Review Article

Genomic and Histopathological Tissue Biomarkers That Predict Radiotherapy Response in Localised Prostate Cancer

Table 3

Negative predictive studies in EBRT.

MarkerFunctionTechniqueIHC cut point used

VEGF [34]HypoxiaIHC0-1 versus 2-3 cytoplasmic staining intensity
Bcl-2 [44, 60, 70]ApoptosisIHCNil versus any cytoplasmic staining [44, 60], <10% versus >10% cell staining [70]
Bax [60]ApoptosisIHCGreater or lesser cytoplasm staining intensity relative to normal prostate
AR [15]Androgen receptorPCR array
PCA3 [15]Prostate markerPCR array
PTEN [15]Cell survivalPCR array
EZH2 [15]Transcriptional controlPCR array
EGFR [15]Growth receptorPCR array
PSMA [15]Prostate markerPCR array
MSMB [15]Tumour suppressionPCR array
CAG repeats [71]Genotyping (PCR)
CYP3A4 polymorphisms [72]Genotyping
TMPRSS2/ERG (or ETV1) [16]Androgen regulated/cell proliferation gene fusion Array CGH, IHCAny positive staining versus negative
Osteopontin [46]SIBLING, tumour associated proteinELISA
Ku70 and Ku80 [45]NHEJIHCKu70 ≤50% versus >50% nuclear staining, Ku80 ≤60% versus >60% nuclear staining
MRE11 [56]DNA damage responseArray CGH
RAD50 [56]DNA damage responseArray CGH
ATM [56]DNA damage responseArray CGH
ATR [56]DNA damage responseArray CGH
PRKDC (DNA PKcs) [56]NHEJArray CGH

SIBLING: small integrin-binding ligand: N-linked glycoprotein.