Are Biodegradable Osteosyntheses Still an Option for Midface Trauma? Longitudinal Evaluation of Three Different PLA-Based Materials

Table 4

Nerve disturbance depending on FU and OM ().

FU	OM	Norm	Hyp	Par	An	MD
T1	BS	5 (13.9%)	25 (69.4%)	3 (8.3%)	3 (8.3%)	0	—
	LS	2 (16.7%)	10 (83.3%)	0	0	0	—
	DS	4 (25.0%)	8 (50.0%)	4 (25.0%)	0	0	—
T2	BS	14 (38.9%)	14 (38.9%)	2 (5.6%)	1 (2.8%)	5 (13.9%)	—
	LS	9 (75.0%)	3 (25.0%)	0	0	0	—
	DS	11 (68.8%)	3 (18.8%)	2 (12.5%)	0	0	—
T3	BS	23 (63.9%)	5 (13.9%)	2 (5.6%)	1 (2.8%)	5 (13.9%)	—
	LS	10 (83.3%)	2 (16.7%)	0	0	0	—
	DS	12 (75.0%)	2 (12.5%)	2 (12.5%)	0	0	—

FU: FU time point (T1 = 3 m, T2 = 6 m, and T3 = 12 m); Norm: normal; Hyp: hypaesthesia; Par: paraesthesia; An: anaesthesia; MD: Missing Data. : the difference between the materials was not statistically significant.