BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 3490906 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3490906

Fithamlak Solomon, Fanuel Belayneh, Gebre Kibru, Solomon Ali, "Vector Potential of Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattidae) for Medically Important Bacteria at Food Handling Establishments in Jimma Town, Southwest Ethiopia", BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 3490906, 6 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3490906

Vector Potential of Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattidae) for Medically Important Bacteria at Food Handling Establishments in Jimma Town, Southwest Ethiopia

Academic Editor: Daniele Corsaro
Received11 Jan 2016
Revised24 Mar 2016
Accepted11 Apr 2016
Published11 May 2016

Abstract

Cockroaches have been regarded as possible vectors of human enteropathogens. Their presence and crawl particularly in food handling establishments could be risky for human health. Therefore, this study was done to determine the vector potential of cockroach for medically important bacterial pathogens in restaurants and cafeterias. A cross-sectional study was conducted on cockroaches from restaurants and cafeterias in Jimma town from May to September 2014. Standard taxonomic keys and microbiological techniques were applied for species identification and isolation. Data was analyzed in SPSS version 16.0. All cockroaches trapped were the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattidae). Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated followed by Salmonella species (serogroups B, D, E, C1, and NG), Bacillus cereus, and Shigella flexneri. Wide varieties of bacteria of medical relevance were also identified. Of which, Klebsiella spp. 49(40.8%), Bacillus spp., and Staphylococcus saprophyticus were predominant. Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattidae) could serve as a potential vector for the dissemination of foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella spp., Shigella flexneri, E. coli, S. aureus, and B. cereus and these bacteria could be a major threat to public health. Therefore, environmental sanitation and standard hygiene need to be applied in the food handling establishments in that locality.

1. Introduction

Cockroaches have long been regarded as possible vectors of human enteropathogens owing to their unsanitary life style and their indiscriminate feeding on sanitary wastes and human meals [1].

Various investigations all around the world also revealed that cockroaches living close to human dwellings were important carriers of etiologic agents belonging to all groups of potential humans and animals pathogens including bacteria, protozoa, worms, fungi, and viruses [2]. Exposure to cockroach antigens also plays an important role in allergens and asthma related health problems [2, 3]. They are known to carry about 57 species of pathogenic bacteria, of which Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Shigella, and Salmonella species are most common foodborne pathogens encountered. But their role in the direct transmission of infection has seldom been established [4, 5].

The range of problems caused by the presence of cockroaches varies between areas they inhabit: the fewer the bacterial species present in the environment, the fewer the bacteria cockroaches will carry [6, 7]. After feeding on contaminated food, bacteria or protozoa can remain in the cockroach external body or within the cockroaches’ digestive system for a month or more and later be transmitted in their faeces [8].

Though various studies indicated that domestic cockroaches play an important role as mechanical as well as biological vectors for foodborne bacterial pathogens, there is no adequate information in the study area in particular and in the country in general. Therefore, the aim of this study was to isolate medically important bacteria from cockroaches. This study was also designed to determine the species composition of cockroaches which are found at food handling establishments (FHEs) of Jimma town.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

This community based cross-sectional study was done at FHEs (all restaurants and cafeterias) of Jimma town from May 1 to September 30, 2014. The town is located at 1780 m above sea level. The area is generally characterized by warm and humid climate. The mean annual maximum temperature of the town is 30°C with a mean annual minimum temperature of 14°C [9]. The annual rainfall ranges from 1138 mm to 1690 mm. Maximum precipitation occurs during the three months’ period, June to August, with minimum rainfall in December and January. The total population of the town that settled on 50.52 km2 area was estimated to be 149,164 [10]. This gives an average population estimate per square kilometer area of 2952.5 [10]. During the study period, there were about 56 restaurants and 29 cafeterias with different levels, capacity, or standard. Many of these FHEs are located in densely populated areas where there is no adequate access for latrine, poorly constructed houses, and a reduced environmental sanitation. Cockroach infestation is high in the town.

2.2. Ethics

Approval and permission to study were obtained from Institutional Review Board (IRB) of College of Public Health and Medical Sciences of Jimma University. Support letter for all cafeterias and restaurants was written by the Jimma town municipality. Consent was also obtained from the owner of each of the cafeterias and restaurants. All information about the food handling establishments (FHEs) was kept confidential.

2.2.1. Cockroaches Trapping

Hoy-Hoy roach sticky traps (Pecopp Pest Control Service) were used to trap cockroaches in FHEs which are ideal for monitoring levels of cockroach infestation. It has a sticky floor approximately 15 cm × 10 cm with an attractant sachet (cyclotene coated sex pheromone) to entice cockroaches to enter the trap. Because of its safety, ease of use, and nontoxicity sticky trap is considered to be a valuable tool in cockroach integrated pest management programs [11]. Sticky traps were placed in kitchens, food preparation areas, refrigerators, coffee machines, bathrooms, and toilets in the selected restaurants and cafeterias. Traps were placed in areas which were hard to reach and dark and crammed corners and tight against the wall.

During trapping of cockroach, five sticky traps were placed in different sections of the FHEs each with a minimum of five feet apart. The sticky traps were placed at 18:00 hrs and left overnight and retrieved from 7:00 to 9:00 hrs in the morning. Sticky traps containing cockroaches were picked from the FHEs with sterile surgical glove, sealed in sterile plastic bag, and placed on their side in order to avoid crushing of the captured cockroaches. They were then transported to the Jimma University microbiology laboratory by cold chain system for investigation. During five months of study period, cockroach sticky traps were placed at 49 restaurants and 27 cafeterias once a week. Accordingly, a total of 1140 adult cockroaches, 730 from restaurants and 410 from cafeterias, were included for microbiological investigation. Since the cockroach infestation is high and cockroaches may probably carry the same amount of bacteria cockroaches were taken as a pool of 10 cockroaches as one batch [8, 1214].

2.2.2. Cockroach Fauna Identification

Species of domestic cockroach was identified by using standard taxonomic keys which include size, color of the wing, and pronotum appearance of the exocuticle, tegmina, wing, and femur with comparison of color pictures of cockroaches [15].

2.3. Microbiological Sample Preparation

The trapped cockroaches were picked from the sticky traps by sterile forceps and pooled in batches (i.e., ten cockroaches pooled as one sample) and anesthetized in a sterile jar by using chloroform soaked cotton [13]. The immobilized cockroaches were placed in 5 mL sterile physiological saline (0.85%) and shaken for two minutes to dislodge bacteria from their body surfaces. Then, the wash was taken as external body homogenate sample and checked for bacteria growth [16]. Subsequently, those dislodged cockroaches were soaked in 90% ethanol for five minutes to decontaminate their external surfaces and dried. After that, they were rewashed with sterile physiological saline (0.85% NaCl) in order to remove traces of ethanol. Then, the cockroaches’ alimentary tract was aseptically dissected out using autoclave-sterilized entomological dissecting needles under a binocular dissecting microscope. The instruments were dipped in ethanol and flamed between dissections. The excised gut was then homogenized in 5 mL sterile normal saline and the homogenates were used for bacteriological analysis [16].

2.3.1. Isolation and Identification of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens

One mL of each of the external and gut homogenate samples was suspended separately into 9 mL of sterile bottles containing buffered peptone water (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and a homogenous enrichment suspension was prepared in nutrient broth and incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h. The preenriched yield solutions then separately inoculated on MacConkey, xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) agar, mannitol salt agar (MSA), and polymyxin-B egg yolk mannitol bacillus cereus agar (PEMBA). Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) broth was also used as a primary enrichment medium for the identification of Salmonella and Shigella. Gram-negative bacterial rods showing growth on MacConkey agar were subcultured to nutrient agar after picking 3–5 colonies to obtain pure colonies and were grown again to the original media for colony identification by incubating at 37°C for 24 h. The bacteria growth on the agar media was identified by colonial morphology, Gram-staining, and a battery of biochemical tests (oxidase, catalase, Simmons citrate, indole production, urease, motility, coagulase, methyl red-Voges Proskauer (MR-VP), lysine decarboxylase (LDC), Klingler’s iron agar (KIA), mannitol fermentation, gas, and H2S production) [17, 18]. Serogrouping of Salmonella spp. was done by slide agglutination technique using polyvalent and monovalent (O2, O3, O4, O5, O6, O7, O8, O9, O15, and Vi) antigens for identification of Salmonella serogroups, A–E (Difco, Detroit, USA). Similarly, Shigella serogrouping was done using known polyvalent Shigella antisera A, B, C, and D (Remel, Europe Ltd., UK). Physiological saline was used in the test as a negative control [19].

2.4. Data Analysis

The data was edited, coded, and entered into SPSS for Windows version 16.0. Descriptive statistics were used to determine frequency, prevalence, and percentage. The relationship between variables was computed using chi-square (with value of 0.05 and 95% confidence interval).

3. Results

During the study period, a total of 1841 cockroaches (both adult and nymph) were trapped from different sections of the food handling establishments (FHEs) in Jimma town and from these 1140 adult cockroaches were included for laboratory investigation. Based on standard taxonomic keys for cockroach fauna identification criteria, all cockroaches were identified as German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattidae).

Relatively high proportion of cockroach infestation was detected in kitchens of restaurants (49.9%) and coffee machines of cafeterias (40%). Least infestation rate (4.5%) was identified in the compartment of refrigerators in both FHEs (Table 1).


Magnitude of cockroach infestation
RestaurantCafeteriasTotal
Number (%)Number (%)Number (%)

Trapping areas
 Kitchen 523 (49.9)224 (28.3)747 (40.6)
 Behind coffee machine317 (40)317 (17.2)
 Food preparation area194 (18.5)99 (12.5)293 (15.9)
 Refrigerator45 (4.3)37 (4.7)82 (4.5)
 Bathroom122 (11.6)122 (6.6)
 Toilet165 (15.7)115 (14.5)280 (15.2)

Total 1049 (57)792 (43)1841 (100)

= not applicable (coffee machines in restaurants and bathrooms in cafeteria were not included in the study).

Out of 114 pooled cockroaches (a pool of ten cockroaches as one sample), 114 external homogenates, and 114 internal homogenates (228 totally) investigated for bacteriology, 91 foodborne bacteria were isolated, of which 39 were from the external surfaces and 52 were from guts of cockroaches (Table 2). Among foodborne bacterial pathogens, E. coli was predominant followed by Salmonella spp. and B. cereus (Table 2). Of those Salmonella serogroups, group B was most frequently seen followed by serogroups D and E.


IsolatesExternalGutTotal

Salmonella B369
Salmonella D235
Salmonella C111
Salmonella E33
Salmonella NG134
E. coli 191635
S. flexneri213
S. aureus 51015
B. cereus7916

Total395291

In this study, no statistical association was observed between isolated foodborne bacteria and type of FHEs (). Moreover, there was no significant difference between body parts (external or gut surfaces) of cockroaches and frequency of foodborne bacterial isolates ().

Apart from these, wide variety of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria of medical importance were also identified from both surfaces of cockroaches. From the external surface isolates, Klebsiella species 49 (43%), Enterobacter spp. 25 (21.9%), and coagulase negative staphylococci 25 (21.9%) were the most frequently isolated ones. From gut bacterial harborage was found from as high as 44 (38.6%) for Klebsiella spp. and 41 (36%) for Bacillus species to as low as 6 (5.3%) for S. marcescens and 5 (4.4%) for Edwardsiella tarda (Table 3).


Isolates ExternalGutBothTotal
Number (%)Number (%)Number (%)Number (%)

Klebsiella spp.49 (43)44 (38.6)10 (8.8)93 (40.8)
Enterobacter spp.25 (21.9)20 (17.5)13 (11.4)45 (19.7)
K. pneumonia24 (21.1)20 (17.5)6 (5.3)44 (19.3)
P. mirabilis11 (9.6)16 (14)3 (2.6)27 (11.8)
P. vulgaris8 (7)14 (12.3)3 (2.6)22 (9.6)
Citrobacter freundii8 (7)15 (13.2)2 (1.75)23 (10.1)
S. marcescens9 (7.9)6 (5.3)2 (1.8)15 (6.6)
Edwardsiella tarda10 (8.8)5 (4.4)15 (6.6)
Citrobacter diversus7 (6.1)8 (7)15 (6.6)
P. aeruginosa10 (8.8)10 (4.4)
Bacillus spp.22 (19.3)41 (36)10 (8.8)63 (27.6)
Coagulase negative staphylococci25 (21.9)37 (32.5)7 (6.1)62 (27.2)
B. subtilis9 (7.9)9 (3.9)

Total 208 (47)235 (53)56 (12.6)443 (100)

: the number of similar isolates identified from each one of the surface and gut homogenates of individual batch of cockroaches.

4. Discussion

The Blattella germanica are the most abundant and closely associated insects with humans worldwide [20]. Though there is no sufficient data on cockroach species surveillance in Ethiopia, Blattella germanica cockroaches were reported at Ziway and Addis Ababa districts [21]. The only active cockroaches that forage in the FHEs of Jimma town were found out to be Blattella germanica, which is consistent with the findings of studies at FHEs and hospitals in Addis Ababa [13, 14]. The preference of Blattella germanica cockroaches to inhabit in tropical and subtropical weather condition might make Jimma town suitable habitat for this species.

The isolation of higher rate (57.1%) of foodborne bacterial pathogens in the gut compared to the external surfaces in this study goes in agreement with study findings reported in Ethiopia [13], Libya [22], and Taiwan [23] where 57%, 51%, and 50.8% gut bacterial carriage were noted, respectively. However, our finding is contrary to the carriage rates reported in Nigeria where 69.7% [24] and 52.9% [25] external surface bacterial carriage were documented. The relative high external surface carriage reported in these studies in Nigeria could be due to the use of faecal pellets as internal homogenate sample where bacteria may remain in the gut and take longer time to be excreted through faeces.

In the present study, cockroaches harbored bacterial pathogens associated with foodborne illness and food spoilage organisms via their bodies. Considering this fact, cockroaches could be the potential vectors/reservoirs for foodborne bacteria pathogens.

The isolation of Salmonella in the present study was similar to report made in Ghana [26], India [27], Iran [28], and Addis Ababa [13]. It is known that Salmonella serogroups A–E are responsible for 99% of the human salmonellosis [29]. The Salmonella serogroups identified in this study go in agreement with findings of Tachbele et al. where Blattella germanica cockroaches collected at restaurants and hospitals of Addis Ababa carried Salmonella serogroups B, D, and E [13]. Similarly Salmonella C1 was identified from cockroaches trapped at pediatrics unit of hospitals in Addis Ababa too [14]. Since cockroaches are passive carriers of bacterial pathogens in the environment where they reside, the identification of Salmonella serogroups in our study might reflect their prevalence in food and FHEs.

The S. flexneri isolate detected from cockroaches body substantiated the previous report made in Ghana [26], Botswana [12], Iran [30], and Ethiopia [14]. The isolation of S. flexneri from the gut of cockroaches in the FHEs might be a reflection of recent infected source as dose feeding experiments demonstrated that maximum survival shedding duration of cockroaches for Shigella was less than four days after they fed with standard inoculums via contaminated food [31]. If not, Shigella spp. may survive longer in cockroaches’ gut and could serve as a reservoir host for this bacterium eventually creating a suitable environment for survival and dissemination. Cockroaches’ vector competence for carriage of S. flexneri is a considerable threat for a consumer and the community since cockroaches could defecate these highly pathogenic bacteria as they rest and could regurgitate them as they eat.

In this study E. coli were the most frequently identified bacteria associated with foodborne illness. Similar report was made in India [16], Ethiopia [13], Iran [2, 30], and Nigeria [25].

The presence of S. aureus on cockroaches in our study has indicated that they could play a role in the dissemination of this bacterium. This finding was analogous with a report made in Taiwan and India [16, 32], Iran [30], and Tehran [2]. Other important foodborne bacteria commonly identified in this study were B. cereus. Cockroaches’ carriage of such kind of bacteria was shown by studies in Botswana [12], Ethiopia [13], Iran [2, 33], and Nigeria [25]. The carriage of B. cereus by cockroaches residing in places where food is prepared and stored makes the problem superior as these spore forming bacteria could be a cause of food poisoning outbreak.

S. aureus was also resistant against most of the antimicrobial drugs tested with a range of resistance that varies from 20% to 100%. MRSA and VRSA isolates in this study from crawling cockroaches may indicate the ability of cockroaches to acquire strains from the hospital area and crawl back to the community since these antibiotics are mostly applied in the nosocomial setting. Vancomycin is the current choice of antibiotics for resistant S. aureus infection and MRSA currently becoming area of concern both in hospital and in community setups.

5. Conclusions

Blattella germanica were the only cockroaches caught foraging in the FHEs of Jimma town. These cockroaches were identified as carrier of different foodborne bacterial pathogens like Salmonella spp., S. flexneri, E. coli, S. aureus, and B. cereus. The guts of cockroaches harbored more foodborne pathogenic bacteria compared to the external body surfaces.

Therefore, environmental sanitation and standard hygiene should be applied in the FHEs. Moreover, health education on the risk inherent in harboring the cockroaches is pertinent to the people working at FHEs.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests as they agreed to share the outcome of this paper equally.

Authors’ Contributions

Fithamlak Solomon, Gebre Kibru, Solomon Ali, and Fanuel Belayneh participated in conceiving, designing, laboratory analysis, interpretation of the data, and writing up of the paper. All the authors read and approved the final version.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Jimma town municipality office, Jimma revenue bureau, and owners and representatives of the food handling establishments for their cooperation and Medical Laboratory Sciences and Pathology Department, Jimma University, for allowing the use of its laboratory facilities. The facility and reagents were provided by Jimma University, Ethiopia, 2014.

References

  1. A. Le Guyader, C. Rivault, and J. Chaperon, “Microbial organisms carried by brown-banded cockroaches in relation to their spatial distribution in a hospital,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 485–492, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. Vazirianzadeh, M. Mehdinejad, and R. Dehghani, “Identification of bacteria which possible transmitted by Polyphaga aegyptica (Blattodea: Blattidae) in the region of Ahvaz, Southwest Iran,” Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. Gao, “Sensitization to cockroach allergen: immune regulation and genetic determinants,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  4. A. Cloarec, C. Rivault, F. Fontaine, and A. Le Guyader, “Cockroaches as carriers of bacteria in multi-family dwellings,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 483–490, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. N. A. Khrustalyova, “Epidemiological sanitary hygienic and medical significance of common cockroaches,” Byulleten' Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody, Otdel Biologicheskii, vol. 99, pp. 3–14, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  6. C. Adler, S. Navarro, M. Choler, and L. Stengard-Hansen, “Integration of chemical control of cockroaches and biological control of stored-product moths,” IOBC WPRS Bulletin, vol. 25, pp. 263–268, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  7. N. Chaichanawongsaroj, K. Vanichayatanarak, T. Pipatkullachat, M. Polrojpanya, and S. Somkiatcharoen, “Isolation of gram-negative bacteria from cockroaches trapped from urban environment,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 681–684, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  8. S. Mpuchane, J. Allotey, I. Matsheka et al., “Carriage of microorganisms by domestic cockroaches and implications on food safety,” International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, vol. 26, pp. 166–175, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  9. A. Alemu, G. Abebe, W. Tsegaye, and L. Golassa, “Climatic variables and malaria transmission dynamics in Jimma town, South West Ethiopia,” Parasites & Vectors, vol. 4, article 30, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Ethiopian Central Statistics Agency, Annual Statistical Abstract, CSA-Ethiopia, 2012, http://www.csa.gov.et/images/documents/pdf_files/nationalstatisticsabstract/2011/2011%20population.pdf.
  11. Pest Control Association, Cockroach Trap, 2014, http://pepcopp.co.in/cockroach-trap.html.
  12. S. Mpuchane, I. Matsheka, B. Gashe, J. Allotey, G. Murindamombe, and N. Mrema, “Microbiological studies of cockroaches from three localities in Gaborone, Botswana,” African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. Tachbele, W. Erku, T. Gebre-Michael, and M. Ashenafi, “Cockroach-associated food-borne bacterial pathogens from some hospitals and restaurants in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: distribution and antibiogram,” Journal of Rural and Tropical Public Health, vol. 5, pp. 34–41, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  14. B. Tilahun, B. Worku, E. Tachbele, S. Terefe, H. Kloos, and W. Legesse, “High load of multi-drug resistant nosocomial neonatal pathogens carried by cockroaches in a neonatal intensive care unit at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,” Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, vol. 1, article 12, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. Choate, “Dichotomous key for the identification of the cockroach fauna (Insecta: Blattaria) of Florida,” Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla, USA, http://www.entnemdept.ufl.edu/choate/blattaria_new1.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  16. R. Fotedar, U. B. Shriniwas, and A. Verma, “Cockroaches (Blattella germanica) as carriers of microorganisms of medical importance in hospitals,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 181–187, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. H. Collins and P. M. Lyne, Microbiological Methods, Oxford University Press, 8th edition, 2004.
  18. M. Cheesbrough, District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2006. View at: Publisher Site
  19. Difco Laboratories, Difco & BBL Manual, Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich, USA, 1st edition, 2003.
  20. W. Ebeling, Urban Entomology. Pests on or near Food, 2002, http://www.entomology.ucr.edu/ebeling/ebeling6.html.
  21. A. Kinfu and B. Erko, “Cockroaches as carriers of human intestinal parasites in two localities in Ethiopia,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. 1143–1147, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. M. Elgderi, K. S. Ghenghesh, and N. Berbash, “Carriage by the German cockroach (Blattella germanica) of multiple-antibiotic-resistant bacteria that are potentially pathogenic to humans, in hospitals and households in Tripoli, Libya,” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H.-H. Pai, “Multidrug resistant bacteria isolated from cockroaches in long-term care facilities and nursing homes,” Acta Tropica, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 18–22, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. M. Tatfeng, M. U. Usuanlele, A. Orukpe et al., “Mechanical transmission of pathogenic organisms: the role of cockroaches,” Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 129–134, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. A. Adeleke, H. A. Akatah, A. W. O. Hassan, and W. O. Adebimpe, “Microbial load and multiple drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria isolated from feaces and body surfaces of cockroaches in an urban area of southwestern Nigeria,” Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1448–1461, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  26. D. Agbodaze and S. B. Owusu, “Cockroaches (Periplaneta americana) as carriers of bacterial diarrhoea in Accra, Ghana,” Central African Journal of Medicine, vol. 35, pp. 484–486, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. J. N. Devi and C. J. Murray, “Cockroaches (Blatta and Periplaneta species) as reservoirs of drug-resistant salmonellas,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 357–361, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Fathpour, G. Emtiazi, and E. Ghasemi, “Cockroaches as reservoirs and vectors of drug resistant Salmonella spp,” Iranian Biomedical Journal, vol. 1, pp. 1–4, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  29. P. Velge, A. Cloeckaert, and P. Barrow, “Emergence of Salmonella epidemics: the problems related to Salmonella enterica serotyp Enteritidis and multiple antibiotic resistance in other major serotypes,” Veterinary Research, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 267–288, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Salehzadeh, P. Tavacol, and H. Majhub, “Bacteria, fungi and parasitic contaminants of cockroaches in Public Hospitals of Hamadan, Iran,” Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases, vol. 44, pp. 105–110, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  31. N. R. Burgess, S. N. McDermott, and J. Whiting, “Laboratory transmission of Enterobacteriaceae by the oriental cockroach, Blatta orientalis,” Journal of Hygiene, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H.-H. Pai, W.-C. Chen, and C.-F. Peng, “Cockroaches as potential vectors of nosocomial infections,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 979–984, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. A. K. Zarchi and H. Vatani, “A survey on species and prevalence rate of bacterial agents isolated from cockroaches in three Hospitals,” Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 197–200, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Fithamlak Solomon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1522
Downloads590
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.