Competing Role of Bioactive Constituents in Moringa oleifera Extract and Conventional Nutrition Feed on the Performance of Cobb 500 Broilers
Table 2
Growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality (mean ± SE).
(a) Growth performance
Parameters
Treatment groups
Nutritional feed only (T1)
0.5% w/w of MOLM (T2)
1.0% w/w of MOLM (T3)
1.5% w/w of MOLM (T4)
Final body weight (g) 42 d
2091 ± 45.9b
2222 ± 25.3a
2263 ± 30.2a
2218 ± 47.6a
Initial body weight (g) 42 d
707 ± 4.38a
705 ± 6.09a
702 ± 4.68a
701 ± 5.81a
Weight gain (g/day) 22–42 d
66 ± 1.986b
72 ± 1.285a
75 ± 1.439a
72 ± 2.409a
Feed intake (g/day) 22–42 d
175 ± 2.05a
178 ± 0.85a
174 ± 1.4a
165 ± 1.16b
FCR 22–42 d
2.67 ± 0.052a
2.47 ± 0.037b
2.32 ± 0.027bc
2.30 ± 0.065c
Mortality (%) 22–42 d
3 ± 2.5
8 ± 5.0
2 ± 2.5
3 ± 2.5
(b) Carcass characteristics
Parameters
Treatment groups
Nutritional feed only (T1)
0.5% w/w of MOLM (T2)
1.0% w/w of MOLM (T3)
1.5% w/w of MOLM (T4)
Dressing percentage
65.97 ± 0.074d
67.07 ± 0.042c
70.15 ± 0.219a
68.56 ± 0.114b
Meat : bone
3.459 ± 0.016b
3.412 ± 0.024b
3.814 ± 0.027a
3.712 ± 0.050a
Meat : fat
6.31 ± 0.016d
7.89 ± 0.030b
8.43 ± 0.045b
6.83 ± 0.040c
Bone : fat
3.91 ± 1.13b
3.65 ± 1.16a
3.54 ± 0.51a
3.79 ± 0.46a
(c) Meat quality
Parameters
Treatment groups
Nutritional feed only (T1)
0.5% w/w of MOLM (T2)
1.0% w/w of MOLM (T3)
1.5% w/w of MOLM (T4)
Cooking loss (%)
21.99 ± 0.464a
16.62 ± 0.619b
21.66 ± 1.441a
20.34 ± 1.141a
Drip loss (%)
5.72 ± 0.027d
5.94 ± 0.028c
8.01 ± 0.034a
7.74 ± 0.065b
Lightness
46.70 ± 1.193b
46.24 ± 0.373b
51.70 ± 0.827a
47.25 ± 0.513b
Redness
6.15 ± 0.583ab
7.93 ± 0.793a
5.45 ± 0.450b
6.64 ± 0.497ab
Yellowness
12.08 ± 0.604b
13.52 ± 0.384ab
13.15 ± 0.537ab
14.24 ± 0.584a
Tenderness
1.07 ± 0.1a
1.23 ± 0.19a
0.94 ± 0.07a
0.89 ± 0.007a
Table 2(a) (growth performance): the final body weight, weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and mortality (a, b values for final body weight, weight gain, and feed intake showing different superscripts within rows are significantly different ( < 0.05) and the a, b, bc, and c within rows of the FCR are significantly different ( < 0.05)). Table 2(b) (carcass characteristics): the dressing percentage and meat : bone : fat ratio (a, b, c, and d values for dressing percentage and meat : bone : fat ratio within rows are significantly different ( < 0.05)). Table 2(c) (meat quality): the cooking loss, drip loss, color, and tenderness (a, b, c, d values with different superscripts on the same row are significantly different ( < 0.05)), of broiler chicken fed with various gradients of Moringa oleifera leaves meal (0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% w/w) MOLM with/without nutritional feed.