Review Article
Anesthesia Related Toxic Effects on In Vitro Fertilization Outcome: Burden of Proof
Table 2
Details of trials investigating general anesthesia’s (GA’s) potential toxicity.
| First author/year | GA versus other techniques | Sample size | Pregnancy rates | Fertilization rate | Oocytes |
| Aghaamoo et al. 2014 [2] | GA versus spinal analgesia | 164 total GA group () Spinal group () | Practicing spinal anesthesia is significantly related to increased chance of chemical pregnancy () | — | — |
| Azmude et al. 2013 [1] | GA versus spinal anesthesia | 200 total GA group () Spinal group () | Spinal anesthesia increased significantly the chance of IVF success () | — | — |
| Wilhelm et al. 2002 [6] | GA versus monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with remifentanil | 251 total GA group () MAC group () | MAC had a greater pregnancy rate () | NS | NS |
| Hammadeh et al. 1999 [8] | GA versus sedation | 202 total GA group () Sedation group () | NS | NS | The number of collected oocytes was significantly higher with GA () |
| Christiaens et al. 1998 [7] | GA versus paracervical local anesthetic block (PCB) | 202 total GA group () PCB group () | NS | NS | NS |
|
|
NS: no significant difference, —: not under investigation.
|