Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015, Article ID 598134, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/598134
Research Article

Growth Pattern of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients with Delayed Surgical Intervention: Fast Growth Rate Correlates with High Grade and May Result in Poor Prognosis

1Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, China
2Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received 19 October 2014; Accepted 8 March 2015

Academic Editor: Paul L. Crispen

Copyright © 2015 Lei Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. C. Smaldone, A. Kutikov, B. L. Egleston et al., “Small renal masses progressing to metastases under active surveillance: a systematic review and pooled analysis,” Cancer, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 997–1006, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Novara, G. Martignoni, W. Artibani, and V. Ficarra, “Grading systems in renal cell carcinoma,” Journal of Urology, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 430–436, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Rioux-Leclercq, P. I. Karakiewicz, Q.-D. Trinh et al., “Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 868–874, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. X.-S. Li, L. Yao, K. Gong et al., “Growth pattern of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with delayed surgical intervention,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 269–274, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Kato, T. Suzuki, Y. Suzuki, Y. Terasawa, H. Sasano, and Y. Arai, “Natural history of small renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of growth rate, histological grade, cell proliferation and apoptosis,” Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 863–866, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. J. Wein, L. R. Kavoussi, A. C. Novick, A. W. Partin, and C. A. Peters, Campbell-Walsh Urology, Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 10th edition, 2012.
  7. A. Volpe, T. Panzarella, R. A. Rendon, M. A. Haider, F. I. Kondylis, and M. A. S. Jewett, “The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses,” Cancer, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 738–745, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Y. Lee, C. K. Kim, D. Choi, and B. K. Park, “Volume doubling time and growth rate of renal cell carcinoma determined by helical CT: a single-institution experience,” European Radiology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 731–737, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Zhang, S. K. Kang, L. Wang, A. Touijer, and H. Hricak, “Distribution of renal tumor growth rates determined by using serial volumetric CT measurements,” Radiology, vol. 250, no. 1, pp. 137–144, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Fujimoto, A. Sugita, Y. Terasawa, and M. Kato, “Observations on the growth rate of renal cell carcinoma,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 71–76, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. A. Bosniak, B. A. Birnbaum, G. A. Krinsky, and J. Waisman, “Small renal parenchymal neoplasms: further observations on growth,” Radiology, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 589–597, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Oda, A. Takahashi, N. Miyao et al., “Cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis and growth rate of incidentally found renal cell carcinoma,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. J. Wehle, D. D. Thiel, S. P. Petrou, P. R. Young, I. Frank, and N. Karsteadt, “Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as safe alternative to invasive therapy,” Urology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 49–52, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. W. A. Lamb, E. J. Bromwich, P. Vasey, and M. Aitchison, “Management of renal masses in patients medically unsuitable for nephrectomy–natural history, complications, and outcome,” Urology, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 909–913, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. N. Chawla, P. L. Crispen, A. L. Hanlon, R. E. Greenberg, D. Y. T. Chen, and R. G. Uzzo, “The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature,” Journal of Urology, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 425–431, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. A. Youssif, W. Kassouf, J. Steinberg, A. G. Aprikian, M. P. Laplante, and S. Tanguay, “Active surveillance for selected patients with renal masses: updated results with long-term follow-up,” Cancer, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 1010–1014, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Kouba, A. Smith, D. McRackan, E. M. Wallen, and R. S. Pruthi, “Watchful waiting for solid renal masses: insight into the natural history and results of delayed intervention,” Journal of Urology, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 466–470, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. Siu, K. S. Hafez, W. K. Johnston III, and J. S. Wolf Jr., “Growth rates of renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma under surveillance are similar,” Urologic Oncology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 115–119, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. S. Fernando, S. Duvuru, and S. J. Hawkyard, “Conservative management of renal masses in the elderly: our experience,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 203–207, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Matsuzaki, Y. Kawano, H. Morikawa, Y. Shiga, H. Murata, and H. Komatsu, “Conservative management of small renal tumors,” Acta Urologica Japonica, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 207–211, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Beisland, K. M. Hjelle, L. A. R. Reisæter, and L. Bostad, “Observation should be considered as an alternative in management of renal masses in older and comorbid patients,” European Urology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1419–1429, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. L. Crispen, R. Viterbo, S. A. Boorjian, R. E. Greenberg, D. Y. T. Chen, and R. G. Uzzo, “Natural history, growth kinetics, and outcomes of untreated clinically localized renal tumors under active surveillance,” Cancer, vol. 115, no. 13, pp. 2844–2852, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. C. Rosales, G. Haramis, J. Moreno et al., “Active surveillance for renal cortical neoplasms,” Journal of Urology, vol. 183, no. 5, pp. 1698–1702, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. K. Hwang, K. Ogan, J. Pattaras, and V. A. Master, “Estimated volume growth characteristics of renal tumors undergoing active surveillance,” Canadian Journal of Urology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 5459–5464, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. A. Jewett, K. Mattar, J. Basiuk et al., “Activesurveillance of small renal masses: progressionpatterns of early stage kidney cancer,” European Urology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 39–44, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. R. Mehrazin, M. C. Smaldone, A. Kutikov et al., “Growth kinetics and short-term outcomes of cT1b and cT2 renal masses under active surveillance,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 659–664, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. E. Brunocilla, M. Borghesi, R. Schiavina et al., “Small renal masses initially managed using active surveillance: results from a retrospective study with long-term follow-up,” Clinical Genitourinary Cancer, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 178–181, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. Lechevallier, M. André, D. Barriol et al., “Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance,” Radiology, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 506–510, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. J. Blumenfeld, K. Guru, G. J. Fuchs, and H. L. Kim, “Percutaneous biopsy of renal cell carcinoma underestimates nuclear grade,” Urology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 610–613, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus