Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 1297527, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1297527
Research Article

Airway Management with Cervical Spine Immobilisation: A Comparison between the Macintosh Laryngoscope, Truview Evo2, and Totaltrack VLM Used by Novices—A Manikin Study

1London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Anaesthetics Department, Northwick Park Hospital, London HA1 3UJ, UK
2Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Medical University of Łódź, 92-209 Łódź, Poland

Received 11 November 2015; Revised 28 January 2016; Accepted 31 January 2016

Academic Editor: Kouichiro Minami

Copyright © 2016 Dawid Aleksandrowicz and Tomasz Gaszyński. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. T. Crosby, “Tracheal intubation in the cervical spine-injured patient,” Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 105–109, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. D. J. Watts, A. W. Gelb, D. B. Bach, and D. M. Pelz, “Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury,” Anesthesiology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1335–1342, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Manoach and L. Paladino, “Manual in-line stabilization for acute airway management of suspected cervical spine injury: historical review and current questions,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 236–245, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Aleksandrowicz, W. Gaszyński, and T. Gaszyński, “Wytyczne dotyczące udrażniania dróg oddechowych w warunkach pozaszpitalnych u chorych po urazach,” Anestezjologia i Ratownictwo, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 233–243, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  5. K. Takahashi, N. Morimura, T. Sakamoto et al., “Comparison of the airway scope and macintosh laryngoscope with in-line cervical stabilization by the semisolid neck collar: manikin study,” Journal of Trauma, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 363–366, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Aoi, G. Inagawa, K. Nakamura, H. Sato, T. Kariya, and T. Goto, “Airway scope versus macintosh laryngoscope in patients with simulated limitation of neck movements,” Journal of Trauma—Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 838–842, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. Takenaka, K. Aoyama, T. Iwagaki, H. Ishimura, Y. Takenaka, and T. Kadoya, “Approach combining the airway scope and the bougie for minimizing movement of the cervical spine during endotracheal intubation,” Anesthesiology, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 1335–1340, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. P. Turkstra, D. M. Pelz, and P. M. Jones, “Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of the AirTraq laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope,” Anesthesiology, vol. 111, pp. 97–101, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. C. H. Maharaj, E. Buckley, B. H. Harte, and J. G. Laffey, “Endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of Macintosh and AirTraq laryngoscopes,” Anesthesiology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Robitaille, S. R. Williams, M.-H. Tremblay, F. Guilbert, M. Thériault, and P. Drolet, “Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 935–941, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Gercek, B. M. Wahlen, and P. M. Rommens, “In vivo ultrasound real-time motion of the cervical spine during intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a comparison of intubation methods,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Maruyama, T. Yamada, R. Kawakami, T. Kamata, M. Yokochi, and K. Hara, “Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 120–124, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. M. Wahlen and E. Gercek, “Three-dimensional cervical spine movement during intubation using the Macintosh and Bullard laryngoscopes, the bonfils fibrescope and the intubating laryngeal mask airway,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 907–913, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. S. Cormack and J. Lehane, “Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics,” Anaesthesia, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1105–1111, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Barak, P. Philipchuck, P. Abecassis, and Y. Katz, “A comparison of the Truview blade with the macintosh blade in adult patients,” Anaesthesia, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 827–831, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. E. Wang and D. M. Yealy, “Out-of-Hospital endotracheal intubation: where are we?” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 532–541, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Manoach and L. Paladino, “Laryngoscopy force, visualization, and intubation failure in acute trauma: should we modify the practice of manual in-line stabilization?” Anesthesiology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 6–7, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. G. Santoni, B. J. Hindman, C. M. Puttlitz et al., “Manual in-line stabilization increases pressures applied by the laryngoscope blade during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation,” Anesthesiology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Frerk, V. S. Mitchell, A. F. McNarry et al., “Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 827–848, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. 2016, http://www.medcomtechgroup.com/media/files/Medcomflow/producto/Catalogue_TotalTrack_VLM_-_English_(LR).pdf.
  21. K. Schebesta, M. Hüpfl, B. Rössler, H. Ringl, M. P. Müller, and O. Kimberger, “Degrees of reality: airway anatomy of high-fidelity human patient simulators and airway trainers,” Anesthesiology, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 1204–1209, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. Arima, O. Nagata, T. Miura et al., “Comparative analysis of airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation primarily for cardiac arrest in prehospital setting,” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 40–43, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Rützler, S. Imach, M. Weiss, T. Haas, and A. R. Schmidt, “Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy: investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer,” Anaesthesist, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 513–519, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. J. Stratton, G. Kane, C. S. Gunter et al., “Prospective study of manikin-only versus manikin and human subject endotracheal intubation training of paramedics,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1314–1318, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. R. Rai and M. T. Popat, “Evaluation of airway equipment: man or manikin?” Anaesthesia, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. M. Cook, “Novel airway devices: spoilt for choice?” Anaesthesia, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 107–110, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Gaszynski, “Local anaesthesia for ‘awake intubation’ using the TruView PCD video laryngoscope,” Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 210–211, 2014. View at Google Scholar