BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 1429892 |

Zhe Jin, Yuheng Guan, Guibo Yu, Yu Sun, "Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Postoperative Fracture Healing Process without Metal Artifact: A Preliminary Report of a Novel Animal Model", BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 1429892, 4 pages, 2016.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Postoperative Fracture Healing Process without Metal Artifact: A Preliminary Report of a Novel Animal Model

Academic Editor: Jiang Du
Received11 Jan 2016
Revised27 Feb 2016
Accepted22 Mar 2016
Published31 Mar 2016


Background. Early radiological diagnosis and continual monitoring are of ultimate importance for timely treatment of delayed union, nonunion, and infection after bone fracture surgery. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could provide superior detailed images compared with X-ray and computed tomography (CT) without ionizing radiation, metal implants used for fracture fixation lead to abundant artifacts on MRI and thus prohibit accurate interpretation. The authors develop a novel intramedullary fixation model of rat femoral fracture using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) threaded rods and investigate its feasibility for in vivo MRI monitoring of the fracture healing process without artifact. Methods. Femoral fractures of 3 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were fixed with intramedullary PEEK threaded rods. X-ray and MRI examinations were performed at day 7 postoperatively. Radiological images were analyzed for the existence of artifact interruption and postoperative changes in bone and peripheral soft tissue. Results. Postoperative plain film revealed no loss of reduction. MRI images illustrated the whole length of femur and peripheral tissue without artifact interruption, and the cortical bone, implanted PEEK rod, and soft tissue were clearly illustrated. Conclusion. This preliminary study introduced a novel rat model for in vivo MRI monitoring of the fracture healing process without metal artifact, by using intramedullary fixation of femur with PEEK threaded rod.

1. Introduction

Trauma and osteoporosis lead to millions of bone fractures each year around the world, and with an aging population the incidence rate will continue increasing in the foreseeable future [1]. Although great advances have been achieved in surgical treatment, postoperative delayed union, nonunion, and infections are still grand challenges faced by orthopaedic surgeons [2]. To prevent long-term adverse effects caused by these complications, early radiological diagnosis and continual monitoring are of ultimate importance to guarantee timely intervention.

For decades, the formation of bone callus and the visibility of fracture line on X-ray or computed tomography (CT) images have been viewed as the most important criteria for clinical evaluation, but these techniques are only suitable for examining mineralized cortical bone, which does not allow early detection during the first several weeks after surgery [3]. Moreover, harmful effects associated with ionizing radiation caused by plain film and CT also limit their application for continual monitoring of fracture sites. As to major tissue components for early healing process, such as newly formed unmineralized bone, bone marrow in medullary cavity, and peripheral soft tissue with less X-ray contrast properties, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could provide superior detailed images from the beginning to bone union with excellent resolution and thin slices in any direction but without radiation injury, being recognized as the most appropriate diagnostic method for depicting the dynamic repairing, inflammatory, and infectious process [4]. Besides, high resolution MRI could also provide detailed information on bone neurovascularization and fibrovascular tissue ingrowth adjacent to medical implants comparable to anatomical dissection and histological studies [5, 6]. However, metal implants used for fracture fixation lead to abundant artifacts on MRI and thus prohibiting accurate interpretation of postoperative images, and MRI without artifact is needed for further research.

Fortunately in recent years, with leaping advances in biomaterials science, new polymeric materials have been developed and come into clinical applications with excellent mechanical properties and biosafety and without artifact interruption on MRI. We have previously developed a rat model of tibia fracture fixation with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) threaded rod, which allowed early postoperative full-weight bearing activities that resemble clinical treatment of human long bone fractures without using surgical metal implants [7]. This preliminary study aimed to develop a novel intramedullary fixation model of rat femoral fracture using PEEK threaded rod and to investigate its feasibility for in vivo MRI monitoring of the fracture healing process without artifact, which may help lab researchers and clinicians in future diagnostic and therapeutic research of postoperative operative complications of orthopaedic surgeries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. PEEK Threaded Rod Preparation

PEEK threaded rods were prepared as described in previous publication [7]. The rods were 2 mm in diameter and 100 mm in length with standard pitch (0.4 mm). All PEEK rods were rinsed ultrasonically with 70% ethanol for 24 hours and then underwent ethylene oxide sterilization according to operation standards used for surgical instruments. Animal experiment protocols were first approved by the ethical committee in the authors’ institution.

2.2. Animals

Three skeletally mature male Sprague-Dawley rats (280–300 g) provided by the Laboratory Animal Center of China Medical University were kept in plastic cage with free access to food and water, at constant room temperature with a 12-hour day/night cycle for 7 days before operation as accommodation.

2.3. Surgical Procedure

Before surgery, animals received intraperitoneal injections of pentobarbital sodium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for general anesthesia (50 mg/kg). The left hind leg was shaved with electric scissor and disinfected with povidone. First, a 1 cm anteromedial knee incision was made and the patella was released laterally to expose the distal femoral condyle, and a 2 mm diameter intercondylar bone tunnel was drilled with a depth of 20 mm. Then, another 1.5 cm longitudinal lateral skin incision was made between anterior and posterior muscle groups to expose the left femur, and the level of osteotomy was set in the middle of femur shaft (Figure 1(a)). After transverse osteotomy, a 20 mm PEEK threaded rod (Figure 1(b)) was inserted by a press-fit maneuver from distal to proximal, and care was taken to ensure rigid fixation of bone osteotomy without extra bone damage, followed by wound irrigation with normal saline. And the muscle fascia and skin were sutured interruptedly.

2.4. Postoperative Imaging

After 1 week, all animals received general anesthesia as stated above and postoperative plain film and MRI were obtained. A standard imaging module of an X-ray unit (Arcadis; Siemens, Germany) was used for X-ray examination, and in vivo MRI was imaged at 3.0T MRI scanner (Signa HDxt, GE Healthcare, USA) using a rat imaging coil with sagittal projections and FSE -weighted (TR = 4000, TE = 100) sequences with a 40 × 40 mm2 field of view, 2 mm slice thickness, 0.2 mm slice spacing, and 256 × 256 matrix. The total scan time was approximately 340 seconds. Regions of interest were analyzed on MRI including the cortical bone and medullary cavity around osteotomy site and signal intensity changes of surrounding soft tissue. All animals were euthanized via overdose injection of pentobarbital after MRI experiment.

3. Results

There were no postoperative wound complications observed during the study. Postoperative plain films revealed no loss of reduction or malalignment between fracture sites, and the site of osteotomy was well defined (Figure 2). The postoperative MRI images illustrated the whole length of left femur without artifact interruption. The cortical bone and implanted PEEK rod (arrow in Figure 3) in the medullary cavity were of low signal on MRI due to lack of free protons for resonance, and a region of discontinuity of the low signal representing cortical bone damage could be identified at the level of osteotomy (asterisk in Figure 3), and increased signal representing adjacent soft tissue edema and inflammation was clearly illustrated.

4. Discussion

Although X-ray and CT have been recognized as the most important radiological tools for postoperative diagnosis of orthopaedic surgical complications, increasing evidence has suggested that MRI could demonstrate higher sensitivity for detecting osseous changes, ectopic bone formation, myelopathies, soft tissue inflammation, and neurovascular changes, allowing assessment of morphological, physical, and chemical properties such as implant position, tissue hydration, and water/lipid ratios [4, 8, 9]. High resolution MRI device used mostly in lab studies may acquire image slices at a thickness of less than 100 μm and cellular level analysis correlated with traditional histological studies, enabling researchers to continuously visualize the cell and tissue behavior around the implant in vivo for evaluation of tissue-engineering products [3]. Besides, MRI is a noninvasive and ideal technique without X-ray radiation damage to patients. For instance, Park et al. and De Potter et al. used MRI examination to evaluate the extent of fibrovascular ingrowth into implanted polyethylene or hydroxyapatite ocular prosthesis and early signs of immune rejection [6, 10]. However, in the area of orthopaedic research no further progress has been made because of the existence of metallic artifact. Although many orthopaedic metal materials such as titanium are not ferromagnetic (MR safe), this paramagnetic hardware is still of large magnetic susceptibility differences with the surrounding tissue, so both ferromagnetic and paramagnetic metal implants can induce inhomogeneity in the static magnetic field (). Moreover, the switching of gradient pulses in an MRI scanner could produce eddy currents in the metal implant, which is another cause of inhomogeneity. The inhomogeneity will result in image distortion as metal-related artifacts, severely reducing the quality of examinations and obscuring anatomical regions which may lead to false diagnosis or evaluation [11, 12].

PEEK as a polymeric material is nonmagnetic and radiofrequency transparent and does not generate MRI artifact. It is chemically stable and nontoxic for both animal research and clinical treatment [13], also with excellent mechanical strength, ideal elastic modulus similar to cortical bone, and radiological translucency [14]. There are other studies published selecting PEEK plates for fracture fixation, but metal screws were still used in combination with PEEK [15]. To solve the problem, we have previously machined thread on PEEK rods to provide press-fit compression for intramedullary bone fixation and developed a tibia fracture healing model with simple operation procedure, good tissue protection, and excellent X-ray translucency [7]. Our threaded rods design on PEEK materials may also provide simple but effective fixation for clinical treatment of certain human tubular bones, especially for non-weight-bearing regions in upper extremities such as clavicle, radius, ulna, and metacarpal bones. In this study, we further investigated its application for rat femur fixation and in vivo postoperative MRI examination. Rat femurs were selected in this study to provide better images of the whole bone as illustrated in Figure 3, considering that the anatomical curvature of rat tibia may add unnecessary technical difficulties. To our knowledge, this is the first report of noninvasive in vivo MRI monitoring of long bone fracture healing using pure PEEK polymeric material for fixation.

This preliminary study has some limitations. We obtained MRI images using -weighted sequences without MR contrast one week postoperatively. Future experiments could include more MRI sequences and contrast agents at more time points, which will involve more animals in study and allow visualization of dynamic cellular and tissue behavior during fracture healing following surgical implantation. Moreover, other animal models with impaired fracture healing process could be evaluated in vivo using our fixation method, such as type-2 diabetes, osteoporosis, critical-size bone defect, tumor, and other inflammatory or infectious diseases.

5. Conclusions

This preliminary study introduced a novel rat model for in vivo MRI monitoring of the fracture healing process without metal artifact, through intramedullary fixation of femur using PEEK threaded rod. This animal model may provide a new diagnostic tool in future studies on postoperative complications of orthopaedic surgeries.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the following people from Institute of Metal Research (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China), for their generous support of the preparation of PEEK threaded rods: Professor Dianzhong Li, Associate Professor Xiuhong Kang, and Dr. Jian Wang.


  1. K. E. Ensrud, “Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age,” Journals of Gerontology—Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 1236–1242, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. J. Hak, D. Fitzpatrick, J. A. Bishop et al., “Delayed union and nonunions: epidemiology, clinical issues, and financial aspects,” Injury, vol. 45, supplement 2, pp. S3–S7, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Xu, S. F. Othman, and R. L. Magin, “Monitoring tissue engineering using magnetic resonance imaging,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 515–527, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. Ernstberger, G. Heidrich, C. Dullin, G. Buchhorn, and E. Grabbe, “Preclinical evaluation by flat-panel detector-based volumetric CT versus MRI of intervertebral spacers implanted in a porcine model,” Spine Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 360–367, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Jacobs, I. Lambrichts, X. Liang et al., “Neurovascularization of the anterior jaw bones revisited using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 683–693, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. W. Park, H. Y. Seol, S. J. Hong, K. A. Kim, J. C. Choi, and I. H. Cha, “Magnetic resonance evaluation of fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene orbital implant,” Clinical Imaging, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 377–381, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Z. Jin, Y. Sun, Y. Guan, and G. Yu, “A novel rat model of intramedullary tibia fracture fixation using polyetheretherketone threaded rod,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 3, no. 6, article e417, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. A. Ladinsky and F. W. Wehrli, “Noninvasive assessment of bone microarchitecture by MRI,” Current Osteoporosis Reports, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 140–147, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. W. Wehrli, H. K. Song, P. K. Saha, and A. C. Wright, “Quantitative MRI for the assessment of bone structure and function,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 731–764, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. De Potter, C. L. Shields, J. A. Shields, A. E. Flanders, and V. M. Rao, “Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant,” Ophthalmology, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 824–830, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. J. Graves and D. G. Mitchell, “Body MRI artifacts in clinical practice: a physicist's and radiologist's perspective,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 269–287, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. M. Naraghi and L. M. White, “Magnetic resonance imaging of joint replacements,” Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 98–106, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. M. Kurtz and J. N. Devine, “PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 32, pp. 4845–4869, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Walter, S. A. Kuhn, R. Reichart, R. Kalff, and C. Ewald, “PEEK cages as a potential alternative in the treatment of cervical spondylodiscitis: a preliminary report on a patient series,” European Spine Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1004–1009, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Viljanen, J. Kinnunen, S. Bondestam, and P. Rokkanen, “Intramedullary fixation of distal femoral diaphyseal osteotomies with absorbable self-reinforced poly-L-lactide and metallic intramedullary rods assessed by plain radiographs, quantitative computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental study in rabbits,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 1998. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Zhe Jin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.