocarriers increases the advantage of both of them. Encapsulation of cyclodextrin complexed drug into carriers will increase the drug loading capacity, entrapment efficiency, prolong the existence of the drug in systemic circulation, and reduces toxicity and provides controlled, sustained, or targeted release. Cyclodextrin adds value to the product. The unique feature of optimized drug-cyclodextrin complex includes lower aggregation; better ADME properties, rare toxicity, and are patient friendly [76].

Safety is important criteria for consideration before using cyclodextrins as pharmaceutical excipients. The safety and toxicity of cyclodextrins depend on the route of administration. When administered orally, cyclodextrins are not absorbed from gastrointestinal tract and thus are practically nontoxic. This is due to their bulky and hydrophilic nature. Any absorption, if it occurs, is by passive diffusion. Most of the hydrophilic derivatives of natural cyclodextrins like 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and sulphobutylether-β-cyclodextrin are considered safe for parenteral administration. Higher dose of cyclodextrins may be harmful. Parenterally (intravenous) administered CDs disappear rapidly from systemic circulation and are renally excreted intact. When administered, CDs are distributed to the kidney, liver, urinary bladder, and various other tissues of the body. As per toxicity, profile of cyclodextrins is considered; several in vitro studies have reported the hemolytic effects of CDs although the toxicological implication of in vivo study is considered negligible. In 2008, Stella and He discussed the detailed safety and toxicity aspects of cyclodextrins with suitable examples [77].

Considering the regulatory aspects of various cyclodextrins, it is still evolving. Monograph of parent cyclodextrins (α and β) is available in various Pharmacopoeias like US Pharmacopeia, European Pharmacopeia, Japanese Pharmacopeia, and National Formulary. The monographs for various hydrophilic derivatives of cyclodextrins are also included in compendial sources like The Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. Efforts are under process for inclusion of all other cyclodextrins in this list. Natural cyclodextrins are also included in US FDA list generally regarded as safe for their use as food additives [78]. The hunt for proficient and safe carrier to attain better drug availability at the targeted site has been an exigent area of research. Encapsulation of antineoplastic agents in carrier vesicles led to decrease in drug induced toxic side effects and increase in antitumor efficacy. Some of the cyclodextrin-based carriers of anticancer drugs are discussed with examples.

4.1. Cyclodextrin-Based Liposomes

Liposomes are concentric vesicles in which an aqueous volume is enclosed by membranous lipid bilayer. They entrap hydrophilic drug in the aqueous phase and hydrophobic drug in the lipid bilayer and retain drugs in route to their destination. In liposomes, cyclodextrin complexation competes with liposomal membrane binding, which tempers the potential benefit of complexation in prolonging hydrophobic drug retention [79]. The entrapment of water-soluble cyclodextrin-drug inclusion complexes in liposomes leads to accommodation of insoluble drugs in the aqueous phase of vesicles, increases the drug to lipid ratio, enlarges the range of encapsulation, allows targeting of complexes to specific sites, and reduces toxicity. Some of the examples are discussed as under Arima et al., in the year 2006, examined the antitumor effect of PEGylated liposomes of DOX complexed with γ-CD, administered through intravenous injection in BALB/c mice bearing colon-26 tumor cells. Results reflected retardation in tumor growth, increase in drug retention, and improvement in survival rate [59]. Dhule et al. 2012 evaluated the liposomal curcumin’s potential against cancer models of mesenchymal (OS) and epithelial origin (breast cancer). The 2-HP-γ-CD/curcumin-liposome complex showed promising anticancer potential both in vitro and in vivo. In another study, the antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity of anticancer agent LPSF/AC04 in cyclodextrin complexed liposomes was enhanced [60]. Cui et al. 2011 developed stable PEGylated liposomal vincristine formulation with enhanced efficiency using sulfobutyl ether cyclodextrin as trapping agent. This formulation prolonged the circulation half-life from 43.6 to 70.0 hrs and reduced toxicity [80]. Thus, this strategy can incorporate several other cyclodextrin complexed anticancer drugs into liposomes and improve their retention inside vesicles.

4.2. Cyclodextrin-Based Niosomes

Niosomes are spherical lipid bilayers that can entrap water-soluble solutes within aqueous domains or alternatively lipid molecules within the lipid bilayers. They are prepared by hydrating the mixture of cholesterol and nonionic surfactants. These are vesicular systems similar to liposomes, biodegradable, biocompatible, and nonimmunogenic in nature and exhibit flexibility in their structural characterization. They are preferred over liposomes due to the higher chemical stability and economy. They alter the tissue distribution, cellular drug interaction and plasma clearance kinetics of the drug [81]. Oommen et al. 1999 entrapped methotrexate (MTX) complexed with β-cyclodextrin into niosomes. Complexation increased the entrapment efficiency and improved the anticancer activity. The entrapment efficiency was higher in the case of niosomes of MTX-β-CD complex (84%) compared to plain drug (67%). A relatively slow drug release of entrapped drug-complex from the vesicles compared to plain MTX encapsulated niosomes was observed [61]. This approach can manage the duration of action, in those cases where the dissociation constants of inclusion complexes can be modified.

4.3. Cyclodextrin-Based Nanosponges

Nanosponges are a class of microscopic particles with cavities of few nanometers wide, characterized by the capacity to encapsulate a large variety of substances that can be transported through aqueous media. Cyclodextrin-based nanosponges (NS) are prepared by cross-linking cyclodextrins (CD) with a carbonyl or a dicarboxylate compound as cross-linker. They are solid particles with spherical morphology with very high solubilizing effect and forms inclusion and noninclusion complexes with various drugs. The CD-cross-linker ratio can be varied to improve the drug loading and obtain a tailored release profile [82]. Swaminathan et al. 2010 prepared cyclodextrin-based nanosponges encapsulating camptothecin, for prolonging the shelf life and drug release. Camptothecin (CAM) has limited therapeutic utility because of its poor solubility, lactone ring instability, and serious side effects. The zeta potentials of cyclodextrin-based nanosponges of camptothecin were sufficiently high (−20 to −25 mV) leading to stable colloidal nanosuspension [62]. The in vitro studies indicated slow and prolonged drug release over 24 hrs and the cytotoxicity study showed that the formulations containing CAM were more cytotoxic than pure CAM. Mognetti et al. 2012 prepared paclitaxel-loaded β-cyclodextrin nanosponges, a water stable colloidal system avoiding the recrystallization of paclitaxel. The in vitro release studies showed that complete drug release was obtained within 2 hrs without an initial burst effect. The delivery of paclitaxel via nanosponges increased the amount of paclitaxel entering cancer cells and lowered the paclitaxel IC50, thereby enhancing its pharmacological effect [63].

4.4. Cyclodextrin-Based Micelles

Micelles are self-assembled nanosized colloidal particles with lipophilic central part and hydrophilic covering. They have a single, central, and primarily hydrophobic zone or “core” surrounded by a hydrophilic layer or “shell.” They have size in the range of about 5 to 2000 nm. They can entrap hydrophobic drugs at the core, which are transported at concentrations exceeding their intrinsic water solubility. The hydrophilic periphery of the micelle renders the polymer water-soluble and provides a tight shell around the drug-loaded core. This minimizes drug degradation and harmful side effects but increases bioavailability. Thus, these micelles can give a better therapeutic profile [83]. Drug is encapsulated into polymeric micelles either covalently or by physical encapsulation. Cyclodextrins as host are exploited for designing of self-assembled networks called polymeric micelles with guest molecules. A cyclodextrin micelle (CDM) contains derivatives of cyclodextrin including dimers, trimers, and polymers, incorporated as amphiphilic molecules and forms aggregate. Liu et al. 2012 formulated multifunctional pH-disintegrable micellar nanoparticles fabricated from asymmetrically functionalized β-cyclodextrin-based star copolymers covalently conjugated with doxorubicin (DOX), folic acid (FA), and DOTA-Gd moieties for targeted drug delivery. Results showed enhancement in drug release due to acid-labile feature of carbamate linkage [64].

4.5. Cyclodextrin-Based Polymeric Millirods

Site-specific, controlled release of cytotoxic agents from biodegradable polymer depots is a rising trend involved in cancer chemotherapy. Drug inclusion in a polymer depot also allows for potential tailoring of release kinetics, adding the benefit of being able to design the most efficacious delivery regimen. The incorporation of cyclodextrins into polymer millirods for complexing drugs significantly improves the drug release kinetics with various release patterns. The millirod consists of two functional compartments: an inner drug-loaded monolithic millirod as the drug depot and an outer NaCl-impregnated polymer membrane to control the release rate of the drug. The inner part of millirod permits the entrapment of drug particles in the matrix and provides sustained drug release [84]. Wang et al. 2006 prepared PLGA polymeric millirods for local delivery of β-lapachone. Complexation with HP-β-CD prevented the dissolution of drug and led to fast release (approximately 80%) after 2 days [65]. This data demonstrated the ability to tailor release kinetics via CD complexation and provided exciting opportunities for the use of millirods in intratumoral drug delivery.

4.6. Cyclodextrin-Based Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles are solid colloidal particles compos6ed of natural, synthetic, or semisynthetic polymers with size range from 1 nm to 1000 nm. Cyclodextrins increase the loading capacity of nanoparticles. Çirpanli et al. 2009 reported that the release of camptothecin was extended to 12 days with amphiphilic β-CD nanoparticles and 48 hrs with polymeric nanoparticles, showing the superiority of CD based nanoparticles over conventional polymeric nanoparticles [66]. The anticancer efficacy of amphiphilic CD nanoparticles was higher than that of PLGA/PCL nanoparticles loaded with CPT and its solution in DMSO. Agüeros et al. 2009 reported that the zeta potentials of the colyophilized nanoparticles of cyclodextrin complexed paclitaxel indicated stable colloidal dispersions within the range of −18 to −39 mV. Thus, paclitaxel encapsulation was higher with threefold increase in loading capacity [67]. Quaglia et al. 2009 prepared nanoparticles of the amphiphilic cyclodextrin heptakis (2-Ooligo (ethyleneoxide)-6-hexadecylthio-)-β-CD (SC16OH) entrapping docetaxel (Doc) to achieve prolonged drug release [68]. Table 3 covers the cyclodextrin-based nanocarriers for most of the anticancer drugs. Figure 4 shows the cyclodextrin-based carriers used in delivery of anticancer drugs.

Table 3: Cyclodextrin-based carriers of anticancer drugs.
Figure 4: Cyclodextrin-based carriers for delivery of anticancer drugs.
4.7. Cyclodextrin Grafted Polymeric Nanocarriers

In this type of delivery system, natural cyclodextrins are grafted with polymers and then utilized for complexation with drugs. These complexes are then loaded into nanocarriers. Grafting is done by conjugating several units of cyclodextrins on polymer, to increase the binding ability of guest molecules and scale up the production. These polymers made of organized CDs provide the opportunity for drug molecule to associate at different levels within the nanostructure. For example, Zhang et al. 2011 designed a β-CD functionalized hyper branched polyglycerol (HPG-β-CD) of paclitaxel to achieve high drug loading capacity and aqueous solubility. The prepared nanoparticles had good biocompatibility and proved to be promising delivery system for hydrophobic drugs [85]. Recently, Zeng et al. 2013 prepared hollow nanospheres of camptothecin complexed with β-CD-graft-PAsp (β-cyclodextrin grafted with poly aspartic acid). Complexation led to improvement in aqueous solubility and stability of CPT. The nanoassemblies (nanospheres) of CPT-β-CD-graft-PAsp led to passive targeting of drug, sustained release, and decreased cytotoxicity [86]. These proved that cyclodextrin grafted polymeric nanocarriers can provide multifunctional properties for effective delivery of anticancer drugs.

4.8. Cyclodextrins Based Magnetic Nanoparticles

Cyclodextrins based magnetic colloidal nanoparticles are developed and fabricated to achieve targeted delivery of hydrophobic anticancer drugs. This is done by conjugation or grafting cyclodextrins with the drug through a linker moiety. For example, Badruddoza et al. in 2013 synthesized uniform nanocomposite for cell targeting of hydrophobic compounds. The magnetic particle Fe3O4 was encapsulated within the shell of silicon-dioxide using folic acid as the cell targeting ligand and β-cyclodextrin as the vehicle. These theranostic nanocomposite magnetic particles possessed multifunctional properties like cell targeting, fluorescence imaging, and delayed release [87]. Recently Sahu and Mohapatra in the year 2013 developed multifunctional magnetic fluorescent hybrid nanocarrier of 5-fluorouracil. Complexation led to increase in aqueous solubility and fluorescent carrier led to increase in stability and magnetic delivery of drug [88]. Several other hydrophobic anticancer drugs like curcumin [89], all-trans-retinoic acid, and methotrexate were also delivered using the same approach. In future, the concept of utilizing this approach of controlled release and drug targeting technology could provide more efficient and less harmful solution to conquer the limitations associated with conventional chemotherapy.

4.9. Cyclodextrin-Based siRNA (Short Interfering RNA) Delivery System

Small pieces of nucleic acid, known as siRNA, are one of the promising carriers for delivery of anticancer drugs. Free siRNA do not produce efficient and predictable therapeutic effect. They have biological half-life of less than an hour in human plasma. Thus, to increase the life span and improve the therapeutic efficacy, nonviral vectors are used. The therapy based on cyclodextrins and siRNA is currently under investigation for the treatment of cancer [90]. Synergistic therapeutic effect and regulation in tumor pathways are achieved by combining the drug with orthogonal therapeutic moieties like siRNA. Kim et al. 2011 synthesized cyclodextrin-modified dendritic polyamines for translocating siRNA and anticancer drugs suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid and erlotinib. The presence of β-cyclodextrins facilitated complexation and intracellular uptake of hydrophobic anticancer drugs, whereas the cationic polyamine backbone allowed electrostatic interaction with the negatively charged siRNA. Codelivery of siRNA-EGFRvIII and SAHA/erlotinib in glioblastoma cells significantly inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis compared to the individual treatments. Also, the DexAM complex possessed minimal cytotoxicity over a wide range of concentration and efficiently delivered siRNA, thereby silencing the expression of targeted genes. Thus, this study led to synergistic induction of apoptosis in brain cancer cells by targeted codelivery of siRNA and anticancer drugs [91]. Deng et al. 2011 synthesized star-shaped polymers for sustained delivery of methotrexate. This polymer exhibited higher transfection efficiency with low cytotoxicity in fibroblast cells. β-cyclodextrin was used simultaneously for the entrapment and sustained release of methotrexate [92]. Another important contribution in this field is the cyclodextrin-based nanoparticles designed to deliver siRNA agent to reduce the production of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M2 (RRM2). The study addresses the relevance of siRNA nanoparticles delivery for tumor-specific targeting. A/J mice bearing subcutaneous Neuro2A tumors were treated by intravenous injection of siRNA-containing nanoparticles formed with cyclodextrin-containing polycations (CDP). Results revealed that transferrin- (Tf-) targeted nanoparticles containing two different siRNA sequences slowed the tumor growth, whereas the nontargeted nanoparticles were considerably less efficient, when treated at the same dose. Another anticancer agent CALAA01, a targeted, self-assembling nanoparticles system based on CD complexed siRNA has been effective in phase I clinical trials for the treatment of solid tumors [93]. These examples highlight the recent advances in development of nanoparticles based on linear and cyclodextrin-based polymers for the treatment of cancer.

4.10. Cyclodextrin-Based Monoclonal Antibody Drug-Conjugate Approach

Many cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs have failed in clinical trials due to their extreme toxicity and lack of satisfactory therapeutic activity at the maximal tolerated dose (MTD). An important aspect of improving therapeutic activity of these anticancer drugs is to conjugate them with antibodies. Antibodies recognize the tumor-associated, cell surface antigens. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a major class of agents currently used for cancer treatment. Therapeutic mAbs display better pharmacokinetic parameters, with moderate or no systemic toxicity [94]. The cytotoxic drugs covalently linked to a monoclonal antibody that recognizes a tumor-associated antigen is the antibody drug conjugate. This conjugate combines the selectivity, favorable pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and functional activity of antibodies with the high cytotoxic potency of drug. A novel contribution in this regard is the antibody drug conjugate (ADC) of trastuzumab. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an ADC consisting of the anti-HER2 mAb trastuzumab (Herceptin) and the maytansinoid DM1 has been administered safely at therapeutically effective doses, despite HER2 being expressed on some normal tissues [9598]. Genentech/Roche and their team are currently developing the ADC T-DM1 for patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer who have previously received multiple HER2-targeted medicines and chemotherapies [99]. Only few antibodies, tested against various tumor-associated antigens, such as rituximab, cetuximab, and panitumumab, are into the clinical practice [100]. Currently, researchers are interested in targeting of cancer stem cell specific antigens with antibody drug conjugate. The unique feature of monoclonal antibody drug conjugate is that it can overcome or minimize the multidrug resistance (MDR), which is a major obstacle in successful chemotherapy [101]. Thus, monoclonal antibody drug conjugate technology can deliver the powerful cytotoxic anticancer drugs with improved/enhanced pharmacokinetic properties. Earlier in 2003 Ikura et al. prepared A7 monoclonal antibody to β-CD conjugate using cell fusion technique, which served as useful tool for detection of β-cyclodextrin and its derivatives both quantitatively and qualitatively with its applications in various fields [102]. In 2003, Johns et al. investigated the antitumor efficiency of cytotoxic drugs in combination with (monoclonal antibody) mAb 806 by EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) inhibitor AG 1478. AG1478 is an inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine kinase, widely used in the laboratories [103]. However, it is insoluble in water and its various therapeutic potential is under process. Sulphobutyl ether β-cyclodextrin was used to solubilize AG1478. The investigation of John et al., 2003 proved that combination of cytotoxic drug with mAb can provide synergistic effect and enhanced antitumor efficiency. In future, this approach could be utilized for treatment of tumors.

4.11. Cyclodextrins Based Supramolecular Vesicles

Supramolecular complexes are formed by the combination of cyclic molecules with polymers (linear and/or branched). The use of supramolecular vesicles in drug delivery is expanding tremendously [104]. In case of cyclodextrin-based supramolecular complexes, the cyclic molecule is natural cyclodextrins and the polymers are PVA, PEG, PTA, PBA, PPG, and so forth; moreover, when the guest moiety (drug) is attached covalently to a host molecule (cyclodextrin) in a suitable way, an intra/intermolecular complex is obtained from supramolecular oligomer and polymer. Recently, the supramolecular self-assembly of cyclodextrins and polymers has led to the development of novel supramolecular hydrogels for drug delivery applications [105]. Nowadays supramolecular vesicles are developed for delivery of anticancer drugs. For example, a supramolecular linear-dendritic copolymeric micellar carrier of paclitaxel was developed using polystyrene and hyperbranched polyglycerols along with β-cyclodextrin [106]. This system provided higher loading capacity of paclitaxel. In another study, Paolino et al. 2012 investigated the potential of folate targeted supramolecular vesicular aggregate of GEM for treatment of solid tumors and breast cancer through in vivo models [107]. Thus, the supramolecular vesicles based delivery system could represent a novel approach by using self-assembling carriers and biocompatible polymers as potential for treatment of cancer.

5. Formulation Containing Cyclodextrin

An ideal drug delivery system should deliver the required amount of drug to the targeted site both efficiently and precisely, for a desired time. For a drug molecule to be pharmacologically active, it must have some amount of aqueous solubility and lipophilicity in order to permeate the biological membranes through passive diffusion. The potency (effectiveness) and type of formulation determine the aqueous solubility of any drug [108]. A hydrophilic drug will not be able to partition from the aqueous exterior layer into lipophilic biomembrane. Improved therapeutic efficiency and targeted delivery of preexisting and new drugs can be achieved through carrier based novel drug delivery system, which is most suitable and approachable method for development of delivery system. Oral delivery of cytotoxic anticancer agents eliminates/minimizes the need for hospitalization, medical assistance, and infusion equipment. Cyclodextrins are used for encapsulation of lipophilic drugs and have demonstrated the ability to inhibit both PGP and cytochrome P450 localized on the surface of enterocytes [109]. To exploit the useful properties of both these above-mentioned features one of the anticancer drugs, PTX (paclitaxel) was loaded into poly (anhydride) nanoparticles after complexing with cyclodextrins. Interestingly, the relative oral bioavailability of PTX-cyclodextrin complex was 80%, which is remarkable for oral formulations. This example shows the promising use of cyclodextrins in oral formulations for delivery of anticancer drugs [110].

Cyclodextrins (CDs) form inclusion complexes with many drugs by trapping the molecule or part of it into the hydrophobic cavity. They are used as formulation additives and transdermal absorption promoters in topical delivery. Bilensoy et al. 2007 prepared vaginal gel formulation loaded with cyclodextrin complexed 5-fluorouracil, having thermosensitive and mucoadhesive properties. This ensures the longer residence of gel at the vagina, HPV-infection site, and the genital tract. Complexation provided favorable drug release with the reduction in side effects. This could be an efficient therapy for HPV-related diseases such as cervical cancer or genital warts with a lower dose.

Injectable formulations of water-insoluble drugs mainly consist of mixture of water, organic cosolvents, and surfactants. The use of organic solvents led to drug precipitation and cause pain, inflammation, and haemolysis [111]. Isotonic aqueous solution of cyclodextrins can replace the use of organic solvents and surfactants in injectable formulations. Among various cyclodextrins, HP-β-CD and SBE-β-CDs due to their high aqueous solubility and minimum toxicity are widely used in parenteral delivery. The advantage of using CDs in parenteral formulation includes solubilization of drug, reduction of drug irritation at the site of administration and stabilization of drugs unstable in aqueous environment, and so forth [112]. The use of cyclodextrins can reduce in situ irritation resulting from direct chemical irritancy of drugs, which cause phlebitis and pain at the site of injection. After intravenous injection, the drug is released rapidly and quantitatively from the complex upon dilution, followed by competitive replacement and binding to tissue and plasma proteins. Cyclodextrin exerts no effect on the pharmacokinetics of injected drugs. Ma et al. 1999 prepared injectable formulation of melphalan with SBE-β-CD and HP-β-CD. Through this formulation, the shelf life, solubility, and stability of the reconstituted melphalan were enhanced. Further, Oomen et al. 2010 prepared niosomal formulation for subcutaneous delivery of plumbagin. Complexation with β-cyclodextrin led to increase in aqueous solubility, stability, and efficacy and the niosome-entrapped drug-complex had improved anticancer activity as evidenced by the enhanced volume doubling time and growth delay [113]. Li et al. 2011 investigated the single and repeated-dose pharmacokinetics of injectable β-cyclodextrin-oridonin inclusion complex in rats. The results showed significant increase in the solubility and bioavailability of oridonin in rats. Finally, the hydrophilic cyclodextrin derivatives like hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and sulfobutylether β-cyclodextrin are relatively nontoxic and have minimal effect on the intrinsic pharmacokinetics of drugs. Thus, the formulations containing cyclodextrin are progressively being used during in vitro and in vivo screening of new anticancer compounds/drugs.

6. Current Status of Cyclodextrin

The impact of cyclodextrin-based nanocarriers and their therapeutics will likely accelerate in coming years. However, as these products move out of the laboratory and into the clinics, various federal agencies like FDA and US patents have to struggle in order to encourage the development of these products. This section highlights the contribution of those cyclodextrin-based therapeutic systems, which are under clinical trials or have been approved for human use [114]. Recently FDA approved the liposomal preparations of doxorubicin (Doxil), daunorubicin (DaunoXome), cytarabine (DepoCyt), and amphotericin B (Abelcet) which have proven to be attractive and less toxic alternatives to the conventional drug formulations and have opened new hopes for researchers. Until now, five (passively targeted) micelle products for anticancer therapy have been investigated in clinical trials, of which one has been granted FDA approval (Genexol-PM) for its use in patients with breast cancer [114]. Several liposomal formulations of conventional anticancer drugs are currently in phase I/II evaluation, including liposomal vincristine, platinum, mitoxantrone, all-trans-retinoic acid, and lurtotecan. There is a strong probability that these drug carriers will allow better administration of poorly soluble cancer drugs, enhance drug delivery and uptake in the tumor, and boost dose intensity, subsequently improving antitumor response. These recent reports favor the need of novel systems in this field.

In past 5 years, the significant contributions of cyclodextrins and their derivatives in drug delivery are discussed here, Dabur Pharma, one of India’s leading manufacturers of anticancer drugs, launched Nanoxel, a novel drug delivery system for Paclitaxel, in 2007. This nanoscale drug delivery system is India’s first indigenously developed nanotechnology-based chemotherapeutic agent throwing open a larger window for antitumor activity. In addition, the market for cyclodextrin-based drug delivery is remarkably increasing. Taj Pharmaceuticals (Mumbai based generic manufacturing Indian Pharmaceuticals Company) announced FDA approval for manufacturing of Piroxicam-beta-Cyclodextrin, Nimesulide-beta-cyclodextrin, Aceclofenac-beta-Cyclodextrin generic drugs in regulatory market, and nonregulated market in the year 2009. The use of sulphobutylether-β-cyclodextrin is tremendously increasing in formulation and development. Recently FDA has approved five drug products containing captisol. They are Vfend I.V. Solution containing voriconazole, used in treatment of fungal infections, Nexterone containing amiodarone, used in ventricular arrhythmia, Geodon containing ziprasidone, used in schizophrenia, and so forth. This shows the wide use of cyclodextrins in pharmaceuticals. The number of the cyclodextrins-containing pharmaceutical products approved and marketed has been continuously increasing. Worldwide there are about 40 products or formulations containing various CDs, especially β-CD and its derivative. However, till date there is no single formulation containing anticancer drug with cyclodextrins in the market. This shows that there is a need to exploit the utility of cyclodextrins in the development of delivery system for anticancer drugs in the coming years.

7. Conclusion

Various nanotherapeutic approaches have been developed for delivery of anticancer drugs. But, still none of the available treatments for cancer is safe, effective, and able to treat the disease completely. Most of these are expensive, unacceptable, and inconvenient for long-term use or associated with significant toxicity. Thus, there is a need to move a step forward and utilize an advanced technology based on combination strategy, which exploits the advantages of both the systems, namely, cyclodextrin complexation and nanotechnology in single delivery system. The use of drug delivery systems, based on colloidal vesicles and macromolecular carriers (cyclodextrins), represents a promising and innovative strategy that enables effective therapy with minimum side effects. However, the major challenge is about the toxicity and pharmacokinetic study of these cyclodextrin-based carriers. Most of the information about toxicity is based on in vitro cell models. There are several studies concerning the interaction of nanoparticles within the body. But, there is no significant result for interaction of cyclodextrin complexed nanoparticles in the body. Also, there is a need to throw light onto the route of administration and the mechanism of elimination of these carriers. Another important parameter to be considered is the dose of anticancer drug and cyclodextrin used in the formulation. The extraordinary features of both these systems (cyclodextrin and nanotechnology) will simultaneously offer additional avenues to treat cancer successfully. Furthermore, there is a prerequisite to exploit the utility of these cyclodextrin-based nanocarriers using in vivo models for tumor targeting and toxicity studies of cancer like life-threatening disease. In future, cyclodextrins could be employed for modification of potent anticancer drugs to achieve effective treatment.

Conflict of Interests

Authors report no conflict of interests.


The authors are thankful to Director, University Institute of Pharmacy, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur (C. G.), for providing necessary infrastructural facilities. One of the authors Bina Gidwani is thankful to UGC-BSR for JRF and extends her gratitude towards the supervisor for guidance and support. The authors are also thankful to UGC-MRP F. no. 42-706/2013 (SR) and CCOST/MRP/2012 Endt. no. 1926 for providing financial assistance relating to this work. Author also wants to thank library of Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University for providing e-resources available through UGC-INFLIBNET.


  1. G. L. Amidon, H. Lennernas, V. P. Shah, and J. R. Crison, “A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutics drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 12, pp. 413–420, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. Yasir, M. Asif, A. Kumar, and A. Aggarval, “Biopharmaceutical classification system: an account,” International Journal of PharmTech Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1681–1690, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Loftsson, M. E. Brewster, and M. Másson, “Role of cyclodextrins in improving oral drug delivery,” The American Journal of Drug Delivery, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 261–275, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. M. M. Terwogt, J. H. M. Schellens, W. W. Ten Bokkel Huinink, and J. H. Beijnen, “Clinical pharmacology of anticancer agents in relation to formulations and administration routes,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 83–101, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Ran, A. Jain, and S. H. Yalkowsky, “Solubilization and preformulation studies on PG-300995 (an anti-HIV drug),” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 297–303, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. A. A. Nunez and S. H. Yalkowsky, “Solubilization of diazepam,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, vol. 52, pp. 33–36, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  7. S. K. Han, G. Y. Kim, and Y. H. Park, “Solubilization of biphenyl dimethyl dicarboxylate by cosolvency,” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1193–1197, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. T. M. Serajuddln, “Solid dispersion of poorly water-soluble drugs: early promises, subsequent problems, and recent breakthroughs,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 1058–1066, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Leuner and J. Dressman, “Improving drug solubility for oral delivery using solid dispersions,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 47–60, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Breitenbach, “Melt extrusion: from process to drug delivery technology,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 107–117, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. N. Reddy, T. Rehana, S. Ramakrishna, K. P. R. Chowdary, and P. V. Diwan, “β-cyclodextrin complexes of celecoxib: molecular-modeling, characterization, and dissolution studies,” AAPS PharmSciTech, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 68–76, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L.-P. Ruan, B.-Y. Yu, G.-M. Fu, and D.-N. Zhu, “Improving the solubility of ampelopsin by solid dispersions and inclusion complexes,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 457–464, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Radtke, “Pure drug nanoparticles for the formulation of poorly soluble drugs,” New Drugs, vol. 3, Article ID 68, pp. 62–68, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  14. R. H. Müller, C. Jacobs, and O. Kayser, “Nanosuspensions as particulate drug formulations in therapy: rationale for development and what we can expect for the future,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Merisko-Liversidge, G. G. Liversidge, and E. R. Cooper, “Nanosizing: a formulation approach for poorly-water-soluble compounds,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Vyas, S. Saraf, and S. Saraf, “Cyclodextrin based novel drug delivery systems,” Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 1-2, pp. 23–42, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Karande and S. Mitragotri, “Enhancement of transdermal drug delivery via synergistic action of chemicals,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Biomembranes, vol. 1788, no. 11, pp. 2362–2373, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Manosroi, M. G. Apriyani, K. Foe, and A. Manosroi, “Enhancement of the release of azelaic acid through the synthetic membranes by inclusion complex formation with hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 293, no. 1-2, pp. 235–240, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Hirayama, S. Mieda, Y. Miyamoto, H. Arima, and K. Uekama, “Heptakis(2,6-di-O-methyl-3-O-acetyl)-β-cyclodextrin: a water-soluble cyclodextrin derivative with low hemolytic activity,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 970–975, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Ono, H. Arima, F. Hirayama, and K. Uekama, “A moderate interaction of maltosyl-α-cyclodextrin with Caco-2 cells in comparison with the parent cyclodextrin,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 395–402, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. H. Froomming and J. Szejtli, Cyclodextrins in Pharmacy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht, The Netherlands, 1994.
  22. A. Al-Omar, S. Abdou, L. de Robertis, A. Marsura, and C. Finance, “Complexation study and anticellular activity enhancement by doxorubicin-cyclodextrin complexes on a multidrug-resistant adenocarcinoma cell line,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1115–1120, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. J. García-Rodriguez, J. Torrado, and F. Bolás, “Improving bioavailability and anthelmintic activity of albendazole by preparing albendazole-cyclodextrin complexes,” Parasite, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. S188–S190, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. P. Donnelly and B. E. de Pauw, “Voriconazole—a new therapeutic agent with an extended spectrum of antifungal activity,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 107–117, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Kim, “Inclusion complexation of ziprasidone mesylate with β-cyclodextrin sulfobutyl ether,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 1560–1567, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Uekama, M. Otagiri, T. Irie, H. Seo, and M. Tsuruoka, “Improvement of dissolution and absorption characteristics of phenytoin by a water-soluble β-cyclodextrin-epichlorohydrin polymer,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. Gidwani and A. Vyas, “Synthesis, characterization and application of epichlorohydrin-β-cyclodextrin polymer,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 114, pp. 130–137, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Szeman, H. Ueda, J. Szejtli, E. Fenyvesi, Y. Machida, and T. Nagai, “Complexation of several drugs with water-soluble cyclodextrin polymer,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 282–288, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. É. Fenyvesi, “Cyclodextrin polymers in the pharmaceutical industry,” Journal of Inclusion Phenomena, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 537–545, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Szente and J. Szejtli, “Highly soluble cyclodextrin derivatives: chemistry, properties, and trends in development,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. M. Layre, N. M. Gosselet, E. Renard, B. Sebille, and C. Amiel, “Comparison of the complexation of cosmetic and pharmaceutical compounds with β-cyclodextrin, 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and water-soluble-β-cyclodextrin-co-epichlorohydrin polymers,” Journal of Inclusion Phenomenon and Macrocyclic Chemistry, vol. 43, pp. 311–317, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. Szejtli, Cyclodextrins and Their Inclusion Complexes, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary, 1982.
  33. R. Challa, A. Ahuja, J. Ali, and R. K. Khar, “Cyclodextrins in drug delivery: an updated review,” AAPS PharmSciTech, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. E329–E357, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Â. M. L. Denadai, M. M. Santoro, M. T. P. Lopes et al., “A supramolecular complex between proteinases and beta-cyclodextrin that preserves enzymatic activity,” BioDrugs, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 283–291, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. Szente, J. Szejtli, and G. L. Kis, “Spontaneous opalescence of aqueous γ-cyclodextrin solutions: complex formation or self-aggregation?” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 778–781, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. E. Cortés, R. D. Sinisterra, M. J. Avila-Campos, N. Tortamano, and R. G. Rocha, “The chlorhexidine: β-cyclodextrin inclusion compound: preparation, characterization and microbiological evaluation,” Journal of Inclusion Phenomenon and Macrocyclic Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 297–302, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. M. M. Del Valle, “Cyclodextrins and their uses: a review,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1033–1046, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. H. Dodziuk, “Rigidity versus flexibility. A review of experimental and theoretical studies pertaining to the cyclodextrin nonrigidity,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 614, no. 1–3, pp. 33–45, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Szejtli, “Introduction and general overview of cyclodextrin chemistry,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1743–1753, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. A. Rajewski and V. J. Stella, “Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins. 2. In vivo drug delivery,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 1142–1168, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Zhang, C. Q. Lan, M. Post, B. Simard, Y. Deslandes, and T. H. Hsieh, “Design of nanoparticles as drug carriers for cancer therapy,” Cancer Genomics & Proteomics, vol. 3, no. 3-4, pp. 147–157, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. G. S. Kwon, “Polymeric micelles for delivery of poorly water-soluble compounds,” Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 357–403, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Y. Luo and G. D. Prestwich, “Cancer-targeted polymeric drugs,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 209–226, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Nie, Y. Xing, G. J. Kim, and J. W. Simons, “Nanotechnology applications in cancer,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 257–288, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. Y. Jiang, X. Jiang, K. Law et al., “Enhanced anti-tumor effect of 9-nitro-camptothecin complexed by hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and safety evaluation,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 415, no. 1-2, pp. 252–258, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. U. V. Singh, K. S. Aithal, and N. Udupa, “Physicochemical and biological studies of inclusion complex of methotrexate with β-cyclodextrin,” Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 573–577, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. Lahiani-Skiba, F. Bounoure, H. Fessi, and M. Skiba, “Effect of cyclodextrins on lonidamine release and in-vitro cytotoxicity,” Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, vol. 69, no. 3-4, pp. 481–485, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. B. Yavuz, E. Bilensoy, I. Vural, and M. Şumnu, “Alternative oral exemestane formulation: improved dissolution and permeation,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 398, no. 1-2, pp. 137–145, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y. Y. Cai, C. W. Yap, and Z. Wang, “Solubilization of vorinostat by cyclodextrins,” Journal of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Therapeutics, vol. 34, pp. 1–6, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  50. S. Béni, Z. Szakács, O. Csernák, L. Barcza, and B. Noszál, “Cyclodextrin/imatinib complexation: binding mode and charge dependent stabilities,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 167–174, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Peng, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, Y. Cui, G. Zhai, and C. Chen, “Photostability study of doxorubicin aqueous solution enhanced by inclusion interaction between doxorubicin and hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin,” Chinese Journal of Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1291–1295, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Balaji, V. P. Pandey, M. S. Srinath, and R. Manavalan, “Synthesis and characterization studies of cisplatin/hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin complex,” Pharmacologyonline, vol. 1, pp. 1135–1143, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. N. Elgindy, K. Elkhodairy, A. Molokhia, and A. Elzoghby, “Lyophilization monophase solution technique for improvement of the physicochemical properties of an anticancer drug, flutamide,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 397–405, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. E. E. M. Eid, A. B. Abdul, F. E. O. Suliman, M. A. Sukari, A. Rasedee, and S. S. Fatah, “Characterization of the inclusion complex of zerumbone with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1707–1714, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. Q. Ma, R. A. Rajewski, and V. J. Stella, “New injectable melphalan formulations utilizing (SBE)7m-β-CD or HP-β-CD,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. B. Li, S. Wang, J. Gao, and S. Fang, “Pharmacokinetics of injectable beta-cyclodextrin-oridonin inclusion complex, a novel formulation of oridonin in Wistar rats,” National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 2, pp. 52–57, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  57. E. Bilensoy, Y. Çirpanli, M. Şen, A. L. Doǧan, and S. Çaliş, “Thermosensitive mucoadhesive gel formulation loaded with 5-Fu: cyclodextrin complex for HPV-induced cervical cancer,” Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 1–4, pp. 363–370, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. V. Monnaert, D. Betbeder, L. Fenart et al., “Effects of γ- and hydroxypropyl-γ-cyclodextrins on the transport of doxorubicin across an in vitro model of blood-brain barrier,” Journal of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 311, no. 3, pp. 1115–1120, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. H. Arima, Y. Hagiwara, F. Hirayama, and K. Uekama, “Enhancement of antitumor effect of doxorubicin by its complexation with γ-cyclodextrin in pegylated liposomes,” Journal of Drug Targeting, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 225–232, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. S. Dhule, P. Penfornis, T. Frazier et al., “Curcumin-loaded γ-cyclodextrin liposomal nanoparticles as delivery vehicles for osteosarcoma,” Nanomedicine, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 440–451, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. E. Oommen, S. P. B. Tiwari, N. Udupa, R. Kamath, and P. U. Devi, “Niosome entrapped β-cyclodextrin methotrexate complex as a drug delivery system,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 279–284, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. Swaminathan, L. Pastero, L. Serpe et al., “Cyclodextrin-based nanosponges encapsulating camptothecin: physicochemical characterization, stability and cytotoxicity,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 193–201, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. B. Mognetti, A. Barberis, S. Marino et al., “In vitro enhancement of anticancer activity of paclitaxel by a Cremophor free cyclodextrin-based nanosponge formulation,” Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, vol. 74, no. 1–4, pp. 201–210, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. T. Liu, X. Li, Y. Qian, X. Hu, and S. Liu, “Multifunctional pH-disintegrable micellar nanoparticles of asymmetrically functionalized β-cyclodextrin-based star copolymer covalently conjugated with doxorubicin and DOTA-Gd moieties,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 2521–2531, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. F. Wang, E. Blanco, J. Gao, H. Ai, and D. A. Boothman, “Modulating β-lapachone release from polymer millirods through cyclodextrin complexation,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 95, no. 10, pp. 2309–2319, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. Y. Çirpanli, E. Bilensoy, A. L. Doğan, and S. Çaliş, “Comparative evaluation of polymeric and amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanoparticles for effective camptothecin delivery,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 82–89, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. M. Agüeros, L. Ruiz-Gatón, C. Vauthier et al., “Combined hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and poly(anhydride) nanoparticles improve the oral permeability of paclitaxel,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 405–413, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. F. Quaglia, L. Ostacolo, A. Mazzaglia, V. Villari, D. Zaccaria, and M. T. Sciortino, “The intracellular effects of non-ionic amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanoparticles in the delivery of anticancer drugs,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 374–382, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. Kreuter, Nanoparticles: Colloidal Drug Delivery Systems, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  70. I. Brigger, C. Dubernet, and P. Couvreur, “Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 631–651, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. A. Stavrovskaya, “Cellular mechanisms of multidrug resistance of tumor cells,” Biochemistry, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. Moorthi, R. Manavalan, and K. Kathiresan, “Nanotherapeutics to overcome conventional cancer chemotherapy limitations,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 67–77, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. T. Lammers, W. E. Hennink, and G. Storm, “Tumour-targeted nanomedicines: principles and practice,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 392–397, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. H. Maeda, J. Wu, T. Sawa, Y. Matsumura, and K. Hori, “Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 271–284, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. F. J. Otero-Espinar, J. J. Torres-Labandeira, C. Alvarez-Lorenzo, and J. Blanco-Méndez, “Cyclodextrins in drug delivery systems,” Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 289–301, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. H. Maeda, G. Y. Bharate, and J. Daruwalla, “Polymeric drugs for efficient tumor-targeted drug delivery based on EPR-effect,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 409–419, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. V. J. Stella and Q. He, “Cyclodextrins,” Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 30–42, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. R. Agrawal and V. Gupta, “Cyclodextrins—a review on pharmaceutical application for drug delivery,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Frontier Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 95–112, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  79. B. McCormack and G. Gregoriadis, “Comparative studies of the fate of free and liposome-entrapped hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin/drug complexes after intravenous injection into rats: implications in drug delivery,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: General Subjects, vol. 1291, no. 3, pp. 237–244, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. J. Cui, C. Li, C. Wang et al., “Development of pegylated liposomal vincristine using novel sulfobutyl ether cyclodextrin gradient: is improved drug retention sufficient to surpass DSPE-PEG-induced drug leakage?” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 2835–2848, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. A. Sankhyan and P. Pawar, “Recent trends in niosome as vesicular drug delivery system,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 20–32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. R. Cavalli, F. Trotta, and W. Tumiatti, “Cyclodextrin-based nanosponges for drug delivery,” Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 209–213, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. C. Oerlemans, W. Bult, M. Bos, G. Storm, J. F. W. Nijsen, and W. E. Hennink, “Polymeric micelles in anticancer therapy: targeting, imaging and triggered release,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2569–2589, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. F. Wang, G. M. Saidel, and J. Gao, “A mechanistic model of controlled drug release from polymer millirods: effects of excipients and complex binding,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 111–120, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Wu et al., “A hydrotropic β-cyclodextrin grafted hyperbranched polyglycerol co-polymer for hydrophobic drug delivery,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 585–592, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. J. Zeng, H. Hunag, and S. Liu, “Hollow nanospheres fabricated from β-cyclodextrin-grafted α, β-poly (aspartic acid) as the carrier of camptothecin,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 105, pp. 120–127, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  87. A. Z. M. Badruddoza, M. T. Rahman, S. Ghosh et al., “β-Cyclodextrin conjugated magnetic, fluorescent silica core-shell nanoparticles for biomedical applications,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 449–457, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. S. Sahu and S. Mohapatra, “Multifunctional magnetic fluorescent hybrid nanoparticles as carriers for the hydrophobic anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil,” Dalton Transactions, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2224–2231, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. T. Silambarasi, S. Latha, M. Thambidurai, and P. Selvamani, “Formulation and evaluation of curcumin loaded magnetic nanoparticles for cancer therapy,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1393–1400, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  90. K. Chaturvedi, K. Ganguly, A. R. Kulkarni et al., “Cyclodextrin-based siRNA delivery nanocarriers: a state-of-the-art review,” Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1455–1468, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. C. Kim, B. P. Shah, P. Subramaniam, and K.-B. Lee, “Synergistic induction of apoptosis in brain cancer cells by targeted co-delivery of siRNA and anticancer drugs,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1955–1961, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. J. Deng, N. Li, K. Mai, C. Yang, L. Yan, and L.-M. Zhang, “Star-shaped polymers consisting of a β-cyclodextrin core and poly(amidoamine) dendron arms: binding and release studies with methotrexate and siRNA,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 5273–5281, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. D. A. Scheinberg, T. L. Rosenblat, and J. G. Jurcic, “Antibodies,” in Chemotherapy and Biotherapy: Principles and Practice, B. A. Chabner and D. L. Longo, Eds., pp. 465–494, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 5th edition, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  94. M. Beeram, H. A. Burris, S. Modi, and M. Beeram, “A phase I study of trastuzumab-DM1, a first-in-class HER2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), given every 3 weeks to patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer,” in Proceedings of the American Society Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, May 2008.
  95. H. A. Burris, S. Vukelja, and H. S. Rugo, “A phase II study of trastuzumab-DM1(T-DM1), a HER2 antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer,” in Proceedings of the ASCO Breast Cancer Symposium, 2008.
  96. S. N. Holden, M. Beeram, and I. E. Krop, “A phase I study of weekly dosing of trastuzumab-DM1(T-DM1) in patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer,” in Proceedings of the American Society Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, 2008.
  97. M. F. Press, C. Cordon-Cardo, and D. J. Slamon, “Expression of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in normal human adult and fetal tissues,” Oncogene, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 953–962, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. G. D. L. Phillips, G. Li, D. L. Dugger et al., “Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab–DM1, an antibody–cytotoxic drug conjugate,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 22, pp. 9280–9290, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. M. Boyiadzis and K. A. Foon, “Approved monoclonal antibodies for cancer therapy,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1151–1158, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. B. M. Boman and M. S. Wicha, “Cancer stem cells: a step toward the cure,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 17, pp. 2795–2799, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. O. K. Okamoto and J. F. Perez, “Targeting cancer stem cells with monoclonal antibodies: a new perspective in cancer therapy and diagnosis,” Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 387–393, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. K. Ikura, J.-I. Fujimoto, K. Kubonishi et al., “A monoclonal antibody to cyclomaltoheptaose (β-cyclodextrin): characterization and use for immunoassay of β-cyclodextrin and its derivatives,” Cytotechnology, vol. 40, no. 1–3, pp. 23–29, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. T. G. Johns, R. B. Luwor, C. Murone et al., “Antitumor efficacy of cytotoxic drugs and the monoclonal antibody 806 is enhanced by the EGF receptor inhibitor AG1478,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 26, pp. 15871–15876, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. A. Harada, Y. Takashima, and H. Yamaguchi, “Cyclodextrin-based supramolecular polymers,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 875–882, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. J. Li, “Self-assembled supramolecular hydrogels based on polymer-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes for drug delivery,” NPG Asia Materials, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 112–118, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. A. Pourjavadi, M. Adeli, and M. Yazdi, “Fully supramolecular vesicles as anticancer drug delivery systems,” New Journal of Chemistry, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 295–298, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. D. Paolino, M. Licciardi, C. Celia, G. Giammona, M. Fresta, and G. Cavallaro, “Folate-targeted supramolecular vesicular aggregates as a new frontier for effective anticancer treatment in in vivo model,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 94–102, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. R. B. Walter, B. W. Raden, D. M. Kamikura, J. A. Cooper, and I. D. Bernstein, “Influence of CD33 expression levels and ITIM-dependent internalization on gemtuzumab ozogamicin-induced cytotoxicity,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 1295–1302, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. K. Takara, T. Sakaeda, and K. Okumura, “An update on overcoming MDR1-mediated multidrug resistance in cancer chemotherapy,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 273–286, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. M. Ishikawa, H. Yoshii, and T. Furuta, “Interaction of modified cyclodextrins with cytochrome P-450,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 246–248, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. R. G. Strickley, “Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable formulations,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 201–230, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. S. Shimpi, B. Chauhan, and P. Shimpi, “Cyclodextrins: application in different routes of drug administration,” Acta Pharmaceutica, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 139–156, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. E. Oommen, B. D. Shenoy, N. Udupa, R. Kamath, and P. U. Devi, “Antitumour efficacy of cyclodextrin-complexed and niosome-encapsulated plumbagin in mice bearing melanoma B16F1,” Pharmacy and Pharmacology Communications, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 281–285, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. A. Glucksmann, L. A. Reiter, and T. C. Crawford, “Cyclodextrin-based polymers for therapeutic delivery,” US20120202772 A1, 2012.