Research Article

Evaluation of an Indirect-ELISA Test for Trypanosoma evansi Infection (Surra) in Buffaloes and Its Application to a Serological Survey in Thailand

Table 1

Results of the buffalo serological survey by indirect-ELISA in 8 provinces of Thailand.

RegionProvincesCensus 2009 AP (%)TP (%)PF (%)PiF (%)
(95% CI)(95% CI)

NorthMaehongson23,761100181813.638.139.2
(11.7–26.7)(6–23.4)

NortheastBuriram105,1771381712.37.330.444.9
(7.8–18.8)(1.9–14.7)
Roi Et70,23811113.68.717.164.3
(7.8–22.7)(1.7–18.7)
Sakon Nakhon75,6472082713.081879.7
(9.1–18.2)(3.5–13.8)
Sisaket98,4275911.704.5100.0 (1 infected)
(0.3–9)(0–3.3)
Surin120,8867379.64.22545.7
(4.7–18.5)(0–14.1)
Ubon Ratcha.136,52813864.3010.847.2
(2–9.2)(0–7.6)

SouthSongkhla4,431952223.219.471.429.2
(15.8–32.6)(10.8–29.8)

Total635,08789210912.27.220.355.7
(10.2–14.5)(4.9–9.8)

: number of serum samples tested. : number of seropositive samples by indirect-ELISA. CI: confidence interval. AP: apparent seroprevalence rate per province (AP = ). TP: true prevalence estimates. PF: percentage of infected farms (at least one seropositive sample). PiF: mean seroprevalence rate on infected farms.