BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 461093 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/461093

Guadalupe Veronica Suarez, Maria Belen Vecchione, Matias Tomas Angerami, Omar Sued, Andrea Claudia Bruttomesso, Oscar Adelmo Bottasso, Maria Florencia Quiroga, "Immunoendocrine Interactions during HIV-TB Coinfection: Implications for the Design of New Adjuvant Therapies", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 461093, 8 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/461093

Immunoendocrine Interactions during HIV-TB Coinfection: Implications for the Design of New Adjuvant Therapies

Academic Editor: Kuldeep Dhama
Received19 Dec 2014
Revised30 Apr 2015
Accepted01 May 2015
Published14 May 2015

Abstract

Worldwide, around 14 million individuals are coinfected with both tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In coinfected individuals, both pathogens weaken immunological system synergistically through mechanisms that are not fully understood. During both HIV and TB infections, there is a chronic state of inflammation associated to dramatic changes in immune cytokine and endocrine hormone levels. Despite this, the relevance of immunoendocrine interaction on both the orchestration of an effective immune response against both pathogens and the control of the chronic inflammation induced during HIV, TB, or both infections is still controversial. The present study reviews immunoendocrine interactions occurring during HIV and TB infections. We also expose our own findings on immunoendocrine cross talk in HIV-TB coinfection. Finally, we evaluate the use of adrenal hormones and their derivatives in immune-therapy and discuss the use of some of these compounds like the adjuvant for the prevention and treatment of TB in HIV patients.

1. Introduction

Worldwide, around 14 million individuals are believed to be coinfected with both tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), constituting together the leading infectious diseases in resource-limited countries [1].

The African region accounted for most of the HIV-infected TB cases, and TB is the first cause of death in AIDS context [1, 2]. Also, HIV coinfection raises latent TB reactivation risk by 20-fold, becoming the leading risk factor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection progression to active disease [1, 3]. Likewise, TB exacerbates HIV infection progression [4, 5]. Therefore, the intersecting HIV and tuberculosis epidemics in countries with a high disease burden of both infections pose many challenges and opportunities.

In coinfected individuals, Mtb and HIV, weaken immunological system synergistically, disrupting immune functions through mechanisms that are not fully understood.

An extended TB treatment (6 months) is required to eradicate Mtb infection, rising up to 9 months for HIV patients [6]. While replicating bacilli are killed by anti-TB drugs during the first weeks of treatment, Mtb evades drugs and host-immune responses by successfully adapting to a quiescent physiological state [7]. In the absence of chemotherapy treatment, immune system failure, among other factors, leads to TB relapse [8]. Therefore, a more effective and shorter treatment may require the modulation of the immune response towards a protective phenotype. Actually, several immune modulation strategies, like vitamin D supplement [9], treatment with Th1 cytokines [10, 11], and immune suppression to disrupt granulomas and make bacteria more susceptible to chemotherapy [12], among others, have been explored with diverse results [13].

Endocrine and immune systems are strictly connected by multiple mutual regulatory pathways, the most extensively studied of which is the anti-inflammatory and immune-suppressive action of glucocorticoids (GCs). Several cytokines have been found to regulate the endocrine system and many steroid and nonsteroid hormones have shown immunomodulatory effects [1417].

In a broad range of bacterial, viral, and parasitic infections, the immune response developed against the pathogen is paralleled by a significantly altered hormonal response both in experimental models and human patients [18]. In fact, there is some evidence that supports a role for the interaction between immune and endocrine systems in the orchestration of an effective defense against the infectious agents [18, 19]. Despite this, the relevance of the cross talk between immune and endocrine systems on the defense against infections has not been fully elucidated.

The classical view stands that proinflammatory cytokines (mostly IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-α/β) produced in response to pathogens induce the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis for the release of GCs [14, 18]. In turn, GCs suppress the immune system at several levels, avoiding the possible adverse effects of an exacerbated immune response and helping to terminate it once the injurious agent was cleared [20]. However, although true for some particular situations like acute inflammation, the view of GCs such as simple immune suppressors has been changed, as there is growing evidence showing that GCs may be both pro- and anti-inflammatory, and also even necessary for several immune processes [20].

On the other hand, the activation of HPA axis induces the release of other adrenal hormones, like dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA-sulphate (DHEA-s), with known anti-GC functions [21]. GCs and DHEA have opposite effects on adaptive immune cells. While GCs inhibit both Th1 and Th2 cytokines by activated human T cells, its effect on Th1 cytokines is more pronounced, shifting T cell response towards Th2 profiles [22]. On the contrary, DHEA promotes a shift towards Th1 responses by skewing cytokine production, upregulates Th1 cytokines like IL-2 and IFN-, and downregulates Th2 cytokines like IL-4 and IL-5 [23]. In line with this, DHEA and its derivatives have been proved to enhance protective immune responses against several pathogens [2427].

During infection, immune-endocrine interactions are even more complex, since pathogens per se can modulate endocrine function either by releasing soluble factors or by directly colonizing endocrine tissue [28, 29]. Furthermore, specific treatments like antibiotics may affect hormone metabolism [30]. Moreover, during chronic infections like HIV or TB, in which pathogens are not cleared and immune response must be sustained in time, there is a chronic state of inflammation associated to dramatic changes in immune cytokine and endocrine hormone levels [29, 31]. Despite this, the relevance of immunoendocrine interaction on both the orchestration of an effective immune response against both pathogens and the control of the chronic inflammation is still controversial.

The present study reviews immunoendocrine interactions occurring during HIV and TB infections. In addition, we expose our own findings on immunoendocrine cross talk in HIV-TB coinfection. Finally, we evaluate the use of adrenal hormones and their derivatives in immune-therapy and discuss the use of some of these compounds like the adjuvant for the prevention and treatment of TB in HIV patients.

2. Immunoendocrine Alterations during Human Tuberculosis

Initial infection with Mtb occurs upon inhalation of airborne droplets containing bacilli, which, once in the lungs, infect and reside mainly in myeloid cells, especially alveolar macrophages [7]. In most people, such initial infection resolves, or it is kept under control by the development of an appropriate adaptive immune response that prevents bacillary proliferation and dissemination.

Effective control of Mtb infection relies on cell-mediated immunity [32]. Once in the infected tissue, T cells produce interferon gamma (IFN-) in response to mycobacterial antigen presentation by antigen presenting cells and consequently IFN- activates macrophages to kill intracellular bacteria [33, 34]. In addition to CD4+ T cells, which are thought to be the most important, both CD8+ T cells [35, 36] and CD1-restricted unconventional T cells [37] contribute to the effective control of Mtb infection. Both CD8+ T cells and CD1-restricted unconventional T cells are thought to be particularly important in the prevention of latent TB reactivation [3538].

Moreover, at least 30% of the persons that take contact with Mtb remain persistently infected without exhibiting signs of disease in a state known as latent TB infection (LTBi) [39]. While infection may persist for life, bacillary growth may be reactivated in 5–10% of non HIV-infected subjects, probably due to factors affecting the host’s immune status, and postprimary disease ensues [7]. As described above, in HIV-infected persons this rate rises to 20%. Persistent infection with Mtb is accompanied by chronic, low-level inflammation, which together drive to several changes in cytokine and hormone levels.

TB patients show a twofold increase in IFN- and IL-10 and a 10-fold increase in IL-6 plasma levels, accompanied by a 50% decrease in testosterone and DHEA in plasma when compared to healthy controls [40]. Also, TB patients show higher diurnal peaks of cortisol [41] and higher cortisol responses to ACTH stimulation [42], showing that HPA axis is activated in these patients. Since GCs enhance Th2 activity, HPA axis control may be relevant to the Th1/Th2 balance during the establishment of the anti-infectious immune response [33, 34, 43]. Conversely, DHEA can directly and indirectly enhance Th1 T cell activity [21]. According to this, Mtb-specific IFN- secretion in TB patients correlated positively with DHEA plasma levels and inversely with cortisol/DHEA ratio [44].

In addition to proinflammatory cytokines, regulatory cytokines such as TGF-β are likely involved in the control of some endocrine functions during TB infection. For instance, in vitro treatment of the human adrenal cell line NCI-H295-R with culture supernatants of Mtb-stimulated PBMC from TB patients inhibited DHEA and induced cortisol secretion [40]. Of note, treatment with anti-TGF-β antibodies abolished the inhibitory effect on DHEA but not cortisol secretion [45].

Overall, the hormonal changes occurring during Mtb infection could prevent the development of protective immune responses and the control of persistent inflammation.

3. Immunoendocrine Interactions in HIV Infection

HIV-1 infection is accompanied by a strong innate and adaptive immune response, beside which it remains as a chronic infection through lifetime.

The main obstacle for HIV eradication is the establishment of a latent HIV reservoir, which occurs during the very early stages of primary infection. Virus genomic integration and latency, as well as an enormous genetic diversity, propel a constant immune escape which limits HIV-specific immune response efficacy, especially during the early events of infection.

HIV infection causes the depletion of CD4+ T cells, which accounts for most infection hallmark symptoms. Additionally, a systemic and chronic immune activation and an accelerated T cell turnover are also thought to contribute to HIV disease progression [46]. Finally, the constant antigenic stimulation is thought to induce T cell dysfunction in response to antigen stimulation [47].

Despite the persistent immune escape seen in the great majority of HIV-infected people, there are rare individuals who control HIV-1 burden to undetectable levels. These individuals, known as elite controllers, show HIV-specific CD8+ T cells with higher cytotoxic capacity [48, 49] and are also associated to some specific MHC class I alleles [50]. In line with this, HIV infection progression was suggested to be associated with a reduction in cellular immunity, that is, Th1, and an increase in Th2 cytokine production [51, 52].

Considering that GCs provoke a shift from Th1 to Th2 immunity and also alter the balance between Th17 and Treg cells [53], recently implicated in the pathogenesis of HIV [54], HPA axis activation could play a central role in the progression of HIV infection to disease. In fact, increased basal ACTH and/or cortisol levels in 50% of HIV-infected patients accompanied by an impaired ACTH and cortisol response to stress and CRH challenge, especially in advanced disease, have been reported [55, 56]. The proposed mechanisms to this hypercortisolemia include a shift in steroidogenesis from DHEA and aldosterone to cortisol and the stimulation of hypothalamus, pituitary, and adrenal cortex by cytokines [56, 57]. Moreover, the stimulation of the HPA axis may also result from the stimulatory effects of viral proteins, like the HIV envelope protein gp-120 and the structural protein viral protein R (Vpr) which have been shown to increase serum ACTH and to cause GCs hypersensitivity, respectively [5860].

HIV-infected patients show a characteristic pattern of high cortisol and low DHEA-s levels [61], which have been associated with a negative course of disease [55, 61]. In fact, it has been shown that DHEA-s levels decline with the progression of the disease in parallel with the CD4 T cell count [61]. Immune system deterioration in HIV-infected patients with high cortisol/DHEA-s levels seems to be associated with the suppression of Th1 cytokines and the concomitant increase in Th2 cytokines levels [62]. In line with this, it has been suggested that cortisol-resistant HIV-infected patients have a prominent Th1 cytokine profile and, therefore, present a limited progression to AIDS [63, 64].

4. Immunoendocrine Alterations Observed in HIV-TB Coinfection

There is limited data available about the role of adrenal steroids on the immune response developed by patients coinfected with HIV-1 and Mtb. We determined DHEA, DHEA-s, and cortisol plasma levels and the role of these adrenal hormones on Mtb-specific Th1 responses and Treg frequencies in patients dually infected with Mtb and HIV undergoing different stages of Mtb infection [65]. We observed that, in HIV-infected patients with active TB (HIV-TB), DHEA plasma levels were diminished by twofold compared to HIV-infected patients without Mtb coinfection or healthy donors. On the contrary, HIV-infected patients latently infected with Mtb (HIV-LTBi) showed preserved DHEA levels. Additionally, while cortisol plasma levels were slightly higher in HIV-TB patients than in HIV patients, cortisol/DHEA ratio was almost 4 times higher in HIV-TB patients compared to HIV, HIV-LTBi, and healthy donors. Of note, in HIV-TB patients, DHEA-s levels correlated positively, while cortisol plasma levels correlated negatively with CD4+ T cell count. Moreover, we observed an inverse correlation between DHEA-s plasma levels and Treg frequency in the same group.

A remarkable finding of this study was the persistent observation of a conspicuous CD4+CD25−FoxP3+ population in HIV-TB patients that was not observed in the other groups. Notably, CD4+CD25−FoxP3+ population is also increased in systemic lupus erythematosus patients [66], but its nature remains undetermined. Some authors suggested that these cells are FoxP3+ non-Treg T cells [67], whereas others argue that these cells are dysfunctional Treg cells with limited regulatory potential [68].

In order to clarify this, we evaluated FoxP3 liability in these cells by keeping them unstimulated for different periods of time. By doing this, we observed that within these cells Foxp3 expression was relatively stable, suggesting that, at least in HIV-TB patients, the intriguing CD4+CD25−FoxP3+ population is not a transiently activated effector population and rather might have regulatory functions [67, 68]. We hypothesize that this unusual regulatory population may preclude protective immune responses against Mtb in our cohort of coinfected patients, a topic currently under investigation by our group. Finally, we also found that the frequency of CD4+CD25−FoxP3+ cells in HIV-TB patients negatively correlated with DHEA plasma levels, which is consistent with a role of DHEA on enhancing Th1 responses while diminishing this particular regulatory T cell population.

Moreover, we also found that the initiation of antituberculous treatment (ATT) diminished CD4+CD25−FoxP3+, which was restored to normal levels after finalization of treatment. In contrast, conventional CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs in HIV-TB patients tended to diminish across visits, but not significantly. In HIV-TB patients, adrenal hormone balance was not restored as well, at least after 6 months of ATT (unpublished results).

In some HIV-infected patients, the recovery of specific immune responses during the beginning of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) can elicit systemic inflammatory responses which lead to the establishment of the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). In HIV-TB IRIS patients, DHEA-s plasma levels were three times lower and cortisol/DHEA ratio was up to four times higher compared to the non-TB groups. The CD4+CD25−FoxP3+ frequency was also increased in IRIS patients and negatively correlated with DHEA-s plasma levels [65].

Previous results obtained by our research group also showed a positive correlation between DHEA plasma levels and the frequency of a terminally differentiated population of CD8+ T cells in HIV-TB patients, which is thought to be crucial in preventing TB reactivation (in press and [38]). We also observed that in vitro DHEA treatment increased Mtb-specific CD8+ T cell proportions and terminal differentiation in CD8+ T cells of HIV-TB coinfected patients. Additionally, we found that DHEA in vitro increased the expression of the transcription factor Tbet and Tbet/Eomesodermin ratio in isolated CD8+ cells, both known to drive to terminal differentiation in CD8+ T cells [69].

Based on our results, in HIV-TB coinfected patients, HPA axis displays a noticeable alteration, probably influenced by the chronic state of inflammation induced by both pathogens concomitantly. This condition may contribute to the immune system dysfunction seen in these patients.

5. Adrenal Steroids in Immunotherapy

As suggested by the evidence depicted above, DHEA seems to have two different functions regarding immune modulation: it favors Th1 responses, fundamental in the protection against intracellular pathogens like Mtb and HIV, and, on the other hand, it exerts anti-inflammatory actions, which may be beneficial in the context of chronic infection. For that reason, DHEA has been proved as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of several infectious diseases.

The apparent dual function of DHEA, together with the fact that a cell receptor is not known for it, suggests that this hormone may exert its immune regulatory function through some of its metabolites, which are known to be potent immune-regulators in vivo [26]. DHEA is the physiological precursor for the synthesis of androgens and estrogen, but it can also be metabolized into oxygenated derivatives in nonsteroidogenic tissues, especially in human liver [70]. There is also evidence that DHEA can be converted into oxygenated derivatives like 3β,17β-androstenediol (AED) and 3β,16β,17β-androstenetriol (AET) by monocyte-derived macrophages [71].

In mice, DHEA and AED were protective against lethal dose of Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Enterococcus faecalis infection. Both steroids appeared to act on immune system rather than bacteria directly, since the growth of bacterium was not altered in in vitro assays [72]. DHEA, AET, and AED also proved to protect mice against lethal doses of human herpes type 2 or coxsackievirus B4 [26, 72] while DHEA supplementation enhanced the immune response against Trypanosoma cruzi in mice, as shown by a significant reduction in parasitemia levels [73].

A synthetic derivate from DHEA, 16-Bromoepiandrosterone (HE2000), has been tested in animal models of TB [25]. In these sets of experiments, HE2000 proved to reduce bacterial load associated with progressive TB and lowered IL-4 expression associated with Mtb infection. Also, BALB/c mice with active TB treated with HE2000 showed lower bacterial proliferation and a higher Th1/Th2 cytokine balance. The treatment with HE2000 also resulted in lower percentages of lungs involved in pneumonia and higher bacterial clearance, when administered as an adjunct to conventional chemotherapy [25].

The above mentioned evidence suggests that DHEA and its derivate upregulate host immunity, leading to higher resistance to infectious agents. In line with this, treatment of mice with AET augmented the absolute numbers of CD4+/CD8+ T cells after irradiation and increased IL-2, IL-3, and IFN- levels counteracting hydrocortisone immune suppression [26]. Additionally, zinc and DHEA supplementation augmented macrophage count and IFN-γ and NO concentrations in an additive manner [24].

Despite the above mentioned immune-enhancing effects of DHEA, the effect of this steroid on T cell function is controversial. While some researchers showed that DHEA enhanced T cells proliferation and IL-2 production [70], others reported the contrary [74]. A posterior study suggested that DHEA acted differentially on T and B lymphocytes, since it significantly inhibited proliferation of T cells, but, on the other hand, increased B cell mitogen pokeweed mitogen (PWM) effect on PBMC [75].

Experiments performed by our group demonstrated that DHEA induced the increment in the production of IL-12 and reduced IL-10 secretion by Mtb-stimulated human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) promoting Th1 responses [76]. Also, DHEA enhanced the expression of MHC I, MHC II, and CD86 and increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Furthermore, DHEA enhanced the antigen-specific T cell proliferation and IFN- production induced by Mtb-stimulated DCs.

DHEA synthetic derivate, HE2000, also proved to be beneficial in human infection. A pilot study showed a 50% reduction in Plasmodium falciparum blood levels in 41 out of 42 patients enrolled, thereafter achieving undetectable parasitemia levels in 76% of them [77]. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study showed that HE2000 administration induced significantly sustained decreases in IL-1β, TNF-, IL-6, and Cox-2 transcripts and although CD4+ T cell numbers remain unaltered, patients demonstrated a significant decrease in viral load and a significant increase in CD8+ T cell responses after HE2000 administration [27]. Noteworthy, as shown by another study, HE2000 lowered by 42.2% the incidence of tuberculosis coinfection in AIDS patients while also reduced the cumulative incidence of opportunistic infections [78]. Unfortunately, despite the positive results obtained in phase I and II studies, currently there are no ongoing clinical trials exploring the effects of HE2000. Finally, at present we are studying the modulatory features of 7-oxo-DHEA, a DHEA natural derivative, on the immune response against TB in the context of HIV infection.

6. Concluding Remarks

Immune endocrine interactions during infectious diseases may determine the failure or success of the immune response. This is particularly true for chronic infections like HIV or TB, in which pathogens and immune system coexist in a long struggle. Here we show the importance of DHEA and its derivatives on immunity to intracellular pathogens like HIV and Mtb through its action on Th1 and CD8 responses. These compounds also exert anti-inflammatory actions, which may be beneficial in the context of chronic infections, especially during HIV-TB coinfection.

This dual function of DHEA makes it very suitable as an immune-therapy for the prevention and treatment of TB in the context of HIV infection.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2010-0656 and PICT 2012-0059 to Maria Florencia Quiroga) and the University of Buenos Aires (UBACyT 20020120200050BA to Maria Florencia Quiroga). Guadalupe Veronica Suarez is a Postgraduate Fellow of ANPCyT; Maria Belen Vecchione and Matias Tomas Angerami are Postgraduate Fellows of CONICET. Maria Florencia Quiroga and Oscar Adelmo Bottasso are members of the Research Career at CONICET. The authors thank Dr. Gabriela Turk, Dr. Horacio Salomon, and Dr. Natalia Laufer for continuous support, Sergio Mazzini for thoroughly revising the paper, and Dr. Graciela Ben and Dr. Héctor Pérez for assistance in recruiting the patients in HIV-TB studies.

References

  1. H. Getahun, C. Gunneberg, R. Granich, and P. Nunn, “HIV infection-associated tuberculosis: the epidemiology and the response,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 50, supplement 3, pp. S201–S207, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. E. L. Corbett, C. J. Watt, N. Walker et al., “The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 163, no. 9, pp. 1009–1021, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. A. Selwyn, D. Hartel, V. A. Lewis et al., “A prospective study of the risk of tuberculosis among intravenous drug users with human immunodeficiency virus infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 320, no. 9, pp. 545–550, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Whalen, C. R. Horsburgh, D. Hom, C. Lahart, M. Simberkoff, and J. Ellner, “Accelerated course of human immunodeficiency virus infection after tuberculosis,” The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 129–135, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Modjarrad and S. H. Vermund, “Effect of treating co-infections on HIV-1 viral load: a systematic review,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 455–463, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. E. Gomez and J. D. McKinney, “M. tuberculosis persistence, latency, and drug tolerance,” Tuberculosis, vol. 84, no. 1-2, pp. 29–44, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. E. Barry Jr., H. I. Boshoff, V. Dartois et al., “The spectrum of latent tuberculosis: rethinking the biology and intervention strategies,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 845–855, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. D. Ernst, “The immunological life cycle of tuberculosis,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 581–591, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Salahuddin, F. Ali, Z. Hasan, N. Rao, M. Aqeel, and F. Mahmood, “Vitamin D accelerates clinical recovery from tuberculosis: results of the SUCCINCT Study [Supplementary Cholecalciferol in recovery from tuberculosis]. A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of vitamin D supplementation in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis',” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, article 22, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. L. Johnson, E. Ssekasanvu, A. Okwera et al., “Randomized trial of adjunctive interleukin-2 in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis,” The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 185–191, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Suarez-Mendez, I. Garcia-Garcia, N. Fernandez-Olivera et al., “Adjuvant interferon gamma in patients with drug—resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: a pilot study,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 4, article 44, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  12. R. S. Wallis, P. Kyambadde, J. L. Johnson et al., “A study of the safety, immunology, virology, and microbiology of adjunctive etanercept in HIV-1-associated tuberculosis,” AIDS, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 257–264, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. Dheda, S. K. Schwander, B. Zhu, R. N. Van Zyl-Smit, and Y. Zhang, “The immunology of tuberculosis: from bench to bedside,” Respirology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 433–450, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. del Rey, H. Furukawa, G. Monge-Arditi, A. Kabiersch, K.-H. Voigt, and H. O. Besedovsky, “Alterations in the pituitary-adrenal axis of adult mice following neonatal exposure to interleukin-1,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 235–248, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. P. Chrousos, “The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 332, no. 20, pp. 1351–1362, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. I. J. Elenkov, R. L. Wilder, G. P. Chrousos, and E. S. Vizi, “The sympathetic nerve—an integrative interface between two supersystems: the brain and the immune system,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 595–638, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  17. F. Eskandari and E. M. Sternberg, “Neural-immune interactions in health and disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 966, pp. 20–27, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. R. Pérez, O. Bottasso, and W. Savino, “The impact of infectious diseases upon neuroendocrine circuits,” NeuroImmunoModulation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 96–105, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Roggero, A. R. Pérez, M. Tamae-Kakazu et al., “Endogenous glucocorticoids cause thymus atrophy but are protective during acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection,” The Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 495–503, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. M. Busillo and J. A. Cidlowski, “The five Rs of glucocorticoid action during inflammation: ready, reinforce, repress, resolve, and restore,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 109–119, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. L. Blauer, M. Poth, W. M. Rogers, and E. W. Bernton, “Dehydroepiandrosterone antagonizes the suppressive effects of dexamethasone on lymphocyte proliferation,” Endocrinology, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 3174–3179, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. D. Ashwell, F. W. M. Lu, and M. S. Vacchio, “Glucocorticoids in T cell development and function,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 18, pp. 309–345, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Kasperska-Zajac, “Asthma and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA): facts and hypotheses,” Inflammation, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 320–324, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. V. Brazão, F. H. Santello, L. C. Caetano, M. Del Vecchio Filipin, M. Paula Alonso Toldo, and J. C. do Prado, “Immunomodulatory effects of zinc and DHEA on the Th-1 immune response in rats infected with Trypanosoma cruzi,” Immunobiology, vol. 215, no. 5, pp. 427–434, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. Hernández-Pando, D. Aguilar-Leon, H. Orozco et al., “16α-Bromoepiandrosterone restores T helper cell type 1 activity and accelerates chemotherapy-induced bacterial clearance in a model of progressive pulmonary tuberculosis,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 299–306, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. M. Loria, D. H. Conrad, T. Huff, H. Carter, and D. Ben-Nathan, “Androstenetriol and androstenediol. Protection against lethal radiation and restoration of immunity after radiation injury,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 917, pp. 860–867, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  27. C. Reading, C. Dowding, B. Schramm et al., “Improvement in immune parameters and human immunodeficiency virus-1 viral response in individuals treated with 16α-bromoepiandrosterone (HE2000),” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1082–1088, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. Kelestimur, Y. Unlu, M. Ozesmi, and I. Tolu, “A hormonal and radiological evaluation of adrenal gland in patients with acute or chronic pulmonary tuberculosis,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 53–56, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. P. Chrousos and E. D. Zapanti, “Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in HIV infection and disease,” Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, vol. 43, pp. 791–806, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  30. K. Keven, A. R. Uysal, and G. Erdogan, “Adrenal function during tuberculous infection and effects of antituberculosis treatment on endogenous and exogenous steroids,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 419–424, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  31. O. Bottasso, M. L. Bay, H. Besedovsky, and A. del Rey, “Adverse neuro-immune-endocrine interactions in patients with active tuberculosis,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 53, pp. 77–85, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. J. North and Y.-J. Jung, “Immunity to tuberculosis,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 22, pp. 599–623, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Chan and J. Flynn, “The immunological aspects of latency in tuberculosis,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 2–12, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. A. Chackerian, J. M. Alt, T. V. Perera, C. C. Dascher, and S. M. Behar, “Dissemination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is influenced by host factors and precedes the initiation of T-cell immunity,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 4501–4509, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. L. Flynn, M. M. Goldstein, K. J. Triebold, B. Koller, and B. R. Bloom, “Major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted T cells are required for resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 24, pp. 12013–12017, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. G. Feng, A. G. D. Bean, H. Hooi, H. Briscoe, and W. J. Britton, “Increase in gamma interferon-secreting CD8+, as well as CD4+, T cells in lungs following aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 3242–3247, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  37. C. H. Ladel, C. Blum, A. Dreher, K. Reifenberg, and S. H. E. Kaufmann, “Protective role of γ/δ T cells and α/β T cells in tuberculosis,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2877–2881, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. H. Bruns, C. Meinken, P. Schauenberg et al., “Anti-TNF immunotherapy reduces CD8+ T cell-mediated antimicrobial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in humans,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 1167–1177, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. G. J. Fox, N. V. Nhung, D. N. Sy et al., “Contact investigation in households of patients with tuberculosis in Hanoi, Vietnam: a prospective cohort study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 11, Article ID e49880, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. D. Rey, C. V. Mahuad, V. V. Bozza et al., “Endocrine and cytokine responses in humans with pulmonary tuberculosis,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 171–179, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. E. L. York, D. A. Enarson, E. J. Nobert, F. A. Fanning, and B. J. Sproule, “Adrenocortical function in patients investigated for active tuberculosis,” Chest, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 1338–1341, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. F. Keleştimur, Z. Göktaş, I. Gülmez et al., “Low dose (1 μg) adrenocorticotropin stimulation test in the evaluation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 235–239, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. I. M. Orme, A. D. Roberts, J. P. Griffin, and J. S. Abrams, “Cytokine secretion by CD4 T lymphocytes acquired in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosisinfection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 518–525, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  44. V. Bozza, L. D'Attilio, G. Didoli et al., “The adrenal steroid response during tuberculosis and its effects on the mycobacterial-driven IFN-gamma production of patients and their household contacts,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1153, pp. 247–255, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. L. D'Attilio, V. V. Bozza, N. Santucci et al., “TGF-β neutralization abrogates the inhibited DHEA production mediated by factors released from M. tuberculosis-stimulated PBMC,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1262, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Moir, T.-W. Chun, and A. S. Fauci, “Pathogenic mechanisms of HIV disease,” Annual Review of Pathology, vol. 6, pp. 223–248, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. M. Kahan, E. J. Wherry, and A. J. Zajac, “T cell exhaustion during persistent viral infections,” Virology, vol. 479-480, pp. 180–193, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. R. Hersperger, F. Pereyra, M. Nason et al., “Perforin expression directly ex vivo by HIV-specific CD8+ T-cells is a correlate of HIV elite control,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e1000917, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. A. Migueles, C. M. Osborne, C. Royce et al., “Lytic granule loading of CD8+ T cells is required for HIV-infected cell elimination associated with immune control,” Immunity, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1009–1021, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. T. Miura, M. A. Brockman, A. Schneidewind et al., “HLA-B57/B*5801 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 elite controllers select for rare gag variants associated with reduced viral replication capacity and strong cytotoxic T-lymphotye recognition,” Journal of Virology, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 2743–2755, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. Clerici, M. L. Fusi, S. Ruzzante et al., “Type 1 and type 2 cytokines in HIV infection—a possible role in apoptosis and disease progression,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 185–188, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. A. Reuter, C. Pombo, and M. R. Betts, “Cytokine production and dysregulation in HIV pathogenesis: lessons for development of therapeutics and vaccines,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 23, no. 4-5, pp. 181–191, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. L.-L. Liu, Y. Qin, J.-F. Cai et al., “Th17/Treg imbalance in adult patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 314–320, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. B. Kanwar, D. Favre, and J. M. McCune, “Th17 and regulatory T cells: implications for AIDS pathogenesis,” Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 151–157, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Mayo, J. Collazos, E. Martinez, and S. Ibarra, “Adrenal function in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 162, no. 10, pp. 1095–1098, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. T. Azar and J. C. Melby, “Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in non-AIDS patients with advanced HIV infection,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 305, no. 5, pp. 321–325, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. N. Christeff, N. Gherbi, O. Mammes et al., “Serum cortisol and DHEA concentrations during HIV infection,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 22, supplement 1, pp. S11–S18, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. Costa, R. E. Nappi, F. Polatti, A. Poma, A. B. Grossman, and G. Nappi, “Stimulating effect of HIV-1 coat protein gp120 on corticotropin-releasing hormone and arginine vasopressin in the rat hypothalamus: involvement of nitric oxide,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 376–384, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. T. Kino and G. P. Chrousos, “Glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid resistance/hypersensitivity syndromes,” The Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 437–445, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. T. Kino and G. P. Chrousos, “Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 accessory protein Vpr: a causative agent of the AIDS-related insulin resistance/lipodystrophy syndrome?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1024, pp. 153–167, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. T. L. Wisniewski, C. W. Hilton, E. V. Morse, and F. Svec, “The relationship of serum DHEA-S and cortisol levels to measures of immune function in human immunodeficiency virus-related illness,” American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 305, no. 2, pp. 79–83, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. M. Clerici, D. Trabattoni, S. Piconi et al., “A possible role for the cortisol/anticortisols imbalance in the progression of human immunodeficiency virus,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 22, supplement 1, pp. S27–S31, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. N. Silverman, B. D. Pearce, C. A. Biron, and A. H. Miller, “Immune modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis during viral infection,” Viral Immunology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 41–78, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. G. Norbiato, M. Bevilacqua, T. Vago, and M. Clerici, “Glucocorticoid resistance and the immune function in the immunodeficiency syndrome,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 840, pp. 835–847, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. F. Quiroga, M. T. Angerami, N. Santucci et al., “Dynamics of adrenal steroids are related to variations in Th1 and Treg populations during mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in HIV positive persons,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e33061, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. D. A. Horwitz, “Identity of mysterious CD4+CD25Foxp3+ cells in SLE,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 101, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. H.-X. Yang, W. Zhang, L.-D. Zhao et al., “Are CD4+CD25-Foxp3+ cells in untreated new-onset lupus patients regulatory T cells?” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 11, no. 5, article R153, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. Bonelli, A. Savitskaya, C.-W. Steiner, E. Rath, J. S. Smolen, and C. Scheinecker, “Phenotypic and functional analysis of CD4+CD25-Foxp3+ T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 1689–1695, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. S. M. Kaech and W. Cui, “Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 749–761, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. L. E. Kihel, “Oxidative metabolism of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and biologically active oxygenated metabolites of DHEA and epiandrosterone (EpiA)—recent reports,” Steroids, vol. 77, no. 1-2, pp. 10–26, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. Schmidt, M. Kreutz, G. Löffler, J. Schölmerich, and R. H. Sträub, “Conversion of dehydroepiandrosterone to downstream steroid hormones in macrophages,” The Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 161–169, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. D. Ben-Nathan, D. A. Padgett, and R. M. Loria, “Androstenediol and dehydroepiandrosterone protect mice against lethal bacterial infections and lipopolysaccharide toxicity,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 425–431, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. V. Brazão, F. H. Santello, L. C. Caetano, M. Del Vecchio Filipin, M. Paula Alonso Toldo, and J. C. do Prado, “Immunomodulatory effects of zinc and DHEA on the Th-1 immune response in rats infected with Trypanosoma cruzi,” Immunobiology, vol. 215, no. 5, pp. 427–434, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. D. A. Padgett and R. M. Loria, “In vitro potentiation of lymphocyte activation by dehydroepiandrosterone, androstenediol, and androstenetriol,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 1544–1552, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  75. Y. Sakakura, Y. Nakagawa, and T. Ohzeki, “Differential effect of DHEA on mitogen-induced proliferation of T and B lymphocytes,” The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 99, no. 2-3, pp. 115–120, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. Angerami, G. Suarez, M. F. Pascutti, H. Salomon, O. Bottasso, and M. F. Quiroga, “Modulation of the phenotype and function of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-stimulated dendritic cells by adrenal steroids,” International Immunology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 405–411, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. J. M. Frincke, D. R. Stickney, N. Onizuka-Handa et al., “Reduction of parasite levels in patients with uncomplicated malaria by treatment with HE2000,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 232–236, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  78. D. R. Stickney, Z. Noveljic, A. Garsd, D. A. Destiche, and J. M. Frincke, “Safety and activity of the immune modulator HE2000 on the incidence of tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections in AIDS patients,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 2639–2641, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Guadalupe Veronica Suarez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1459 Views | 570 Downloads | 3 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.