Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1256414, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1256414
Clinical Study

Intercondylar Route of Prosthetic Infragenicular Femoropopliteal Bypass Has Better Primary, Assisted, and Secondary Patency but Not Limb Salvage Rate Compared to the Medial Route

1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
3Fourth Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
4Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Received 25 May 2016; Revised 17 August 2016; Accepted 21 August 2016

Academic Editor: Kibret Mequanint

Copyright © 2016 Tomas Grus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. E. Pereira, M. Albers, M. Romiti, F. C. Brochado-Neto, and C. A. B. Pereira, “Meta-analysis of femoropopliteal bypass grafts for lower extremity arterial insufficiency,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 510–517.e3, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Aracil-Sanus, C. Mendieta-Azcona, C. Cuesta-Gimeno, and A. Chinchilla-Molina, “Infragenicular bypass graft for limb salvage using polytetrafluoroethylene and distal vein cuff as the first alternative in patients without ipsilateral greater saphenous vein,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 379–385, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. R. Lauterbach, G. A. Torres, G. Andros et al., “Infragenicular polytetrafluoroethylene bypass with distal vein cuffs for limb salvage: a contemporary series,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 487–494, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Takagi, S.-N. Goto, M. Matsui, H. Manabe, and T. Umemoto, “A contemporary meta-analysis of Dacron versus polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for femoropopliteal bypass grafting,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 232–236, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Tuchmann and K. Dinstl, “Below-knee femoropopliteal bypass using externally supported polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 177–180, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Daenens, S. Schepers, I. Fourneau, S. Houthoofd, and A. Nevelsteen, “Heparin-bonded ePTFE grafts compared with vein grafts in femoropopliteal and femorocrural bypasses: 1- and 2-year results,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1210–1216, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Sarkar, H. J. Salacinski, G. Hamilton, and A. M. Seifalian, “The mechanical properties of infrainguinal vascular bypass grafts: their role in influencing patency,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 627–636, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Grus, G. Grusova, L. Lambert, R. Banerjee, J. Matecha, and M. Mlcek, “The influence of the anastomosis angle on the hemodynamics in the distal anastomosis in the infrainguinal bypass: an in-vitro study,” Physiological Research, vol. 65, no. 4, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  9. T. Grus, J. Lindner, T. Vidim et al., “The anastomosis angle is a key to improved long-term patency of proximal femoropopliteal bypass,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 598–605, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. A. Dormandy and R. B. Rutherford, “Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. S1–S296, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. R. T. Gregory and J. S. T. Yao, “The first Gore-Tex femoral-popliteal bypass,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 266–269, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. V. Sterpetti, P. Sapienza, and A. Cavallaro, “Distal runoff and the development of degenerative changes in autologous reversed saphenous vein femoropopliteal bypass,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 766–769, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. S. Bassiouny, S. White, S. Glagov, E. Choi, D. P. Giddens, and C. K. Zarins, “Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: mechanical injury or flow induced,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 708–717, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Haruguchi and S. Teraoka, “Intimal hyperplasia and hemodynamic factors in arterial bypass and arteriovenous grafts: a review,” Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 227–235, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Hoedt, T. How, P. Poyck, and C. Wittens, “Why patencies of femoropopliteal bypass grafts with distal end-to-end anastomosis are comparable with end-to-side anastomosis,” Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 157–164, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Grus, J. Lindner, K. Vik et al., “Particle image velocimetry measurement in the model of vascular anastomosis,” Prague Medical Report, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. M. Panneton, L. H. Hollier, and J. M. Hofer, “Multicenter ramdomized prospective trial comparing a pre-cuffed polytetrafluoroethylene graft to a vein cuffed polytetrafluoroethylene graft for infragenicular arterial bypass,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 199–206, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. A. Khalil, A. Boyd, and G. Griffiths, “Interposition vein cuff for infragenicular prosthetic bypass graft,” in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, The Cochrane Collaboration, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Roll, J. Müller-Nordhorn, T. Keil et al., “Dacron® vs. PTFE as bypass materials in peripheral vascular surgery—systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Surgery, vol. 8, article 22, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. A. Stonebridge, R. J. Prescott, and C. V. Ruckley, “Randomized trial comparing infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting with and without vein interposition cuff at the distal anastomosis,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 543–550, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. D. Griffiths, J. Nagy, D. Black, and P. A. Stonebridge, “Randomized clinical trial of distal anastomotic interposition vein cuff in infrainguinal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 560–562, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. T. Ulus, C. Ljungman, B. Almgren, A. Hellberg, D. Bergqvist, and S. Karacagil, “The influence of distal runoff on patency of infrainguinal vein bypass grafts,” Vascular Surgery, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. Dorigo, R. Pulli, P. Castelli et al., “A multicenter comparison between autologous saphenous vein and heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft in the treatment of critical limb ischemia in diabetics,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1332–1338, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. A. Loh, B. S. Howell, C. B. Rockman et al., “Mid- and long-term results of the treatment of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease with precuffed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts compared with vein grafts,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 208–217, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. B. Kreienberg, R. C. Darling III, B. B. Chang, P. S. K. Paty, W. E. Lloyd, and D. M. Shah, “Adjunctive techniques to improve patency of distal prosthetic bypass grafts: polytetrafluoroethylene with remote arteriovenous fistulae versus vein cuffs,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 696–701, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. M. W. Donker, G. H. Ho, A. Te Slaa et al., “Midterm results of autologous saphenous vein and ePTFE pre-cuffed bypass surgery in peripheral arterial occlusive disease,” Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 598–603, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. D. Giannoukas, “Lower limb revascularization with infragenicular bypass using PTFE graft and the distal vein patch technique: does it confer any advantage over the distal vein cuff techniques?” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 183–184, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. J. Naoum and E. J. Arbid, “Bypass surgery in limb salvage: polytetrafluoroethylene prosthetic bypass,” Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 43–46, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus