Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2384894, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2384894
Research Article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Robot-Guided, Software Based Transperineal MRI/TRUS Fusion Biopsy of the Prostate in a High Risk Population of Previously Biopsy Negative Men

1Department of Urology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
2Department of Radiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
3Department of Clinical Pathology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 115a, 79106 Freiburg, Germany

Received 29 August 2016; Accepted 25 October 2016

Academic Editor: Michael Feuerstein

Copyright © 2016 Malte Kroenig et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. N. A. Howlader, M. Krapcho, D. Miller et al., Eds., SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2013, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md, USA, 2016, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/.
  2. P. Harvey, A. Basuita, D. Endersby, B. Curtis, A. Iacovidou, and M. Walker, “A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific antigen,” BMC Urology, vol. 9, article 14, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. A. Bjurlin and S. S. Taneja, “Standards for prostate biopsy,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 155–161, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Takenaka, R. Hara, T. Ishimura et al., “A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy,” Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 134–138, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Ficarra, G. Novella, A. Galfano, and W. Artibani, “Transperineal TRUS-guided prostate biopsy,” Urologia, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Loeb, A. Vellekoop, H. U. Ahmed et al., “Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy,” European Urology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 876–892, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P.-F. Shen, Y.-C. Zhu, W.-R. Wei et al., “The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 310–315, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. J. Fütterer, A. Briganti, P. De Visschere et al., “Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature,” European Urology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1045–1053, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. de Rooij, E. H. J. Hamoen, J. J. Fütterer, J. O. Barentsz, and M. M. Rovers, “Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 343–351, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Gayet, A. van der Aa, HP. Beerlage, BP. Schrier, PF. Mulders, and H. Wijkstra, “The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy platforms in prostate cancer detection: a systematic review,” BJU International, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 392–400, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Valerio, I. Donaldson, M. Emberton et al., “Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review,” European Urology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 8–19, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. van Hove, P.-H. Savoie, C. Maurin et al., “Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 847–858, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. H. Kuru, K. Wadhwa, R. T. M. Chang et al., “Definitions of terms, processes and a minimum dataset for transperineal prostate biopsies: a standardization approach of the Ginsburg Study Group for enhanced prostate diagnostics,” BJU International, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 568–577, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. O. Barentsz, J. C. Weinreb, S. Verma et al., “Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use,” European Urology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 41–49, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. I. Epstein, L. Egevad, M. B. Amin, B. Delahunt, J. R. Srigley, and P. A. Humphrey, “The 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 244–252, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. L. Robertson, M. Emberton, and C. M. Moore, “MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 589–597, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Marks, S. Young, and S. Natarajan, “MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. C. M. Moore, N. L. Robertson, N. Arsanious et al., “Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review,” European Urology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 125–140, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Heidenreich, P. J. Bastian, J. Bellmunt et al., “EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent—update 2013,” European Urology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 124–137, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Kesch, J. P. Radtke, F. Distler et al., “Multiparametric MRI and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsy,” Der Urologe, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1071–1077, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. F. V. Mertan, M. D. Greer, J. H. Shih et al., “Prospective evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 for prostate cancer detection,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 690–696, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. H. Cash, A. Maxeiner, C. Stephan et al., “The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy,” World Journal of Urology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 525–532, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Selvanayagam, “Perforated rectal diverticulum following prostate biopsy resulting in peri-rectal abscess and sepsis,” Surgical Infections Case Reports, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2–3, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar