Research Article

Impact of Orthodontic Brackets on the Intraoral Scan Data Accuracy

Table 2

Horizontal distortion of 3D images assessed by mean absolute error in arch widths between digital and actual measurements (unit: mm).

 E4D DentistiTero
 Model BModel LSignificantModel BModel LSignificant

Maxillary intermolar width1.76 (1.7)1.23 (1.32)NS0.36 (0.31)0.29 (0.32)NS
Mandibular intermolar width0.44 (0.44)0.29 (0.31)NS0.18 (0.39)0.60 (0.16)
Maxillary intercanine width0.93 (0.59)0.56 (0.82)NS0.18 (0.15)0.34 (0.10)
Mandibular intercanine width0.39 (0.26)0.17 (0.24)NS0.17 (0.27)0.49 (0.56)

 TriosZfx IntraScan
 Model BModel LSignificantModel BModel LSignificant

Maxillary intermolar width0.42 (0.58)0.26 (0.34)NS0.79 (1.07)0.69 (0.95)NS
Mandibular intermolar width0.15 (0.11)0.38 (0.44)0.60 (1.06)0.81 (1.03)NS
Maxillary intercanine width0.20 (0.16)0.18 (0.16)NS0.09 (0.27)0.26 (0.31)NS
Mandibular intercanine width0.35 (0.21)0.46 (0.22)NS0.17 (0.40)0.45 (1.44)NS

: maximum deviation, which is the difference between maximum and minimum errors of 5 repeated images, which refers to the largest distortion considered as precision of the scanner.
(Mann–Whitney test).
NS: not significant.