BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 873251 |

Runguang Li, Liang Liang, Yonggang Dou, Zeping Huang, Huiting Mo, Yaning Wang, Bin Yu, "Mechanical Strain Regulates Osteogenic and Adipogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 873251, 10 pages, 2015.

Mechanical Strain Regulates Osteogenic and Adipogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Academic Editor: Cijun Shuai
Received28 Dec 2014
Revised27 Feb 2015
Accepted10 Mar 2015
Published02 Apr 2015


This study examined the effects of mechanical strain on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of cultured MSCs by stimulating MSCs cultured in general and adipogenic differentiation media using a mechanical strain device. Markers of osteogenic (Runx2, Osx, and I-collagen) and adipogenic (PPARγ-2, C/EBPα, and lipid droplets) differentiation were examined using real-time PCR, western blot, immunocytochemical, or histochemical stain analyses. Levels of Runx2 and Osx gradually increased in MSC groups in general medium subject to strain stimulation, as compared with in unstrained groups. After adding the stress signal, I-collagen protein levels of expression were obviously promoted in cells in comparison to the controls. The levels of PPARγ-2 and C/EBPα were decreased, and the emergence of lipid droplets was delayed in MSCs groups in adipogenic differentiation medium subject to strain stimulation, as compared with in unstrained groups. Mechanical strain can promote differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts and can impede differentiation into adipocytes. These results clarify the mechanisms underlying the effects of exercise on bone repair and reconstruction and provide a more adequate scientific basis for the use of exercise therapy in the treatment of obesity and metabolic osteoporosis.

1. Introduction

Obesity and osteoporosis are considered to be current worldwide public health concerns with serious detrimental implications for human health [1, 2]. Obesity is characterized by mass growth of adipose tissue, resulting from hypertrophy and increasing numbers of adipocytes [3]. Osteoporosis is characterized by decreased bone mass and is often accompanied by an increase in adipose tissue in the bone marrow, indicating gradual replacement of bone marrow by adipose tissue [4]. In vitro experiments have shown that both adipocytes and osteoblasts originate from common progenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are capable of multiple pathways of differentiation, including differentiation into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, myoblasts, adipocytes, and fibroblasts [5, 6]. However, regulation of the initial phase of differentiation is complex and subject to the influence of multiple factors, such as growth factors, cytokines, and hormones. It is commonly accepted that, to induce MSC differentiation towards a specific cell type, it is necessary to simultaneously inhibit differentiation towards other cell types [79]. Transgenic techniques have been used to introduce a TAZ promoter to control the differentiation of MSCs toward either osteoblast or lipoblast phenotypes [10]. Zhou et al. [11] showed interactions between the TGF-β and Wnt signaling pathways during stimulation of chondrogenesis and inhibition of adipogenesis.

During normal development, organisms are exposed to a variety of mechanical stimuli that promote and regulate tissue development [1214]. For example, physiological loading is widely believed to be beneficial in maintaining skeletal integrity [15], and skeletal unloading, as for example, during conditions of space flight, being bedridden, and fracturing of a limb, results in increased bone resorption and decreased bone mineral density, bone formation, bone strength, and mineralization [16, 17]. Mechanical stimuli acting on fat tissue, such as occurring through stretching, rubbing, and pressure during gymnastic exercise, massage, and whole-body vibration, are believed to decrease or prevent obesity and osteoporosis [18, 19]. Moreover, other potential and as yet unidentified mechanisms may exist to control fat production and osteoporosis, for example, as related to the regulation of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation by biologically induced mechanical strain; such mechanisms, if identified, could potentially improve conditions for bone formation and increase caloric consumption to achieve weight loss goals.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of mechanical strain on the regulation of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. Markers of osteoblast differentiation (Runx2, Osx, and I-collagen) and adipogenic differentiation (PPARγ-2, C/EBPα, and lipid droplets) were observed in MSCs stimulated by a mechanical strain device, cultured in both general and adipogenic differentiation media in vitro. Results of the study provide a scientific basis for the application of improved exercise therapy regimens in the treatment of metabolic obesity and osteoporosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. MSC Cultures and Identification

Sprague-Dawley rats (male and female, 80–100 g) were used for the isolation of marrow-derived MSCs. This animal study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (Guangzhou, China). The rats were euthanized via cervical dislocation under the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanfang Hospital; appropriate steps were taken to ameliorate suffering, in accordance with the guidelines of the committee. The MSCs were isolated according to a previously described method [20]. Bone marrow was obtained by flushing the femurs and tibias of rats with general medium consisting of DMEM-LG medium (Gibco, OK, USA) supplemented with 10% defined fetal calf serum (Gibco), 100 U penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (North China Pharmaceutical Factory, China). Isolated cells were plated in 25 cm2 flasks and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After 24 h, nonadherent cells were removed and washed with PBS, and fresh general medium was added to allow for further growth. Culture media were changed every 2-3 days. When the cells reached 80%–90% confluence, they were washed with PBS, detached using 0.25% trypsin, and then subcultured in two new 25 cm2 flasks at a concentration of 1 × 104 cells cm−2. The MSCs were then collected at the second or third generation and analyzed by flow cytometry for expressions of CD29, CD34, CD44, and CD45 (BD, NJ, USA). All experiments were performed with cells at passages 3–6.

2.2. Group and Parameter Settings

Experimental and control groups were defined, respectively, by the presence or absence of stress intervention and intervention duration and by growth in an adipogenic differentiation or general medium/osteogenic medium. The strain parameters were as follows: 5% strain magnitude, 6 h/day, 10 times/min according to a sinusoidal waveform. The general medium was DMEM-LG medium, while the osteogenic medium consisted of 10-8 mol/L dexamethasone, 10 mmol/Lβ-glycerol phosphate, and 50 μg/mL L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate. The adipogenic differentiation medium comprised DMEM-DG medium containing 1 μmol/L dexamethasone, 0.5 mmol/L 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), 10 mg/L insulin, and 100 mmol/L indomethacin. The MSCs were stimulated with a Flexcell-5000 device (Flexcell International, NC, USA) (Figure 1), using the method described by Turner et al. [21] and Lohberger et al. [22].

2.3. Application of Mechanical Strain

We mixed adequate amounts of MSCs (passages 3–6) to ensure a consistent source of cells in each group. The MSCs were plated in general medium in collagen-coated Bioflex 6-well plates (Flexcell International, NC, USA) at approximately 1.5 × 105/2 mL. Cells reached 80% confluence approximately 3 days later. After replacing the culture medium, the experimental groups were stimulated using the Flexcell-5000 device. All conditions in the control group were identical to those in the experimental group, except that mechanical stress stimulation was applied in the experimental group. Stress stimulation treatments were repeated four times, after which cells were then collected from each group. The mRNA and protein expressions of osteogenic and adipogenic markers in the MSCs were detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and western blot analysis, respectively. I-collagen protein levels of expression in cells were detected by immunocytochemical stain. Lipid droplets were visualized by oil red O staining.

2.4. Reverse Transcription and Real-Time Fluorescence Quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from cells subjected to mechanical strain and control cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results were quantified using spectrophotometry (ShiMadzu, Japan). The cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using the Prime Script RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR analyses were performed at least in triplicate using a CFX96 real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The primer nucleotide sequences used in the study are listed in Table 1. The information of primers came from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website ( The primer sequences were designed using Primer 3.0. Reactions were performed in a final volume of 20 μL containing 25 ng cDNA, 10 μL SYBR Premix Ex Taq (2x), and 1 μL each of the PCR forward and reverse primers (10 μM). The cDNA was amplified at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 44 denaturation cycles at 95°C for 10 s and annealing and extension at 60°C for 20 s, and at 72°C for 30 s. After the cycles, extension was performed at 72°C for 10 min. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA was quantified as an endogenous control, and the target gene expressions in each sample were normalized to those of GAPDH. The specificity of PCR was determined using a dissociation curve analysis. The data were analyzed using Bio-Rad CFX Manager Software (version 1.6, Applied Biosystems) to determine relative quantitative gene expressions.

GeneReference gene IDPrimerPrimer sequence






2.5. I-Col Immunocytochemical Analysis

For immunocytochemical staining, cells were rinsed using ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 30 min and washed three times in PBS. The silicone membrane was cut into small pieces. According to the instructions of SP/DAB kit (Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, LTD., Wuhan, China), the cells were incubated for 20 min at room temperature in 0. 1% Triton-X100, blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin, and incubated overnight at 4°C with I-col antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) at 1 : 100 dilutions. The cells were washed with PBS and exposure to 1 : 200 dilution of secondary antibody for 40 min at room temperature. DAB Substrate Kit was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Images were observed under a microscope and subsequently photographed.

2.6. Western Blotting

Proteins were extracted from the collected cells and were measured and analyzed using a BCA protein assay kit (Boster, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal amounts of protein from each sample were separated using SDS-PAGE (10% gel). The separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using an electroblotting apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was blocked in 5% nonfat milk/PBS-Tween 20 solution, followed by separate incubation with monoclonal antibodies specific for Runx2 (1 : 1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), Osterix (1 : 1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), PPARγ (1 : 1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), adiponectin (1 : 1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), and C/EBPα (1 : 1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight. After incubating at room temperature for 1.5 h, membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgG, Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Wuhan, China) diluted to 1 : 5000 in 5% nonfat milk/PBS-Tween 20. The membrane was washed three times with 0. 01% PBS/Tween 20 for 10 min after each antibody application. The nitrocellulose membrane proteins were detected using the ECL Plus Detection System (Amersham, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Various protein band intensities were quantified using densitometry and ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA).

2.7. Histochemical Staining

After fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, cells were rinsed three times for 5 min in deionized water and stained using cytoplasmic triglyceride droplets with oil red O [23, 24].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SPSS version 11.5 statistical software. Values of were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. MSC Morphology and Identification

The primary MSCs adhered to the culture flask wall at 2–4 days after seeding and were fibroblast-like and spindle-shaped in morphology. Clustering and rapid cell proliferation were observed after the first medium replacement at days 3 or 4. After multiple medium replacements and PBS washing, hematopoietic cells were gradually eliminated. At days 12–14, cell confluence reached 80%. After passaging, the growth rate of the MSCs increased, and full confluence was reached after 7–10 days. The cells were slender and spindle-shaped and were spirally distributed until cell fusion. As consistent with the known phenotypic characteristics of MSCs [25, 26], the cells tested positive for CD29 (98.6%), CD34 (1.3%), CD44 (99.4%), and CD45 (1.6%). The MSCs proliferated rapidly and reached 80% confluence by 48–72 h in 6-well culture plates containing elastic silicone membranes. After mechanical strain was applied, the cells were orientated perpendicular to the axis of the strain.

3.2. Effects of Mechanical Strain on Osteogenic Differentiation of MSCs

Levels of Runx2 and Osx mRNA and protein gradually increased in MSCs in the strain stimulation groups in general medium at both 3 days and 5 days, as compared to unstrained groups (Figure 2). I-collagen protein staining in the cytoplasm was stronger in the experimental groups (strain + osteogenic medium) at 7 days than in the control groups (general medium or osteogenic medium). Stressed cells were oriented perpendicularly to the strain axis, whereas, in the control group (unstrained), cells were randomly oriented (Figure 3). These results show that mechanical stress can promote osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.

3.3. Effects of Mechanical Strain on Adipogenic Differentiation of MSCs

Levels of PPARγ-2 and C/EBPα mRNA and protein clearly decreased in MSCs assigned to strain stimulation groups in adipogenic differentiation medium at both 3 days and 5 days, as compared with levels in unstrained groups (Figure 4). After 10 days of sustained growth in adipogenic differentiation medium, lipid droplets appeared as translucent vacuoles with high refractive index inside the cytoplasm due to chemically induced differentiation to adipocytes. The presence of lipids was confirmed by oil red O staining of the droplets. In contrast, no significant development of intracellular lipid droplets was observed in the MSCs during the adipogenic differentiation process following the application of mechanical stress stimuli (Figure 5). These results show that mechanical stress can inhibit adipogenic differentiation of MSCs.

4. Discussion

Mechanical strain modulates a variety of cellular functions (such as proliferation and differentiation) that are critical for development, growth, and regeneration of various tissues in mammals [27]. Appropriate levels of strain are particularly important for regeneration and reconstruction of bone tissues after bone fracture [28, 29]. Obesity, a disease of excess adipose tissue, and osteoporosis, indicated by decreased bone mass, are both suppressed by exercise. These diseases can be further linked, as adipocytes and osteoblasts develop from common MSC progenitor cells [5, 30], and signals that promote MSC differentiation towards one lineage may preclude induction of the other, which shows relationships between diseases such as osteoporosis and obesity and their modulation by physical exercise [24].

Exercise can potentially reduce fat mass and increase bone mass through mechanical induction of MSCs away from adipogenesis and towards osteoblastogenesis. In our study, strain promoted MSC differentiation to osteoblasts. However, during lipoblast induction, stress stimulation delayed differentiation. Expressions of Runx2 and Osx were used as indicators of osteoblastic activity. The Runx2 protein is a transcription factor that is believed to act as a “master switch” that regulates a number of other genes involved in the development of bone-building cells (osteoblasts) [31]. The Osx protein contains a zinc finger domain located in the nucleus; thus, it is more specific than Runx2 for reflecting osteogenic processes. It is believed that Osx plays a role in osteogenic processes downstream of Runx2, indicating that it is involved in a late stage of osteogenic differentiation [32]. I-collagen protein is the most abundant extracellular protein in bone and is expressed during all stages of osteoblast development [33]. We found that I-collagen protein staining in the cytoplasm was stronger in the experimental groups (strain + osteogenic medium) at 7 days than in the control groups (general medium or osteogenic medium). In the study of Simmons et al. [34], application of equibiaxial cyclic strain to hMSCs cultured in osteogenic media stimulated a 2.3-fold increase in matrix mineralization over unstrained cells. So it was concluded that mechanical strain and osteogenic media had synergistic effects on osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.

The PPARγ and C/EBPα proteins are critical transcription factors in the adipogenic differentiation of MSCs and are therefore known to play key roles in adipogenic processes [35, 36]. Expression of these transcription factors alone is sufficient to initiate adipogenic differentiation; adipocytes are completely absent in C/EBPα-knockout mice [37], while PPARγ knockout mice show seriously flawed development of adipocytes [38]. Case et al. [39] reported that mechanical strain inhibits rosiglitazone-induced adipogenesis in bone marrow-derived MSCs, a process that involves limiting the expression of PPARγ-2. Intracellular lipid droplet formation is a sign of adipogenic differentiation and maturity of MSCs, although it appears relatively late in the adipogenic process [21]. The MSCs cultured in general medium and without stimulation showed weak adipogenic differentiation ability. It is difficult to observe the inhibitory effects of mechanical stress on adipogenic differentiation of MSCs using pure stimulation; therefore, in this study, we applied a composite stress stimulation comprising chemically induced adipogenic differentiation as well as mechanical strain, using the method described by Turner et al. [21]. The effect of stress on adipogenic differentiation of MSCs can be observed through enhanced adipogenic differentiation.

In this study, the mRNA and protein levels of intracellular Runx2 and Osx significantly increased at 3 days and 5 days in MSCs assigned to mechanical strain stimulation groups, as compared with those of the control group, while the expressions of PPARγ-2 and C/EBPα were significantly reduced at 3 days and 5 days. Intracellular lipid droplets were observed in some of the MSCs after 10 days in the chemically induced adipogenic differentiation group, while no significant intracellular lipid droplets were observed in the mechanically strained group. These results suggest that appropriate mechanical stress stimulation can promote osteogenic differentiation, while impeding adipogenic differentiation. A number of studies have linked the upregulation of osteogenic genes in MSCs (such as Runx2, Osx, collagen type I, BMP-2, ALP, and osteocalcin) following mechanical stimulation [22, 40, 41]. However, differentiation of MSCs to osteoblasts occurred only under a certain range of stress stimulation magnitudes: when the stress was too high, biological activity of MSCs was inhibited, or generated cell damage or apoptosis [42]. We found that excessive magnitude of the cyclic tensile strain (>12%) induced oxygen free radical experimental groups according to the preliminary study disequilibrium, resulting in cytotoxicity [43].

In vitro, cell response to mechanical signals results in a variety of sensitive gene expressions. These include synthesis and secretion of cytokines, which regulate cell function activity networks and mediate cascading amplification effects. Mechanical strain activates specific functional gene expressions via positive or negative feedback effects and regulation at transcriptional and translational levels, which triggers a series of biological effects such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration [14, 44]. The specific mechanisms underlying the regulation of MSC differentiation by mechanical strain is not clear but might be related to the regulation of transcription through various pathways in response to mechanical stress signals [7, 4547]. Kearney et al. [42] reported that strain regulates MSC differentiation leading to osteogenesis. They examined mechanotransduction, in which cells were strained in the presence of a stretch-activated cation channel (SACC) blocker, gadolinium chloride (GdCl3), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitor (U0126), p38 inhibitor (SB203580), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase) inhibitor (LY294002). Following exposure to strain, the osteogenic markers Cbfa1, collagen type I, osteocalcin, and BMP2 were temporally expressed. Exposure to strain in the presence of GdCl3 reduced induction of collagen I expression, thus confirming the role of SACCs, at least in part, as mechanosensors involved in strain-induced MSC differentiation. It was found that strain-induced synthesis of BMP2 was reduced by inhibitors of kinases, ERK, p38, and PI3 kinase. Charoenpanich et al. [40] found that cyclic tensile strain enhances the modulation of genes associated with increases in both the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs from osteoporotic donors; potential mechanisms of strain-induced osteogenesis include the canonical pathways that are known to play an important role in bone formation, such as Wnt/BMP/PIK signaling. Tanabe et al. [48, 49] showed that mechanical stress downregulated the expression of PPARγ-2 in 3T3-L1 cells and impeded adipocyte fat cell maturation. They found that expression of C/EBP, which is a member of the transcription factor family and plays a role in the regulation of fat cells, was significantly decreased by mechanical stress and concluded that the effect is related to the ERK/MAPK signal pathway. Hossain et al. [50] reported that compressive forces could inhibit human adipogenesis by suppressing expression of PPARγ-2 and C/EBPα in a COX-2-dependent manner. Khayat et al. [23] showed that relatively low-frequency mechanical stimulation (0.01 Hz) could inhibit adipogenic differentiation of C3H10T1/2 mouse MSCs, even in a potent adipogenic differentiation medium. Furthermore, ERK signaling was decreased in a mechanically stimulated culture, indicating its role in the inhibition of adipogenic differentiation. Zayzafoon et al. [51] found that microgravity (weightlessness) inhibits osteoblast differentiation of human MSCs but promotes adipocyte differentiation. They hypothesized that weightlessness leads to decreased RhoA activity, affecting the activation of downstream Rho kinases, and impedes the phosphorylation of LIM-kinase and cofilin, thereby influencing the differentiation fate of stem cells.

In conclusion, this study showed that an appropriate mechanical signal can promote osteogenic differentiation, while suppressing adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. These results indicate that exercise can promote bone growth and impede the differentiation and maturation of adipocytes. Thus, this study provides a more adequate scientific basis for exercise therapy in the treatment of metabolic obesity and osteoporosis, as well as furthering our understanding of tissue engineering involving MSCs.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Runguang Li and Liang Liang contributed equally to this work.


This work was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Approval no. 81101366 (and its matching topics LT201212), 81272052), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Approval no. 2014A030313338), National Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China (Approval no. 201412121034), and President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (Approval no. 2014A002).


  1. N. Stefan, H.-U. Häring, F. B. Hu, and M. B. Schulze, “Metabolically healthy obesity: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical implications,” The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 152–162, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. D. Leslie and S. N. Morin, “Osteoporosis epidemiology 2013: implications for diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 440–446, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. W. Coppack, “Adipose tissue changes in obesity,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1049–1052, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Kawai, F. J. A. de Paula, and C. J. Rosen, “New insights into osteoporosis: the bone-fat connection,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 272, no. 4, pp. 317–329, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. F. Pittenger, A. M. Mackay, S. C. Beck et al., “Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5411, pp. 143–147, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Z.-J. Liu, Y. Zhuge, and O. C. Velazquez, “Trafficking and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 984–991, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. L. Knothe Tate, T. D. Falls, S. H. McBride, R. Atit, and U. R. Knothe, “Mechanical modulation of osteochondroprogenitor cell fate,” International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2720–2738, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Zhao and B. M. Hantash, “TGF-β1 regulates differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells,” Vitamins and Hormones, vol. 87, pp. 127–141, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. J. Heino and T. A. Hentunen, “Differentiation of osteblasts and osteocytes from mesenchymal stem cells,” Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 131–145, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J.-H. Hong, E. S. Hwang, M. T. McManus et al., “TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation,” Science, vol. 309, no. 5737, pp. 1074–1078, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Zhou, K. Eid, and J. Glowacki, “Cooperation between TGF-beta and Wnt pathways during chondrocyte and adipocyte differentiation of human marrow stromal cells,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 463–470, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Adams, “The mechanical environment of chondrocytes in articular cartilage,” Biorheology, vol. 43, no. 3-4, pp. 537–545, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J. S. Park, N. F. Huang, K. T. Kurpinski, S. Patel, S. Hsu, and S. Li, “Mechanobiology of mesenchymal stem cells and their use in cardiovascular repair,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 12, no. 13, pp. 5098–5116, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Z. Genchev, M. Källberg, G. Gürsoy et al., “Mechanical signaling on the single protein level studied using steered molecular dynamics,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 141–152, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. M. Frost, “A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff s law for clinicians,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M.-H. Lafage-Proust, P. Collet, J. M. Dubost, N. Laroche, C. Alexandre, and L. Vico, “Space-related bone mineral redistribution and lack of bone mass recovery after reambulation in young rats,” The American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. R324–R334, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  17. W. Dehority, B. P. Halloran, D. D. Bikle et al., “Bone and hormonal changes induced by skeletal unloading in the mature male rat,” The American Journal of Physiolog—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. E62–E69, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  18. Y. Bei, X. Fang, and Z. Yao, “Sixty-two cases of simple obesity treated by acupuncture combined with massage,” Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 36–39, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  19. C. T. Rubin, E. Capilla, Y. K. Luu et al., “Adipogenesis is inhibited by brief, daily exposure to high-frequency, extremely low-magnitude mechanical signals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 45, pp. 17879–17884, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X. Zeng, S. P. Yu, T. Taylor, M. Ogle, and L. Wei, “Protective effect of apelin on cultured rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells against apoptosis,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 357–367, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. N. J. Turner, H. S. Jones, J. E. Davies, and A. E. Canfield, “Cyclic stretch-induced TGFβ1/Smad signaling inhibits adipogenesis in umbilical cord progenitor cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 377, no. 4, pp. 1147–1151, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. Lohberger, H. Kaltenegger, N. Stuendl, M. Payer, B. Rinner, and A. Leithner, “Effect of cyclic mechanical stimulation on the expression of osteogenesis genes in human intraoral mesenchymal stromal and progenitor cells,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 189516, 10 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. Khayat, D. H. Rosenzweig, and T. M. Quinn, “Low frequency mechanical stimulation inhibits adipogenic differentiation of C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells,” Differentiation, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 179–184, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Sen, Z. Xie, N. Case, M. Ma, C. Rubin, and J. Rubin, “Mechanical strain inhibits adipogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by stimulating a durable beta-catenin signal,” Endocrinology, vol. 149, no. 12, pp. 6065–6075, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. P. Sun, B. L. Zhang, J. W. Duan et al., “Effect of NK4 transduction in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on biological characteristics of pancreatic cancer cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 3729–3745, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. N. Liu, R. Chen, H. Du, J. Wang, Y. Zhang, and J. Wen, “Expression of IL-10 and TNF-alpha in rats with cerebral infarction after transplantation with mesenchymal stem cells,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 207–213, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. E. Jaalouk and J. Lammerding, “Mechanotransduction gone awry,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. T. S. Palomares, R. E. Gleason, Z. D. Mason et al., “Mechanical stimulation alters tissue differentiation and molecular expression during bone healing,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1123–1132, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. D. Boerckel, K. M. Dupont, Y. M. Kolambkar, A. S. P. Lin, and R. E. Guldberg, “In vivo model for evaluating the effects of mechanical stimulation on tissue-engineered bone repair,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 131, no. 8, Article ID 084502-1, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. R. Park, R. O. C. Oreffo, and J. T. Triffitt, “Interconversion potential of cloned human marrow adipocytes in vitro,” Bone, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 549–554, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. P. J. Marie, “Transcription factors controlling osteoblastogenesis,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 473, no. 2, pp. 98–105, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. Nakashima, X. Zhou, G. Kunkel et al., “The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor Osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation,” Cell, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. W. Pradel, R. Mai, T. Gedrange, and G. Lauer, “Cell passage and composition of culture medium effects proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells from facial bone,” Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 59, supplement 5, pp. 47–58, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  34. C. A. Simmons, S. Matlis, A. J. Thornton, S. Chen, C.-Y. Wang, and D. J. Mooney, “Cyclic strain enhances matrix mineralization by adult human mesenchymal stem cells via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) signaling pathway,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1087–1096, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. G. Cristancho and M. A. Lazar, “Forming functional fat: a growing understanding of adipocyte differentiation,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 722–734, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. D. Rosen and O. A. MacDougald, “Adipocyte differentiation from the inside out,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 885–896, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. G. Linhart, K. Ishimura-Oka, F. Demayo et al., “C/EBPalpha is required for differentiation of white, but not brown, adipose tissue,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 22, pp. 12532–12537, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. Zhang, M. Fu, T. Cui et al., “Selective disruption of PPARγ2 impairs the development of adipose tissue and insulin sensitivity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 29, pp. 10703–10708, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. N. Case, J. Thomas, Z. Xie et al., “Mechanical input restrains PPARgamma2 expression and action to preserve mesenchymal stem cell multipotentiality,” Bone, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 454–464, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. Charoenpanich, M. E. Wall, C. J. Tucker et al., “Cyclic tensile strain enhances osteogenesis and angiogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells from osteoporotic donors,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 20, no. 1-2, pp. 67–78, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. D. F. Ward Jr., R. M. Salasznyk, R. F. Klees et al., “Mechanical strain enhances extracellular matrix-induced gene focusing and promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells through an extracellular-related kinase-dependent pathway,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 467–479, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. E. M. Kearney, E. Farrell, P. J. Prendergast, and V. A. Campbell, “Tensile strain as a regulator of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1767–1779, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. R. G. Li, B. Chen, G. Wang, B. Yu, G. H. Ren, and G. X. Ni, “Effects of mechanical strain on oxygen free radical system in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from children,” Injury, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 753–757, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Klein-Nulend, A. D. Bakker, R. G. Bacabac, A. Vatsa, and S. Weinbaum, “Mechanosensation and transduction in osteocytes,” Bone, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 182–190, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. E. Potier, J. Noailly, and K. Ito, “Directing bone marrow-derived stromal cell function with mechanics,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 807–817, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. Shoham and A. Gefen, “Mechanotransduction in adipocytes,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. R. Li, M. Wei, and J. Shao, “Effects of verapamil on the immediate-early gene expression of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells stimulated by mechanical strain in vitro,” Medical Science Monitor Basic Research, vol. 19, pp. 68–75, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. Y. Tanabe, Y. Matsunaga, M. Saito, and K. Nakayama, “Involvement of cyclooxygenase-2 in synergistic effect of cyclic stretching and eicosapentaenoic acid on adipocyte differentiation,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 478–484, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. Y. Tanabe, M. Koga, M. Saito, Y. Matsunaga, and K. Nakayama, “Inhibition of adipocyte differentiation by mechanical stretching through ERK-mediated downregulation of PPARgamma2,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 117, no. 16, pp. 3605–3614, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. G. Hossain, T. Iwata, N. Mizusawa et al., “Compressive force inhibits adipogenesis through COX-2-mediated down-regulation of PPARgamma2 and C/EBPalpha,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 297–303, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. Zayzafoon, W. E. Gathings, and J. M. McDonald, “Modeled microgravity inhibits osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and increases adipogenesis,” Endocrinology, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 2421–2432, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Runguang Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.