Research Article
Smaller Anterior Cruciate Ligament Diameter Is a Predictor of Subjects Prone to Ligament Injuries: An Ultrasound Study
Table 2
ACL diameter measurements between injured and control subjects.
| | ACL injured (mean ± SD) ( = 25) | Control (mean ± SD) ( = 25) | Mean difference (95% CI) | value* |
| Ultrasound ACL diameter (cm) measurements by radiologist 1 | 0.61 ± 0.06 | 0.80 ± 0.07 | −0.19 (−0.23 to −0.16) | <0.0001 |
| Ultrasound ACL diameter (cm) measurements by radiologist 2 | 0.62 ± 0.09 | 0.81 ± 0.07 | −0.18 (−0.23 to −0.14) | <0.0001 |
| Mean ultrasound ACL diameter (cm) measurements by both radiologists | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 0.81 ± 0.06 | −0.19 (−0.23 to −0.15) | <0.0001 |
| ACL diameter (MRI versus US) (cm) measurements in 10 controls by radiologist 1 | | 0.84 ± 0.05 versus 0.80 ± 0.06 | −0.04 (−0.07 to −0.00) | 0.06† |
| MRI ACL diameter (MRI versus US) (cm) measurements in 10 controls by radiologist 2 | | 0.81 ± 0.06 versus 0.79 ± 0.08 | −0.19 (−0.06 to −0.03) | 0.449† |
|
|
CI: confidence interval. * value computed using unpaired -test. †Paired -test.
|