Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 1734190, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1734190
Review Article

Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging in MRI and CT: Theoretical Models and Current Implementation

1University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging North-East Netherlands (CMI-NEN), University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
2University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
3University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands

Received 4 December 2015; Accepted 11 February 2016

Academic Editor: Sebastian Kelle

Copyright © 2016 G. J. Pelgrim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Jaarsma, T. Leiner, S. C. Bekkers et al., “Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 19, pp. 1719–1728, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Morton, A. Chiribiri, M. Ishida et al., “Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 60, no. 16, pp. 1546–1555, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. G. Kuhle, G. Porenta, S.-C. Huang et al., “Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and reoriented dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging,” Circulation, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 1004–1017, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Choi, S.-C. Huang, R. A. Hawkins et al., “Quantification of myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and PET: comparison of tracer models,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1045–1055, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Gewirtz, “PET measurement of adenosine stimulated absolute myocardial blood flow for physiological assessment of the coronary circulation,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 347–354, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. A. Kajander, E. Joutsiniemi, M. Saraste et al., “Clinical value of absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion with 15O-water in coronary artery disease,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 678–684, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. F. Di Carli, S. Dorbala, J. Meserve, G. El Fakhri, A. Sitek, and S. C. Moore, “Clinical myocardial perfusion PET/CT,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 783–793, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. H. Schindler, H. R. Schelbert, A. Quercioli, and V. Dilsizian, “Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health,” JACC Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 623–640, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. H. J. A. Slart, C. J. Zeebregts, H. L. Hillege et al., “Myocardial perfusion reserve after a PET-driven revascularization procedure: a strong prognostic factor,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 873–879, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. A. Tio, A. Dabeshlim, H.-M. J. Siebelink et al., “Comparison between the prognostic value of left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with ischemic heart disease,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 214–219, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. E. Juárez-Orozco, J. Glauche, E. Alexanderson et al., “Myocardial perfusion reserve in spared myocardium: correlation with infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1148–1154, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Maddahi, “Properties of an ideal PET perfusion tracer: new PET tracer cases and data,” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 19, supplement 1, pp. S30–S37, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. J. Gordon, K. C. Chu, A. Margaritis, A. J. Martin, C. R. Ethier, and B. K. Rutt, “Measurement of Gd-DTPA diffusion through PVA hydrogel using a novel magnetic resonance imaging method,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 459–467, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Nair, W.-J. Kim, R. D. Braatz, and M. S. Strano, “Dynamics of surfactant-suspended single-walled carbon nanotubes in a centrifugal field,” Langmuir, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1790–1795, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Irace, S. Tamburini, B. Bertucci, M. S. Franceschi, and A. Gnasso, “Effects of iodinated contrast media on common carotid and brachial artery blood flow and wall shear stress,” European Radiology, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2721–2727, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. H. Reinhart, B. Pleisch, L. G. Harris, and M. Lütolf, “Influence of contrast media (iopromide, ioxaglate, gadolinium-DOTA) on blood viscosity, erythrocyte morphology and platelet function,” Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 227–239, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. Utz, T. Niendorf, R. Wassmuth, D. Messroghli, R. Dietz, and J. Schulz-Menger, “Contrast-dose relation in first-pass myocardial MR perfusion imaging,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1131–1135, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Ishida, H. Sakuma, S. Murashima et al., “Absolute blood contrast concentration and blood signal saturation on myocardial perfusion MRI: Estimation from CT data,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 205–210, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Jerosch-Herold, “Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 12, article 57, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. P. B. O'Connor, P. S. Tofts, K. A. Miles, L. M. Parkes, G. Thompson, and A. Jackson, “Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. S112–S120, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. Bamberg, R. Hinkel, R. P. Marcus et al., “Feasibility of dynamic CT-based adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging to detect and differentiate ischemic and infarcted myocardium in an large experimental porcine animal model,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 803–812, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Bastarrika, L. Ramos-Duran, U. J. Schoepf et al., “Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial volume perfusion imaging with second generation dual-source computed tomography: concepts and first experiences,” Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 127–135, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Salerno and G. A. Beller, “Noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 412–424, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Jogiya, S. Kozerke, G. Morton et al., “Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 756–765, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Kikuchi, N. Oyama-Manabe, M. Naya et al., “Quantification of myocardial blood flow using dynamic 320-row multi-detector CT as compared with 15O-H2O PET,” European Radiology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1547–1556, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Rossi, D. Merkus, E. Klotz, N. Mollet, P. J. de Feyter, and G. P. Krestin, “Stress myocardial perfusion: imaging with multidetector CT,” Radiology, vol. 270, no. 1, pp. 25–46, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. R. Schelbert, M. E. Phelps, S. C. Huang et al., “N-13 ammonia as an indicator of myocardial blood flow,” Circulation, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1259–1272, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. Y. Tong, F. S. Prato, G. Wisenberg et al., “Measurement of the extraction efficiency and distribution volume for Gd- DTPA in normal and diseased canine myocardium,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 337–346, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. X. Li, C. S. Springer Jr., and M. Jerosch-Herold, “First-pass dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with extravasating contrast reagent: evidence for human myocardial capillary recruitment in adenosine-induced hyperemia,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 148–157, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Ishida, T. Ichihara, M. Nagata et al., “Quantification of myocardial blood flow using model based analysis of first-pass perfusion MRI: extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA varies with myocardial blood flow in human myocardium,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1391–1399, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. M. Canty Jr., R. M. Judd, A. S. Brody, and F. J. Klocke, “First-pass entry of nonionic contrast agent into the myocardial extravascular space. Effects on radiographic estimates of transit time and blood volume,” Circulation, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 2071–2078, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. Daghini, A. N. Primak, A. R. Chade et al., “Evaluation of porcine myocardial microvascular permeability and fractional vascular volume using 64-slice helical computed tomography (CT),” Investigative Radiology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 274–282, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Saraste, S. Kajander, C. Han, S. V. Nesterov, and J. Knuuti, “PET: is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?” Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1044–1059, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. P. Sourbron and D. L. Buckley, “Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: estimating perfusion and capillary permeability,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. R31–R33, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Jerosch-Herold, C. Swingen, and R. T. Seethamraju, “Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution,” Medical Physics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 886–897, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Jerosch-Herold, N. Wilke, A. E. Stillman, and R. F. Wilson, “Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution,” Medical Physics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. A. Broadbent, J. D. Biglands, A. Larghat et al., “Myocardial blood flow at rest and stress measured with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of a distributed parameter model with a fermi function model,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1591–1597, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. A. Johnson and T. A. Wilson, “A model for capillary exchange,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 210, no. 6, pp. 1299–1303, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. S. Koh, D. L. H. Cheong, and Z. Hou, “Issues of discontinuity in the impulse residue function for deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 886–892, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. Garpebring, N. Ostlund, and M. Karlsson, “A novel estimation method for physiological parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: application of a distributed parameter model using Fourier-domain calculations,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1375–1383, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. S. St Lawrence and T.-Y. Lee, “An adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model for water exchange in the brain. II. Experimental validation,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1378–1385, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. Bisdas, G. Konstantinou, K. Surlan-Popovic et al., “Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of head and neck tumors: comparison of first-pass and permeability perfusion measurements using two different commercially available tracer kinetics models,” Academic Radiology, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1580–1589, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. V. Goh, S. Halligan, and C. I. Bartram, “Quantitative tumor perfusion assessment with multidetector CT: are measurements from two commercial software packages interchangeable?” Radiology, vol. 242, no. 3, pp. 777–782, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. So, J. Hsieh, J.-Y. Li, J. Hadway, H.-F. Kong, and T.-Y. Lee, “Quantitative myocardial perfusion measurement using CT Perfusion: a validation study in a porcine model of reperfused acute myocardial infarction,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1237–1248, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. So, G. Wisenberg, A. Islam et al., “Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences,” European Radiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Jerosch-Herold, N. Wilke, Y. Wang et al., “Direct comparison of an intravascular and an extracellular contrast agent for quantification of myocardial perfusion,” International Journal of Cardiac Imaging, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 453–464, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. P. S. Tofts, G. Brix, D. L. Buckley et al., “Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)- weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 223–232, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. N. A. Pack and E. V. R. DiBella, “Comparison of myocardial perfusion estimates from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with four quantitative analysis methods,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 125–137, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. P. Sourbron and D. L. Buckley, “On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 735–745, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. S. Patlak, R. G. Blasberg, and J. D. Fenstermacher, “Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. T. Ichihara, M. Ishida, K. Kitagawa et al., “Quantitative analysis of first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI using a Patlak plot method and blood saturation correction,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 373–383, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. F. Bamberg, R. Hinkel, F. Schwarz et al., “Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. Bamberg, E. Klotz, T. Flohr et al., “Dynamic myocardial stress perfusion imaging using fast dual-source CT with alternating table positions: initial experience,” European Radiology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1168–1173, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. G. Gould, M. J. Lipton, M. T. McNamara, R. E. Sievers, S. Koshold, and C. B. Higgins, “Measurement of regional myocardial blood flow in dogs by Ultrafast CT,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 348–353, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Bindschadler, D. Modgil, K. R. Branch, P. J. La Riviere, and A. M. Alessio, “Comparison of blood flow models and acquisitions for quantitative myocardial perfusion estimation from dynamic CT,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1533–1556, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. O. M. Muehling, N. M. Wilke, P. Panse et al., “Reduced myocardial perfusion reserve and transmural perfusion gradient in heart transplant arteriopathy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1054–1060, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. T. F. Christian, A. H. Aletras, and A. E. Arai, “Estimation of absolute myocardial blood flow during first-pass MR perfusion imaging using a dual-bolus injection technique: comparison to single-bolus injection method,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1271–1277, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. T. F. Christian, D. W. Rettmann, A. H. Aletras et al., “Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 677–684, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. L.-Y. Hsu, D. W. Groves, A. H. Aletras, P. Kellman, and A. E. Arai, “A quantitative pixel-wise measurement of myocardial blood flow by contrast-enhanced first-pass CMR perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in dogs and feasibility study in humans,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 154–166, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. C. A. Miller, J. H. Naish, M. P. Ainslie et al., “Voxel-wise quantification of myocardial blood flow with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Effect of variations in methodology and validation with positron emission tomography,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 16, article 11, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. N. A. Pack, E. V. R. DiBella, T. C. Rust et al., “Estimating myocardial perfusion from dynamic contrast-enhanced CMR with a model-independent deconvolution method,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 10, article 52, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. E. Henderson, B. K. Rutt, and T.-Y. Lee, “Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1057–1073, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. R. Gebker, C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch et al., “MR myocardial perfusion imaging with k-space and time broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique: feasibility study,” Radiology, vol. 245, no. 3, pp. 863–871, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. D. Spira, J. D. Gerlach, S. M. Spira, M. Schulze, A. Sauter, and M. Horger, “Effect of scan time on perfusion and flow extraction product (K-trans) measurements in lung cancer using low-dose volume perfusion CT (VPCT),” Academic Radiology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 78–83, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. S. Ng, A. G. Chandler, W. Wei et al., “Effect of sampling frequency on perfusion values in perfusion CT of lung tumors,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. W155–W162, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. V. Goh, J. Liaw, C. I. Bartram, and S. Halligan, “Effect of temporal interval between scan acquisitions on quantitative vascular parameters in colorectal cancer: implications for helical volumetric perfusion CT techniques,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 191, no. 6, pp. W288–W292, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. Y. Cao, D. Li, Z. Shen, and D. Normolle, “Sensitivity of quantitative metrics derived from DCE MRI and a pharmacokinetic model to image quality and acquisition parameters,” Academic Radiology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 468–478, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. L. E. Kershaw and H.-L. M. Cheng, “Temporal resolution and SNR requirements for accurate DCE-MRI data analysis using the AATH model,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1772–1780, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. Fujita, K. Kitagawa, T. Ito et al., “Dose reduction in dynamic CT stress myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison of 80-kV/370-mAs and 100-kV/300-mAs protocols,” European Radiology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 748–755, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. F. Schwab, M. Ingrisch, R. Marcus et al., “Tracer kinetic modeling in myocardial perfusion quantification using MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 1206–1215, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. J. Czernin, P. Müller, S. Chan et al., “Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve,” Circulation, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. S. Sdringola, N. P. Johnson, R. L. Kirkeeide, E. Cid, and K. L. Gould, “Impact of unexpected factors on quantitative myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve in young, asymptomatic volunteers,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 402–412, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. S. Nakamori, K. Onishi, M. Ishida et al., “Myocardial perfusion reserve is impaired in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison to current smokers,” European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 180–188, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. H. Nakajima, K. Onishi, T. Kurita et al., “Hypertension impairs myocardial blood perfusion reserve in subjects without regional myocardial ischemia,” Hypertension Research, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1144–1149, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. K. Kawecka-Jaszcz, D. Czarnecka, A. Olszanecka et al., “Myocardial perfusion in hypertensive patients with normal coronary angiograms,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1686–1694, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus