BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 3237586 |

Han Chien Lin, Yu-Liang Kuo, Wen-Ju Lee, Hui-Yi Yap, Shao-Hung Wang, "Antidermatophytic Activity of Ethanolic Extract from Croton tiglium", BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 3237586, 6 pages, 2016.

Antidermatophytic Activity of Ethanolic Extract from Croton tiglium

Academic Editor: Adair Santos
Received08 Apr 2016
Accepted25 May 2016
Published03 Jul 2016


Dermatophytosis, which is caused mainly by genera of Trichophyton, Epidermophyton, and Microsporum, is a frequent dermatological problem in tropical and subtropical countries. Investigations were carried out in this study to evaluate the antidermatophytic activity of the stems, leaves, and seeds of Croton tiglium, one of the traditional medicine plants indigenous to Asia. Ethanolic extracts of the stems, leaves, and seeds of C. tiglium were prepared by cold soak or heat reflux methods. The antidermatophytic activities of the extracts were evaluated by disc diffusion and microdilution susceptibility assays against Trichophyton mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, and Epidermophyton floccosum. The active components in the extracts were analyzed and identified by GC-MS. All ethanolic extracts of C. tiglium showed some antifungal activities against the three dermatophytes. The ethanolic stem extract had the greatest inhibitory activities against T. mentagrophytes and E. floccosum with MICs at 0.16 mg/mL and had a lower activity against T. rubrum (MIC: 0.31 mg/mL). Oleic acid and hexadecanoic acid were found to be the major constituents in the stem extract that demonstrated strong antidermatophytic activities. The ethanolic extracts of stem or seed of C. tiglium exhibit strong antidermatophytic activities and, thus, could be considered for application on treating skin fungal infections after appropriate processing.

1. Introduction

Fungal infections of the skin and nails are common in humans and are caused mostly by dermatophytes. A microbiological surveillance demonstrated that molds actually account for a quarter of skin fungal pathogens in hospitalized fever patients in central Taiwan [1]. While the causative agents vary in species geographically, T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, and E. floccosum are the most common anthropophilic dermatophytes in Taiwan [2, 3]. Essential oils or organic extracts from plants have been reported with antidermatophytic activity, including Abies holophylla, Angelica major, Alpinia speciosa, Artemisia sieberi, Baccharis trimera, Chamaecyparis obtusa, Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Cymbopogon citratus, Eucalyptus smithii, Eugenia uniflora, Foeniculum vulgare, Ocimum gratissimum, Mentha piperita, Moringa oleifera, Olea europaea, Prunus armeniaca, Prunus dulcis, and Thymus schimperi [313].

Croton tiglium L. (Euphorbiaceae) is a medicinal plant that is indigenous to China, India, and Southeast Asia [14]. Seeds, leaves, bark, and root of C. tiglium are used in traditional medicine to ease various illnesses, including dropsy, obstinate constipation, intestinal obstruction, lead poisoning, and high blood pressure [15]. Moreover, extracts of C. tiglium have been reported possessing antimicrobial activities. The tested microorganisms include Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pasteurella multocida, Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. aureus, Aspergillus niger, Candida albicans, Microsporum canis, Mucor mucedo, and Trichophyton rubrum [1620]. Croton oil, prepared from the seeds of C. tiglium, was used to treat some skin diseases, including ringworm [21, 22]. To find whether C. tiglium has antidermatophytic activity, we extracted stems, leaves, and seeds of the plant separately and analyzed the possible active components after the extracts were further resolved by gas-chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Extraction of Croton tiglium

Stems, leaves, and seeds of Croton tiglium L. taken from the plants at Fanlu countryside, Chiayi county, Taiwan, were crushed and grinded. The powder was then extracted with ethanol either by cold soak or by heat reflux. In the cold soak method, 95% ethanol at a 10 : 1 weight ratio was used to soak the powder in dark at room temperature for 48 h. On the other hand of using heat reflux, the mixture of ethanol and powder was boiled and refluxed for 2 h in a flask equipped with a condenser. The filtrates (Advantec number 1) were concentrated and dried at 40°C in a rotary evaporator (Laborota 4000, Heidolph, Germany). After dissolving in a minimum amount of dimethyl sulfoxide, these extracts were used for the initial bioassay.

Additional dried ethanolic extracts were subjected to water and ethyl acetate partition (1 : 1) at room temperature. The ethyl acetate soluble fraction and the ethyl acetate insoluble but water soluble fraction were concentrated and dried at 40°C.

2.2. Fungal Strains and Culture Conditions

The dermatophytes used for experimental controls in this study were obtained from the Food Industry Research and Development Institute in Taiwan. Trichophyton mentagrophytes (BCRC 32066), T. rubrum (BCRC 32805), and Epidermophyton floccosum (BCRC 30531) were regularly cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agars (SDA; Difco) at 25°C. RPMI-1640 (Sigma) buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS was used for the broth microdilution susceptibility assay, to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Amphotericin B (AMB; Sigma) was used as a positive control for antifungal activity. All the works were performed in biosafety level-2 (P2) facility. The protocol and the procedures of the study were approved by the National Chiayi University Biosafety Committee.

2.3. Antifungal Disc Diffusion Susceptibility Testing

Stock fungal conidia were prepared from 15-day-old colonies grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco) and suspended in sterile saline as a stock. SDA plates were streaked evenly with 0.5-McFarland inoculums. Samples to be tested were dissolved appropriately, and 10 μL of the solution was applied to sterile paper discs (ADVANTEC), 8 mm in diameter, and air dried. The discs were then applied to the surfaces of inoculated plates. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 48 h, and the diameters of the inhibition zone were measured.

2.4. Susceptibility Assay by Broth Microdilution

MICs of the samples were determined alternatively by the broth microdilution method using serially diluted extract samples. In brief, each microdilution well that contained 100 μL of the MOPS-buffered RPMI-diluted extract received an equal volume of 50-fold diluted conidia stock. The well-containing plates were incubated at 25°C for 48 h. After incubation, the plates were examined visually, and the MIC for the assayed sample was the lowest extract concentration showing no apparent growth of the target microorganism.

2.5. Identification of Components in the Ethyl Acetate Soluble Fractions

To analyze the components in the ethyl acetate soluble fractions of the C. tiglium, GC-MS (Agilent model 6890 GC with model 5973 MSD) was applied. To DB-5ms column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 μm film thickness), 1 μL sample was injected. The oven temperature was set initially at 40°C for 1 min, followed by an increment of 4°C/min up to 180°C, then by an increase of 15°C/min up to 260°C, and then by keeping at 260°C for 10 min; the injector was set at 270°C with helium as the carrier gas (1 mL/min). The split valve was opened with a split ratio of 1 : 50 and the ionization energy was 70 eV. Spectra were scanned from 45 to 425 m/z. Volatile compounds were identified by comparing the mass spectra with the data system libraries (Wiley/NBS and NIST) and by Kovats indices (KI) estimated in accordance with modified Kovats method [23]. The relative percentages of individual compounds were calculated from the corresponding peak areas.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Experimental measurements were carried out in triplicate. All values are expressed as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS). Differences were considered statistically significant when .

3. Results

3.1. Antidermatophytic Activity of Ethanolic Extract from Croton tiglium

Three most common dermatophytes in Taiwan, that is, T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, and E. floccosum, were used for testing the antifungal activity of C. tiglium extracts in this study (Tables 13). By using disc diffusion method, we demonstrated that both heat reflux and cold soak fractions of the ethanolic stem extract of C. tiglium had inhibitory activities against T. mentagrophytes (Table 1) and E. floccosum (Table 3) in a dose-dependent manner. T. rubrum is less sensitive to all of the extracts. However, when the heat reflux extract was used at 10 μg (Table 2), a clear zone can be seen. The heat reflux or the cold soak fractions of C. tiglium seeds showed a weak but noteworthy inhibition against T. mentagrophytes (Table 1) and E. floccosum (Table 3). It is conclusively seen that using the heat reflux method to extract stems of C. tiglium yielded the highest inhibition activity to the three dermatophytes among all preparations (Tables 1 and 3).

Heat refluxCold soakHeat refluxCold soakHeat refluxCold soak

Extract10 g11.1 ± 0.48.7 ± 0.38.0 ± 0.08.0 ± 0.09.5 ± 0.49.1 ± 0.3
50 g14.0 ± 0.411.7 ± 0.29.6 ± 0.38.7 ± 0.513.0 ± 0.611.7 ± 0.6
250 g17.0 ± 0.214.2 ± 0.612.5 ± 0.211.1 ± 0.216.1 ± 0.814.4 ± 0.7
500 g18.1 ± 0.415.2 ± 0.413.4 ± 0.112.4 ± 0.817.3 ± 0.715.4 ± 0.8

AMB (10 g)21.3 ± 0.2

The fungal spores were plated on SDA plates with the extracts or amphotericin B (AMB) absorbed on 8 mm filter paper discs. Duncan’s multiple range test () was used to statistically evaluate the difference in the diameters (mm) of inhibition zones. The letters “a, b, c, d, and e” indicated significant differences between groups treated with different amounts of the extracts. The letters “w, x, y, and z” indicate statistical differences among the extraction groups.

Heat refluxCold soakHeat refluxCold soakHeat refluxCold soak

Extract10 g9.8 ± 0.58.0 ± 0.08.0 ± 0.08.0 ± 0.08.0 ± 0.08.0 ± 0.0
50 g13.9 ± 0.110.1 ± 0.48.9 ± 0.29.9 ± 0.210.0 ± 0.210.0 ± 1.0
250 g16.8 ± 0.112.5 ± 0.310.5 ± 0.212.3 ± 0.112.9 ± 0.412.7 ± 0.9
500 g17.7 ± 0.513.5 ± 0.2111.8 ± 0.113.0 ± 0.213.8 ± 0.613.4 ± 0.5

AMB (10 g)20.2 ± 0.2

The notes are the same as those in Table 1.

Heat refluxCold soakHeat refluxCold soakHeat refluxCold soak

Extract10 g12.04 ± 0.6510.08 ± 0.418.50 ± 0.358.00 ± 0.008.88 ± 0.278.00 ± 0.00
50 g15.08 ± 0.7213.88 ± 0.5310.29 ± 1.109.42 ± 0.2412.79 ± 0.6010.79 ± 0.06
250 g17.50 ± 0.2016.08 ± 0.3312.42 ± 0.3613.50 ± 0.3515.17 ± 0.2413.92 ± 0.31
500 g18.29 ± 0.2917.08 ± 0.4615.04 ± 0.9114.25 ± 0.5416.38 ± 0.1814.92 ± 0.51

AMB (10 g)21.4 ± 0.1

The notes are the same as those in Table 1.

To determine the MICs of those extracts against the three dermatophytes, broth microdilution susceptibility was performed. The smallest values of MIC of the prepared C. tiglium extracts against T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, and E. floccosum were 0.16 mg/mL, 0.31 mg/mL, and 0.16 mg/mL, respectively. They were all obtained from the heat reflux-derived extracts of stem (Table 4), an observation that was consistent with the inhibitory results using disc diffusion method (Tables 1 and 3).

SpecimenT. mentagrophytesT. rubrumE. floccosum

StemHeat reflux0.160.310.16
Cold soak0.631.250.31

LeaveHeat reflux1.252.500.63
Cold soak2.501.251.25

SeedHeat reflux0.311.250.63
Cold soak0.631.251.25

3.2. Antidermatophytic Activity of the Ethyl Acetate Fractions from Croton tiglium Ethanolic Extracts

To analyze the antidermatophytic ingredients in the extracts of C. tiglium, the preparations were partitioned with water and ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate soluble parts, but not the water soluble fraction (i.e., ethyl acetate insoluble fractions), readily possessed antidermatophytic activity (Table 5). Moreover, the values of MIC measured for the ethyl acetate soluble fractions were all smaller than the original nonpartitioned ones (Tables 4 and 5). Among them, those ethyl acetate extracts from the heat reflux of the C. tiglium stem showed the strongest antidermatophytic activity (Table 5) with the values of MIC against T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, and E. floccosum at 0.08 mg/mL, 0.16 mg/mL, and 0.04 mg/mL, respectively. Second to the stem preparations, the counterparts prepared from the heat reflux seed showed MIC strengths at 0.16 mg/mL, 0.31 mg/mL, and 0.16 mg/mL, respectively (Table 5). Those from the leaves yielded the least inhibitory activities.

SpecimenT. mentagrophytesT. rubrumE. floccosum

StemHeat reflux0.080.160.04
Cold soak0.310.630.16

LeaveHeat reflux0.631.250.31
Cold soak1.250.630.63

SeedHeat reflux0.160.310.16
Cold soak0.310.630.31

All ethyl acetate insoluble (water soluble) fractions gave MIC values greater than 5 mg/mL.
3.3. Component Identification of the Ethyl Acetate-Partitioned, Heat Reflux Ethanolic Extracts from C. tiglium

To examine what compounds within the C. tiglium extracts have the antidermatophytic activities, the final ethyl acetate preparations from the heat reflux ethanolic extracts of C. tiglium stem and seed were separately subjected to GC-MS analysis. In the GC profiles, any peak with a volume higher than 1% of the total peak areas was examined and their components were identified by matching to the built-in data. Table 6 shows ten major components in the stem extract while showing eight components in the seed preparation. Among the ten major components in the stem extract, one (hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester) was also detected abundantly in the seed extract. The top four abundant compounds in the stem extract were oleic acid, ethyl ester (20.87%), hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid, 20.77%), hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester (14.11%), and oleic acid (14.04%).

Compound identificationStemSeed

EstersBis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate5.23
Decanoic acid, ethyl ester6.44
Dodecanoic acid, ethyl ester5.74
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester14.1117.78
Tetradecanoic acid, ethyl ester4.39
15-Methyl-11-hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester1.87
Heptadecanoic acid, ethyl ester0.95
Linoleic acid, ethyl ester35.90
Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester5.5624.47
Oleic acid, ethyl ester20.87


AcidsHexadecanoic acid20.77
Oleic acid14.04


Numbers indicate the percentages of each GC-MS peak. Those peaks with percentages less than 1% were omitted.
3.4. Antidermatophytic Activity of Oleic Acid

Since the major chemicals identified in the ethyl acetate extracts of C. tiglium stem and seed were long-chain organic acids or their esters (Table 6), we tested the top four major components found in the ethyl acetate-stem extract for their possible antifungal activities by the microdilution method, after balancing the pH values. The results in Table 7 show that oleic acid (MIC: 0.08–0.31 mg/mL) is the most active one, followed by hexadecanoic acid (MIC: 0.16–0.31 mg/mL), against the three common dermatophytes. In contrast, their ethyl esters showed less active (oleic acid, ethyl ester with MIC at 0.63 to >5 mg/mL) or negligible activities (hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester with MIC at >5 mg/mL). As aforementioned, T. rubrum displayed less sensitivity to those compounds than the other two fungi.

T. mentagrophytesT. rubrumE. floccosum

Oleic acid0.080.310.08
Hexadecanoic acid0.310.310.16
Oleate, ethyl ester2.5>50.63
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester>5>5>5

4. Discussion

C. tiglium, a plant considered indigenous to Asia, has been used long time for medical purposes. In the present study, we revealed that the ethanolic extract of C. tiglium did possess strong antifungal activities against dermatophytes, including T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, and E. floccosum. GC-MS analysis revealed that the major components in the stem or seed extracts of C. tiglium were long-chain organic acids and their ester derivatives. Moreover, we found that oleic acid and hexadecanoic acid of the extracts, but not their ester forms, exhibited strong antidermatophytic activity.

In a screening of medicinal plants for the antifungal activity, Jamil et al. found that crude extracts from the leaves and seeds of C. tiglium were active against Trichocomaceae (Aspergillus niger and A. tamarii) and Mucoraceae (Mucor mucedo and Rhizopus solani) [24]. In a separate experiment, Shahid et al. discovered that a 50 kDa protein had good antifungal activity [18]. However, Iraqui and Yadav [19] have discovered the ethanolic or methanolic extracts from seeds of C. tiglium exhibiting better fungicidal activity against T. rubrum than the water extracts. Here we consistently found that the portion of C. tiglium ethanol extract followed by partition into ethyl ester did contain the anti-T. rubrum activities. However, we did not aim at the large molecules solubilized in water. The possible antifungal protein in C. tiglium remains to be confirmed. It is conceivable that ingredients of C. tiglium against dermatophytes may consist of multiple components.

Extracts of leaves from Helichrysum pedunculatum have been previously proven to be active against Gram-positive bacteria and within the extracts, oleic and linoleic acids are the active constituents. Furthermore, they have synergistic bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Micrococcus kristinae [25]. Linolenic, linoleic, and oleic acids have been demonstrated to exhibit strong activities against some important plant fungal pathogens [26]. In our case of C. tiglium, high contents of oleic acid and hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid) seem to play a major role in inhibiting three human fungal pathogens. Intriguingly, polyunsaturated fatty acids seem to be more active against dermatophytes than the saturated fatty acid [27] as the effective linoleic (C 18:2), linolenic (C 18:3), and oleic (C 18:1) acids are all unsaturated.

5. Conclusion

The ethanolic extracts of stem or seed extracts of C. tiglium exhibited strong antidermatophytic activities. A topical application of the ethanolic extracts of C. tiglium on treating skin fungal infection and formulation of the extracts into shampoo or soap may be practical and scientifically sounding.

Competing Interests

All contributing authors declare no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Han Chien Lin and Yu-Liang Kuo contributed equally to this work.


The authors thank Dr. WJ Syu from National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, for useful discussion and critical reading of this paper. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 104-2320-B-415-005).


  1. M.-Y. Huang and J.-H. Wang, “Impact of antibiotic use on fungus colonization in patients hospitalized due to fever,” Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 123–128, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. W. Han, M. M.-L. Hsu, J. S. Choi et al., “Rapid detection of dermatophytes and Candida albicansin onychomycosis specimens by an oligonucleotide array,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 1, article 581, pp. 1–7, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P.-H. Chuang, C.-W. Lee, J.-Y. Chou, M. Murugan, B.-J. Shieh, and H.-M. Chen, “Anti-fungal activity of crude extracts and essential oil of Moringa oleifera Lam,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 232–236, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Mahboubi and N. Kazempour, “The antifungal activity of Artemisia sieberi essential oil from different localities of Iran against dermatophyte fungi,” Journal de Mycologie Medicale, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. e65–e71, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Y. Ibrahim and M. M. Abd El-Salam, “Anti-dermatophyte efficacy and environmental safety of some essential oils commercial and in vitro extracted pure and combined against four keratinophilic pathogenic fungi,” Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 279–286, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Nasir, K. Tafess, and D. Abate, “Antimicrobial potential of the Ethiopian Thymus schimperi essential oil in comparison with others against certain fungal and bacterial species,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 15, no. 1, article 260, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S.-H. Kim, S.-Y. Lee, S.-M. Cho, C.-Y. Hong, M.-J. Park, and I.-G. Choi, “Evaluation on anti-fungal activity and synergy effects of essential oil and their constituents from Abies holophylla,” Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 113–123, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. B. Baptista, D. C. Zimmermann-Franco, A. A. B. Lataliza, and N. R. B. Raposo, “Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oil from Eucalyptus smithii against dermatophytes,” Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 746–752, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. Zeng, X. Chen, and J. Liang, “In vitro antifungal activity and mechanism of essential oil from fennel (Foeniculum vulgare L.) on dermatophyte species,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Caneschi, F. Martins, D. Larrudé, E. Romani, M. Brandão, and N. Raposo, “In vitro antifungal activity of Baccharis trimera Less (DC) essential oil against dermatophytes,” Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2083–2089, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Cavaleiro, L. Salgueiro, M.-J. Gonçalves, K. Hrimpeng, J. Pinto, and E. Pinto, “Antifungal activity of the essential oil of Angelica major against Candida, Cryptococcus, Aspergillus and dermatophyte species,” Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 241–248, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Takao, I. Kuriyama, T. Yamada, H. Mizoguchi, H. Yoshida, and Y. Mizushina, “Antifungal properties of Japanese cedar essential oil from waste wood chips made from used sake barrels,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1163–1168, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. O. Lima, O. F. Gompertz, A. M. Giesbrecht, and M. Q. Paulo, “In vitro antifungal activity of essential oils obtained from officinal plants against dermatophytes,” Mycoses, vol. 36, no. 9-10, pp. 333–336, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. U. Lloyd, Croton Tiglium, Engelhard, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1898.
  15. N. R. Pillai, “Gastro intestinal effects of croton tiglium in experimental animals,” Ancient Science of Life, vol. 18, no. 3-4, pp. 205–209, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  16. Z. Zhao, M. Liu, and Y. Wu, “Observation of Croton oil killing Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro,” Journal of Changzhi Medical College, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  17. H. Akiyama, H. Kanzaki, Y. Abe, J. Tada, and J. Arata, “Staphylococcus aureus infection on experimental croton oil-inflamed skin in mice,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Shahid, M. Tayyab, F. Naz, A. Jamil, M. Ashraf, and A. H. Gilani, “Activity-guided isolation of a novel protein from Croton tiglium with antifungal and antibacterial activities,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1646–1649, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. P. Iraqui and R. N. S. Yadav, “Evaluation of antibacterial and antifungal activities of leaf and seed extracts of Croton tiglium plant against skin disease causing microbes,” International Journal of Research Studies in Biosciences (IJRSB), vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 139–144, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  20. Y. Y. Chung, T. C. Shiah, and H. C. Lin, “Evaluation of antifungal activities of ethanolic original extracts from Croton tiglium,” Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, National Chiayi University, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 20–37, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  21. W. Cottle, “The treatment of ringworm,” The Lancet, vol. 115, no. 2952, pp. 482–483, 1880. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. Liveing, “The treatment of ringworm by croton oil,” The British Medical Journal, vol. 1, no. 1050, pp. 227–228, 1881. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. W.-W. Cheng, C.-T. Lin, F.-H. Chu, S.-T. Chang, and S.-Y. Wang, “Neuropharmacological activities of phytoncide released from Cryptomeria japonica,” Journal of Wood Science, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Jamil, M. Shahid, M. Masud-Ul-Haq Khan, and M. Ashraf, “Screening of some medicinal plants for isolation of antifungal proteins and peptides,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 211–221, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  25. F. Dilika, P. D. Bremner, and J. J. M. Meyer, “Antibacterial activity of linoleic and oleic acids isolated from Helichrysum pedunculatum: A plant used during circumcision rites,” Fitoterapia, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 450–452, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. Walters, L. Raynor, A. Mitchell, R. Walker, and K. Walker, “Antifungal activities of four fatty acids against plant pathogenic fungi,” Mycopathologia, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 87–90, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. P. Garg and J. Müller, “Fungitoxicity of fatty acids against dermatophytes,” Mycoses, vol. 36, no. 1-2, pp. 51–63, 1993. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Han Chien Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.