Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 934387, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/934387
Research Article

A Novel Simple Phantom for Verifying the Dose of Radiation Therapy

1Health Physics Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Longtan 325, Taiwan
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei 112, Taiwan
3Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
4Department of Anesthesiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
5Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
6School of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
7School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
8Biophotonics and Molecular Imaging Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan

Received 3 June 2014; Revised 21 October 2014; Accepted 22 October 2014

Academic Editor: Tsair-Fwu Lee

Copyright © 2015 J. H. Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Izewska and P. Andreo, “The IAEA/WHO TLD postal programme for radiotherapy hospitals,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Izewska, P. Andreo, S. Vatnitsky, and K. R. Shortt, “The IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose quality audits for radiotherapy: a perspective of dosimetry practices at hospitals in developing countries,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Izewska, P. Bera, and S. Vatnitsky, “IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose audit service and high precision measurements for radiotherapy level dosimetry,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 101, no. 1–4, pp. 387–392, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Pernička, A. Meghzifene, H. Tölli, and J. Izewska, “IAEA TLD based audits for radiation protection calibrations at secondary standards dosimetry laboratories,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 101, no. 1–4, pp. 275–278, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Izewska, D. Georg, P. Bera et al., “A methodology for TLD postal dosimetry audit of high-energy radiotherapy photon beams in non-reference conditions,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. H. Ferreira, A. Dutreix, A. Bridier, J. Chavaudra, and H. Svensson, “The ESTRO-QUALity assurance network (EQUAL),” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 273–284, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. S. Followill, D. A. R. Evans, C. Cherry et al., “Design, development, and implementation of the radiological physics center's pelvis and thorax anthropomorphic quality assurance phantoms,” Medical Physics, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 2070–2076, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Bridier, H. Nyström, I. Ferreira, I. Gomola, and D. Huyskens, “A comparative description of three multipurpose phantoms (MPP) for external audits of photon beams in radiotherapy: the water MPP, the Umea MPP and the EC MPP,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 285–293, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Kroutilíková, J. Novotný, and L. Judas, “Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) quality assurance network in the Czech Republic,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 235–244, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. E. Davidson, R. A. Popple, G. S. Ibbott, and D. S. Followill, “Technical note: heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom,” Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 5434–5439, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Han, E. H. Shin, C. Lim et al., “Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program,” Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2519–2527, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Molineu, N. Hernandez, T. Nguyen, G. Ibbott, and D. Followill, “Credentialing results from IMRT irradiations of an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom,” Medical Physics, vol. 40, no. 2, Article ID 022101, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Kron, A. Haworth, and I. Williams, “Dosimetry for audit and clinical trials: challenges and requirements,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 444, no. 1, Article ID 012014, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. S. Ibbott, “QA in radiation therapy: the RPC perspective,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 250, Article ID 012001, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus