Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 574705, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/574705
Clinical Study

Using PET/CT Bone Scan Dynamic Data to Evaluate Tibia Remodeling When a Taylor Spatial Frame Is Used: Short and Longer Term Differences

1Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
2School of Information and Communication Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 16440 Stockholm, Sweden
3Department of Hospital Physics, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
4Department of Radiology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
5School of Computing, College of Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84109, USA

Received 27 April 2015; Accepted 23 August 2015

Academic Editor: Clemens Decristoforo

Copyright © 2015 Henrik Lundblad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. C. Taylor, Webpage for J. Charles Taylor M.D., 2015, http://www.jcharlestaylor.com/.
  2. P. A. L. Foster, S. B. Barton, S. C. E. Jones, R. J. M. Morrison, and S. Britten, “The treatment of complex tibial shaft fractures by the Ilizarov method,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—British Volume, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 1678–1683, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Blau, W. Nagler, and M. A. Bender, “Fluorine-18: a new isotope for bone scanning,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 3, pp. 332–334, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  4. F. P. Castronovo Jr. and R. J. Callahan, “New bone scanning agent: 99m Tc-labeled 1-hydroxy-ethylidene-1, 1-disodium phosphonate,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 823–827, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. J. R. Cook, G. M. Blake, P. K. Marsden, B. Cronin, and I. Fogelman, “Quantification of skeletal kinetic indices in Paget's disease using dynamic 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 854–859, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. J. Dworkin, N. F. Moon, R. J. Lessard, and P. LaFleur, “A study of the metabolism of fluorine-18 in dogs and its suitability for bone scanning,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 510–520, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Lundblad, G. Q. Maguire Jr., H. Olivecrona et al., “Can Na18F PET/CT be used to study bone remodeling in the tibia when patients are being treated with a taylor spatial frame?” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 249326, 9 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. S. Patlak, R. G. Blasberg, and J. D. Fenstermacher, “Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. G. Blasberg, C. S. Patlak, and J. D. Fenstermacher, “Selection of experimental conditions for the accurate determination of blood-brain transfer constants from single-time experiments: a theoretical analysis,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 215–225, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. K. Hsu, B. T. Feeley, L. Krenek, D. B. Stout, A. F. Chatziioannou, and J. R. Lieberman, “The use of 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET scans to assess fracture healing in a rat femur model,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1291–1301, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Czernin, N. Satyamurthy, and C. Schiepers, “Molecular mechanisms of bone 18F-NaF deposition,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1826–1829, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. A. Sayre, B. L. Franc, and Y. Seo, “Patient-specific method of generating parametric maps of Patlak Ki without blood sampling or metabolite correction: a feasibility study,” International Journal of Molecular Imaging, vol. 2011, Article ID 185083, 12 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. G. M. Blake, M. Siddique, M. L. Frost, A. E. B. Moore, and I. Fogelman, “Quantitative PET imaging using 18F sodium fluoride in the assessment of metabolic bone diseases and the monitoring of their response to therapy,” PET Clinics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 275–291, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. B. Gunderson, H. Steen, J. Horn, and L. P. Kristiansen, “Subsidence of callotasis zone in distraction osteogenesis after external fixator removal, measured by RSA,” Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 733–736, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Hatherly, F. Brolin, Å. S. Oldner et al., “Technical requirements for Na18F pet bone imaging of patients being treated using a taylor spatial frame,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. E. Noz, G. Q. Maguire Jr., M. P. Zeleznik, E. L. Kramer, F. Mahmoud, and J. Crafoord, “A versatile functional-anatomic image fusion method for volume data sets,” Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 297–307, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Olivecrona, J. Crafoord, H. Olivecrona et al., “Acetabular component migration in total hip arthroplasty using CT and a semiautomated program for volume merging,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 517–527, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. J. T. Gorniak, E. L. Kramer, G. Q. Maguire Jr., M. E. Noz, C. J. Schettino, and M. P. Zeleznik, “Evaluation of a semiautomatic 3D fusion technique applied to molecular imaging and MRI brain/frame volume data sets,” Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 141–156, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. A. Weber, E. J. Greenberg, A. Dimich et al., “Kinetics of radionuclides used for bone studies,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. A. Weber, J. W. Keyes Jr., S. Landman, and G. A. Wilson, “Comparison of Tc99m polyphosphate and F18 for bone imaging,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, Radium Therapy, and Nuclear Medicine, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 184–190, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Creutzig, “A comparison of osteotropic radiopharmaceuticals II plasma clearance of 18F and 99mTc-EHDP,” Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 313–318, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2014, https://www.r-project.org/.
  23. B. C. McLeod, T. H. Price, and R. A. Weinstein, Eds., Apheresis: Principles and Practice, AABB Press, Bethesda, Md, USA, 2nd edition, 2003.
  24. H. Creutzig, A. Creutzig, K. G. Gerdts, E. Greif, and W. Eckhardt, “Comparative investigations of osteotropic isotopes. I animal experiments on the uptake of 18F, 85Sr and 99mTc-EHDPH (author's transl),” RöFo, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  25. H. Creutzig, “Comparative investigations concerning osteotropic radiopharmaceuticals. III. Scanning with 18F and 99mTc-EHDP in malignant and non-malignant diseases,” Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 462–467, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. G. J. R. Cook, M. A. Lodge, P. K. Marsden, A. Dynes, and I. Fogelman, “Non-invasive assessment of skeletal kinetics using fluorine-18 fluoride positron emission tomography: evaluation of image and population-derived arterial input functions,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1424–1429, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Piert, T. T. Zittel, H. J. Machulla et al., “Blood flow measurements with [15O]H2O and [18F]fluoride ion PET in porcine vertebrae,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1328–1336, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. O. Adesanya, A. Sprowson, J. Masters, and C. Hutchinson, “Review of the role of dynamic 18F-NaF PET in diagnosing and distinguishing between septic and aseptic loosening in hip prosthesis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 10, article 5, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. P.-Y. Lévy and F. Fenollar, “The role of molecular diagnostics in implant-associated bone and joint infection,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1168–1175, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Siddique, M. L. Frost, G. M. Blake et al., “The precision and sensitivity of 18F-fluoride PET for measuring regional bone metabolism: a comparison of quantification methods,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1748–1755, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Segall, D. Delbeke, M. G. Stabin et al., “SNM practice guideline for sodium18F-fluoride PET/CT bone scans 1.0,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1813–1820, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. Even-Sapir, E. Mishani, G. Flusser, and U. Metser, “18F-fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 462–469, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. A. Kurdziel, J. H. Shih, A. B. Apolo et al., “The kinetics and reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride for oncology using current PET camera technology,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1175–1184, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. S. Perrien, N. S. Akel, E. E. Dupont-Versteegden et al., “Aging alters the skeletal response to disuse in the rat,” The American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. R988–R996, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Blau, R. Ganatra, and M. A. Bender, “18F-fluoride for bone imaging,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. P. Raijmakers, O. P. P. Temmerman, C. P. Saridin et al., “Quantification of 18F-fluoride kinetics: evaluation of simplified methods,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1122–1127, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. L. Frost, G. M. Blake, S.-J. Park-Holohan et al., “Long-term precision of 18F-fluoride PET skeletal kinetic studies in the assessment of bone metabolism,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 700–707, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Freesmeyer, F. F. Stecker, J.-H. Schierz, G. O. Hofmann, and T. Winkens, “First experience with early dynamic 18F-NaF-PET/CT in patients with chronic osteomyelitis,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 314–321, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. K. K. Wong and M. Piert, “Dynamic bone imaging with 99mTc-labeled diphosphonates and 18F-NaF: mechanisms and applications,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 590–599, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. G. M. Blake, S.-J. Park-Holohan, and I. Fogelman, “Quantitative studies of bone in postmenopausal women using 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 338–345, 2002. View at Google Scholar