Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 427814, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/427814
Review Article

Interaction between Flavivirus and Cytoskeleton during Virus Replication

Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

Received 19 March 2015; Revised 30 June 2015; Accepted 28 July 2015

Academic Editor: Christophe N. Peyrefitte

Copyright © 2015 Kar Yue Foo and Hui-Yee Chee. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Flaviviruses are potentially human pathogens that cause major epidemics worldwide. Flavivirus interacts with host cell factors to form a favourable virus replication site. Cell cytoskeletons have been observed to have close contact with flaviviruses, which expands the understanding of cytoskeleton functions during virus replication, although many detailed mechanisms are still unclear. The interactions between the virus and host cytoskeletons such as actin filaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments have provided insight into molecular alterations during the virus infection, such as viral entry, in-cell transport, scaffold assembly, and egress. This review article focuses on the utilization of cytoskeleton by Flavivirus and the respective functions during virus replication.

1. Introduction

The genus Flavivirus, a member of the family Flaviviridae, comprises more than 70 viruses, including dengue virus (DENV), West Nile virus (WNV), tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV), St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV), yellow fever virus (YFV), and many more [1]. Most of the flaviviruses are human pathogens that cause large epidemics globally, resulting in thousands of deaths annually [2]. Dengue virus is an emerging Flavivirus that causes major epidemics worldwide [3]. Flavivirus genome is a single-stranded, positive-sense, ~11 kb RNA genome with a single open reading frame that is directly translated into a polyprotein precursor [4]. The virus particles have two surface viral proteins: the E (envelope) glycoprotein, which is the major determining antigen and is involved in binding and fusion during viral entry, and the M (membrane) protein, which is part of precursor prM, formed during the maturation of virus particle [4]. Cytoskeletons in cells had already been observed to have close contact with virus particles, and virus yields were affected by the disruption of the cytoskeleton [58]. Over the years, there were studies using viruses as tools to understand not only the interaction between virus and cytoskeleton but also the cytoskeleton elements of the host cell during virus entry, in-cell transport, process of intracellular assembly, and release of the virus [819]. An increased number of dengue cases have been encouraging researchers to study the unclear mechanism causing severe dengue infection in which cytoskeleton disorganisation was observed [2022]. In this short review, the interaction between Flavivirus and cytoskeleton will be discussed.

2. Cytoskeleton Characteristics

Cytoskeleton is an interconnected network composed of filamentous polymers and regulatory proteins that enables a cell to prevent cell distortion, organises intracellular organelles, associates cell to external environment, enables shape alterations during movement, and assists intracellular cargo transportation [23]. The cytoskeleton has essential functions that are vital for cellular activity, for example, regulating the branching process of epithelial cells [24]. There are three main types of cytoskeleton: actin filaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments. First, actin filaments, also known as microfilaments, are the most abundant polymer found in a cell. Actin filaments are packed in bundles or form a network, and both structures help support the cell plasma membrane, forming the cell shape [25]. This globular polymer functions to maintain cell shape, division, migration, junction formation, and intracellular vesicle trafficking [26]. At the end of a polymerising actin filament, the process may aid the escape of viruses from the host cell and infect a new host [25]. The structures that associate with actin filaments for cell contraction are from the myosin protein family [23]. Next are microtubules that are built by tubulin subunit, and it seems that microtubules saturate the entire cytosol [27]. This polar polymer has almost similar functions as actin, including the positioning of organelles and ordered vesicle transport powered by motor proteins [28]. Microtubules associate with molecular motors from the dynein and kinesin family, which function to assemble microtubules during interphase and mitosis cycle and carry cargo for intracellular transportation along the microtubule [23]. Lastly, intermediate filament consists of vimentins, keratins, desmin, peripherin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilaments, and lamins that have different expressions in tissue or cell type [29]. Intermediate filaments can be presumed to be functioning mainly to strengthen and organise cells together, forming tissue based on the organisation and association with the plasma membrane [29]. Vimentin is important for supporting the structure in the cytoplasm and nucleus, which may cause fragility of cell if disrupted [30]. Vimentin filament strengthens when interacting with microtubules and microfilaments which are assisted by multiple intermediate filament-associated proteins [31, 32]. Vimentin is expressed the most in many cells such as leukocytes, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and mesenchymal cells [29]. Since intermediate filament is a nonpolar polymer unlike actin and microtubule, it is not involved in cell motility, and no known motor proteins are found along the intermediate filament [23, 29]. These three cytoskeleton polymers are arranged as a network that aids to organise intracellular components and is able to resist or rearrange when force is applied to the cell. The differences between these polymers that differentiate the structure and functions of their network are the dynamic assembly, polarity, and associating motor proteins [23].

3. The Involvement of Cytoskeleton in Flavivirus Infection

Rearrangement of host cell cytoskeletal and membrane compartments due to activities of virus particles may lead to conformational changes of the cell, known as cytopathic effect, which is a hallmark of virus infection in tissue culture [12, 13]. These alterations vary for different viruses and cell types [10]. The Kunjin virus protein was first known to be associated with cytoskeleton, which was reported to be microtubules [33]. Since then, numerous studies reported Flavivirus having close interaction with cytoskeleton elements in the replication cycles of the viruses [8, 9, 14, 15, 1821, 3342]. Actin filament was shown to contribute in the entry, production, and release of DENV 2 via interaction with DENV E protein [18, 21]. In addition, a reduction in viral replication of DENV and WNV was observed by blocking the actin function [34, 43]; WNV infection in a mouse model showed proteins associated with actin cytoskeleton, and Rho-GTPase signalling pathways were modified when WNV invaded mice neurons and led to the rearrangement of actin [44]. Rho-GTPase involvement in virus movement and activities has already been described where it controls the assembly of actin and tubulins in neurons [45, 46]. Microtubules [35, 40] and vimentin [14, 42] had been shown to interact directly with Flavivirus protein during virus replication. The utilisation of cytoskeleton components may not be direct in some flaviviruses infected cells. For example, actin involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) pathway in WNV [36], microtubule-destabilizing protein STMN1 [47], and vimentin rearrangement induced during dengue infection [48].

3.1. Entry

Flaviviruses utilise different cytoskeletons for similar activities in host cells. Besides interrupting actin network during viral entry, DENV 2 also utilises and reorganises microtubules and vimentin during the course of infection [9, 21, 48]. However, the involvement of microtubules is suggested to have little to no effect on DENV 2 entrance into ECV304 cells when clarification was made using demecolcine, nocodazole, and paclitaxel drugs that are able to disrupt normal activity of microtubules [9]. JEV internalisation of host neuronal cells uses clathrin-independent mechanism where actin rearrangement takes place when JEV binds to neuronal cells for viral entry [37]. However clathrin-dependent pathway was observed when JEV infects fibroblast cells [37] and Vero cells [49]. On the other hand, WNV internalisation event into the plasma membrane of uninfected cells was studied and shown to be prevented by actin microfilament agitation using cytochalasin D to disrupt actin filaments [36]. Other than utilising cytoskeletons directly, viruses also make use of cell membrane microdomains, such as lipid raft, to enter host cells as seen in DENV [50]. Microtubules, intermediate filaments, and cytoskeletal proteins are the few lipid raft associated proteins, and this perchance indicates secondary involvement of cytoskeletons during the internalisation of viruses exploiting lipid rafts [51]. Similarly, WNV was reported to exploit lipid rafts by interacting with either receptors or accessory proteins in the lipid rafts to promote virus internalisation into host cells [52]. Polymerization of actin was seen to be involved in the CME pathway by coupling with the plasma membrane, making an invaginated path especially for virus internalisation [5355]. The function of clathrin in facilitating virus entry into host cells has been well documented and, by disrupting clathrin, viral entry was interrupted [36, 49, 5658]. In addition, the microtubule-associated protein dynamin II was found to aid DENV 2 internalisation through associating with DENV E protein [38]. Taken together, it is not necessary that Flavivirus requires the direct utilisation of cytoskeleton for entry to the host cells as the virus may indirectly go through intermediate proteins such as lipid rafts, clathrin, and dynamin II.

3.2. In-Cell Transport

Microtubules and their associating proteins play important roles in trafficking viral particles into the host cells, including their responsibility as a transport tool for virions in virus-infected cells [59]. Since microtubules serve as a bidirectional pathway between cell organelles and the viral polyprotein of JEV, it is deduced that the interaction of the viral polyprotein with the microtubules leads to in-cell transport of the proteins from endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi apparatus during JEV replication [35]. Dynein motors in microtubules were studied intensively, and it has been suggested that viral capsids utilise this dynein transport system to move around and exit the cell [60]. DENV, JEV, and WNV were tested to interact with the light chain of dynein (Tctex-1) by binding to its membrane protein. Silencing of Tctex-1 using siRNA method indicated Tctex-1 is involved in the trafficking of these flaviviruses inside the host cell. However, when the same method was tested for YFV and TBV, there were no similar interactions found [39]. Dynein was seen to be utilised by DENV 2 E protein where newly synthesised E proteins were suggested to be trafficked to the assembly site and dissociate from dynein motor as the infection continues. The importance of dynein utilisation during DENV 2 E protein in-cell trafficking was investigated by the disruption of dynein motor activity by dynamitin which subsequently affects the expression of DENV 2 E and C protein [38]. Similarly, microtubule was reported to transport internalised WNV from endosomes to lysosomes [36].

3.3. In-Cell Scaffold Assembly

Viral particles require cytoskeletons for movement inside vesicles or in the cytoplasm during assembly to budding compartment [61]. Microtubules were perceived to assist WNV envelope and capsid proteins transported from the perinuclear region to plasma membranes, probably for assembly before releasing virus particles, and disruption of microtubules could markedly reduce virus titres [8]. Host cell cytoskeleton is proposed to play an important role in TBEV maturation process as microtubulin is observed to dense up in the assembly area of TBEV proteins [62]. Another research proposed that TBEV causes reorganization of actin in rat astrocyte instead of microtubules [15]. However, the proper function of cytoskeleton for TBEV is still not fully understood. In DENV-infected cells, vimentin reorganisation was seen where a cage of vimentin is formed, and it has been shown that vimentin is involved in the assembly of DENV 2 particles [9, 16]. Acrylamide, which is able to ruin the organisation of vimentin intermediate filaments [63], caused a reduction of colocalisation of DENV 2 antigen in host cell cytoplasm [9]. The tubulin of DENV 2-infected cells was also suggested to assist in the scaffold assembly of the virus with interactions with the DENV 2 E protein [40]. Cytoskeleton rearrangement induced by the Kunjin virus was suggested to aggregate fibres in the infected cells as there was an increase in vacuole numbers in the cytoplasm, which contains whorls of fibres; when infection progresses, clusters of matured Kunjin virus particle inside the vacuoles in the cytoplasm are possibly released [64].

3.4. Egress

WNV was previously illustrated to interact with filopodia, which is composed of a bundle of actin filaments, during the budding process at the plasma membrane of host cells [17]. Kunjin virus yield was apparently slightly reduced when cytochalasin B drug disrupted the organisation of actin filaments, and this event suggested the possibility that any form of disruption could have affected the egress of virus particles [65]. Myosin is an actin motor that was previously reported to be involved in the process of DENV 2 infection, and redistribution of myosin causes reduction of DENV particles being released [41]. A 43 kDa actin protein was identified specifically bound to recombinant domain III of DENV 2 E protein to assist viral particle egress from the host cell [18]. DENV NS1 protein was demonstrated to have a strong association with vimentin, which plays a crucial role in virus replication as well as in the emergence of dengue virus [42]. Recently, microtubule has been shown to be involved in the release of mature JEV [66]. However, drugs that can interfere with the polymerization of the microtubule, such as demecolcine, nocodazole, or paclitaxel, were observed to enhance the production of DENV 2 [9]. The discrepancies seen between different flaviviruses need further investigation. In fact, not many studies were reported on the utilisation of cytoskeleton during the release of Flavivirus particles; therefore, mechanisms are still poorly understood.

3.5. Other Utilisation of Cytoskeleton

It is shown that during DENV infection the NS4A protein interacts with vimentin where it localizes the protein and assists the RNA replication process [14]. NS3 and NS5 proteins of Flavivirus were studied using yeast two-hybrid assay that is able to screen for interacting proteins, and results indicated that NS3 or NS5 protein interacts with many major cellular proteins such as vimentin and myosin, but no further studies were done to identify the mechanism of these interactions [67]. Tight junction protein occludin was displaced to the cytoplasm and actin filament was reorganised when DENV infects host cells [22]. Tight junction proteins are connected to actin filaments [6870] and the contractile machinery of actin-myosin in vascular endothelial cells is highly regulated [7173]. Actin-myosin contraction will weaken endothelial cell adhesion and cause vascular permeability [74]. The alteration of tight junctions and actin filament arrangement seen in DENV-infected cells may be one of the causes of endothelial permeability which lead to plasma leakage in DHF patients [12].

4. Examples of Cytoskeleton Involvement with Other Viruses

Flavivirus is not the only one that utilises cytoskeleton; in fact, many viruses other than Flavivirus will either hijack or directly interact with cytoskeletal transport [75]. Here are two examples of viruses that were studied intensively on actin cytoskeleton interactions with respective viruses: influenza A virus (IAV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Cytoskeleton was observed to be involved in regulating polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNL) activities such as neutrophil chemotactic, oxidative, and secretory functions; and because previous report showed that IAV affects PMNL by modifying these cell activities, studies were performed to determine whether IAV alters PMNL cytoskeletons [7678]. By using flow cytometry, IAV was observed to increase F-actin after 20 minutes of incubation and stimulation by a chemotactic fMet-Leu-Phe (FMLP) on IAV-incubated PMNC, further increasing the level of actin. In addition, alteration on the assembly of polymerized actin was observed when lamellipod/uropod polarity experiment was conducted [78]. Another example is RSV connection with cytoskeleton where actin crosslinking protein filamin A was observed to colocalise with RSV in host cells using a yeast two-hybrid screen. The role of filamin A protein in RSV was studied using fusion protein cytoplasmic tail (FCT), which is critical for virus filamentous assembly by knocking down the protein gene expression using lentivirus-expressing shRNA against filamin A and inhibiting the expression of filamin A. The data showed that filamin A was not necessarily needed in the assembly of RSV [79]. Those studies performed on IAV and RSV with actin cytoskeleton are yet to be performed in Flavivirus, but perhaps it could be done in the near future for further understanding of the interactions with cytoskeleton.

5. Conclusions

Cytoskeletons, especially actin filament, microtubulins, and intermediate filaments of the host cells, have been observed to be involved with most, if not all, flaviviruses during entry, assembly, and egress processes. Over the years, the observations of the roles of cytoskeletons in viruses-infected cells have developed and improved. These related results from viruses other than Flavivirus may indicate that almost all flaviviruses could have a similar method of invading the cells and assembly or evading the host cells. The major challenge is to explicate how viruses adjust the regulation of cytoskeleton motor activity to fulfill their own transport needs. Although the host cells also depend on the cytoskeleton motors for certain cell functions, viruses might interact with them through unique sites, which may have not yet been discovered. The interaction of flaviviruses with cytoskeleton protein binding sites during virus life cycle in various types of host cells will provide extra understanding of these binding sites and expand findings on antiviral production. Since there is still no vaccine for viruses such as DENV and WNV, these detailed studies might be able to provide an insight into producing antivirals.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Ministry of Education, Malaysia, Long-term Research Grant Scheme (LRGS) LR001/2011A. Kar Yue Foo was supported by Graduate Research Fellowship, Universiti Putra Malaysia, and MyBrain, Ministry of Education, Malaysia.

References

  1. J. M. Smit, B. Moesker, I. Rodenhuis-Zybert, and J. Wilschut, “Flavivirus cell entry and membrane fusion,” Viruses, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 160–171, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. S. Mackenzie, D. J. Gubler, and L. R. Petersen, “Emerging flaviviruses: the spread and resurgence of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and dengue viruses,” Nature Medicine, vol. 10, supplement 12, pp. S98–S109, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. J. Gubler, “Dengue/dengue haemorrhagic fever: history and current status,” in New Treatment Strategies for Dengue and Other Flaviviral Diseases, pp. 3–22, Wiley-Blackwell, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  4. B. D. Lindenbach, C. L. Murray, H.-J. Thiel, and C. M. Rice, “Flaviviridae,” in Fields Virology, D. M. Knipe and P. M. Howley, Eds., pp. 712–746, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. B. Luftig, “Does the cytoskeleton play a significant role in animal virus replication?” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 173–191, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. G. Payne and K. Kristensson, “The effect of cytochalasin D and monensin on enveloped vaccinia virus release,” Archives of Virology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Satake and R. B. Luftig, “Microtubule-depolymerizing agents inhibit Moloney murine leukaemia virus production,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 58, no. part 2, pp. 339–349, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. J. H. Chu and M. L. Ng, “Trafficking mechanism of West Nile (Sarafend) virus structural proteins,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 127–136, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. W. Chen, N. Gao, J.-L. Wang, Y.-P. Tian, Z.-T. Chen, and J. An, “Vimentin is required for dengue virus serotype 2 infection but microtubules are not necessary for this process,” Archives of Virology, vol. 153, no. 9, pp. 1777–1781, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Ploubidou and M. Way, “Viral transport and the cytoskeleton,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. L. Kallewaard, A. L. Bowen, and J. E. Crowe Jr., “Cooperativity of actin and microtubule elements during replication of respiratory syncytial virus,” Virology, vol. 331, no. 1, pp. 73–81, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Cudmore, I. Reckmann, and W. Michael, “Viral manipulations of the actin cytoskeleton,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 142–148, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Sodeik, “Mechanisms of viral transport in the cytoplasm,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 465–472, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. S. H. Teo and J. J. H. Chu, “Cellular vimentin regulates construction of dengue virus replication complexes through interaction with NS4A protein,” Journal of Virology, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1897–1913, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Potokar, M. Korva, J. Jorgačevski, T. Avšič-Županc, R. Zorec, and H. Favoreel, “Tick-borne encephalitis virus infects rat astrocytes but does not affect their viability,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e86219, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Sripada and C. Dayaraj, “Viral interactions with intermediate filaments: paths less explored,” Cell Health and Cytoskeleton, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. L. Ng, J. Howe, V. Sreenivasan, and J. J. L. Mulders, “Flavivirus West Nile (Sarafend) egress at the plasma membrane,” Archives of Virology, vol. 137, no. 3-4, pp. 303–313, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Yang, L. Zou, Z. Hu et al., “Identification and characterization of a 43 kDa actin protein involved in the DENV-2 binding and infection of ECV304 cells,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 310–318, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. Makino, T. Suzuki, R. Hasebe et al., “Establishment of tracking system for West Nile virus entry and evidence of microtubule involvement in particle transport,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 195, pp. 250–257, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. Kanlaya, S.-N. Pattanakitsakul, S. Sinchaikul, S.-T. Chen, and V. Thongboonkerd, “Alterations in actin cytoskeletal assembly and junctional protein complexes in human endothelial cells induced by dengue virus infection and mimicry of leukocyte transendothelial migration,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2551–2562, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J.-L. Wang, J.-L. Zhang, W. Chen et al., “Roles of small GTPase RAc1 in the regulation of actin cytoskeleton during dengue virus infection,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 4, no. 8, article e809, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Talavera, A. M. Castillo, M. C. Dominguez, A. Escobar Gutierrez, and I. Meza, “IL8 release, tight junction and cytoskeleton dynamic reorganization conducive to permeability increase are induced by dengue virus infection of microvascular endothelial monolayers,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1801–1813, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. A. Fletcher and R. D. Mullins, “Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton,” Nature, vol. 463, no. 7280, pp. 485–492, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Y. Kim and C. M. Nelson, “Extracellular matrix and cytoskeletal dynamics during branching morphogenesis,” Organogenesis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 56–64, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Lodish, A. Berk, S. L. Zipursky et al., “The actin cytoskeleton,” in Molecular Cell Biology, W. H. Freeman, Ed., Macmillan Education, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  26. P. Draber, V. Sulimenko, and E. Draberova, “Cytoskeleton in mast cell signaling,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 3, article 130, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  27. H. Lodish, A. Berk, S. L. Zipursky et al., “Microtubule structure,” in Molecular Cell Biology, W. H. Freeman, Ed., Macmillan Education, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  28. E. Nogales and H.-W. Wang, “Structural intermediates in microtubule assembly and disassembly: how and why?” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 179–184, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Lodish, A. Berk, S. L. Zipursky et al., “Intermediate filaments,” in Molecular Cell Biology, W. H. Freeman, Ed., Macmillan Education, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  30. S. Kim and P. A. Coulombe, “Intermediate filament scaffolds fulfill mechanical, organizational, and signaling functions in the cytoplasm,” Genes & Development, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 1581–1597, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Robert, H. Herrmann, M. W. Davidson, and V. I. Gelfand, “Microtubule-dependent transport of vimentin filament precursors is regulated by actin and by the concerted action of Rho- and p21-activated kinases,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 2879–2890, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K. J. Green, M. Böhringer, T. Gocken, and J. C. R. Jones, “Intermediate filament associated proteins,” Advances in Protein Chemistry, vol. 70, pp. 143–202, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. L. Ng and S. S. Hong, “Flavivirus infection: essential ultrastructural changes and association of Kunjin virus NS3 protein with microtubules,” Archives of Virology, vol. 106, no. 1-2, pp. 103–120, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. M. Colpitts, J. Cox, A. Nguyen, F. Feitosa, M. N. Krishnan, and E. Fikrig, “Use of a tandem affinity purification assay to detect interactions between West Nile and dengue viral proteins and proteins of the mosquito vector,” Virology, vol. 417, no. 1, pp. 179–187, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C.-T. Chiou, C.-C. A. Hu, P.-H. Chen, C.-L. Liao, Y.-L. Lin, and J.-J. Wang, “Association of Japanese encephalitis virus NS3 protein with microtubules and tumour susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101) protein,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 2795–2805, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. J. H. Chu and M. L. Ng, “Infectious entry of West Nile virus occurs through a clathrin-mediated endocytic pathway,” Journal of Virology, vol. 78, no. 19, pp. 10543–10555, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Kalia, R. Khasa, M. Sharma, M. Nain, and S. Vrati, “Japanese encephalitis virus infects neuronal cells through a clathrin-independent endocytic mechanism,” Journal of Virology, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 148–162, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. N. Shrivastava, S. Sripada, J. Kaur, P. S. Shah, and D. Cecilia, “Insights into the internalization and retrograde trafficking of dengue 2 virus in BHK-21 cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 10, Article ID e25229, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J.-B. Brault, M. Kudelko, P.-O. Vidalain, F. Tangy, P. Desprès, and N. Pardigon, “The interaction of flavivirus M protein with light chain Tctex-1 of human dynein plays a role in late stages of virus replication,” Virology, vol. 417, no. 2, pp. 369–378, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H.-Y. Chee and S. AbuBakar, “Identification of a 48 kDa tubulin or tubulin-like C6/36 mosquito cells protein that binds dengue virus 2 using mass spectrometry,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 320, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. X.-F. Xu, Z.-T. Chen, N. Gao, J.-L. Zhang, and J. An, “Myosin Vc, a member of the actin motor family associated with Rab8, is involved in the release of DV2 from HepG2 cells,” Intervirology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 258–265, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. Kanlaya, S.-N. Pattanakitsakul, S. Sinchaikul, S.-T. Chen, and V. Thongboonkerd, “Vimentin interacts with heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins and dengue nonstructural protein 1 and is important for viral replication and release,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 795–806, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. F. Ang, A. P. Y. Wong, M. M.-L. Ng, and J. J. H. Chu, “Small interference RNA profiling reveals the essential role of human membrane trafficking genes in mediating the infectious entry of dengue virus,” Virology Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, article 24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. Fraisier, L. Camoin, S. Lim et al., “Altered protein networks and cellular pathways in severe west nile disease in mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, Article ID e68318, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. P. Taylor, O. O. Koyuncu, and L. W. Enquist, “Subversion of the actin cytoskeleton during viral infection,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 427–439, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Watabe-Uchida, E.-E. Govek, and L. van Aelst, “Regulators of Rho GTPases in neuronal development,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 42, pp. 10633–10635, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. N. Wu, N. Gao, D. Fan, J. Wei, J. Zhang, and J. An, “MiR-223 inhibits dengue virus replication by negatively regulating the microtubule-destabilizing protein STMN1 in EAhy926 cells,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 911–922, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. Lei, Y.-P. Tian, W.-D. Xiao et al., “ROCK is involved in vimentin phosphorylation and rearrangement induced by dengue virus,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1333–1342, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Nawa, T. Takasaki, K.-I. Yamada, I. Kurane, and T. Akatsuka, “Interference in Japanese encephalitis virus infection of Vero cells by a cationic amphiphilic drug, chlorpromazine,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 1737–1741, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Reyes-Del Valle, S. Chávez-Salinas, F. Medina, and R. M. Del Angel, “Heat shock protein 90 and heat shock protein 70 are components of dengue virus receptor complex in human cells,” Journal of Virology, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 4557–4567, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. L. J. Foster, C. L. De Hoog, and M. Mann, “Unbiased quantitative proteomics of lipid rafts reveals high specificity for signaling factors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 5813–5818, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. G. R. Medigeshi, A. J. Hirsch, D. N. Streblow, J. Nikolich-Zugich, and J. A. Nelson, “West Nile virus entry requires cholesterol-rich membrane microdomains and is independent of alphavbeta3 integrin,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 5212–5219, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. D. K. Cureton, R. H. Massol, S. Saffarian, T. L. Kirchhausen, and S. P. J. Whelan, “Vesicular stomatitis virus enters cells through vesicles incompletely coated with clathrin that depend upon actin for internalization,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 5, no. 4, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. O. L. Mooren, B. J. Galletta, and J. A. Cooper, “Roles for actin assembly in endocytosis,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 661–686, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Skruzny, T. Brach, R. Ciuffa, S. Rybina, M. Wachsmuth, and M. Kaksonen, “Molecular basis for coupling the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton during clathrin-mediated endocytosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 38, pp. E2533–E2542, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. E. G. Acosta, V. Castilla, and E. B. Damonte, “Functional entry of dengue virus into Aedes albopictus mosquito cells is dependent on clathrin-mediated endocytosis,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 474–484, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. C.-K. Chuang, T.-H. Yang, T.-H. Chen, C.-F. Yang, and W.-J. Chen, “Heat shock cognate protein 70 isoform D is required for clathrin-dependent endocytosis of Japanese encephalitis virus in C6/36 cells,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 793–803, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. J. J. H. Chu, P. W. H. Leong, and M. L. Ng, “Analysis of the endocytic pathway mediating the infectious entry of mosquito-borne flavivirus West Nile into Aedes albopictus mosquito (C6/36) cells,” Virology, vol. 349, no. 2, pp. 463–475, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. U. F. Greber and M. Way, “A superhighway to virus infection,” Cell, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 741–754, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. Merino-Gracia, M. F. García-Mayoral, and I. Rodríguez-Crespo, “The association of viral proteins with host cell dynein components during virus infection,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 278, no. 17, pp. 2997–3011, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. Kotsakis, L. E. Pomeranz, A. Blouin, and J. A. Blaho, “Microtubule reorganization during herpes simplex virus type 1 infection facilitates the nuclear localization of VP22, a major virion tegument protein,” Journal of Virology, vol. 75, no. 18, pp. 8697–8711, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. D. Růžek, M. Vancová, M. Tesařová, A. Ahantarig, J. Kopecký, and L. Grubhoffer, “Morphological changes in human neural cells following tick-borne encephalitis virus infection,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 1649–1658, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. P. R. Sager, “Cytoskeletal effects of acrylamide and 2,5-hexanedione: selective aggregation of vimentin filaments,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 141–155, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. L. Ng, “Ultrastructural studies of Kunjin virus-infected Aedes albopictus cells,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 577–582, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. Lee Ng, J. S. Pedersen, B. H. Toh, and E. G. Westaway, “Immunofluorescent sites in vero cells infected with the flavivirus Kunjin,” Archives of Virology, vol. 78, no. 3-4, pp. 177–190, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. S. Henry Sum, “The involvement of microtubules and actin during the infection of Japanese encephalitis virus in neuroblastoma cell line, IMR32,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 695283, 8 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. M. Le Breton, L. Meyniel-Schicklin, A. Deloire et al., “Flavivirus NS3 and NS5 proteins interaction network: a high-throughput yeast two-hybrid screen,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 11, article 234, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. M. Dudek and J. G. N. Garcia, “Cytoskeletal regulation of pulmonary vascular permeability,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 1487–1500, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. N. Prasain and T. Stevens, “The actin cytoskeleton in endothelial cell phenotypes,” Microvascular Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. E. Vandenbroucke, D. Mehta, R. Minshall, and A. B. Malik, “Regulation of endothelial junctional permeability,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1123, pp. 134–145, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. S. Cai, L. Pestic-Dragovich, M. E. O'Donnell et al., “Regulation of cytoskeletal mechanics and cell growth by myosin light chain phosphorylation,” The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 275, no. 5, pp. C1349–C1356, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. M. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka and K. Burridge, “Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 1403–1415, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. H.-J. Schnittler, A. Wilke, T. Gress, N. Suttorp, and D. Drenckhahn, “Role of actin and myosin in the control of paracellular permeability in pig, rat and human vascular endothelium,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 431, pp. 379–401, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. R. R. Rigor, Q. Shen, C. D. Pivetti, M. H. Wu, and S. Y. Yuan, “Myosin light chain kinase signaling in endothelial barrier dysfunction,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 911–933, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. K. Döhner and B. Sodeik, “The role of the cytoskeleton during viral infection,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 285, pp. 67–108, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. J. S. Abramson, E. L. Mills, G. S. Giebink, and P. G. Quie, “Depression of monocyte and polymorphonuclear leukocyte oxidative metabolism and bactericidal capacity by influenza A virus,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 350–355, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. J. S. Abramson, J. W. Parce, J. C. Lewis et al., “Characterization of the effect of influenza virus on polymorphonuclear leukocyte membrane responses,” Blood, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 131–138, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. G. Wheeler, L. S. Winkler, M. Seeds, D. Bass, and J. S. Abramson, “Influenza A virus alters structural and biochemical functions of the neutrophil cytoskeleton,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 332–343, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. F. Y. Shaikh, T. J. Utley, R. E. Craven et al., “Respiratory syncytial virus assembles into structured filamentous virion particles independently of host cytoskeleton and related proteins,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID e40826, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus