Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 292743, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/292743
Clinical Study

Application of Combined Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Carcinoma

Department of Ultrasound of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China

Received 3 August 2014; Accepted 7 October 2014

Academic Editor: Ji-Bin Liu

Copyright © 2015 Hui-li Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Jemal, T. Murray, A. Samuels, A. Ghafoor, E. Ward, and M. J. Thun, “Cancer statistics, 2003,” Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 5–26, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. L. Xia, Gynecologic Endoscopy, People's Medical Publishing House, Beijing, China, 1st edition, 2001.
  3. J. H. Hwang, N. W. Lee, K. W. Lee, and J. K. Lee, “Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of deep endometrial invasion for patients with endometrial carcinoma,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 537–541, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. S. Zhang, J. Z. Liu, Z. B. Liu, and W. Y. Li, “Value of magnetic resonance imaging on local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma,” Cancer Research and Clinic, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 482–485, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Signorelli, L. Guerra, A. Buda et al., “Role of the integrated FDG PET/CT in the surgical management of patients with high risk clinical early stage endometrial cancer: detection of pelvic nodal metastases,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 231–235, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Amant, P. Moerman, P. Neven, D. Timmerman, E. van Limbergen, and I. Vergote, “Endometrial cancer,” The Lancet, vol. 366, no. 9484, pp. 491–505, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. L. Wang, C. X. Yang, H. P. Zhang et al., “Preoperative evaluation of the myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma by transvaginal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography,” Chinese Journal Clinicians, vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 11030–11032, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  8. M.-R. Orden, S. Gudmundsson, and P. Kirkinen, “Contrast-enhanced sonography in the examination of benign and malignant adnexal masses,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 783–788, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Claudon, D. Cosgrove, T. Albrecht et al., “Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): update 2008,” Ultraschall in der Medizin, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 28–44, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Z. Z. Liu, Y. X. Jiang, Q. Dai, S. Cai, J. Yang, and P. Gao, “Study of endometrial carcinoma by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound,” Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 604–607, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  11. Y. Liu, J.-W. Tian, Y. Xu, and W. Cheng, “Role of transvaginal contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the early diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 416–421, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Artner, P. Bsze, and G. Gonda, “The value of ultrasound in preoperative assessment of the myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 147–151, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Kurjak, S. Kupesic, T. Anic, and D. Kosuta, “Three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler improve the diagnosis of ovarian lesions,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. L. Sun, X. X. Wang, and S. Wang, “Differential diagnosis of endometrial lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and conventional ultrasound,” Journal of Chinese PLA Postgraduate Medical School, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1030–1031, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  15. P. Phillips and E. Gardner, “Contrast-agent detection and quantification,” European Radiology, Supplement, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. P4–P10, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Krix, C. Plathow, M. Essig et al., “Monitoring of liver metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy using low-MI contrast-enhanced ultrasound—initial results,” European Radiology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 677–684, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. K. Luo, L. X. Wang, J. Y. Wang et al., “The clinical value of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of intrauterine lesions at low mechanical index,” Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 23, pp. 473–475, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. H. Chen, B. Y. Liu, Y. Q. Liu et al., “Differential diagnosis of endometrial lesions using transvaginal contrast-enhanced ultrasound,” Chinese Journal of Clinicians (Electronic Edition), vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 4573–4576, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. T. D. Barwick, A. G. Rockall, D. P. Barton, and S. A. Sohaib, “Imaging of endometrial adenocarcinoma,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 545–555, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Zamani, S. Goodarzi, F. Hallaji et al., “Diagnostic value of pelvic MRI for assessment of the depth of myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrial cancer: comparison of new versus old FIGO staging,” Iranian Journal of Radiology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 202–208, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. L. Benedet, H. Bender, H. Jones III, H. Y. Ngan, and S. Pecorelli, “FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 209–262, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Q. Pei, Y. J. Xie, Y. H. Li et al., “The clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in typing of stage I endometrial carcinoma,” Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 598–601, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. K. Saarelainen, L. Kööbi, R. Järvenpää, M. Laurila, and J. U. Mäenpää, “The preoperative assessment of deep myometrial invasion by three-dimensional ultrasound versus MRI in endometrial carcinoma,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 983–990, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Jiao and H. B. Fan, “The diagnostic value of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound on endometrial polyps,” Journal of Medical Imaging, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 205–206, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  25. M. E. M. Aboul-Fotouh, M. H. Mosbeh, A. F. El-Gebaly, and A. N. Mohammed, “Transvaginal power Doppler sonography can discriminate between benign and malignant endometrial conditions in women with postmenopausal bleeding,” Middle East Fertility Society Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. X. Chen, S. P. Chen, H. M. Li et al., “The clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion characteristics in the differential diagnosis between endometrial cancer and endometrial polyps,” Journal of Medical Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 112–115, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  27. H. X. Xue, Q. P. Zhang, X. T. Xiao et al., “Artifact types in three-dimensional ultrasonography and its formation mechanism,” Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 424–426, 2001. View at Google Scholar