BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Environmental Biotechnology: Current Advances, New Knowledge Gaps, and Emerging Issues

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 474879 |

Manoel Eduardo da Silva, Fabio Ribeiro Braga, Pedro Mendoza de Gives, Miguel Angel Mercado Uriostegui, Manuela Reyes, Filippe Elias de Freitas Soares, Lorendane Millena de Carvalho, Francielle Bosi Rodrigues, Jackson Victor de Araújo, "Efficacy of Clonostachys rosea and Duddingtonia flagrans in Reducing the Haemonchus contortus Infective Larvae", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 474879, 5 pages, 2015.

Efficacy of Clonostachys rosea and Duddingtonia flagrans in Reducing the Haemonchus contortus Infective Larvae

Academic Editor: José L. Campos
Received29 Jan 2015
Accepted10 Apr 2015
Published04 Oct 2015


The biocontrol is proven effective in reducing in vitro and in situ free-living stages of major gastrointestinal helminths, allowing progress in reducing losses by parasitism, maximizing production, and productivity. This study aimed at evaluating the predatory activity of fungal isolates of Duddingtonia flagrans and Clonostachys rosea species and its association on infective larvae (L3) of H. contortus in microplots formed by grasses and maintained in a protected environment. All groups were added with 10 mL of an aqueous suspension with 618 H. contortus L3 approximately. Group 1 was used as control and only received the infective larvae. Groups 2 and 3 received D. flagrans chlamydospores and C. rosea conidia at doses of 5 × 106. Group 4 received the combination of 5 × 106 D. flagrans chlamydospores + 5 × 106 C. rosea conidia. D. flagrans and C. rosea showed nematicidal effectiveness reducing by 91.5 and 88.9%, respectively, the population of H. contortus L3. However, when used in combination efficiency decreased to 74.5% predation of H. contortus L3. These results demonstrate the need for further studies to determine the existence of additive effects, synergistic or antagonistic, between these species.

1. Introduction

Endoparasitic nematodiasis are considered as one of the main factors seriously affecting the livestock industry, since they cause an important reduction not only in the animal weight but also their main products; that is, meat and milk are also diminished [1]. Other problems derived from nematode parasitic infections are the continuous expenses in chemical treatments and eventually the death of young animals [2]. The use of chemical drugs is so far the unique method of anthelmintic control that is established around the world [3]. Unfortunately the use of drugs and other measures of control is in most of the cases not based on the adequate recommendations, that is, the general animal state, body weight, diagnosis of parasitic burden, and other important factors that should be considered to establish a successful control as quantity and quality of food, selection of gastrointestinal parasitic genetically resistant animals, and the presence of parasites resistance to chemical drugs [4].

A number of alternatives of control different than the use of chemical drugs are being proposed, although the most promising measure of control is the use of natural nematode antagonists like nematophagous fungi [5, 6]. Allied to chemical control, one of the most promising and sustainable methods of control is biological control, which has shown a good effectiveness either in laboratory trials or in pasture experiments which is an important activity reducing the free-living stages of mayor gastrointestinal helminths. This method can be considered as a useful tool of control which reduces the economic losses caused by parasites and can promote a higher animal productivity [7, 8].

The species Clonostachys rosea belonging to the order Hypocreales (family: Bionectriacea) has being recorded as a parasite of other microfungi and also as a nematode parasite, apart from being a saprophyte fungus [9]. This species colonizes plants and it has attracted interest by workers as a potential biological control agent, since it produces volatile organic compounds toxic for some living organisms [10, 11].

Duddingtonia flagrans is an “old friend” of scientists who envision biological control as an alternative to the treatment of herd animals by chemical means and also in the future of prevention of high levels of contamination by nematodes in public areas and squares used by humans [3, 12]. Again it must be remembered here that the ability to pass through the gastrointestinal tract of domestic animals makes this species of fungus an eternal ally in combating nematodes present in the environment [13].

This fungal species is said to be the “most promising.” Its main focus of activity culminates in the predation of infective helminth forms (in this case, nematode larvae), by means of simple adhesive hyphae.

The fungus D. flagrans belonging to the order Moniliales (family: Moniliaceae) is one of the most promising microorganisms for biological control of ruminant parasitic nematodes [14]. This species is harmless to plants, animals, and human being [15, 16] and it is possible to isolate it mainly from soil samples and animal faeces [17]. This microorganism possesses dual food habits, being saprobius in absence of nematodes and becoming either predatory or parasite of nematodes in the presence of them [18].

Taking into account the representation of the world livestock and its socioeconomics, it is important to evaluate, improve, and provide the use of technologies that can contribute to the development of this segment of agrobusiness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predatory activity of fungal isolates of the species C. rosea and D. flagrans and their association on H. contortus infective larvae (L3) in microplots with graminaceous forage plant.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Fungi

The C. rosea Yucatan strain, belonging to the CICY collection, was used. This strain was maintained in 2% water-agar (2% WA) at the Department of Helminthology (CENID-PAVET-INIFAP-MEXICO). The D. flagrans fungal strain (FTHO-8) belonging to the Fungal Collection of CENID-Parasitología Veterinaria, INIFAP-Mexico, was used. This strain was originally obtained from a sheep faecal sample from a farm at Fierro del Toro Village, Huitzilac Municipality, Morelos State, Mexico [19].

2.2. Nematodes

A H. contortus isolate was originally obtained from a naturally infected sheep from “Las Margaritas” Experimental Sheep Farm (INIFAP) in Hueytamalco Municipality in the state of Puebla, Mexico. A H. contortus egg donor lamb was orally infected with an aqueous suspension containing 350 larvae/kg of body weight. Twenty days after infection the presence of H. contortus eggs in faecal samples was detected through the McMaster technique. Faecal cultures were prepared by mixing faeces with polystyrene particles in plastic bowls. Water was added to the faecal cultures and the mixture was homogenized to keep the cultures hydrated and oxygenated to promote better larval hatching [20]. Faecal cultures were covered with paper foil and incubated for 7 days at room temperature (25–30°C). Infective larvae were extracted from faeces using the Baermann funnel technique [21]. The larvae were washed several times in density gradients of 50% sucrose solution and rinsed and suspended in sterile water.

2.3. Assay

The pots were conformed as follows: thirty-six plastic (gardening) pots with a capacity of 100 grams (75 × 55 mm) were used. Seventy grams of soil acquired from commercial nurseries was autoclaved at 1.2 atm and 115°C for 15 minutes and added to the plastic pots. Every pot with soil was added with 0.06 grams of a commercial mixture of different genera/species grass seeds; about 70 graminaceous seeds were added to the soil surface in order to obtain a homogeneous grass growing. Six mL of top water was added to every pot every day during 18 days of the experiment using a Pasteur pipette to maintain the pots humidity.

After germination the pots were randomly divided into four (4) experimental groups with 8 replicates each. All groups were added with 10 mL average of an acqueos suspension with 618 H. contortus L3 approximately. Group 1 was used as control and only received the infective larvae. Groups 2 and 3 received D. flagrans chlamydospores and C. rosea conidia at doses of 5 × 106, respectively. Group 4 received the combination of 5 × 106 D. flagrans chlamydospores + 5 × 106 C. rosea conidia.

The pots were maintained under a shading rate hedging protected screen and after 12 days of interaction between nematophagous fungi and parasitic nematodes, the whole nematode population from total soil and grass of every single pot was recovered using the Baermann Funnel method [21].

2.4. Location

The experiment was conducted in CENID-PAVET-INIFAP-MEXICO, located at 18°53′04′′ N latitude and 98°51′34′′ W and 1615.16 meters above sea level, in the municipality of Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico.

2.5. Weather Data

Meteorological data including maximum and minimum temperatures, relative humidity, and rainfall during the experiment were obtained from the closest experimental weather station (National Institute for Water Technology), Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed using an ANOVA test and the Tukey test was used as a complementary technique for discriminating the mean different from the others. Data were analysed using the software BioEstat 5.3.

3. Results and Discussion

The results are shown in Table 1, which shows the mean, standard deviation, and the H. contortus larvae reduction percentage after being recovered from pots after 12 days of interaction between nematophagous fungi and nematode larvae. The average temperature value during the experimental period was 16.1°C, ranging from 15 to 33°C; the environmental relative humidity was 71.03%, ranging from 15.2 to 108% and 7 mm of rain. These environmental conditions are considered as ideal for the development of ruminant parasitic larvae [22] and nematophagous fungi [23].

TreatmentControlC. rosea D. flagrans D. flagrans + C. rosea

H. contortus 118 (±114)a13 (±19)b10 (±15)b30 (±19)b
% reduction L3088.9%91.5%74.5%

Different small letters in rows indicate the existence of a statistical difference ().

The results obtained using D. flagrans in reducing the nematode larvae population into animal faeces have generated the development of studies focused on the production of chlamydospores which are resistant stages of some microfungi for the control of ruminant parasitic nematodes [13]. The results of the present work are promising and an important reduction in the larval population recovered from treated pots has shown evidence that fungi produce satisfactory results with the use of 5 × 106 conidia and chlamydospores per pot; and although this is only a model of study, it gives a clear image about the potential use of this biological system of control of infective larvae on the contaminated grass.

The recovery larvae mean values have shown statistical difference among the treated groups when compared with control group (). However, no differences were found among the treated groups () (Table 1). Such results corroborate those published of De Almeida et al. [24] that demonstrated high effectiveness of the specie D. flagrans against different genera of parasites affecting ruminants such as Haemonchus, Teladorsagia, and Trichostrongylus.

The nematophagous C. rosea fungus was able to reduce by 88.9% the number H. contortus L3. D. flagrans was able to reduce by 91.5% the number H. contortus L3. The association of the micro fungi D. flagrans and C. rosea was able to reduce 74.5% of H. contortus (L3) infective larvae.

Higher in vitro reductions (94.21–99.61%) in the H. contortus L3 population by different D. flagrans isolates were recently found by Priego-Cortes [25], although it is important to remark that this research was performed under in vitro conditions on water agar plates. In the same work the in vitro activity of D. flagrans isolates, FTHO-8, M3, and DFIPC, showed 99.2, 98.23, and 98.8% reductions against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne sp. Such results are encouraging in searching for a fungal candidate as a potential agent of agricultural pest control.

Assis et al. [5] evaluated the predatory activity of D. flagrans and M. thaumasium in the control of nematodiasis in grazing cattle by administering fungal pellets obtaining a reduction of 47.8 and 56.67% of the number of larvae, respectively, and these results were lower than those found in our study, although conducted in animals grazing.

In the present study, the nematophagous fungus C. rosea reduced by 76.9% the number of H. contortus L3 under environmental conditions. Similar results were recently obtained using two isolates, C. rosea (Yucatán strain) and Clonostachys sp.

One Campeche strain C. rosea reduced 84.2 and 59.5% H. contortus L3, respectively. These fungi also showed 94.3 and 95.9% reduction on the phytonematode Meloidogyne sp. (J2), respectively [26].

Baloyi et al. [27] evaluated the in vitro predatory activity of C. rosea (in faeces and in water) against trichostrongylids larvae and they reported 69.9 and 89.3%, reductions, respectively, of the number of trichostrongylids larvae in bioassays made in sheep feces and water. On the other hand, Rodriguez-Martínez [28] evaluated in vitro predatory activity of C. rosea against Rhabditis sp., Caenorhabditis elegans, Panagrellus redivivus, Butlerius sp., and H. contortus and they recorded 71.9, 94.7, 92.7, 100, and 87.7%, larvae reductions, respectively. Their results have shown evidence about the potential of these species in the control of parasites of veterinary importance. These results are similar to those described in the present work performed in soil pots.

Dong et al. [10] showed that the metabolites obtained of C. rosea were lethal 24 hours after treatment to 50% of C. elegans, P. redivivus, and B. xylophilus larvae; in our work we obtained better results of predation for free-living nematodes same test being done in vivo. Other researches in phytopathology highlight the relevance and efficiency of the species C. rosea as entomopathogenic against Cicadellidae hemiptera, causing, respectively, 82.5 and 45% mortality in Oncometopia tucumana and Tapajosa rubromaginata at 14 days after incubation [29]. Vega et al. [30] showed that C. rosea and B. bassiana associated were able to reduce 82.5% of the insects Hypothenemus hampei in coffee beans and Carreño-Perez et al. [31] showed that C. rosea reduction 79% of diseases caused by plant pathogenic fungus Phytophthora cactorum isolated on apple fruits.

According to Ayers et al. [32] a group of compounds extracted from C. candelabrum showed 90% of efficacy against H. contortus. These compounds were synthesized by Rama Rao [11], the macrolide clonostachydiol derived from C. cilindrospora that showed 80–90% of reduction of H. contortus in artificially infected sheep when subcutaneously administered at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg, corroborating with 21 our results, although we have worked with environmental control.

The association of the micro fungi D. flagrans and C. rosea was able to reduce 74.5% of H. contortus (L3) infective larvae. Furthermore Baloyi et al. [27] demonstrated that the combination of B. thuringiensis and C. rosea showed an additive effect in vitro causing a mortality of 76.7% of parasites nematode of sheep possibly due to the action of C. rosea (enzyme production) and B. thuringiensis (endotoxin production).

Some studies have noted the combination of nematophagous fungi under natural conditions to combat parasitic forms (eggs and/or larvae) of gastrointestinal nematode parasites. This association of fungi has been tested and the results are relevant. Tavela et al. (2013) reported that the nematophagous fungi have been used as an alternative for controlling gastrointestinal nematodes from domestic animals under natural and laboratory conditions. At that time, those authors demonstrated that the associations of D. flagrans and M. thaumasium were viable after passing through the gastrointestinal tract in horses and could be used under natural conditions. However, these authors have stated that it is unclear “whether the association of some of these species could bring some kind of advantage,” from the biological point of view, since the antagonism or synergism between species must be better understood.

In the present study, the association of Clonostachys and D. flagrans was effective and can be used in new experimental designs under laboratory conditions and in the field. C. rosea and D. flagrans have shown nematicidal effectiveness when were used alone or in combination, effectively reducing the population of infective larvae (L3) of H. contortus in controlled environmental conditions.

However, the authors believe that there is a need for further studies to determine the existence of additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effects between these species. It is read here that Braga et al. (2014) discuss the predatory activity of an isolate from the nematophagous fungus Arthrobotrys robusta, as an example of predatory activity on L3 of H. contortus. At that time, the authors demonstrated a percentage reduction of 73.8% by the end of seven days. Thus, in this study, it is suggested that the tested association (Clonostachys + Duddingtonia) could be further explored in future studies of biological control, since the percentage obtained was 74.5%. This is the first report of C. rosea and D. flagrans association and is the first report to control H. contortus in environmental conditions.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.


The authors also would like to thank CNPq, Capes, Fapes, and Fapemig for financial support and grant concession.


  1. F. Pisseri, C. Benedictis, S. P. Roberti, and B. Azzarello, “Sustainable animal production, systemic prevention strategies in parasitic diseases of ruminants,” Alternative and Integrative Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Al-Rofaai, W. A. Rahman, and M. Abdulghani, “Sensitivity of two in vitro assays for evaluating plant activity against the infective stage of Haemonchus contortus strains,” Parasitology Research, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 893–898, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. R. Braga and J. V. de Araújo, “Nematophagous fungi for biological control of gastrointestinal nematodes in domestic animals,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 71–82, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. S. Cezar, J. B. Catto, and I. Bianchin, “Controle alternativo de nematódeos gastrintestinais dos ruminantes: atualidade e perspectivas,” Ciência Rural, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 2083–2091, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. C. L. Assis, F. D. Luns, J. V. Araújo et al., “Comparison between the action of nematode predatory fungi Duddingtonia flagrans and Monacrosporium thaumasium in the biological control of bovine gastrointestinal nematodiasis in tropical southeastern Brazil,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 193, no. 1–3, pp. 134–140, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Mendoza-de-Gives and J. F. J. Torres-Acosta, “Biotechnological use of fungi in the control of ruminant parasitic nematodes,” in Fungi: Types, Environmental Impact and Role in Disease, V. Arias and A. Paz-Silva, Eds., Nova Science Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  7. F. R. Braga, J. V. Araújo, F. E. F. Soares et al., “Interaction of the nematophagous fungus Duddingtonia flagrans on Amblyomma cajannense engorged females and enzymatic characterisation of its chitinase,” Biocontrol Science and Technology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 584–594, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. V. L. R. Vilela, T. F. Feitosa, F. R. Braga et al., “Biological control of goat gastrointestinal helminthiasis by Duddingtonia flagrans in a semi-arid region of the northeastern Brazil,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 188, no. 1-2, pp. 127–133, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Li, J. Yang, X. Huang, and K.-Q. Zhang, “Purification and characterization of an extracellular serine protease from Clonostachys rosea and its potential as a pathogenic factor,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 925–929, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J.-Y. Dong, H.-P. He, Y.-M. Shen, and K.-Q. Zhang, “Nematicidal epipolysulfanyldioxopiperazines from Gliocladium roseum,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 1510–1513, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. V. Rama Rao, V. S. Murthy, and G. V. M. Sharma, “Studies directed towards the synthesis of clonostachydiol. Part I,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 139–142, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Faedo, M. Larsen, and S. Thamsborg, “Effect of different times of administration of the nematophagous fungus Duddingtonia flagrans on the transmission of ovine parasitic nematodes on pasture—a plot study,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 94, no. 1-2, pp. 55–65, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Paz-Silva, I. Francisco, R. O. Valero-Coss et al., “Ability of the fungus Duddingtonia flagrans to adapt to the cyathostomin egg-output by spreading chlamydospores,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 179, no. 1–3, pp. 277–282, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. F. Ojeda-Robertos, J. F. J. Torres-Acosta, A. J. Ayala-Burgos, C. A. Sandoval-Castro, R. O. Valero-Coss, and P. Mendoza-de-Gives, “Digestibility of Duddingtonia flagrans chlamydospores in ruminants: In vitro and in vivo studies,” BMC Veterinary Research, vol. 5, article 46, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. K. Chamuah, P. Perumal, and A. Mech, “Epidemiology and control measures of helminth parasites in small ruminants,” International Journal of Bio-Resource and Stress Management, vol. 4, pp. 278–287, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  16. E. Jagla, E. Jodkowska, and M. Popiolek, “Alternative methods for the control of gastrointestinal parasites in horses with a special focus on nematode predatory fungi: a review,” Annals of Animal Science, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 217–227, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Larsen, “Biological control of nematode parasites in sheep,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 84, pp. E133–E139, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  18. G. L. Barron, The Nematode-Destroying Fungi, Topics in Mycology no. 1, Canadian Biological Publications, Ontario, Canada, 1977.
  19. R. D. Llerandi-Juárez and P. Mendoza-de Gives, “Resistance of chlamydospores of nematophagous fungi to the digestive processes of sheep in Mexico,” Journal of Helminthology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 155–158, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Liébano-Hernández, “Identificación morfométrica de larvas infectantes de nematodos gastrointestinales y pulmonares en rumiantes domésticos de México,” in Diagnóstico y control de los nematodos gastrointestinales de los rumiantes en México, V. M. V. Prats, Ed., pp. 27–34, 2nd edition, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  21. A. Chaney, Identification of Internal Parasites of Sheep and Goats, Honors College, 2012.
  22. E. Liébano-Hernández, “Ecología de larvas de nematodos gastrointestinales de bovinos, ovinos y caprinos,” in Epidemiología de Enfermidades Parasitarias em Animales Domésticos, E. Q. Romero, J. A. F. Castillo, F. I. Velarde, and M. E. L. Arellano, Eds., Version Electronic, 1st edition, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  23. O. D. Dhingra and J. B. Sinclair, Basic Plant Pathology Methods, CRC Press, 1995.
  24. G. L. De Almeida, J. M. Santurio, J. O. J. Filho et al., “Predatory activity of the fungus Duddingtonia flagrans in equine strongyle infective larvae on natural pasture in the Southern Region of Brazil,” Parasitology Research, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 657–662, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. I. Priego-Cortes, Aislamiento y caracterización morfológica y molecular del hongo nematófago Duddingtonia flagrans y evaluación de su actividad biológica in vitro en contra de nematodos de importancia para la industria agrícola y pecuaria [Tesis de Licenciatura], Universidad Politécnica del Estado de Morelos, 2013.
  26. S. Rojas-Jiménez, Evaluación de la actividad nematicida in vitro del hongo Clonostachys spp en contra de Haemonchus contortus (L3) y Meloidogyne sp. (J2) [Tesis de Licenciatura], Universidad Politécnica del Estado de Morelos, 2013.
  27. M. A. Baloyi, M. D. Laing, and K. S. Yobo, “Isolation and in vitro screening of Bacillus thuringiensis and Clonostachys rosea as biological control agents against sheep nematodes,” African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 5047–5054, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  28. R. Rodriguez-Martínez, Evaluación de la actividad letal in vitro del hongo nematófago Clonostachys rosea contra cinco nematodos diferentes [Tesis de Licenciatura], Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad del Estado de México, 2011.
  29. A. V. Toledo, E. Virla, R. A. Humber, S. L. Paradell, and C. C. L. Lastra, “First record of Clonostachys rosea (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) as an entomopathogenic fungus of Oncometopia tucumana and Sonesimia grossa (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in Argentina,” Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. E. Vega, F. Posada, M. Catherine Aime, M. Pava-Ripoll, F. Infante, and S. A. Rehner, “Entomopathogenic fungal endophytes,” Biological Control, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 72–82, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. J. Carreño Perez, J. O. Blanco Valbuena, and B. Villegas Estrada, “Selección de hongos biocontroladores de Phytophthora cactorum, agente causal de la pudrición radical y de corona en manzano,” Agronomia, vol. 14, pp. 89–96, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  32. S. Ayers, D. L. Zink, K. Mohn et al., “Anthelmintic constituents of Clonostachys candelabrum,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 119–122, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Manoel Eduardo da Silva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles