Research Article

Smaller Anterior Cruciate Ligament Diameter Is a Predictor of Subjects Prone to Ligament Injuries: An Ultrasound Study

Table 2

ACL diameter measurements between injured and control subjects.

ACL injured 
(mean ± SD) ( = 25)
Control 
(mean ± SD) ( = 25)
Mean difference 
(95% CI)
value*

Ultrasound ACL diameter (cm) measurements by radiologist 1 0.61 ± 0.060.80 ± 0.07−0.19 
(−0.23 to −0.16)
<0.0001

Ultrasound ACL diameter (cm) measurements by radiologist 20.62 ± 0.090.81 ± 0.07−0.18 
(−0.23 to −0.14)
<0.0001

Mean ultrasound ACL diameter (cm) measurements by both radiologists0.62 ± 0.070.81 ± 0.06−0.19 
(−0.23 to −0.15)
<0.0001

ACL diameter (MRI versus US) (cm) measurements in 10 controls by radiologist 10.84 ± 0.05 
versus  
0.80 ± 0.06
−0.04 
(−0.07 to −0.00)
0.06

MRI ACL diameter (MRI versus US) (cm) measurements in 10 controls by radiologist 20.81 ± 0.06  
versus 
0.79 ± 0.08
−0.19 
(−0.06 to −0.03)
0.449

CI: confidence interval.
* value computed using unpaired -test.
Paired -test.