Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 521756, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/521756
Clinical Study

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of AJG522 versus Standard PEG + E as Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

1Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
2Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan

Received 6 May 2014; Revised 13 October 2014; Accepted 14 October 2014

Academic Editor: Sachiyo Nomura

Copyright © 2015 Toshihiko Sagawa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Ell, W. Fischbach, R. Keller et al., “A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*),” Endoscopy, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 300–304, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Belsey, O. Epstein, and D. Heresbach, “Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 373–384, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. Ell, W. Fischbach, H. J. Bronisch et al., “Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 883–893, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. M. Kelly, C. Rodgers, N. Patterson, S. G. Jacob, and I. Mainie, “A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 595–601, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Tajika, Y. Niwa, V. Bhatia et al., “Efficacy of mosapride citrate with polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy preparation,” World Journal of Gastroenterology: WJG, vol. 18, no. 20, pp. 2517–2525, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Corporaal, J. H. Kleibeuker, and J. J. Koornstra, “Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1380–1386, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Furuie, H. Hirato, and M. Yagi, “Safety and efficacy of AJG522 as a bowel cleansing agent for colonoscopy in healthy Japanese subjects,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 53–60, 2013 (Japanese). View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Matsuda and N. Akaike, “Bowel cleansing effects of AJG522 in rats—comparative study with Niflec,” Journal of New Remedies & Clinics, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 2507–2513, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. V. Jansen, J. G. Goedhard, B. Winkens, and C. T. van Deursen, “Preparation before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial comparing different regimes,” European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 897–902, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. C. Hookey, W. T. Depew, and S. J. Vanner, “Combined low-volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard-volume polyethylene glycol solution: a prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy,” Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 101–105, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus