|
| Author (year) [reference number] | Test | | Precapsulotomy BCVA
(mean ± SD) | Postcapsulotomy BCVA
(mean ± SD) | Results after capsulotomy |
|
|
García-Medina et al. (2006) [14]. | AP | 26 | 0.35 ± 0.11
(decimal scale) | 0.84 ± 0.14
(decimal scale) | MD and PSD improved. |
|
|
García-Medina et al. (2006) [23] | SLP | 28 | 0.41 ± 0.12
(decimal scale) | 0.85 ± 0.13
(decimal scale) | NFI and TSS increased. Significant decreases of all absolute parameters. |
|
| Vetrugno et al. (2007) [24] | SLP | 158 | 0.3 ± 0.6
(LogMar) | 0.05 ± 0.2
(LogMar) | Inferior ratio and TSNIT SD decreased. Superior/nasal increased. |
|
| Brittain et al. (2007) [25] | SLP | 20 | 0.32 ± un
(LogMar) | 0.14 ± un
(LogMar) | TSS and TSNIT SD increased. TSNIT score decreased. |
|
| Arraes et al. (2008) [26] | SLP | 37 | 0.2 ± un
(decimal scale) | 0.8 ± un
(decimal scale) | No significant difference between parameters. |
|
| Hougaard et al. (2001) [35] | TD-OCT | 13 | 0.29 ± un
(decimal scale) | 0.39 ± un
(decimal scale) | Signal-to-noise ratio increased but no changes in macular thickness. |
|
| Garcia-Medina et al. (2007) [32] | TD-OCT | 32 | 0.25 ± 0.17
(decimal scale) | 0.77 ± 0.22
(decimal scale) | SS increased but no changes in pRNFL thicknesses (in reliable exams). |
|
|
González-Ocampo-Dorta et al. (2008) [40] | TD-OCT | 32 | 0.25 ± 0.17
(decimal scale) | 0.77 ± 0.22
(decimal scale) | SS increased but no changes in macular thicknesses (in reliable exams). |
|
| Altiparmak et al. (2010) [36] | TD-OCT | 54 | 0.47 ± 0.3
(decimal scale) | 0.91 ± 0.14
(decimal scale) | No change of the foveal thickness. |
|
| Giocanti-Aurégan et al. (2011) [37] | TD-OCT | 30 | 0.6 ± 0.3
(LogMar) |
0.1 ± 0.3
(LogMar) | No change of the foveal thickness. |
|
| Wróblewska-Czajka et al. (2012) [38] | TD-OCT | 55 | NA | NA | No change of the central macular thickness. |
|
| Kara et al. (2012) [31] | TD-OCT | 98 | 0.49 ± 0.28
(LogMar) | 0.09 ± 0.11
(LogMar) | SS and pRNFL thicknesses increased. |
|
|
Garcia-Medina et al. (2013) [34] | SD-OCT | 37 |
0.27 ± 0.19
(decimal scale) |
0.83 ± 0.18
(decimal scale) | All pRNFL thickness parameters increased. No changes when considering reliable examinations. |
|
| Garcia-Medina et al. (2013) [41] | SD-OCT | 35 | 0.23 ± 0.28
(decimal scale) | 0.81 ± 0.16
(decimal scale) | All macular thickness parameters increased. No changes when considering reliable examinations. |
|
| Ruiz-Casas et al. (2013) [39] | SD-OCT | 31 | 0.4 ± NA | 0.8 ± NA | No change of the foveal thickness. |
|
