Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 579206, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/579206
Research Article

Are Auditory Steady-State Responses Useful to Evaluate Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss in Children?

Department of Otolaryngology, University of São Paulo, 255 Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar Avenue, 05403-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Received 21 January 2015; Accepted 8 April 2015

Academic Editor: Haldun Oguz

Copyright © 2015 Signe Schuster Grasel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Yoshinaga-Itano, A. L. Sedey, D. K. Coulter, and A. L. Mehl, “Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss,” Pediatrics, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 1161–1171, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. A. Zwolan, S. Zimmerman-Phillips, C. J. Ashbaugh, S. J. Hieber, P. R. Kileny, and S. A. Telian, “Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open-set speech recognition skills,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 240–251, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. P. Nikolopoulos, G. M. O'Donoghue, and S. Archbold, “Age at implantation: Its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation,” Laryngoscope, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 595–599, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. S. Eisenberg, A. S. Martinez, G. Sennaroglu, and M. J. Osberger, “Establishing new criteria in selecting children for a cochlear implant: performance of ‘platinum’ hearing aid users,” The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Supplement, vol. 185, pp. 30–33, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. A. Novak, J. B. Firszt, L. A. Rotz, D. Hammes, R. Reeder, and M. Willis, “Cochlear implants in infants and toddlers,” The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Supplement, vol. 185, pp. 46–49, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. M. Hammes, M. A. Novak, L. A. Rotz, M. Willis, D. M. Edmondson, and J. F. Thomas, “Early identification and cochlear implantation: critical factors for spoken language development,” The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Supplement, vol. 189, pp. 74–78, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. I. Kirk, R. T. Miyamoto, C. L. Lento, E. Ying, T. O'Neill, and B. Fears, “Effects of age at implantation in young children,” The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Supplement, vol. 189, pp. 69–73, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Rance, R. C. Dowell, F. W. Rickards, D. E. Beer, and G. M. Clark, “Steady-state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brain stem response,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 48–61, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. O. G. Lins, T. W. Picton, B. L. Boucher et al., “Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 81–96, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. A. Small and D. R. Stapells, “Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 611–623, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. P. Gorga, S. T. Neely, B. M. Hoover, D. M. Dierking, K. L. Beauchaine, and C. Manning, “Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 302–307, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. W. Picton and M. S. John, “Avoiding electromagnetic artifacts when recording auditory steady-state responses,” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 541–554, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Swanepoel and R. Hugo, “Estimations of auditory sensitivity for young cochlear implant candidates using the ASSR: preliminary results,” International Journal of Audiology, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 377–382, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. F. Ramos, S. S. Grasel, R. M. Beck et al., “Evaluation of residual hearing in cochlear implants candidates using auditory steady-state response,” Acta Oto-laryngologica, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 246–253, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. M. O. Beck, H. Ramos, S. S. Grasel, E. R. de Almeida, and R. D. B. Neto, “F079 Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) in young cochlear implant candidates,” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 75, supplement 1, p. 97, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Poblano, I. Chayo, J. Ibarra, and E. Rueda, “Electrophysiological and behavioral methods in early detection of hearing impairment,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. D. Didoné, L. R. Kunst, T. M. Weich, A. C. Ourique, C. M. Franceschi, and T. Tochetto, “Acompanhamento do desenvolvimento da função auditiva em crianças sem e com indicadores de risco para a surdez,” Distúrbios da Comunicação, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 317–323, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. M. Dworsack-Dodge, J. Gravel, and A. M. Grimes, Audiologic Guidelines for the Assessment of Hearing in Infants and Young Children, 2012, http://audiology-web.s3.amazonaws.com/migrated/201208_AudGuideAssessHear_youth.pdf_5399751b249593.36017703.pdf.
  19. N. L. Cohen, S. B. Waltzman, and S. G. Fisher, “A prospective, randomized study of cochlear implants,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 328, no. 4, pp. 233–237, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. B. J. Gantz, G. G. Woodworth, J. F. Knutson, P. J. Abbas, and R. S. Tyler, “Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 102, no. 12, pp. 909–916, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Z. Jafari, S. Malayeri, H. Ashayeri, and M. A. Farahani, “Adults with auditory neuropathy: comparison of auditory steady-state response and pure-tone audiometry,” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 621–628, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Swanepoel, R. Hugo, and R. Roode, “Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss,” Archives of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 531–535, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Rance and R. J. S. Briggs, “Assessment of hearing in infants with moderate to profound impairment: the Melbourne experience with auditory steady-state evoked potential testing,” The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Supplement, vol. 189, pp. 22–28, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. I. Tlumak, E. Rubinstein, and J. D. Durrant, “Meta-analysis of variables that affect accuracy of threshold estimation via measurement of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR),” International Journal of Audiology, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 692–710, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. R. Stapells, J. S. Gravel, and B. A. Martin, “Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 361–371, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus