BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Plant Fungal Pathogenesis

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 4130376 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4130376

Xue Zhang, Rashmi Jain, Guotian Li, "Roles of Rack1 Proteins in Fungal Pathogenesis", BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 4130376, 8 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4130376

Roles of Rack1 Proteins in Fungal Pathogenesis

Academic Editor: György Schneider
Received22 May 2016
Accepted16 Aug 2016
Published30 Aug 2016

Abstract

Pathogenic fungi cause diseases on various organisms. Despite their differences in life cycles, fungal pathogens use well-conserved proteins and pathways to regulate developmental and infection processes. In this review, we focus on Rack1, a multifaceted scaffolding protein involved in various biological processes. Rack1 is well conserved in eukaryotes and plays important roles in fungi, though limited studies have been conducted. To accelerate the study of Rack1 proteins in fungi, we review the functions of Rack1 proteins in model and pathogenic fungi and summarize recent progress on how Rack1 proteins are involved in fungal pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Diseases caused by pathogenic fungi pose a serious threat to human, animal, plant, and ecosystem health [1, 2]. Particularly, plant diseases caused by fungi, for example, rice blast and wheat rust, have long been known as widespread threats to global food security [1, 3]. In pathogenic fungi, key proteins and signal transduction pathways play conserved roles in the regulation of different developmental and infection processes and are therefore valuable targets for controlling these devastating diseases [4, 5].

Heterotrimeric G proteins are involved in environmental sensing of nutrients, pheromones, stresses, and other stimuli in eukaryotes [6]. The heterotrimeric G protein complex consists of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits. In the signal transduction pathway, heterotrimeric G proteins are activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that perceive various signals. In the absence of a stimulus, the GDP-bound Gα monomer and the Gβγ dimer form an inactive complex with the GPCR. Binding of the ligand to the GPCR triggers exchange of GDP with GTP in association with Gα and subsequent dissociation of Gα from Gβγ, and the released active form of the Gβγ dimer interacts with other effector proteins to activate downstream signal transduction pathways. One of them is the cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate/protein kinase A (cAMP/PKA) pathway. The GPCR activates the adenylyl cyclase, which catalyzes the formation of cAMP that in turn activates the PKA-mediated signaling cascades. cAMP is degraded by the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase, which, together with the adenylyl cyclase, balances the level of cAMP in the cell [7]. Another pathway activated by the GPCR is the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, consisting of three sequentially activating kinases, with the upstream MAPK kinase kinases (MAPKKKs) perceiving signals from the receptors and activating MAPK kinases (MAPKKs) that in turn activate the MAPKs through phosphorylation, for example, Fus3/Kss1 and Slt2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [8]. The phosphorylated MAPKs activate related transcription factors, which in turn regulate genes in different biological processes.

Receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1) was originally identified as the binding protein for activated protein kinase C [9, 10]. Rack1 belongs to the WD-repeat-containing proteins and contains seven WD40 repeats. These seven WD40 repeats assemble into a typical seven-bladed β-propeller structure that provides an interactive platform for the binding of other proteins [11]. Rack1 proteins are constitutively expressed in eukaryotes. Rack1 has been intensively studied in mammalian cells [12, 13]. Rack1 functions in angiogenesis, tumor growth, cell migration, apoptosis, autophagy, neuronal response, proper function of the circadian clock, defense responses against virus infection, chromatin remodeling, transcriptional and translational regulations, and cAMP/PKA and MAPK pathways [1115]. Rack1 regulates these biological processes through the control of protein complex assembly [13]. In plants, Rack1 proteins are functional in seed germination, leaf production, flowering, hormonal signaling, and biotic/abiotic stress responses [1618]. The emerging role of Rack1 as a scaffold protein in the MAPK pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana has been recently published [1921]. In protozoan parasites, Rack1 proteins are critical for effective mammalian parasitization by Leishmania major and Trypanosoma brucei, which cause leishmaniasis and African trypanosomiasis, respectively [2224]. The L. major LACK (Leishmania homologue of mammalian RACK) antigen is also a target of the immune response in mice and therefore a vaccine candidate for human leishmaniasis [22]. In Plasmodium falciparum, the most lethal malarial parasite, the Rack1 protein inhibits Ca2+ signaling of the mammalian cells and subverts the host intracellular environment, an important mechanism for parasite survival [25]. In summary, Rack1 proteins play important roles across a wide variety of organisms. In this review, we summarize recent progress on Rack1 proteins in model and pathogenic fungi.

2. Rack1 Homologs Are Well Conserved

The Rack1 protein is found in many organisms, including the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, yeasts, filamentous fungi, plants, nematodes, insects, and vertebrates, indicating that it is evolutionarily conserved [16, 58]. In fungi, Rack1 proteins are well conserved in most species of Chytridiomycota, Zygomycota, Glomeromycota, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota (Figure 1). Rack1 proteins are also well conserved in fungi-like microbes, oomycetes, which cause serious plant diseases, such as potato late blight and sudden oak death [59, 60].

Rack1 proteins are functionally conserved. Multiple complementation assays show that Rack1 proteins are functionally interchangeable among different species, or even across kingdoms [26, 49, 52]. For example, the mammalian RACK1 gene can rescue the defects of rack1 mutants in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Aspergillus nidulans [40, 52]. The Neurospora crassa cpc-2 and the rat RACK1 genes are able to complement the cpc2 mutant in S. pombe [26]. RACK1 genes of A. nidulans and yeasts (S. cerevisiae, S. pombe, and Candida albicans) can largely rescue the hyphal growth defects of the cpcB deletion mutant in Aspergillus fumigatus [49]. Species-specific roles of Rack1 proteins have also been shown in different fungi. For example, the A. nidulans CpcB ortholog but not the RACK1 genes from yeasts can completely rescue the conidiation defect of the A. fumigatus cpcB mutant [49]. Taken together, these studies show the well conserved and unique roles of Rack1 proteins in different fungal species.

3. Rack1 Proteins in Model Fungi

3.1. Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In S. cerevisiae, a model unicellular eukaryote, the Rack1 homolog, known as Asc1, is involved in multiple biological processes (Table 1). Asc1 is involved in the general amino acid control (GAAC) that provides the cell with sufficient amounts of protein precursors under conditions of amino acid limitation [61]. Amino acid starvation in yeast promotes translation of GCN4, which then causes expression of genes required for synthesis of all 20 amino acids. This response is called GAAC. In the absence of amino acid starvation, Asc1 represses Gcn4 [26], a transcription activator of the GAAC pathway [61]. In S. pombe, studies suggest that Cpc2 promotes the GAAC response under the amino acid starvation condition [41].


SpeciesRack1FunctionsReferences

Ascomycetes
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeAsc1General amino acid control, pheromone response, mating and filamentous growth, pseudohyphal development, translation regulation and fidelity, cell size, cell wall integrity, stress responses, and cAMP/PKA and MAPK pathways[8, 2639]
Schizosaccharomyces pombeCpc2Stress responses, cell wall integrity, cell size, mitotic commitment, positive role in the general amino acid control response, cell cycle progression, and meiotic development[4043]
Candida albicansAsc1Growth, filamentation, adhesive growth, invasion, and virulence[44, 45]
Neurospora crassacpc-2Cross-pathway control, sexual reproduction, and the heterotrimeric G protein complex[4648]
Aspergillus fumigatusCpcBGrowth, conidiation, conidial germination, cell wall integrity, mycotoxin (gliotoxin) production, virulence, and antifungal drug resistance[4951]
Aspergillus nidulansCpcBGrowth, conidiation, conidial germination, sexual development, mycotoxin (sterigmatocystin) production, and cross-pathway control[50, 52]
Basidiomycetes
Cryptococcus neoformansGib2Growth, virulence, a scaffolding adaptor protein, and a Gβ-like subunit of the cAMP/PKA pathway [5356]
Ustilago maydisRak1Growth, cell wall integrity, cell fusion, filament formation, appressorium formation, virulence, and a ribosomal protein[53, 57]

Human pathogens.
Plant pathogens.

Asc1 functions as the Gβ subunit for Gpa2 and interacts directly with the Gα subunit as a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor that inhibits the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of Gα. Asc1 negatively regulates glucose-mediated signaling via two pathways. In the cAMP/PKA pathway, Asc1 binds to the effector enzyme adenylyl cyclase (Cyr1) in addition to Gpa2 and represses the production of cAMP in response to glucose stimulation [27]. Secondly, Asc1 is involved in the Kss1 MAPK pathway by binding to Ste20. In the asc1 mutant, basal phosphorylation of Kss1 is enhanced. Similarly, under pheromone stimulus, the asc1 mutant shows enhanced phosphorylation of both Fus3 and Kss1 but shows reduced expression of gene FLO11, key components for pheromone response, mating, and filamentous growth [8, 28].

Asc1 is involved in cell wall integrity and stress responses [2831]. The asc1 mutant is hypersensitive to cell wall damaging agents, iron chelators, and nitrosative stress [29, 31]. Similarly, Cpc2 is involved in stress responses in S. pombe [42]. The cell wall integrity defect of the asc1 mutant most likely results from PKC-independent mechanisms because the double-knockout mutant (asc1 pkc1) shows synergistic sensitivity to cell wall stresses [29]. Interestingly, the basal phosphorylation level of the MAPK Slt2 is higher in the asc1 mutant [32], indicating that Asc1 regulates the SLT2 MAPK pathway. In addition, Asc1 regulates replication stress-induced formation of P-bodies that consist of many enzymes involved in mRNA turnover [33, 62]. Asc1 also regulates cell size. Compared to the wild-type control, the cell size of the asc1 mutant is larger in S. cerevisiae [28]. The enlarged cell size is also observed in the cpc2 mutant in S. pombe [43].

Asc1 executes its many functions by interacting with different proteins and regulating the transcription and translation of different genes. De novo proteome analysis indicates that the asc1 mutant shows 50% elevated de novo biosynthesis of soluble proteins, compared to the wild type. In contrast, expression of insoluble proteins is reduced by nearly a quarter in the asc1 mutant [31]. The protein level of several transcription factors, including Rap1, Tec1, Phd1, and Flo8, is downregulated but the protein level of Ste12 is upregulated over 6-fold in the asc1 mutant [31]. Interestingly, all three transcription factors, Flo8, Ste12, and Tec1, positively regulate the expression of gene FLO11. Flo8 and Tec1 are downregulated and Ste12 is upregulated in the asc1 mutant. However, the expression of gene FLO11 is still downregulated in the asc1 mutant and the invasive growth is impaired [28]. Some proteins involved in cell wall biogenesis and overall cell morphology were found to be significantly reduced in the asc1 mutant. Almost 50% of all proteins found to be regulated in asc1 cells are involved in energy metabolism. This comprehensive group is composed of proteins taking part in glycolysis, mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration, oxidative stress, and fermentation. The findings of de novo proteome analysis are consistent with the phenotypes of the asc1 mutant [31].

Asc1 is involved in translational regulation in S. cerevisiae. The Asc1 protein is a core component of the small (40S) ribosomal subunit [3436]. Phosphoproteome and Western blotting studies show that the ribosomal protein Asc1 affects the phosphorylation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF2α and eIF4A and the ribosome-associated complex RAC [28]. Asc1 also participates in nascent peptide-dependent translation arrest at consecutive basic amino acid sequences, and the 40S subunit binding to Rack1 is crucial for translation arrest. Translation arrest of an mRNA by a nascent peptide leads to cleavage of the mRNA, as well as to cotranslational protein degradation [37]. Asc1 is required for efficient translation of short mRNAs with short open reading frames that usually show greater than average translational efficiency in diverse eukaryotes [38]. Asc1 is required to prevent frameshifting at ribosomes stalled at repeated CGA codons. In the absence of Asc1, ribosomes continue translation at CGA codons but undergo substantial frameshifting. Thus, the general translation fidelity of the cell depends upon Asc1-mediated quality control [39]. Taken together, these studies indicate that Asc1 constitutes a ribosomal interface for signal transduction and translational regulation [28].

3.2. Neurospora crassa

N. crassa is a model filamentous fungus [63]. In N. crassa, cross-pathway control (CPC) was first described by Carsiotis and collaborators [64, 65]. The cross-pathway control in N. crassa is the same as the GAAC in S. cerevisiae; that is, starvation for any one of several amino acids leads to globally increased synthesis of enzymes of many amino acid biosynthetic pathways in this fungus. cpc-2 positively regulates the cross-pathway control under conditions of amino acid limitation [46]. Therefore, there is no activation of target amino acid biosynthetic genes in the cpc-2 mutant under starvation conditions (Table 1). Under nonstarved conditions, mutation of the cpc-2 gene decreases fungal growth. Formation of protoperithecia during sexual reproduction is impaired in the cpc-2 mutant [47]. Genetic epistasis between cpc-2 and components of the G protein pathway has been studied [48]. One Ga subunit (gna-3) is epistatic to cpc-2 during submerged-culture conidiation, while two other Gα subunits (gna-1, gna-2) are independent of cpc-2, and the Gβ (gnb-1) and Gγ (gng-1) subunits operate downstream of cpc-2 during submerged-culture conidiation. In yeast two-hybrid assays, gna-3 interacts with cpc-2. The epistatic studies together with the protein-protein interaction studies indicate that cpc-2 does work in the heterotrimeric G protein complex.

4. Rack1 Proteins in Pathogenic Fungi

4.1. Candida albicans

C. albicans is an opportunistic pathogen and causes life-threatening systemic infections in immunocompromised individuals [66]. Its virulence factors include host recognition biomolecules (adhesins), morphogenetic transitions (the reversible transition between unicellular yeast cell and filamentous growth forms), biofilms, secreted aspartyl proteases, and phospholipases [44, 66]. From transcriptomics and proteomics data, Liu et al. show that the expression of ASC1 in C. albicans is iron-, temperature-, and Gcn4-dependent and is downregulated by amino acid starvation, caspofungin, and farnesol (Table 1) [45]. The asc1 null mutant displays shorter hyphae on several liquid and solid hypha-inducing media, compared to the wild-type strain [45]. Adhesive growth and invasive growth are impaired in the asc1 null mutant [44]. The asc1 null mutant has attenuated virulence. In a mouse model of systematic infection, the asc1 null mutant is dramatically less virulent than the wild-type strain shown by the fact that 50% of the mice infected with the asc1 null mutant survived, while the wild-type strain killed all the infected mice. In another assay using a mouse model of disseminated infection, nearly all of the mice inoculated with the wild-type strain died within 16 days. However, mice infected with the asc1 null mutant were completely asymptomatic [44]. Finally, Fan et al. show that transcription of adhesion-related genes ALS3, ECE1, and HWP1 [67] is reduced in the asc1 null mutant, indicating that Asc1 regulates virulence of C. albicans through these important genes [44].

4.2. Aspergillus nidulans and Aspergillus fumigatus

A. nidulans, a model filamentous fungus, is also reported as an opportunistic pathogen [68, 69]. A. fumigatus, the major causative agent of life-threatening invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised individuals, is a ubiquitous saprophytic fungus [70]. Thermotolerance, specialized cell wall, melanization, resistance to oxidative stress, and mycotoxins (gliotoxin) are important for virulence of A. fumigatus. In addition, the cAMP/PKA pathway regulates the synthesis of several virulence factors [71]. In both A. nidulans and A. fumigatus, Rack1 proteins, CpcB, play important roles in fungal growth, conidiation, conidial germination, and mycotoxin production (Table 1) [49, 50]. In A. nidulans, CpcB represses the cross-pathway control in the presence of amino acids and regulates sexual development [50, 52]. Compared to the wild-type strain, the cpcB mutant of A. nidulans produces much fewer cleistothecia, and the cleistothecia contain no ascospores, indicating that CpcB is required for proper formation of fruiting bodies and ascosporogenesis [50, 52]. In A. fumigatus, CpcB is localized in the cytoplasm. To determine the genetic relationship between CpcB and GpaB (Ga), the gpaB mutant and the double-deletion mutant, cpcB gpaB, were generated. The double mutant cpcB gpaB causes a similar phenotype to the gpaB mutant with abnormal multiple septa conidiophores, indicating the overlapping functions of CpcB and GpaB [49]. Cell wall integrity of the cpcB mutant is impaired, revealed by transmission electron microscopy examinations [49]. Virulence of the cpcB mutant is attenuated in an immunosuppressed mouse model. The study also demonstrates that the G–H residues in WD repeats 1, 2, and 3 and the W–D residue in WD repeat 2 of CpcB are required for normal hyphal growth and conidiation and are also necessary for maintaining normal antifungal drug susceptibility. The cpcB mutant displays enhanced drug resistance, which might be due to reduced intracellular drug accumulation and altered ergosterol component. In addition, the first G–H residue of CpcB plays a critical role in the virulence of A. fumigatus [51]. The involvement of CpcB in pathogenesis of A. fumigatus might be through its connection with the G protein complex and/or its role in maintaining proper cell wall structure.

4.3. Cryptococcus neoformans

C. neoformans is an encapsulated yeast-like basidiomycetous fungus. C. neoformans has a worldwide distribution [72]. It is found in soil, bird excrement, and trees. It is an opportunistic pathogen and causes meningoencephalitis in immunocompromised individuals [73]. Fungal capsulation and melanization, among others, are important for its virulence. The major virulence factors of the pathogen are regulated by the cAMP/PKA pathway [53]. In C. neoformans, the Rack1 protein Gib2 is required for full virulence (Table 1) [5355]. Gib2 functions as a scaffolding adaptor protein and interacts with Gα (Gpa1) and Gγ (Gpg1 and Gpg2) proteins. Gib2 also interacts with the protein kinase C1 Smg1, a phosphodiesterase Pde2, and the small G protein Ras1, which are all involved in the cAMP/PKA pathway. Gib2 positively regulates the cAMP/PKA pathway, for overexpression of Gib2 rescues the defects of the gpa1 mutant in both melanization and capsule formation and restores the cAMP level by relieving the inhibitory effect of Ras1 on the adenylyl cyclase Cac1 in the gpa1 mutant [54, 55]. In a murine model of cryptococcosis, disruption of the GIB2 gene results in severe attenuation of virulence [54]. In summary, Gib2 is involved in virulence by acting as a scaffolding adaptor protein of the cAMP/PKA pathway in C. neoformans.

4.4. Ustilago maydis

U. maydis, a dimorphic basidiomycete, causes corn smut and serves as a model for obligate biotrophic fungal pathogens [74]. Infection of maize by U. maydis requires that haploid yeast cells of compatible mating types fuse and establish dikaryotic filamentous hyphae. The morphological transition from budding to filamentous hyphae is important for fungal virulence and is regulated by the conserved cAMP/PKA and MAPK pathways. Loss of Rack1 protein, Rak1, causes slow growth, hypersensitivity to cell wall stress, attenuated cell fusion, and attenuated virulence in U. maydis (Table 1) [57]. In infection assays, more than 80% of plants infected with the wild-type strain showed tumor formation but no tumors could be observed in rak1-infected maize plants. Filament formation and appressorium formation are impaired in the mutant. The attenuated cell fusion likely results from the reduced expression of rop1, a transcriptional activator of the pheromone response factor (prf1) that regulates pheromone (mfa) and pheromone-receptor genes. Rak1 is a ribosome-associated protein and interacts with a large number of proteins including 32 ribosomal proteins shown in protein pull-down assays. These proteins are involved in metabolism, energy production, cell division, DNA replication, rRNA processing, and UDP-galactose translocation, which are possibly involved in fungal pathogenesis [75]. The constitutive expression of rop1 or constitutive activation of the pheromone-responsive MAPK pathway could rescue the defect of the rak1 mutant in conjugation tube formation. Prf1 is regulated at the posttranscriptional level by the cAMP/PKA pathway and the MAPK pathway, indicating that Rak1 possibly functions in the cAMP/PKA and MAPK pathways [74]. However, no interaction between Rak1 and any Gα subunits has been established, and additional studies are needed to determine how Rak1 participates in the cAMP/PKA and MAPK pathways that are required for pathogenicity of U. maydis.

5. Concluding Remarks and Perspectives

Rack1 proteins play important roles in fungal pathogenesis. However, compared to the intensive studies on Rack1 proteins in human, plants, and yeasts [12, 16, 39], limited studies have been conducted in a few pathogenic fungi. In these fungi, Rack1 proteins affect various virulence factors through conserved signal transduction pathways (Table 1) [76, 77]. In other fungal pathogens, such as Penicillium marneffei and Histoplasma capsulatum, Rack1 proteins are found to be associated with stress responses or dimorphic transition [78, 79]. In plant pathogens Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum, WD40 proteins are required for virulence and other important functions, though the Rack1 proteins have not been characterized [80]. In addition, protein-protein interaction network analyses indicate that WD40 proteins are highly connected in the malaria parasite, with 1,928 potential interactions, supporting the role of WD40-containing proteins, including Rack1 proteins, as hubs in cellular networks [81]. Given the conserved and versatile roles of Rack1 proteins in eukaryotes [34], it is important to explore the unique and dynamic roles of Rack1 proteins in different pathogenic fungi.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Brittany Anderton for critical reading of the manuscript.

References

  1. M. C. Fisher, D. A. Henk, C. J. Briggs et al., “Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health,” Nature, vol. 484, no. 7393, pp. 186–194, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C.-Y. Low and C. Rotstein, “Emerging fungal infections in immunocompromised patients,” F1000Prime Reports, vol. 3, article 14, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. Dean, J. A. L. Van Kan, Z. A. Pretorius et al., “The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 414–430, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Liu, M. D. Healy, B. A. Dougherty et al., “Conserved fungal genes as potential targets for broad-spectrum antifungal drug discovery,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 638–649, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. Shor and N. Chauhan, “A case for two-component signaling systems as antifungal drug targets,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 11, no. 2, Article ID e1004632, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Li, S. J. Wright, S. Krystofova, G. Park, and K. A. Borkovich, “Heterotrimeric G protein signaling in filamentous fungi,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 61, pp. 423–452, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. Sassone-Corsi, “The Cyclic AMP pathway,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 4, no. 12, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. E. Chen and J. Thorner, “Function and regulation in MAPK signaling pathways: lessons learned from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1773, no. 8, pp. 1311–1340, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. Mochly-Rosen, H. Khaner, and J. Lopez, “Identification of intracellular receptor proteins for activated protein kinase C,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 3997–4000, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. Ron, C.-H. Chen, J. Caldwell, L. Jamieson, E. Orr, and D. Mochly-Rosen, “Cloning of an intracellular receptor for protein kinase C: a homolog of the beta subunit of G proteins,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 839–843, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. R. Adams, D. Ron, and P. A. Kiely, “RACK1, a multifaceted scaffolding protein: structure and function,” Cell Communication and Signaling, vol. 9, article 22, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J.-J. Li and D. Xie, “RACK1, a versatile hub in cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 1890–1898, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. J. Gibson, “RACK1 research—ships passing in the night?” FEBS Letters, vol. 586, no. 17, pp. 2787–2789, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Gallo and N. Manfrini, “Working hard at the nexus between cell signaling and the ribosomal machinery: an insight into the roles of RACK1 in translational regulation,” Translation, vol. 3, article e1120382, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Erbil, O. Oral, G. Mitou et al., “RACK1 is an interaction partner of ATG5 and a Novel Regulator of Autophagy,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 291, no. 32, pp. 16753–16765, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Islas-Flores, A. Rahman, H. Ullah, and M. A. Villanueva, “The receptor for activated C kinase in plant signaling: tale of a promiscuous little molecule,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, article 1090, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J.-G. Chen, “Phosphorylation of RACK1 in plants,” Plant Signaling and Behavior, vol. 10, article e1022013, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. C. Miller, W. R. Chezem, and N. K. Clay, “Ternary WD40 repeat-containing protein complexes: evolution, composition and roles in plant immunity,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, article 1108, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. Cheng, J.-F. Li, Y. Niu et al., “Pathogen-secreted proteases activate a novel plant immune pathway,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7551, pp. 213–216, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Su, J. Xu, and S. Zhang, “RACK1, scaffolding a heterotrimeric G protein and a MAPK cascade,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 405–407, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. X. Meng, L. Shan, and P. He, “Stack heterotrimeric G proteins and MAPK cascades on a RACK,” Molecular Plant, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1691–1693, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. L. Kelly, D. B. Stetson, and R. M. Locksley, “Leishmania major LACK antigen is required for efficient vertebrate parasitization,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 198, no. 11, pp. 1689–1698, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. G. Rothberg, D. L. Burdette, J. Pfannstiel, N. Jetton, R. Singh, and L. Ruben, “The RACK1 homologue from Trypanosoma brucei is required for the onset and progression of cytokinesis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 14, pp. 9781–9790, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. Cardenas, P. M. Carter, C. S. Nation et al., “LACK, a RACK1 ortholog, facilitates cytochrome c oxidase subunit expression to promote Leishmania major fitness,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 95–109, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. Sartorello, M. J. Amaya, M. H. Nathanson, and C. R. S. Garcia, “The plasmodium receptor for activated C kinase protein inhibits Ca2+ signaling in mammalian cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 389, no. 4, pp. 586–592, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. Hoffmann, H.-U. Mösch, E. Sattlegger, I. B. Barthelmess, A. Hinnebusch, and G. H. Braus, “The WD protein Cpc2p is required for repression of Gcn4 protein activity in yeast in the absence of amino-acid starvation,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 807–822, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. E. Zeller, S. C. Parnell, and H. G. Dohlman, “The RACK1 ortholog Asc1 functions as a G-protein β subunit coupled to glucose responsiveness in yeast,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 34, pp. 25168–25176, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. O. Valerius, M. Kleinschmidt, N. Rachfall et al., “The Saccharomyces homolog of mammalian RACK1, Cpc2/Asc1p, is required for FLO11-dependent adhesive growth and dimorphism,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1968–1979, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. Melamed, L. Bar-Ziv, Y. Truzman, and Y. Arava, “Asc1 supports cell-wall integrity near bud sites by a Pkc1 independent mechanism,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 6, Article ID e11389, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. C. Galvão, D. Rossi, W. D. S. Silveira, S. R. Valentini, and C. F. Zanelli, “The deoxyhypusine synthase mutant dys1-1 reveals the association of eIF5A and Asc1 with cell wall integrity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, article e60140, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. N. Rachfall, K. Schmitt, S. Bandau et al., “RACK1/Asc1p, a ribosomal node in cellular signaling,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 87–105, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. A. Chasse, P. Flanary, S. C. Parnell et al., “Genome-scale analysis reveals Sst2 as the principal regulator of mating pheromone signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 330–346, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. M. Tkach, A. Yimit, A. Y. Lee et al., “Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 966–976, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. V. R. Gerbasi, C. M. Weaver, S. Hill, D. B. Friedman, and A. J. Link, “Yeast Asc1p and mammalian RACK1 are functionally orthologous core 40S ribosomal proteins that repress gene expression,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 8276–8287, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. Jenner, S. Melnikov, N. G. de Loubresse et al., “Crystal structure of the 80S yeast ribosome,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 759–767, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. M. Coyle, W. V. Gilbert, and J. A. Doudna, “Direct link between RACK1 function and localization at the ribosome in vivo,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1626–1634, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. Kuroha, M. Akamatsu, L. Dimitrova et al., “Receptor for activated C kinase 1 stimulates nascent polypeptide-dependent translation arrest,” EMBO Reports, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 956–961, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. K. Thompson, M. F. Rojas-Duran, P. Gangaramani, and W. V. Gilbert, “The ribosomal protein Asc1/RACK1 is required for efficient translation of short mRNAs,” eLife, vol. 5, Article ID e11154, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. S. Wolf and E. J. Grayhack, “Asc1, homolog of human RACK1, prevents frameshifting in yeast by ribosomes stalled at CGA codon repeats,” RNA, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 935–945, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. McLeod, B. Shor, A. Caporaso, W. Wang, H. Chen, and L. Hu, “Cpc2, a fission yeast homologue of mammalian RACK1 protein, interacts with Ran1 (Pat1) kinase to regulate cell cycle progression and meiotic development,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 4016–4027, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. Tarumoto, J. Kanoh, and F. Ishikawa, “Receptor for activated C-kinase (RACK1) homolog Cpc2 facilitates the general amino acid control response through Gcn2 kinase in fission yeast,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 26, pp. 19260–19268, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Núñez, A. Franco, M. Madrid et al., “Role for RACK1 orthologue Cpc2 in the modulation of stress response in fission yeast,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 3996–4009, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Núñez, A. Franco, T. Soto, J. Vicente, M. Gacto, and J. Cansado, “Fission yeast receptor of activated C kinase (RACK1) ortholog Cpc2 regulates mitotic commitment through Wee1 kinase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 53, pp. 41366–41373, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. W. Kim, Y. J. Joo, and J. Kim, “Asc1p, a ribosomal protein, plays a pivotal role in cellular adhesion and virulence in Candida albicans,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 842–848, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. X. Liu, X. Nie, Y. Ding, and J. Chen, “Asc1, a WD-repeat protein, is required for hyphal development and virulence in Candida albicans,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 793–800, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. Krüger, J. Koch, and I. B. Barthelmess, “cpc-2, a new locus involved in general control of amino acid synthetic enzymes in Neurospora crassa,” Current Genetics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 211–215, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. F. Müller, D. Krüger, E. Sattlegger et al., “The cpc-2 gene of Neurospora crassa encodes a protein entirely composed of WD-repeat segments that is involved in general amino acid control and female fertility,” MGG Molecular & General Genetics, vol. 248, no. 2, pp. 162–173, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. V. Garud, The role of the cross pathway control (cpc)-2 gene in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa [M.S. thesis], University of California, Riverside, Calif, USA, 2013.
  49. Z.-D. Cai, Y.-F. Chai, C.-Y. Zhang, W.-R. Qiao, H. Sang, and L. Lu, “The Gβ-like protein CpcB is required for hyphal growth, conidiophore morphology and pathogenicity in Aspergillus fumigatus,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 81, pp. 120–131, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Q. Kong, L. Wang, Z. Liu, N.-J. Kwon, S. C. Kim, and J.-H. Yu, “Gβ-like CpcB plays a crucial role for growth and development of Aspergillus nidulans and Aspergillus fumigatus,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, article e70355, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Z. Cai, Y. Chai, C. Zhang, R. Feng, H. Sang, and L. Lu, “Molecular characterization of Gβ-like protein CpcB involved in antifungal drug susceptibility and virulence in A. fumigatus,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 7, article 106, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. B. Hoffmann, C. Wanke, S. K. LaPaglia, and G. H. Braus, “c-Jun and RACK1 homologues regulate a control point for sexual development in Aspergillus nidulans,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 28–41, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Choi, W. H. Jung, and J. W. Kronstad, “The cAMP/protein kinase A signaling pathway in pathogenic basidiomycete fungi: connections with iron homeostasis,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 579–587, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y. Wang, G. Shen, J. Gong et al., “Noncanonical Gβ Gib2 is a scaffolding protein promoting camp signaling through functions of ras1 and cac1 proteins in cryptococcus neoformans,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 18, pp. 12202–12216, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. D. A. Palmer, J. K. Thompson, L. Li, A. Prat, and P. Wang, “Gib2, a novel Gβ-like/RACK1 homolog, functions as a Gβ subunit in cAMP signaling and is essential in Cryptococcus neoformans,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 43, pp. 32596–32605, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. R. Ero, V. T. Dimitrova, Y. Chen et al., “Crystal structure of Gib2, a signal-transducing protein scaffold associated with ribosomes in Cryptococcus neoformans,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, article 8688, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. L. Wang, P. Berndt, X. Xia, J. Kahnt, and R. Kahmann, “A seven-WD40 protein related to human RACK1 regulates mating and virulence in Ustilago maydis,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1484–1498, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. K. Tarnowski, K. Fituch, R. H. Szczepanowski, M. Dadlez, and M. Kaus-Drobek, “Patterns of structural dynamics in RACK1 protein retained throughout evolution: a hydrogen-deuterium exchange study of three orthologs,” Protein Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 639–651, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. B. J. Haas, S. Kamoun, M. C. Zody et al., “Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans,” Nature, vol. 461, no. 7262, pp. 393–398, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. B. M. Tyler, S. Tripathy, X. Zhang et al., “Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis,” Science, vol. 313, no. 5791, pp. 1261–1266, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. G. Hinnebusch, “Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 59, pp. 407–450, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. C. J. Decker and R. Parker, “P-bodies and stress granules: possible roles in the control of translation and mRNA degradation,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 4, no. 9, Article ID a012286, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  63. J. E. Galagan, S. E. Calvo, K. A. Borkovich et al., “The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa,” Nature, vol. 422, no. 6934, pp. 859–868, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Carsiotis and A. M. Lacy, “Increased activity of tryptophan biosynthetic enzymes in histidine mutants of neurospora crassa,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 89, pp. 1472–1477, 1965. View at: Google Scholar
  65. M. Carsiotis, R. F. Jones, and A. C. Wesseling, “Cross-pathway regulation: histidine-mediated control of histidine, tryptophan, and arginine biosynthetic enzymes in Neurospora crassa,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 893–898, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  66. F. L. Mayer, D. Wilson, and B. Hube, “Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms,” Virulence, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 119–128, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. Y. Fan, H. He, Y. Dong, and H. Pan, “Hyphae-specific genes HGC1, ALS3, HWP1, and ECE1 and relevant signaling pathways in Candida albicans,” Mycopathologia, vol. 176, no. 5, pp. 329–335, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. E. Galagan, S. E. Calvo, C. Cuomo et al., “Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae,” Nature, vol. 438, no. 7071, pp. 1105–1115, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. B. H. Segal, E. S. DeCarlo, K. J. Kwon-Chung, H. L. Malech, J. I. Gallin, and S. M. Holland, “Aspergillus nidulans infection in chronic granulomatous disease,” Medicine, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 345–354, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. K. J. Kwon-Chung and J. A. Sugui, “Aspergillus fumigatus-what makes the species a ubiquitous human fungal pathogen?” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 9, no. 12, Article ID e1003743, pp. 1–4, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. T. M. Hohl and M. Feldmesser, “Aspergillus fumigatus: principles of pathogenesis and host defense,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1953–1963, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. B. J. Loftus, E. Fung, P. Roncaglia et al., “The genome of the basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5713, pp. 1321–1324, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. X. Lin and J. Heitman, “The biology of the Cryptococcus neoformans species complex,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 60, pp. 69–105, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. T. Brefort, G. Doehlemann, A. Mendoza-Mendoza, S. Reissmann, A. Djamei, and R. Kallmann, “Ustilago maydis as a pathogen,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 47, pp. 423–445, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. L. Wang, Functional characterization of a seven-WD40 repeat protein Rak1 in Ustilago maydis [Ph.D. thesis], Philipps-Universität Marburg, 2011.
  76. D. Turrà, D. Segorbe, and A. Di Pietro, “Protein kinases in plant-pathogenic fungi: conserved regulators of infection,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 52, pp. 267–288, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. G. Li, X. Zhou, and J.-R. Xu, “Genetic control of infection-related development in Magnaporthe oryzae,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 678–684, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. M. S. Winters, D. S. Spellman, Q. Chan et al., “Histoplasma capsulatum proteome response to decreased iron availability,” Proteome Science, vol. 6, article 36, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. J. M. Chandler, E. R. Treece, H. R. Trenary et al., “Protein profiling of the dimorphic, pathogenic fungus, Penicillium marneffei,” Proteome Science, vol. 6, article 17, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. W.-B. Shim, U. S. Sagaram, Y.-E. Choi, J. So, H. H. Wilkinson, and Y.-W. Lee, “FSR1 is essential for virulence and female fertility in Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 725–733, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. P. Chahar, M. Kaushik, S. S. Gill et al., “Genome-wide collation of the Plasmodium falciparum WDR protein superfamily reveals malarial parasite-specific features,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, article e0128507, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Xue Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1431
Downloads1586
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.