Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 834805, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/834805
Research Article

Gene Expression-Genotype Analysis Implicates GSDMA, GSDMB, and LRRC3C as Contributors to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Susceptibility

1Division of Medical Diagnostics, Ryhov County Hospital, 55185 Jönköping, Sweden
2Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
3Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden

Received 28 June 2015; Accepted 6 September 2015

Academic Editor: Dimitrios P. Bogdanos

Copyright © 2015 Jan Söderman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

To investigate the biological foundation of the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, susceptibility locus rs2872507, we have investigated the expression of 13 genes using ileal and colonic biopsies from patients with IBD (inflamed and noninflamed mucosa) or from individuals without IBD (noninflamed mucosa). The susceptibility allele was consistently associated with reduced expression of GSDMB ( = 4.1 × 10−3–7.2 × 10−10). The susceptibility allele was also associated with the increased expression of GSDMA ( = 1.6 × 10−4) and LRRC3C ( = 7.8 × 10−6) in colon tissue from individuals without IBD and with the reduced expression of PGAP3 (IBD; = 2.0 × 10−3) and ZPBP2 (Crohn’s disease; = 7.7 × 10−4) in noninflamed ileum. Inflammation resulted in the reduced colonic expression of ERBB2, GRB7, MIEN1, and PGAP3 ( = 1.0 × 10−4–1.0 × 10−9) and the increased colonic expression of IKZF3 and CSF3 ( = 2.4 × 10−7–3.5 × 10−8). Based on our results and published findings on GSDMA, GSDMB, LRRC3C, and related proteins, we propose that this locus in part affects IBD susceptibility via effects on apoptosis and cell proliferation and believe this hypothesis warrants further experimental investigation.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of intestinal disorders, subdivided into Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and, in the absence of a confident diagnosis, unclassified colitis (IBD-U) [1, 2]. Susceptibility to IBD is to a large extent determined by genetic predisposition [3]. Consistent with that, genetic association studies have uncovered a large number of susceptibility loci in relation to IBD. Recently, a total of 163 IBD loci were identified in a genome-wide analysis, and 110 of those susceptibility loci were shared between CD and UC [4]. Within each susceptibility locus, candidate risk genes have been prioritized, based largely on bioinformatic evaluations of the relationships among genes, the presence of coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or the investigation of gene expression-genotype correlations [46].

A linkage disequilibrium block encompassing IKZF3, ZPBP2, GSDMB, and ORMDL3, which was previously associated with childhood-onset asthma [7], has been identified as an IBD susceptibility locus [6, 8]. Barrett et al. [6] and McGovern et al. [8] highlighted ORMDL3 in relation to CD and IBD, respectively, based either on a correlation between genotype and gene expression in lymphoblastoid cell lines [7] or on the biological role and previous implication of ORMDL3 in diseases involving dysregulated immune responses. More recent studies of UC and CD have emphasized several genes (GSDMA, GSDMB, IKZF3, ORMDL3, PNMT, and ZPBP2) within the same region, using information based on bioinformatics, the presence of coding SNPs, or correlations between genotype and gene expression [4, 5, 9].

The aim of this study was to investigate disease relevant intestinal tissue samples in order to further pinpoint the genes involved in IBD susceptibility. The ileal and colorectal expression of 13 genes within the genetic region of the shared (CD and UC) susceptibility locus rs2872507 (PGAP3MED24; Figure 1) was analyzed in relation to genotype, inflammation, and sampling location.

Figure 1: Overview of the genes present within the investigated region. Location of genes in the vicinity of the IBD susceptibility marker rs2872507 (position marked with an upward-pointing arrow) according to the human genome assembly GRCh37/hg19 viewed using the UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/).

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Samples

Colorectal and ileal mucosal biopsy specimens () were collected during routine endoscopies of 85 adult patients who were being investigated for a known IBD diagnosis or were in the work-up for suspected gastrointestinal disorders (Table 1). Thirty-three patients not afflicted with IBD and without intestinal inflammation were included as noninflamed, non-IBD controls. Study biopsies were collected in parallel to and from the same areas as the biopsies collected for histopathologic assessment. Each biopsy was categorized as “inflamed” or “noninflamed” based on a compound evaluation of endoscopic findings as assessed by one experienced endoscopist (Sven Almer) and on a routine histopathologic assessment for inflammation.

Table 1: Clinical characteristics of participants.

The biopsy specimens used for RNA purification were immersed in RNAlater RNA stabilization reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and stored at 4°C overnight and at −20°C thereafter, awaiting RNA purification.

2.2. DNA and RNA Purification

The biopsies were homogenized using TissueRuptor and disposable probes (Qiagen). DNA and RNA were purified using the AllPrep DNA/RNA mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, either manually or using the automated QIAcube system (Qiagen). Concentration and purity were spectrophotometrically measured using a Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), and RNA integrity was assessed using the RNA integrity number with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA). RNasin plus RNase inhibitor (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) was added to the RNA.

2.3. Reverse Transcription

Two preparations of 2 μg RNA from each biopsy were reverse-transcribed in a total volume of 20 μL each using the high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit with RNase inhibitor (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each biopsy, the resulting cDNA libraries were pooled and stored at −80°C.

2.4. Gene Expression Analysis and Data Preprocessing

Assays for gene expression analysis (see S1 Table in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/834805) were preloaded onto TaqMan gene expression array cards (Life Technologies). All steps were in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, using 300 ng sample cDNA per array port (48 different assays).

Threshold cycle () values were established using the ExpressionSuite software version 1.0.1 (Life Technologies). Missing values, caused by low copy numbers, were replaced by the highest value available, increased by one cycle, for the gene in question (GenEx software version 5.4.2, MultiD Analyses, Gothenburg, Sweden). The resulting values were normalized to the average of the selected reference genes (S1 Table) using the GenEx software version 5.4.2. The resulting delta- values were further processed to obtain the relative expression in relation to the sample with the lowest expression of each gene.

2.5. Genotyping

The genotype of the SNP susceptibility marker rs2872507 [5, 9] on chromosome 17q12 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp) was assessed using 5 ng genomic DNA per sample, a TaqMan SNP genotyping assay (assay ID C_11630970_20), and the TaqMan genotyping master mix (Life Technologies). All genotyping was conducted on the 7500 Fast real-time PCR system using the standard run mode, and the genotypes were generated using the 7500 Fast system SDS software version 2.0.6 (Life Technologies).

2.6. Data Analysis

Reference genes were evaluated for low sample-to-sample variation using the GeNorm [10] and NormFinder [11] algorithms in the GenEx software version 5.4.2.

In order to reduce potential confounding effects on the analysis of genotype and gene expression, the samples were stratified based on inflammatory status (inflamed versus noninflamed) and sampling location (ileum versus colon). Multiple colorectal biopsies within inflamed or noninflamed areas from single individuals were treated as biological replicates (see Effects of Sampling Location on Gene Expression in Results). Additionally, the samples were grouped based on disease status (CD, UC, overall IBD, and non-IBD).

The gene expression was investigated in relation to the genotypes using Spearman’s rank correlation test. For group comparisons, the Mann-Whitney test or the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA were used, as appropriate. A Bonferroni-corrected value < 0.00385 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica version 10.0 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

3. Results

Only biopsies with concordant results between the macroscopic appearance at endoscopy and the histopathological findings (i.e., “inflamed” or “noninflamed”) were used for further analyses.

3.1. Correlation between Genotype and Gene Expression

The susceptibility allele (A) of the rs2872507 locus (Figure 1) was associated with the reduced expression of Gasdermin B (GSDMB) in intestinal biopsies from patients with IBD; the associations for noninflamed ileum and noninflamed colon were significant and that for inflamed colon was borderline significant (Table 2, Figure 2). The negative correlation between the number of susceptibility alleles and GSDMB expression was also noted separately for CD and UC, although the correlation only reached nominal significance () in noninflamed ileal biopsies and inflamed colonic biopsies from patients with UC (Table 2). Among the patients with IBD, the expression of GSDMB was at least 2.17-fold lower in individuals homozygous for the susceptibility allele compared with that in individuals homozygous for the opposite allele (Figure 2). The susceptibility allele was further associated with the reduced expression of PGAP3 in noninflamed ileum biopsies from the overall IBD group and with the reduced expression of ZPBP2 in noninflamed ileum biopsies from the CD group (Table 2, Figure 3), with the expression of PGAP3 reduced 1.81-fold (2 versus 0 susceptibility alleles) and that of ZPBP2 reduced 2.27-fold (1 versus 0 susceptibility alleles). A correlation between the number of susceptibility alleles and PGAP3 expression was also identified with nominal significance () separately for CD and UC.

Table 2: Spearman’s rank correlation between the genotype of rs2872507 (number of susceptibility alleles) and gene expression (dCt-values) in intestinal biopsy samples from different study groups.
Figure 2: Association between rs2872507 genotype and intestinal GSDMB expression in IBD patients. Genotype (A is the IBD risk allele) versus the relative quantity (RQ) of GSDMB expression in intestinal biopsies from noninflamed ileal IBD mucosa ((a) = 4, = 14, = 6; = −0.61, = 1.54 × 10−3), noninflamed colonic IBD mucosa ((b) = 8, = 14, = 7; = −0.87, = 7.18 × 10−10), and inflamed colonic IBD mucosa ((c) = 9, = 12, = 7; = −0.53, = 4.12 × 10−3).
Figure 3: Association between rs2872507 genotype and ileal PGAP3 expression in IBD patients. Genotype (A is the IBD risk allele) versus the relative quantity (RQ) of PGAP3 expression in intestinal biopsies from noninflamed ileal IBD mucosa ((a) = 4, = 14, = 6; = −0.60, = 2.00 × 10−3) or the RQ of ZPBP2 expression in noninflamed ileal CD mucosa ((b) = 1, = 6, = 4; = −0.86, = 7.68 × 10−4).

A negative correlation between GSDMB expression and the number of susceptibility alleles was also present in the noninflamed, non-IBD ileal and colonic biopsy samples (Table 2, Figure 4), and the expression was lower at least 1.84-fold in individuals homozygous for the IBD susceptibility allele compared with that in individuals homozygous for the opposite allele. Furthermore, the IBD susceptibility allele was associated with the increased expression of GSDMA and LLRC3C in noninflamed, non-IBD colonic samples (Table 2, Figure 5) and with expression levels increased 5.53-fold and 6.78-fold, respectively, in individuals homozygous for the susceptibility allele compared with those in individuals homozygous for the opposite allele.

Figure 4: Association between rs2872507 genotype and intestinal GSDMB expression in non-IBD patients. Genotype (A is the IBD risk allele) versus the relative quantity (RQ) of GSDMB expression in intestinal biopsies from noninflamed ileal non-IBD mucosa ((a) = 6, = 11, = 7; = −0.59, = 2.38 × 10−3) or noninflamed colonic non-IBD mucosa ((b) = 10, = 15, = 8; = −0.58, = 3.69 × 10−4).
Figure 5: Association between rs2872507 genotype and colonic expression of GSDMA and LRRC3C in non-IBD patients. Genotype (A is the IBD risk allele) versus the relative quantity (RQ) of GSDMA ((a) = 10, = 15, = 8; = 0.61, = 1.61 × 10−4) expression or the RQ of LRRC3C ((b) = 10, = 15, = 8; = 0.69, = 7.79 × 10−6) expression in noninflamed colonic biopsies from non-IBD mucosa.
3.2. Inflammatory Effects on Gene Expression

Five of the genes displayed either modestly decreased (MIEN1, PGAP3, GRB7, and ERBB2; 1.24–2.01-fold) or increased expression (IKZF3; 2.41-fold) in biopsies from inflamed, compared with noninflamed, colonic IBD mucosa (Table 3). Similar effects were seen separately for CD and UC, although only nominal significance () was reached for IKZF3 in CD and for MIEN1 in both UC and CD. CSF3 expression was increased at least 116-fold in inflamed, compared with noninflamed, biopsies from the overall IBD group and from the separate disease subentities (Table 3).

Table 3: Inflammatory effects on the colonic mucosal expression of genes in the IBD risk locus (rs2872507).
3.3. Drug-Mediated Effects on Gene Expression

Drug-mediated effects on gene expression were investigated to elucidate a potential explanation for the observed differences in the relationships between genotype and gene expression among patients with and without IBD, respectively. Colonic gene expression levels were compared among patients with IBD receiving a particular treatment versus those not receiving that treatment. No drug-mediated effects were observed in relation to treatment with thiopurines, aminosalicylates, or corticosteroids (S2 Table). There were too few individuals on treatment with anti-TNF-α-antibodies for a meaningful statistical analysis.

3.4. Effects of Sampling Location on Gene Expression

No differences in gene expression were observed among four different segments of colon (ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid) from the noninflamed intestinal mucosa of individuals without IBD (S3 Table; caecum and rectum were excluded because of a low number of samples). Four genes were differentially expressed between the ileum and the colon, however, with either lower (PSMD3 and LRRC3C, 1.34- and 3.85-fold, resp.) or higher (ORMDL3 and IKZF3, 1.34-fold and 2.23-fold, resp.) expression in the ileum compared with that in the colon (S4 Table).

4. Discussion

A large number of genetic susceptibility loci have been uncovered in relation to IBD, with pervasive sharing of genetic susceptibility loci between the two major disease subtypes, UC and CD [4]. In this study, we searched for an association between the risk allele of the shared (UC and CD) susceptibility locus rs2872507 and the expression of genes in the intestinal mucosal. This locus has previously been associated with autoimmune diseases such as type-1 diabetes [12], rheumatoid arthritis [13], primary biliary cirrhosis [14], and childhood-onset asthma [7, 15] and has been shown to affect the number of white blood cells [16, 17].

We found that an increase in the number of susceptibility alleles was associated with the reduced expression of GSDMB in all of the investigated biopsy locations in noninflamed control individuals and in patients with IBD, irrespective of the presence of active inflammation. Additionally, the susceptibility allele was associated with the increased expression of GSDMA and LRRC3C in noninflamed colon biopsies from individuals without IBD and with the reduced expression of PGAP3 and ZPBP2 in noninflamed ileum biopsies from individuals in the overall IBD cohort and the CD cohort, respectively. Concurrent increase and decrease in the expression of neighboring genes in relation to a susceptibility haplotype for childhood asthma were previously shown for the same genomic region, possibly due to differential associations between the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) and different haplotypes [18]. CTCF function as an architectural protein that modifies the topology of the genome, which can result in differential regulation of neighboring genes [19]. A recent analysis of IBD susceptibility loci highlighted ORMDL3 as a candidate gene in the same region based on a correlation between genotype and ORMDL3 expression in lymphoblastoid cell lines, liver tissue, and adipose tissue [4]. Susceptibility alleles might exert tissue-dependent effects on gene expression, which are possibly modulated by disease type and medical treatment [20, 21]. It is conceivable that the more extensive alteration of gene expression in the colon (GSDMA, GSDMB, and LRRC3C) compared with that in the CD ileum (ZPBP2) reflects the fact that colonic inflammation may occur in both CD and UC, whereas ileal engagement is restricted to CD. Recently, our group demonstrated an effect of thiopurine treatment on the expression of genes present in networks involving candidate IBD susceptibility genes [22]. Although it is likely that such therapeutic effects also extend to the actual IBD susceptibility genes, no such effects of ongoing medication were observed in the current study.

GSDMA and GSDMB belong to the Gasdermin family of genes. The expression of GSDMA and GSDMB has been associated with differentiated epithelial cells and with regions containing proliferating cells or stem cells, respectively, of the esophagus and the gastric mucosa [23, 24]. GSDMA, but not GSDMB, expression was capable of inhibiting cell growth in a colony formation assay and could induce apoptosis [24]. Additionally, GSDMA expression was frequently suppressed in esophageal cancer cell lines and gastric cancer cell lines, whereas GSDMB was expressed in all investigated cancer cell lines and also showed evidence of gene amplification and overexpression in some cases of gastric cancer [24].

No functional studies have, to our knowledge, been published regarding LRRC3C and the single-pass membrane protein that it encodes: leucine-rich repeat- (LRR-) containing protein 3C (LRRC3C). Within the human genome, LRRC3C was most similar to the protein encoded by LRRC3B. Based on experiments using transformed carcinoma cell lines, a role in the suppression of cell proliferation has been suggested for LRRC3B [25, 26].

ZPBP2 encodes a protein paralogue of the zona pellucida binding protein [27] and harbors a missense SNP associated with primary biliary cirrhosis [14].

The colonic mucosa is a complex tissue, and the biopsies represent a heterogeneous collection of cell types. We did not determine the cellular origin of gene expression. However, all the genes that were differentially expressed with respect to inflammation were of potential interest in relation to either the inflammatory response or the turnover of epithelial cells. Inflamed, compared with noninflamed, colonic biopsies showed strongly increased transcript levels of CSF3 and modestly increased transcript levels of IKZF3, whereas the transcript levels of ERBB2, GRB7, MIEN1, and PGAP3 were modestly decreased. The granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (encoded by CSF3) stimulates the production, survival, and activity of neutrophils [28], and the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor produced by nonhematopoietic cells promotes neutrophil trafficking to the synovial tissue during collagen-induced arthritis in a murine model of rheumatoid arthritis [29]. Neutrophil infiltration of the intestinal mucosa is a feature of IBD [30]. The transcription factor zinc-finger protein Aiolos (encoded by IKZF3) is important for lymphocyte differentiation and shows higher expression in B cells [31]. The overexpression of IKZF3 inhibited proliferation and suppressed apoptosis in a pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line [32]. Ikzf3 knockout mice developed a phenotype similar to human autoimmune systemic lupus erythematosus [33]. Also, Pgap3 knockout mice developed autoimmune-like symptoms, possibly relating to impaired clearance of apoptotic cells by peritoneal macrophages [34]. ERBB2 [35, 36], GRB7 [37, 38], and MIEN1 [39, 40] have all been associated with various carcinomas, affecting cell proliferation and/or cell migration.

Considering the risk genotype-gene expression relationships uncovered in our study, both a dysregulated intestinal epithelium [4143] and aberrant T-cell proliferation and apoptosis [44] have been implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD. However, due to the relatively small sample size of our study the identified relationships need to be cautiously interpreted and confirmed in an independent, preferably larger, study cohort. The exact causes of IBD remain unclear, but the etiology likely includes complex interactions that depend on, at least, the intestinal microbiome and host factors such as genetic susceptibility, intestinal barrier function, and mucosal immune response [45, 46]. In this context it is notable that a joint effect of variants within the genetic region of our study and human rhinovirus wheezing illness has been observed on the subsequent risk of developing childhood-onset asthma. [47, 48]. Although the mechanism of action is not understood, it is possible that it is pertinent to IBD as well. Microbiome studies in IBD have, so far, mainly focused on alterations in the bacterial flora. However, recent studies have also described alterations in the viral component of the intestinal microbiome of IBD patients [49, 50].

Based on our results and published findings on GSDMA, GSDMB, LRRC3C, and related proteins, we propose that the rs2812507 locus in part affects IBD susceptibility via effects on apoptosis and cell proliferation and believe this hypothesis warrants further experimental investigation.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Linköping, Sweden (Dnr 2011/201-31).

Consent

Written and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Conflict of Interests

Jan Söderman has received a grant (no. FORSS-235131) from the Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden. Sven Almer has received grants from the Karolinska Institutets Forskningsstiftelser (no. 2014fobi42063), the Swedish Society of Medicine, Bengt Ihre Fonden, the Research Council of South-East Sweden (FORSS), and the County Council of Östergötland (ALF-Grants) and has a paid board membership at Takeda and Hospira and a paid consultancy for AbbVie. Sven Almer has previously received payment for lectures at Meda. Linda Berglind declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge laboratory technician Lena Svensson (Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden) for excellent technical assistance and support.

References

  1. K. Geboes and P. Van Eyken, “Inflammatory bowel disease unclassified and indeterminate colitis: the role of the pathologist,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 201–205, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. J. Tremaine, “Is indeterminate colitis determinable?” Current Gastroenterology Reports, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 162–165, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. K. Russell and J. Satsangi, “IBD: a family affair,” Best Practice & Research: Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 525–539, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Jostins, S. Ripke, R. K. Weersma et al., “Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature, vol. 491, no. 7422, pp. 119–124, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. A. Anderson, G. Boucher, C. W. Lees et al., “Meta-analysis identifies 29 additional ulcerative colitis risk loci, increasing the number of confirmed associations to 47,” Nature Genetics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 246–252, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. C. Barrett, S. Hansoul, D. L. Nicolae et al., “Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn's disease,” Nature Genetics, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 955–962, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. F. Moffatt, M. Kabesch, L. Liang et al., “Genetic variants regulating ORMDL3 expression contribute to the risk of childhood asthma,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 470–473, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. P. B. McGovern, A. Gardet, L. Törkvist et al., “Genome-wide association identifies multiple ulcerative colitis susceptibility loci,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 332–337, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Franke, D. P. McGovern, J. C. Barrett et al., “Genome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of confirmed Crohn's disease susceptibility loci,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1118–1125, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Vandesompele, K. De Preter, F. Pattyn et al., “Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes,” Genome Biology, vol. 3, no. 7, Article ID RESEARCH0034, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. L. Andersen, J. L. Jensen, and T. F. Ørntoft, “Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 15, pp. 5245–5250, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. C. Barrett, D. G. Clayton, P. Concannon et al., “Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis find that over 40 loci affect risk of type 1 diabetes,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 703–707, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. A. S. Kurreeman, E. A. Stahl, Y. Okada et al., “Use of a multiethnic approach to identify rheumatoid- arthritis-susceptibility loci, 1p36 and 17q12,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 524–532, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. M. Hirschfield, X. Liu, Y. Han et al., “Variants at IRF5-TNPO3, 17q12-21 and MMEL1 are associated with primary biliary cirrhosis,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 655–657, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Hao, Y. Bossé, D. C. Nickle et al., “Lung eQTLs to help reveal the molecular underpinnings of asthma,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e1003029, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. R. Crosslin, A. McDavid, N. Weston et al., “Genetic variants associated with the white blood cell count in 13,923 subjects in the eMERGE Network,” Human Genetics, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 639–652, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Soranzo, T. D. Spector, M. Mangino et al., “A genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 22 loci associated with eight hematological parameters in the HaemGen consortium,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1182–1190, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. J. Verlaan, S. Berlivet, G. M. Hunninghake et al., “Allele-specific chromatin remodeling in the ZPBP2/GSDMB/ORMDL3 locus associated with the risk of asthma and autoimmune disease,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 377–393, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C.-T. Ong and V. G. Corces, “CTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 234–246, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Grundberg, K. S. Small, Å. K. Hedman et al., “Mapping cis- and trans-regulatory effects across multiple tissues in twins,” Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1084–1089, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Kabakchiev and M. S. Silverberg, “Expression quantitative trait loci analysis identifies associations between genotype and gene expression in human intestine,” Gastroenterology, vol. 144, no. 7, pp. 1488.e3–1496.e3, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Haglund, S. Almer, C. Peterson, and J. Söderman, “Gene expression and thiopurine metabolite profiling in inflammatory bowel disease—novel clues to drug targets and disease mechanisms?” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 2, Article ID e56989, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. Saeki, D. H. Kim, T. Usui et al., “GASDERMIN, suppressed frequently in gastric cancer, is a target of LMO1 in TGF-beta-dependent apoptotic signalling,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 45, pp. 6488–6498, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Saeki, T. Usui, K. Aoyagi et al., “Distinctive expression and function of four GSDM family genes (GSDMA-D) in normal and malignant upper gastrointestinal epithelium,” Genes Chromosomes & Cancer, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 261–271, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Haraldson, V. I. Kashuba, A. A. Dmitriev et al., “LRRC3B gene is frequently epigenetically inactivated in several epithelial malignancies and inhibits cell growth and replication,” Biochimie, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1151–1157, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Kim, J.-H. Kim, H.-R. Jang et al., “LRRC3B, encoding a leucine-rich repeat-containing protein, is a putative tumor suppressor gene in gastric cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 17, pp. 7147–7155, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y.-N. Lin, A. Roy, W. Yan, K. H. Burns, and M. M. Matzuk, “Loss of zona pellucida binding proteins in the acrosomal matrix disrupts acrosome biogenesis and sperm morphogenesis,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 27, no. 19, pp. 6794–6805, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. L. Eyles, A. W. Roberts, D. Metcalf, and I. P. Wicks, “Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and neutrophils—forgotten mediators of inflammatory disease,” Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 500–510, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. L. Eyles, M. J. Hickey, M. U. Norman et al., “A key role for G-CSF induced neutrophil production and trafficking during inflammatory arthritis,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 13, pp. 5193–5201, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. M. Fournier and C. A. Parkos, “The role of neutrophils during intestinal inflammation,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 354–366, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Billot, C. Parizot, I. Arrouss et al., “Differential aiolos expression in human hematopoietic subpopulations,” Leukemia Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 289–293, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. Zhuang, D. Li, J. Fu, Q. Shi, Y. Lu, and X. Ju, “Overexpression of AIOLOS inhibits cell proliferation and suppresses apoptosis in Nalm-6 cells,” Oncology Reports, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1183–1190, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Sun, G. Matthias, M. J. Mihatsch, K. Georgopoulos, and P. Matthias, “Lack of the transcriptional coactivator OBF-1 prevents the development of systemic lupus erythematosus-like phenotypes in Aiolos mutant mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 1699–1706, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Y. Wang, Y. Murakami, T. Yasui et al., “Significance of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein enrichment in lipid rafts for the control of autoimmunity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 35, pp. 25490–25499, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Q. Li, D. Wang, J. Li, and P. Chen, “Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of HER-2/neu and VEGF expression in colon carcinomas,” BMC Cancer, vol. 11, article 277, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. E. Wang, “The functional crosstalk between HER2 tyrosine kinase and TGF-β signaling in breast cancer malignancy,” Journal of Signal Transduction, vol. 2011, Article ID 804236, 8 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. P.-Y. Chu, L.-Y. Huang, C.-H. Hsu et al., “Tyrosine phosphorylation of growth factor receptor-bound protein-7 by focal adhesion kinase in the regulation of cell migration, proliferation, and tumorigenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 30, pp. 20215–20226, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Ramsey, T. Bai, A. Hanlon Newell et al., “GRB7 protein over-expression and clinical outcome in breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 659–669, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Dasgupta, L. M. Wasson, N. Rauniyar, L. Prokai, J. Borejdo, and J. K. Vishwanatha, “Novel gene C17orf37 in 17q12 amplicon promotes migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells,” Oncogene, vol. 28, no. 32, pp. 2860–2872, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. E. E. Evans, A. D. Henn, A. Jonason et al., “C35 (C17orf37) is a novel tumor biomarker abundantly expressed in breast cancer,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 2919–2930, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Y. Goto and H. Kiyono, “Epithelial barrier: an interface for the cross-communication between gut flora and immune system,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 147–163, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H. H. Uhlig, “Monogenic diseases associated with intestinal inflammation: implications for the understanding of inflammatory bowel disease,” Gut, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1795–1805, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. L. Vereecke, R. Beyaert, and G. van Loo, “Enterocyte death and intestinal barrier maintenance in homeostasis and disease,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 584–593, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Sturm, H. S. P. de Souza, and C. Fiocchi, “Mucosal T cell proliferation and apoptosis in inflammatory bowel disease,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 381–387, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. Knights, K. G. Lassen, and R. J. Xavier, “Advances in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: linking host genetics and the microbiome,” Gut, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1505–1510, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Wlodarska, A. Kostic, and R. Xavier, “An integrative view of microbiome-host interactions in inflammatory bowel diseases,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 577–591, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. M. Caliskan, Y. A. Bochkov, E. Kreiner-Moller et al., “Rhinovirus wheezing illness and genetic risk of childhood-onset asthma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 368, no. 15, pp. 1398–1407, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  48. L. A. M. Smit, E. Bouzigon, I. Pin et al., “17q21 Variants modify the association between early respiratory infections and asthma,” The European Respiratory Journal, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. M. Norman, S. A. Handley, M. T. Baldridge et al., “Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease,” Cell, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 447–460, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. W. Wang, J. Jovel, B. Halloran et al., “Metagenomic analysis of microbiome in colon tissue from subjects with inflammatory bowel diseases reveals interplay of viruses and bacteria,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1419–1427, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar