Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 4385279, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4385279
Research Article

UV Photofunctionalization Effect on Bone Graft in Critical One-Wall Defect around Implant: A Pilot Study in Beagle Dogs

1Department of Prosthodontics, Oral Science Research Center, BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Division in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Oral Science Research Center, BK21 PLUS Project, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Department of Dental Technology, School of Medical and Public Health, Kyungdong University, Wonju, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea

Received 19 August 2016; Revised 3 November 2016; Accepted 1 December 2016

Academic Editor: Wei-Jen Chang

Copyright © 2016 Min-Young Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Ogawa, “Ultraviolet photofunctionalization of titanium implants,” The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. e95–102, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Berglundh, I. Abrahamsson, N. P. Lang, and J. Lindhe, “De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants: a model study in the dog,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 251–262, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. E. Davies, “Mechanisms of endosseous integration,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 391–401, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Aita, N. Hori, M. Takeuchi et al., “The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on integration with bone,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1015–1025, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Funato and T. Ogawa, “Photofunctionalized dental implants: a case series in compromised bone,” The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1589–1601, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Funato, M. Yamada, and T. Ogawa, “Success rate, healing time, and implant stability of photofunctionalized dental implants,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1261–1271, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Buser, V. Chappuis, M. M. Bornstein, J.-G. Wittneben, M. Frei, and U. C. Belser, “Long-term stability of contour augmentation with early implant placement following single tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a prospective, cross-sectional study in 41 patients with a 5- to 9-year follow-up,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 1517–1527, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. E. Friedlaender, “Bone grafts. The basic science rationale for clinical applications,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 786–790, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. E. Jung, N. Fenner, C. H. F. Hämmerle, and N. U. Zitzmann, “Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12–14 years,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1065–1073, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Stavropoulos, L. Kostopoulos, J. R. Nyengaard, and T. Karring, “Deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and bioactive glass (Biogran) arrest bone formation when used as an adjunct to guided tissue regeneration (GTR): an experimental study in the rat,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 636–643, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Carmagnola, T. Berglundh, M. Araújo, T. Albrektsson, and J. Lindhe, “Bone healing around implants placed in a jaw defect augmented with Bio-Oss. An experimental study in dogs,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 799–805, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  12. F. A. Santos, M. T. Pochapski, M. C. Martins, E. G. Zenóbio, L. C. Spolidoro, and E. Marcantonio Jr, “Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Marco Degidi, A. Piattelli, V. Perrotti, and G. Iezzi, “Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of an implant retrieved 8 years after insertion in a sinus augmented with anorganic bovine bone and anorganic bovine matrix associated with a cell binding peptide,” The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, vol. 32, pp. 451–457, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Philipp, W. Duncan, M. Roos, C. H. Hämmerle, T. Attin, and P. R. Schmidlin, “Comparison of SLA® or SLActive® implants placed in the maxillary sinus with or without synthetic bone graft materials—an animal study in sheep,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1142–1148, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Ueno, M. Yamada, N. Hori, T. Suzuki, and T. Ogawa, “Effect of ultraviolet photoactivation of titanium on osseointegration in a rat model,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 287–294, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Ueno, M. Yamada, T. Suzuki et al., “Enhancement of bone-titanium integration profile with UV-photofunctionalized titanium in a gap healing model,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1546–1557, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. C. de Vicente, O. Recio, L. Martín-Villa, L. M. Junquera, and J. S. López-Arranz, “Histomorphometric evaluation of guided bone regeneration around implants with SLA surface: an experimental study in beagle dogs,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1047–1053, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Donath, “Equipment and methodical performance,” in Preparation of Histologic Sections, EXAKT-Kulzer-Publication, Norderstedt, Germany, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  19. A. K. Gosain, L. Song, P. Yu et al., “Osteogenesis in cranial defects: reassessment of the concept of critical size and the expression of TGF-β isoforms,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 360–371, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. I. Zucker and A. K. Beery, “Males still dominate animal studies,” Nature, vol. 465, no. 7299, p. 690, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Sakata, H. Abe, A. Ohazama et al., “Effects of combined treatment with porous bovine inorganic bone grafts and bilayer porcine collagen membrane on refractory one-wall intrabony defects,” International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 161–169, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J.-I. Park, C. Yang, Y.-T. Kim et al., “Space maintenance using crosslinked collagenated porcine bone grafted without a barrier membrane in one-wall intrabony defects,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research B Applied Biomaterials, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 1454–1461, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus