Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 684826, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/684826
Review Article

Clinical Applications of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Bone Healing and Osteomyelitic Treatment: A Literature Review

1Orthopaedic Biomechanics Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI Research School, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
3Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
4Institute for Biomechanics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich (ETHZ), Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1-5/10, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland

Received 22 May 2015; Accepted 28 July 2015

Academic Editor: Antonio Ravaglioli

Copyright © 2015 N. A. P. van Gestel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Polo-Corrales, M. Latorre-Esteves, and J. E. Ramirez-Vick, “Scaffold design for bone regeneration,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–56, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. L. Hench and J. M. Polak, “Third-generation biomedical materials,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5557, pp. 1014–1017, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Navarro, A. Michiardi, O. Castaño, and J. A. Planell, “Biomaterials in orthopaedics,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 5, no. 27, pp. 1137–1158, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Hannink and J. J. C. Arts, “Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration?” Injury, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. S22–S25, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. L. Hench, “Genetic design of bioactive glass,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1257–1265, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. J. Blokhuis and J. J. C. Arts, “Bioactive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes: definitions, facts and myths,” Injury, vol. 42, supplement 2, pp. S26–S29, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. T. Heikkilä, “Use of bioactive glasses as bone substitutes in orthopeadics and traumatology,” in Bioactive Glasses: Materials, Properties and Applications, H. Ylänen, Ed., pp. 189–208, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Hupa, “Melt-derived bioactive glasses,” in Bioactive Glasses: Materials, Properties and Applications, H. Ylänen, Ed., pp. 3–28, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. R. Jones, “Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 4457–4486, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. C. Coraça-Huber, M. Fille, J. Hausdorfer, D. Putzer, and M. Nogler, “Efficacy of antibacterial bioactive glass S53P4 against S. aureus biofilms grown on titanium discs in vitro,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 175–177, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Detsch, P. Stoor, A. Grünewald, J. A. Roether, N. C. Lindfors, and A. R. Boccaccini, “Increase in VEGF secretion from human fibroblast cells by bioactive glass S53P4 to stimulate angiogenesis in bone,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. 4055–4061, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. O. Leppäranta, M. Vaahtio, T. Peltola et al., “Antibacterial effect of bioactive glasses on clinically important anaerobic bacteria in vitro,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 547–551, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Leu and J. K. Leach, “Proangiogenic potential of a collagen/bioactive glass substrate,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1222–1229, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Leu, S. M. Stieger, P. Dayton, K. W. Ferrara, and J. K. Leach, “Angiogenic response to bioactive glass promotes bone healing in an irradiated calvarial defect,” Tissue Engineering—Part A, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 877–885, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Munukka, O. Leppäranta, M. Korkeamäki et al., “Bactericidal effects of bioactive glasses on clinically important aerobic bacteria,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. N. Rahaman, B. S. Bal, and W. Huang, “Review: emerging developments in the use of bioactive glasses for treating infected prosthetic joints,” Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 41, pp. 224–231, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Zhang, O. Leppäranta, E. Munukka et al., “Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bioactive glasses,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part A, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 475–483, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Suominen and J. Kinnunen, “Bioactive glass granules and plates in the reconstruction of defects of the facial bones,” Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 281–289, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Aitasalo, I. Kinnunen, J. Palmgren, and M. Varpula, “Repair of orbital floor fractures with bioactive glass implants,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1390–1396, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Peltola, I. Kinnunen, and K. Aitasalo, “Reconstruction of orbital wall defects with bioactive glass plates,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 639–646, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Stoor, K. Mesimäki, C. Lindqvist, and R. Kontio, “The use of anatomically drop-shaped bioactive glass S53P4 implants in the reconstruction of orbital floor fractures-a prospective long-term follow-up study,” Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 969–975, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Peltola, K. Aitasalo, J. Suonpää, M. Varpula, and A. Yli-Urpo, “Bioactive glass S53P4 in frontal sinus obliteration: a long-term clinical experience,” Head and Neck, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 834–841, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Stoor, E. Söderling, and R. Grénman, “Bioactive glass S53P4 in repair of septal perforations and its interactions with the respiratory infection-associated microorganisms Heamophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. Stoor and R. Grénman, “Bioactive glass and turbinate flaps in the repair of nasal septal perforations,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 655–661, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Turunen, J. Peltola, A. Yli-Urpo, and R.-P. Happonen, “Bioactive glass granules as a bone adjunctive material in maxillary sinus floor augmentation,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 135–141, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Sarin, R. Grénman, K. Aitasalo, and J. Pulkkinen, “Bioactive glass S53P4 in mastoid obliteration surgery for chronic otitis media and cerebrospinal fluid leakage,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 563–569, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. T. Silvola, “Mastoidectomy cavity obliteration with bioactive glass: a pilot study,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 119–126, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. Stoor, J. Pulkkinen, and R. Grénman, “Bioactive glass S53P4 in the filling of cavities in the mastoid cell area in surgery for chronic otitis media,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 377–382, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Drago, D. Romanò, E. De Vecchi et al., “Bioactive glass bag-S53P4 for the adjunctive treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the long bones: an in vitro and prospective clinical study,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 1, article 584, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. L. Romanò, N. Logoluso, E. Meani et al., “A comparative study of the use of bioactive glass S53P4 and antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis: a retrospective comparative study,” The Bone & Joint Journal—British Volume, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 845–850, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N. C. Lindfors, P. Hyvönen, M. Nyyssönen et al., “Bioactive glass S53P4 as bone graft substitute in treatment of osteomyelitis,” Bone, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 212–218, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. McAndrew, C. Efrimescu, E. Sheehan, and D. Niall, “Through the looking glass; bioactive glass S53P4 (BonAlive) in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis,” Irish Journal of Medical Science, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 509–511, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Frantzén, J. Rantakokko, H. T. Aro et al., “Instrumented spondylodesis in degenerative spondylolisthesis with bioactive glass and autologous bone: a prospective 11-year follow-up,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 455–461, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Rantakokko, J. P. Frantzén, J. Heinänen et al., “Posterolateral spondylodesis using bioactive glass S53P4 and autogenous bone in instrumented unstable lumbar spine burst fractures,” Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. T. Heikkilä, J. Kukkonen, A. J. Aho, S. Moisander, T. Kyyrönen, and K. Mattila, “Bioactive glass granules: a suitable bone substitute material in the operative treatment of depressed lateral tibial plateau fractures: a prospective, randomized 1 year follow-up study,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1073–1080, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. N. C. Lindfors, J. T. Heikkilä, I. Koski, K. Mattila, and A. J. Aho, “Bioactive glass and autogenous bone as bone graft substitutes in benign bone tumors,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B, Applied Biomaterials, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 131–136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. C. Lindfors, “Treatment of a recurrent aneurysmal bone cyst with bioactive glass in a child allows for good bone remodelling and growth,” Bone, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 398–400, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. N. C. Lindfors, I. Koski, J. T. Heikkilä, K. Mattila, and A. J. Aho, “A prospective randomized 14-year follow-up study of bioactive glass and autogenous bone as bone graft substitutes in benign bone tumors,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 157–164, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. Mok, L. Lessard, C. Cordoba, P. G. Harris, and A. Nikolis, “A review of materials currently used in orbital floor reconstruction,” The Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 134–140, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  40. F. Baino, “Biomaterials and implants for orbital floor repair,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 3248–3266, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. E. M. M. van Lieshout, G. H. van Kralingen, Y. El-Massoudi, H. Weinans, and P. Patka, “Microstructure and biomechanical characteristics of bone substitutes for trauma and orthopaedic surgery,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 12, article 34, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S.-W. Kim and C.-S. Rhee, “Nasal septal perforation repair: predictive factors and systematic review of the literature,” Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 58–65, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. H. Lohmann, G. Grass, C. Rangger, and G. Mathiak, “Economic impact of cancellous bone grafting in trauma surgery,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 345–348, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. H. C. Pape, A. Evans, and P. Kobbe, “Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 24, supplement 1, pp. S36–S40, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Geurts, J. J. Chris Arts, and G. H. I. M. Walenkamp, “Bone graft substitutes in active or suspected infection. Contra-indicated or not?” Injury, vol. 42, supplement 2, pp. S82–S86, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. H. Calhoun, M. M. Manring, and M. Shirtliff, “Osteomyelitis of the long bones,” Seminars in Plastic Surgery, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 59–72, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. G. H. I. M. Walenkamp, L. L. A. Kleijn, and M. de Leeuw, “Osteomyelitis treated with gentamicin-PMMA beads: 100 patients followed for 1–12 years,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 518–522, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Bassetti and E. Righi, “Multidrug-resistant bacteria: what is the threat?” Hematology/The Education Program of the American Society of Hematology, vol. 2013, no. 1, pp. 428–432, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  49. B. Parsons and E. Strauss, “Surgical management of chronic osteomyelitis,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 188, no. 1, supplement, pp. 57–66, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. K. Pernaa, I. Koski, K. Mattila et al., “Bioactive glass S53P4 and autograft bone in treatment of depressed tibial plateau fracture—a prospective randomized 11-year follow-up,” Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. V. Campana, G. Milano, E. Pagano et al., “Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2445–2461, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Dupuytren Foundation, “Normal Range of Motion Reference Values,” American Society for Surgery of the Hand, 2014, http://www.eatonhand.com/nor/nor002.htm.
  53. L. L. Hench, “The story of Bioglass®,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 967–978, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. L. H. Nguyen, N. Annabi, M. Nikkhah et al., “Vascularized bone tissue engineering: approaches for potential improvement,” Tissue Engineering—Part B: Reviews, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 363–382, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. N. C. Lindfors and A. J. Aho, “Granule size and composition of bioactive glasses affect osteoconduction in rabbit,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 365–372, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus