Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 482389, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/482389
Research Article

Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process

1CRF Les Trois Soleils, Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Unité de Rééducation Neurologique, 77310 Boissise-le-Roi, France
2Analyse et Restauration du Mouvement, Groupe Hospitalier Henri Mondor, Rééducation Neurolocomotrice, AP-HP, 94010 Créteil, France

Received 20 June 2014; Revised 28 September 2014; Accepted 4 October 2014

Academic Editor: Giorgio Ferriero

Copyright © 2015 Christophe Duret et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Desrosiers, F. Malouin, D. Bourbonnais, C. L. Richards, A. Rochette, and G. Bravo, “Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 666–673, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. S. Nichols-Larsen, P. C. Clark, A. Zeringue, A. Greenspan, and S. Blanton, “Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1480–1484, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. H. Dobkin, “Rehabilitation after stroke,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 16, pp. 1677–1684, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Bütefisch, H. Hummelsheim, P. Denzler, and K.-H. Mauritz, “Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. V. Cooke, K. Mares, A. Clark, R. C. Tallis, and V. M. Pomeroy, “The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Medicine, vol. 8, article 60, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Feys, W. de Weerdt, G. Verbeke et al., “Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial,” Stroke, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 924–929, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Kwakkel, R. C. Wagenaar, J. W. R. Twisk, G. J. Lankhorst, and J. C. Koetsier, “Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial,” The Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9174, pp. 191–196, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Kwakkel, R. van Peppen, R. C. Wagenaar et al., “Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis,” Stroke, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2529–2536, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. B. Lincoln, R. H. Parry, and C. D. Vass, “Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 573–579, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. P. S. van Peppen, G. Kwakkel, S. Wood-Dauphinee, H. J. M. Hendriks, P. J. van der Wees, and J. Dekker, “The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 833–862, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Woldag and H. Hummelsheim, “Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 249, no. 5, pp. 518–528, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. L. Aisen, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, F. McDowell, and B. T. Volpe, “The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 443–446, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelstein, C. Diels, and M. Aisen, “A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation,” Neurology, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1938–1944, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. S. Lum, C. G. Burgar, M. van der Loos, P. C. Shor, M. Majmundar, and R. Yap, “MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: a follow-up study,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 631–642, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Masiero, A. Celia, G. Rosati, and M. Armani, “Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Masiero, M. Armani, and G. Rosati, “Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 355–366, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. S. Lum, C. G. Burgar, P. C. Shor, M. Majmundar, and M. Van der Loos, “Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 952–959, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. E. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs, J. Stein, W. R. Frontera, R. Hughes, and N. Hogan, “Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1106–1111, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Posteraro, S. Mazzoleni, S. Aliboni et al., “Robot-mediated therapy for paretic upper limb of chronic patients following neurological injury,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 976–980, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. C. Lo, P. D. Guarino, L. G. Richards et al., “Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb Impairment after stroke,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, pp. 1772–1783, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. E. L. Miller, L. Murray, L. Richards et al., “Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American heart association,” Stroke, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2402–2448, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. E. Lang, J. R. MacDonald, D. S. Reisman et al., “Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1692–1698, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Marchal-Crespo and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 6, no. 1, article 20, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. J. Reinkensmeyer, E. Wolbrecht, and J. Bobrow, “A computational model of human-robot load sharing during robot-assisted arm movement training after stroke,” in Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of IEEE-EMBS, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 4019–4023, August 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. T. Wolbrecht, V. Chan, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, and J. E. Bobrow, “Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 286–297, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. I. Krebs, M. L. Aisen, B. T. Volpe, and N. Hogan, “Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 4645–4649, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. Rohrer, S. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs et al., “Submovements grow larger, fewer, and more blended during stroke recovery,” Motor Control, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 472–483, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. I. Krebs, M. Krams, D. K. Agrafiotis et al., “Robotic measurement of arm movements after stroke establishes biomarkers of motor recovery,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 200–204, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. R. F. Meyer, L. Jaasko, and I. Leyman, “The post stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance,” Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. Lindmark and E. Hamrin, “Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Validation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment,” Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 111–115, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. I. Krebs, J. J. Palazzolo, L. Dipietro et al., “Rehabilitation robotics: performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7–20, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Semans, “The Bobath concept in treatment of neurological disorders; a neuro-developmental treatment,” American Journal of Physical Medicine, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 732–788, 1967. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. B. Shepherd and J. H. Carr, “Neurological rehabilitation,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 28, no. 13-14, pp. 811–812, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Pennycott, D. Wyss, H. Vallery, V. Klamroth-Marganska, and R. Riener, “Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 9, no. 1, article 65, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. I. Collantes, G. Asin, J. C. Moreno, and J. L. Pons, “Analysis of biomechanical data to determine the degree of users participation during robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '12), pp. 4855–4858, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. C. Krishnan, D. Kotsapouikis, Y. Y. Dhaher, and W. Z. Rymer, “Reducing robotic guidance during robot-assisted gait training improves gait function: a case report on a stroke survivor,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 1202–1206, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Lynch, M. Ferraro, J. Krol, C. M. Trudell, P. Christos, and B. T. Volpe, “Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 594–599, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. Duret and E. Hutin, “Effects of prolonged robot-assisted training on upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Colombo, F. Pisano, S. Micera et al., “Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 50–63, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. M. Mirbagheri and W. Z. Rymer, “Time-course of changes in arm impairment after stroke: variables predicting motor recovery over 12 months,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 1507–1513, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. L. Zollo, L. Rossini, M. Bravi, G. Magrone, S. Sterzi, and E. Guglielmelli, “Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1131–1144, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. K. Subramanian, J. Yamanaka, G. Chilingaryan, and M. F. Levin, “Validity of movement pattern kinematics as measures of arm motor impairment poststroke,” Stroke, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2303–2308, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. Krabben, B. I. Molier, A. Houwink, J. S. Rietman, J. H. Buurke, and G. B. Prange, “Circle drawing as evaluative movement task in stroke rehabilitation: an explorative study,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 8, no. 1, article 15, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus