Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 5985987, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5985987
Research Article

Microcystin Biosynthesis and mcyA Expression in Geographically Distinct Microcystis Strains under Different Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Boron Regimes

1Cell Factory Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
2Ocular Biochemistry, Dr. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
3Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India

Received 1 June 2016; Accepted 1 September 2016

Academic Editor: Kaiyu He

Copyright © 2016 Ankita Srivastava et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Roles of nutrients and other environmental variables in development of cyanobacterial bloom and its toxicity are complex and not well understood. We have monitored the photoautotrophic growth, total microcystin concentration, and microcystins synthetase gene (mcyA) expression in lab-grown strains of Microcystis NIES 843 (reference strain), KW (Wangsong Reservoir, South Korea), and Durgakund (Varanasi, India) under different nutrient regimes (nitrogen, phosphorus, and boron). Higher level of nitrogen and boron resulted in increased growth (avg. 5 and 6.5 Chl mg/L, resp.), total microcystin concentrations (avg. 1.185 and 7.153 mg/L, resp.), and mcyA transcript but its expression was not directly correlated with total microcystin concentrations in the target strains. Interestingly, Durgakund strain had much lower microcystin content and lacked microcystin-YR variant over NIES 843 and KW. It is inferred that microcystin concentration and its variants are strain specific. We have also examined the heterotrophic bacteria associated with cyanobacterial bloom in Durgakund Pond and Wangsong Reservoir which were found to be enriched in Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria and that could influence the bloom dynamics.

1. Introduction

Bloom-forming freshwater cyanobacterial genera such as Microcystis, Oscillatoria, Anabaena, and Nostoc produce toxins and other bioactive compounds that can poison and kill humans and livestock [1, 2]. Microcystis sp. is the most frequently encountered one in freshwater bodies and is associated with production of hepatotoxic microcystin (MC) [3]. MCs are coded by the microcystins synthetase (mcy) gene cluster having 10 genes [4]. The gene cluster is transcribed in two polycistronic transcripts (mcyABC and mcyDEFGHIJ). The larger, mcyD-J, encodes a modular polyketide synthase (PKS) (mcyD), two hybrid enzymes comprising nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) and PKS modules (mcyE and mcyG), and enzymes putatively involved in the tailoring (mcyJ, F, and I) and transport (mcyH) of the toxins. The smaller operon, mcyA-C, encodes three NRPS enzymes. More than 89 MC variants have been described from natural blooms and laboratory cultures of cyanobacteria [2]. The physiological role of MCs in the producing organism is little understood. However, their roles were proposed in extracellular signaling and autoinduction [5, 6], photosynthesis [7], protein modulation [8], scavenging of oxygen radicals [9], and maintenance of colonies [10].

Parameters like light intensity, pH, temperature, nutrients, and trace metals could play a critical role in MCs production [11, 12]. Various field studies have demonstrated that nutrient enrichment of aquatic bodies by nitrogen (N) and/or phosphorus (P) could promote toxic blooms of Microcystis [13, 14]. In large aquatic systems highly complex interactions among the physical, chemical, and biological variables regulate the proliferation of Microcystis blooms and toxin production, which could lead to contradicting results [13]. Laboratory studies have also shown the effects of nutrients on the growth and MC production of Microcystis [15, 16]. Only a few studies have focused on response of Microcystis to differing nutrient concentrations and trace metals on mcy transcription and MCs production [17, 18]. Recently, bacterial population associated with Microcystis bloom also received attention for its role in development of bloom [19]. A potential role of boron (B) in signaling and bacterial interspecies communication [20] aroused interest in studying its role in growth of Microcystis sp. and MC production in lab cultures, in addition to N and P.

A part of gene mcyA codes for the section of the condensation domain that contains the conserved motif C5 and is essentially required for MC biosynthesis in Microcystis sp. [4]. Therefore, we have monitored the mcyA gene expression and MC production and growth of three different strains of Microcystis, namely, M. aeruginosa NIES 843 (reference strain), M. aeruginosa KW (Wangsong Reservoir, South Korea), and Microcystis sp. (local pond, Durgakund, India), under selected nutrient regimes. As we had accessibility to natural algal bloom material from Durgakund Pond and Wangsong Reservoir, a seasonal variation in community dynamics of bacteria associated with cyanobacteria was also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Photoautotrophic Growth of Target Strains of Microcystis sp. and MC Analysis

Culture of M. aeruginosa NIES 843 strain and M. aeruginosa KW strain was maintained in BG-11 medium [21]. M. aeruginosa Durgakund strain was isolated from bloom samples collected from Durgakund Pond, Varanasi, India (25°17′20′′N, 82°59′58′′E), in which cyanobacterial blooms were noticed throughout the year. Our previous study characterized the real state of cyanobacterial bloom composition and the levels of MC variants in the target pond [12]. This pond lies 8.77 m above the sea level and has an area of 8010 m2 with a mean depth 26.6 m. The pond is not connected to any river with exception of incoming water from adjacent temples and is often used for various religious activities. Samples were purified by repetitive subculturing in solid (soft agarose) and liquid culture media alternately [22]. The strains were grown in 165 mL sterilized BG-11 in 250 mL flasks. The cultures in all of the experiments were incubated at °C with cool white fluorescent lights (80 μmol photons m−2 s−1, 18 h light/6 h dark).

Growth and MC production curves of all three strains were determined under different nutrient (N, P, and B) regimes. Nutrients levels were selected based on the concentrations in BG-11 medium (comparatively nutrient rich media) and further decreased according to N/P ratio in cells [23]. Microcystis strains were individually grown in 250 mL culture flasks for 15 days in sterile BG-11 medium under low nitrate (0.015 mM), low phosphate (0.001 mM), and low boron (0.23 μM) separately. The growth of the cultures was followed up every alternate day. Samples were filtered (GF/C, Whatman, UK) and suspended in 80% acetone for overnight in dark (4°C). The supernatant was used to measure chlorophyll a (Chl a) (665 nm) according to Myers and Kratz [24]. A known volume of samples was collected four times (days 1, 3, 5, and 11) during the study period, filtered (GF/C, Whatman, UK), and stored until use for total (intracellular and extracellular) MC analysis. MC data are expressed as total MC concentration and as a ratio to Chl to indicate the change in MC content. Extraction and estimation of three MC variants (MC-LR, -RR, and -YR) were carried out as previously described [12]. After starvation, 15 mL culture was washed and transferred separately to 250 mL flasks containing 150 mL sterilized BG-11 with higher N concentrations (1.5 mM and 17.6 mM) while P and B concentrations were kept constant as those of standard BG-11 medium. The experiment design was the same for all the three strains for higher P (0.1 mM and 0.23 mM) and B (23 μM and 46 μM) levels.

2.2. RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and Real-Time RT-PCR

Microcystis cultures (15 mL) were harvested on 11th day (exponential phase) by centrifugation at 6,000 ×g for 10 min, and the cell pellets were resuspended in 1 mL TRI Reagent® (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Zirconia beads (0.5 g, 0.2 mm; Biospec, Bartlesville, OK, USA) were added to the cell suspension and cells were disrupted by vortex for 60 s. Total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the reagent and resuspended in 30 μL of DEPC-H2O. RNA integrity was verified by agarose electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining. The quantity and quality of RNA were assessed with a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc.). For construction of cDNA, total RNA was digested using DNase I (New England BioLabs, MA, USA) to remove genomic DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA in 20 μL reactions using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Negative controls containing no reverse transcriptase were run simultaneously.

Real-time RT-PCR was carried out using CFX 96 C 1000 Thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The reaction mixture consisted of 10 μL of SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix, 1 μL of each primer set for mcyA and 16S rRNA (Table 1), 1 μL 1 : 5 dilution of cDNA, and 7 μL of sterile Milli-Q-H2O. Negative controls (without template DNA) were run simultaneously. The quantitative PCR program consisted of 94°C (5 min) and 40 cycles of 94°C (30 s), 60°C (30 s), and 72°C (30 s) with a final extension of 72°C (5 min). The annealing temperature for 16S rRNA gene was increased to 62°C. The fold change in the expression of the target gene relative to the control cells (grown in low nutrient concentrations) was calculated using CFX Manager Software (Version 2.1) and normalized with the expression of 16S rRNA (reference gene) [30].

Table 1: Primers used in this study.
2.3. Field Samples

Water samples were collected in 2 L acid washed glass bottles (Durgakund Pond) and 20 L polyethylene bottles (Wangsong Reservoir) from surface above a depth of 20 cm after some mixing and stored immediately at 4°C until the laboratory analysis was done. The samples were collected monthly from May 2010 to April 2011 and July 2010 to November 2010 during the cyanobacterial bloom only from Durgakund Pond and Wangsong Reservoir, respectively. The samples were filtered (0.2 μm cellulose nitrate filter, Sartorius, Germany) to harvest most of the bacteria on the same day of collection and stored (−20°C) until use for molecular analyses.

2.4. DNA Extraction, PCR, and DGGE

DNA was extracted from the filter by grinding in liquid nitrogen and suspending in TE buffer (pH 8.0, 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA) followed by phenol/chloroform method [31]. A nested-PCR was carried out for the amplification of nearly complete sequence of 16S rRNA with primers 27F and 1525R (Table 1). PCR was performed in a 50 μL final volume of reaction mixture with 5 μL of 10× buffer, 5 μL of 2.5 mM dNTP mixture, 1.5 μL of the respective primer sets (10 pmol), 1 μL of template DNA, and 5 U of Ex-Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Japan). The PCR protocol consisted of initial denaturation at 94°C (5 min) and 30 cycles of 94°C (30 s), 56°C (30 s), and 72°C (45 s) with a final extension of 72°C (10 min). This was followed by a touchdown PCR [32] with primers 341F (with 40 bp long-GC-clamp) and 907R (Table 1). The PCR protocol consisted of initial denaturation at 94°C (5 min) and 30 cycles of 94°C (45 s) and 72°C (45 s) with annealing temperature set to 65°C and decreased by 0.5°C at every cycle for 20 cycles, and then 15 additional cycles were performed with the annealing temperature at 55°C and a final extension of 72°C (10 min).

The amplified products were separated in a denaturing gradient gel of a 12% polyacrylamide gel [acrylamide-bisacrylamide (37.5 : 1, w/v)] containing a linear 30–60% denaturant gradient (100% denaturant corresponded to 7 M urea and 40% (v/v) formamide). DGGE was run for 18 h at 110 V on the DCode system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by UV transillumination. Thereafter, the bands were excised from the DGGE gel and incubated in Milli-Q-water (30 μL) for 24 h at 4°C. The eluent was then again amplified using the same PCR condition and primers but without GC-clamp.

2.5. Cloning and Sequencing

The amplified PCR products were purified using the QIAquick® Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and ligated into the pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. They were transformed into HIT competent Escherichia coli DH5-α (RBC Bioscience, New Taipei, Taiwan) and plated on Luria-Bertani agar plates in the presence of ampicillin. The white colonies were selected and incubated in Luria-Bertani broth containing ampicillin (50 μg/mL). DNA was purified using the QIAprep® Spin Mini-Prep Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The purified products were sequenced by Solgent Inc. (Daejeon, South Korea), using an ABI 3730XL automatic DNA sequence (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were carried out in triplicate with standard deviation (SD) represented as bars wherever necessary using Microcal Origin® Version 6.0. Effects of N, P, and B supplementation to the growth medium on total MCs production, Chl , and MC content were statistically analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data were explored using SPSS 16.0 software and log-transformed to give these an approximate normal distribution.

3. Results

3.1. Photoautotrophic Growth of the Target Strains in Different Nutrient Regimes (N, P, and B)

Photoautotrophic growth of target strains was monitored in low levels of nutrients (N, 0.015 mM; P, 0.001 mM; B, 0.23 μM). These strains were transferred separately in medium having selected higher nutrient concentrations and growth behavior was monitored up to 15th d by measuring Chl at periodic intervals (Figure 1). Chl was significantly influenced by different concentrations of N ( = 120, ), P ( = 5.4, ), and B ( = 26.4, ) in all three strains. Increased level of the N in the medium resulted in the higher Chl yield (avg. 5 mg/L, 11th d) in the target strains. The yield was approximately 1.1 times higher in the cultures of all strains with 17.6 mM N. It was interesting that 100 times more concentration of N (1.5 mM) did not affect the Chl yield (avg. 4.1 mg/L) in the target strains as compared to the growth in the lowest N concentration. The growth of Durgakund strain was lower as compared to NIES 843 and KW strains.

Figure 1: Growth curves of M. aeruginosa NIES 843, KW, and Durgakund (DK) strains under different concentrations of N, P, and B.

Likewise, the strains grown in varying levels of P behaved differently. The Chl yield of the strains in low level of P (0.001 mM) was 1.67 times lower on an average basis as compared to the cultures with low level of N. Increase in the P concentration (100 times) in the growth medium increased the growth of the target strains by 1.21 times (avg. 3.4 mg/L) (Figure 1). The growth of Durgakund strain was better as compared to NIES 843 and KW strains. Decrease in the Chl yield (1.1 times) of the target strains at 0.23 mM P indicated that there was no increase in the growth beyond a critical threshold level of P (0.1 mM). This was in contrast to the level of N in the cultures favoring the growth of the target strains. Interestingly, photoautotrophic growth of the strains was favored with increase in B levels (Figure 1). Average Chl yield of the strains was 4.1, 6.2, and 6.5 mg/L in low (0.23 μM) and higher concentrations (23 and 46 μM), respectively.

3.2. Effect of Nutrient Concentrations on MC Variants

Samples were collected simultaneously from the same set of cultures on 1, 3, 5, and 11 d for MC analysis. Intracellular and extracellular MCs were referred to as total MC for each variant. All three MC variants (MC-LR, -RR, and -YR) were detected in both NIES 843 and KW strains at different N concentrations with predominance of MC-RR (Figure 2). MC-YR was not detected in cultures of Durgakund strain at any of the N addition experiments. Total MC was significantly influenced by N ( = 653, ), P ( = 1179, ), and B ( = 1131, ) in the target strains. MC content was also significantly influenced by N ( = 381, ), P ( = 194, ), and B ( = 718, ). The highest levels of MC-LR (0.77 mg/L), -RR (8.2 mg/L), and -YR (1.4 mg/L) were recorded at 0.015 mM N in NIES 843. However, at higher concentrations of N (1.5 and 17.6 mM), the same levels of MC variants were recorded in both NIES 843 and KW strains (Figure 2). In comparison, Durgakund strain had the lowest concentration of MC-LR and -RR.

Figure 2: Variations in MC-LR, -RR, and -YR of M. aeruginosa NIES 843, KW, and Durgakund (DK) strains under different concentrations of N, P, and B.

Likewise MC-YR was not detected in Durgakund strain growing in any of the P concentrations while higher level of MC-YR was recorded in KW strain at 0.23 mM P. Highest level of MC-LR and -RR was recorded in NIES 843 strain followed by KW strain and Durgakund strain (Figure 2). Higher level of P (0.23 mM) favored the production of MC-LR, -RR, and -YR in NIES 843. MC-YR was again not detected in Durgakund strain at any of the B incubated cultures. Higher B concentrations favored all MC variants in both NIES 843 and KW strains (Figure 2).

The total MC concentration in the cultures of the target strains linearly increased with the Chl concentration (Figure 3). Very high total MC concentration was observed under different concentrations of B in NIES 843 and KW strains while total MC concentration was much lower in DK strain under various N, P, and B concentrations (Figure 3). Highly significant correlation was observed between MC concentration and total MC content under variable concentrations of N, P, and B in the target strains (Figure 4).

Figure 3: Total MC concentration as a function of chlorophyll concentration in M. aeruginosa NIES 843, KW, and Durgakund (DK) strains under different concentrations of N, P, and B.
Figure 4: Relationship between MC content and total MC concentration in M. aeruginosa NIES 843, KW, and Durgakund (DK) strains under different concentrations of N, P, and B.
3.3. Effect of Nutrient Concentrations on mcyA Expression

Real-time RT-PCR was used to measure the expression of mcyA at different nutrient concentrations (N, P, and B) in the target strains (Figure 5). mcyA transcript increased at 1.5 and 17.6 mM N relative to the control (0.015 mM N). Maximum increase (12.4-fold) in mcyA transcript was recorded in Durgakund strain and only 2.3-fold increase in NIES 843. mcyA transcript in KW strain decreased (0.19-fold) relative to the control at 17.6 mM N. However, mcyA transcript increased in the target strains at 1.5 μM N indicating a threshold level of N for optimum expression of mcyA. Similarly, increase in P levels (0.1 and 0.23 mM) increased the mcyA transcript in NIES 843 and Durgakund strains while only 0.23 mM P slightly increased the expression of mcyA. The maximum increase of mcyA transcript (10-fold) was recorded in NIES 843 at 0.1 mM P. In B-containing cultures, concentration-dependent increase in mcyA transcript was recorded in the target strains. The maximum increase (19-fold) in mcyA transcript was recorded in NIES 843 at 46 μM B followed by Durgakund (2.8-fold) and KW strain (1.4-fold).

Figure 5: Effect of different concentrations of N, P, and B on mcyA expression of M. aeruginosa NIES 843, M. aeruginosa KW, and Microcystis Durgakund (DK) strain. The data were calculated relative to the expression in control cells (grown in low nutrient concentration) and normalized with the expression of the reference gene (16S rRNA).

The correlation among growth, MC concentrations, MC content, and mcyA expression for the target strains is represented in Table 2. MC content per biomass increased with the total MC concentrations as significant correlation was observed among these (, = 0.769). Chl concentration and MC production were closely related in different concentrations of P in NIES 843 (, = 0.835) and KW strains (, = 0.669) and of B in NIES 843 (, = 0.960) and KW strains (, = 0.918). Such relationship was rather weak in different concentrations of N in NIES 843 (, = 0.378) and KW strains (, = 0.584). In different nutrient regimes the expression of mcyA was not correlated with MC concentration (, = 0.342) and content (, = 0.232) in NIES 843. Similar trend was evident in Durgakund strain with MC concentration (, = 0.001) and content (, = 0.001). Contrary to this, mcyA expression pattern is directly reflected on MC concentration (, = 0.834) and content (, = 0.679) in KW strain.

Table 2: Coefficient of determination () among chlorophyll a, microcystin concentrations and content, and mcyA expression in Microcystis strains (NIES 843, KW, and Durgakund).
3.4. Bacterial Community

DGGE profile of water samples, collected during cyanobacterial bloom, from Durgakund Pond and Wangsong Reservoir for bacterial and cyanobacterial 16S rRNA gene is shown in Figure 6. All labeled bands were sequenced and most of the analyzed sequences showed 99% similarity to their closest relatives in the database (Table 3). Six sequences (bands 5, 10, 16, 17, 18, and 19) were related to Alphaproteobacteria and retrieved from all the samples except for August and September in Durgakund while bands 17 and 18 appeared in July and August in Wangsong Reservoir samples. Sequence related to Betaproteobacteria (band 4) appeared in August and September. One bacterial sequence (band 9) was related to Xanthomonadales order within Gammaproteobacteria and found in the Durgakund samples of all months. Among the cyanobacterial community, bands 8, 12, and 13 (intense) showed similarity to M. aeruginosa and were present in all the samples of Durgakund and Wangsong Reservoir. Interestingly, sequence (band 6) related to M. wesenbergii was more intense in August and September samples of Durgakund Pond. Sequence (band 2) related to Merismopedia glauca belonging to order Chroococcales was also seen in all the samples of Durgakund. In general, the banding pattern of DGGE in August and September samples differed from the samples of other months in Durgakund (Figure 6).

Table 3: Phylogenetic affinity of 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from monthly cyanobacterial bloom samples.
Figure 6: DGGE profile of 16S rDNA fragments of bacteria and cyanobacteria in bloom samples collected monthly from Durgakund Pond and Wangsong Reservoir. All labeled bands were excised from the gel, reamplified, and sequenced.

4. Discussion

Net production of MC was shown to be influenced by growth rate, that is, cell division process, reflecting a nearly linear correlation between them [33]. In the present study, the MC content per biomass increased with the total MC concentration but growth could not be correlated with total MC concentration in the target strains (Table 2). This was in tune with observations recorded earlier in the hepatotoxic Microcystis strains [15]. In this study, low N (0.015 mM) approximated eutrophic conditions in water bodies; therefore increased N concentration (maximum 17.6 mM) favored growth in the target strains. Higher level of N (1.5 mM and 17.6 mM) resulted in increased MC concentrations in the strains which is consistent with previous lab studies [34, 35]. Fluctuations in MC level of cyanobacteria with respect to N concentrations in medium have already been reported [16, 33, 36]. Recent study also demonstrated that N-limited conditions reduced the MC quota in Microcystis aeruginosa relative to nutrient-saturated conditions [37]. Increased MC content in higher levels of N seemed to be rational in this context; however composition and presence of MC variants also changed with strains. Composition and dominance of MC-RR variant in the present context could be explained on the basis that MC is an N-rich compound (over 14% of MC-LR on molecular weight basis) [38] and increased intracellular content of the N-rich amino acid arginine promotes production of the [Asp3] MC-RR variant in M. aeruginosa [35, 39].

The target strains showed better growth at 0.1 mM P, indicating it is a threshold limit. M. aeruginosa NIES 843 and KW followed the same trend in growth, while Durgakund strain seemed more sensitive to the changes in P concentrations. Fluctuations in MC levels of the target strains under varying P concentrations again indicate strain specific response to P. Interestingly, significant decrease in the total MC level was observed in Durgakund strain under higher P concentrations (0.1 and 0.23 mM). There are some reports where P limitation slightly reduced or did not influence the toxicity of M. aeruginosa [36, 37], while increase in MC production by Microcystis was also reported with decreasing concentrations of P in culture conditions [40, 41]. In contrast to these results, a positive correlation between MC content and increasing phosphate was observed in natural ecosystems suggesting that raised level of P increased the relative contribution of toxigenic cyanobacteria to total phytoplankton biomass [42, 43]. Several reports have also emphasized the importance of N : P ratios in MC production due to variations in response of Microcystis strains to N and P [14, 15, 44, 45]. For example, Lee et al. [44] reported higher MC and Chl content at total N : P atomic ratios of 16 : 1 and 50 : 1. Furthermore, it was suggested that cellular MC content is a function of cellular nitrogen status and found to be strongly correlated with cellular protein content at N : P ratios between 18 and 51 in M. aeruginosa [34].

It is hard to devise a clear role of N and/or P in development of bloom and its toxicity; therefore we also investigated the effect of B, which has a potential role in signaling and interspecies communication. The role of B has also been shown in organization of cell walls, membrane function, metabolic activities, and stabilization of heterocyst in cyanobacteria [46]. Recently, a B-containing signal molecule (autoinducer AI-2), encoded by AI-2 synthase (luxS), has been reported by Chen et al. [20]. AI-2 is produced by a large number of bacterial species and proposed to serve as a universal signal for interspecies communication [47]. The production of signaling molecules called N-acyl homoserine-lactones (AHLs) was also reported for the first time in Gloeothece sp. [48] and M. aeruginosa [49]. They demonstrated that the concentration of the AHLs was cell density dependent and might play an important role in bloom formation. Since one of the potential roles of MCs in the producing organism was proposed in extracellular signaling, autoinduction, and maintenance of colonies [5, 6, 10], we studied the effect of B on MC production in Microcystis strains in the current study. It was interesting that B favored growth of all the target strains along with MC concentrations (Figure 3). The total concentrations of MC variants in Durgakund strain were lowest as compared to NIES 843 and KW strains under different concentrations of N, P, and B. This could be explained on the basis that the presence of toxic strains of cyanobacteria does not always indicate toxicity, as MC-producing cell quota may vary up to 3-4 orders of magnitude [50]. Since we have done lab-based study, cyanobacteria also undergo changes in loss of toxin production [51] and colonial morphology in Microcystis, if maintained in the culture for prolonged period [52].

Transcription of mcy genes in M. aeruginosa occurs via a central bidirectional promoter between mcyA and mcyD. A total of three NtcA (global nitrogen regulator) binding sites were identified in the mcyA/D promoter region, suggesting the role of nitrogen in controlling MC biosynthesis [53]. In this study, the overall patterns in mcyA expression were somewhat consistent with MC levels measured under different N concentrations in all the three strains but not directly correlated with the total MC concentrations (, = 0.287). This finding is consistent with observation where low N resulted in decrease in transcript levels of MC synthesizing genes [54]. However, Sevilla et al. [17] reported that the MC concentration in the cultures correlated with mcyD expression but the transcript level remained constant and was independent of nitrate availability. Recently, Horst et al. [37] suggested that MC quota was not driven by decrease in copy number of the mcyB gene but mediated by phenotypic responses of individual cells to N availability. As MC is made up of different modules, each having specific enzymatic function [4], N might be helpful in assembly of these modules explaining the increased MC concentration without any direct correlation with upregulation of transcription. An alternative explanation could be that there might be an initial accumulation of MC quota in the cells and since prokaryotic mRNA is highly unstable, these might have already been transcribed and translated leading to variable results at the time of expression analysis. However, further research on time dependent real-time analysis is needed.

In this study, mcyA transcript increased under higher P levels in the target strains. In another study, insignificant changes were observed in the relative quantification of mcyD in M. aeruginosa PCC 7806 under excess phosphate, while P-deficiency (N/P = 40 : 1) led to an increase in mcyD transcript and MC-LR per cell [55]. Increases in MC quotas and mcyE expression were also reported in Lake Rotorua with the increase in Microcystis cell concentrations [56]. They demonstrated that MC production was not always continuous and significant changes in mcyE expression occurred over smaller time frames.

Increase in mcyA expression in the target strains was consistent but not correlated with MCs levels under selected concentrations of B. Correlation analysis revealed that mcyA expression in only KW strain was directly linked with MC content (, = 0.679) and concentrations (, = 0.834) under different levels of N, P, and B. Increase in photoautotrophic growth and MC concentrations in the target strains suggested an indirect role of B but its role in nonheterocystous cyanobacteria is still not well documented. Furthermore, it was suggested that accumulation of mcyB in the lysing Microcystis cells stimulated the production of MCs in the remaining intact Microcystis cells [6]. Therefore, a more detailed study on direct role of B in signaling or MC production is needed particularly in nonnitrogen fixing species like Microcystis. Various field and laboratory studies failed to assign a single major factor responsible for promoting cyanobacterial bloom and its toxicity. This indicated a complex regulation of bloom development and its toxicity by biological and environmental variables. Induction of the growth of toxic Microcystis bloom is not yet known in spite of the fact that cyanobacterial blooms are regulated by various environmental factors. This study focused on response of Microcystis to differing nutrient concentrations on mcy transcription and MCs production which could help to decipher the possible regulation of the bloom growth and its toxicity and in timely management of the water bodies.

The interaction between bacteria and cyanobacteria is one of the biotic factors that influence the bloom dynamics [57]. Therefore, we also investigated the community compositional plasticity of heterotrophic bacteria associated with cyanobacterial blooms in Durgakund Pond and Wangsong Reservoir (Figure 6, Table 3). Bacterial groups, such as Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria, were frequently found to be the dominant groups during the bloom of Microcystis. Earlier we have reported the dominance of Microcystis sp. in Durgakund Pond with the highest proportion of potentially toxigenic Microcystis sp. (14%) and MCs concentration in September [12]. Our observation was in tune with the findings that Microcystis bloom changed the microhabitat and quantity and quality of exudates and also microbes have the potential to control bloom development of potentially toxic cyanobacteria [9, 57]. However, in future a more comprehensive comparative study of bacteria associated with cyanobacteria and MC production in the field and lab cultures may provide insight in the complex regulatory mechanisms of MC production.

5. Conclusions

In summary, a comparison of photoautotrophic growth, MC content and concentration, and mcyA gene expression of three lab-grown Microcystis strains (NIES 843, KW, and Durgakund) in different nutrient regimes revealed that MC content per biomass and total MC concentration were highly correlated. MC production increased with increase in growth and this could have important implications for the management of freshwater bodies during Microcystis bloom upsurge. Lack of MC-YR in Durgakund strain indicated that MC concentration and variants were strain specific. Expression of mcyA showed nutrient concentration-dependent tendency but was not correlated with total MC concentration and therefore necessitates a time dependent real-time analysis for understanding the role of nutrients and other ecological variables in MC production. Natural associations of heterotrophic bacteria and cyanobacterial bloom were somewhat similar in freshwater bodies; however bacterial community showed variation during the different phases of the cyanobacterial bloom.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from DST (Department of Science and Technology), New Delhi, to Ankita Srivastava (IF 10355, Date: 26 November, 2010) is gratefully acknowledged. A grant from the host institution through the KRIBB Research Initiative Program is acknowledged. Financial support by the Basic Core Technology Development Program for the Oceans and the Polar Regions of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2016MIA5A1027453) is gratefully acknowledged. Ravi Kumar Asthana is thankful to UGC (University Grants Commission), New Delhi, Project Code no. P-01/623, and UGC, UPE support from the university, for financial support.

References

  1. W. W. Carmichael, “Health effects of toxin-producing cyanobacteria: ‘The CyanoHABs’,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1393–1407, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Welker and H. Von Döhren, “Cyanobacterial peptides—nature's own combinatorial biosynthesis,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 530–563, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. K. Hudnell, Q. Dortch, and H. Zenick, “An overview of the interagency, international symposium on cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (ISOC-HAB): advancing the scientific understanding of freshwater harmful algal blooms,” in Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms: State of the Science and Research Needs, H. K. Hudnell, Ed., pp. 1–16, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Tillett, E. Dittmann, M. Erhard, H. Von Döhren, T. Börner, and B. A. Neilan, “Structural organization of microcystin biosynthesis in Microcystis aeruginosa PCC7806: an integrated peptide-polyketide synthetase system,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 753–764, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Dittmann, M. Erhard, M. Kaebernick et al., “Altered expression of two light-dependent genes in a microcystin-lacking mutant of Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806,” Microbiology, vol. 147, no. 11, pp. 3113–3119, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Schatz, Y. Keren, A. Vardi et al., “Towards clarification of the biological role of microcystins, a family of cyanobacterial toxins,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 965–970, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Jähnichen, B. M. Long, and T. Petzoldt, “Microcystin production by Microcystis aeruginosa: direct regulation by multiple environmental factors,” Harmful Algae, vol. 12, pp. 95–104, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Alexova, P. A. Haynes, B. C. Ferrari, and B. A. Neilan, “Comparative protein expression in different strains of the bloom-forming cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID M110.003749, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Dziallas and H.-P. Grossart, “Increasing oxygen radicals and water temperature select for toxic Microcystis sp,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e25569, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Gan, Y. Xiao, L. Zhu et al., “The role of microcystins in maintaining colonies of bloom-forming Microcystis spp.,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 730–742, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Lukač and R. Aegerter, “Influence of trace metals on growth and toxin production of Microcystis aeruginosa,” Toxicon, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 293–305, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Srivastava, G.-G. Choi, C.-Y. Ahn, H.-M. Oh, A. K. Ravi, and R. K. Asthana, “Dynamics of microcystin production and quantification of potentially toxigenic Microcystis sp. using real-time PCR,” Water Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 817–827, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. M. Rinta-Kanto, E. A. Konopko, J. M. DeBruyn, R. A. Bourbonniere, G. L. Boyer, and S. W. Wilhelm, “Lake Erie Microcystis: relationship between microcystin production, dynamics of genotypes and environmental parameters in a large lake,” Harmful Algae, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 665–673, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. W. Paerl, W. S. Gardner, M. J. McCarthy, B. L. Peierls, and S. W. Wilhelm, “Algal blooms: noteworthy nitrogen,” Science, vol. 346, no. 6206, p. 175, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Vézie, J. Rapala, J. Vaitomaa, J. Seitsonen, and K. Sivonen, “Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth of toxic and nontoxic Microcystis strains and on intracellular microcystin concentrations,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 443–454, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Dai, H. Liu, J. Qu, X. Zhao, J. Ru, and Y. Hou, “Relationship of energy charge and toxin content of Microcystis aeruginosa in nitrogen-limited or phosphorous-limited cultures,” Toxicon, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 649–658, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Sevilla, B. Martin-Luna, L. Vela, M. Teresa Bes, M. Luisa Peleato, and M. F. Fillat, “Microcystin-LR synthesis as response to nitrogen: transcriptional analysis of the mcyD gene in Microcystis aeruginosa PCC7806,” Ecotoxicology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1167–1173, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Alexova, M. Fujii, D. Birch et al., “Iron uptake and toxin synthesis in the bloom-forming Microcystis aeruginosa under iron limitation,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1064–1077, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. E. Kirkwood, C. Nalewajko, and R. R. Fulthorpe, “The effects of cyanobacterial exudates on bacterial growth and biodegradation of organic contaminants,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 4–12, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X. Chen, S. Schauder, N. Potier et al., “Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron,” Nature, vol. 415, no. 6871, pp. 545–549, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Rippka, J. Deruelles, J. B. Waterbury, M. Herdman, and R. Y. Stanier, “Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria,” Microbiology, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 1–61, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Shirai, A. Ohotake, T. Sano et al., “Toxicity and toxins of natural blooms and isolated strains of Microcystis spp. (Cyanobacteria) and improved procedure for purification of cultures,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1241–1245, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. C. Redfield, “On the proportions of organic derivations in seawater and their relation to the composition of plankton,” in James Johnstone Memorial Volume, R. J. Daniel, Ed., pp. 177–192, University Press of Liverpool, 1934. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Myers and W. A. Kratz, “Relation between pigment content and photosynthetic characteristics in a blue-green algae,” The Journal of General Physiology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Hisbergues, G. Christiansen, L. Rouhiainen, K. Sivonen, and T. Börner, “PCR-based identification of microcystin-producing genotypes of different cyanobacterial genera,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 180, no. 6, pp. 402–410, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Muyzer, E. C. De Waal, and A. G. Uitterlinden, “Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 695–700, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. J. Paster, F. E. Dewhirst, I. Olsen, and G. J. Fraser, “Phylogeny of Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas spp. and related bacteria,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 725–732, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. J. Lane, “16S/23S rRNA sequencing,” in Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics, E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow, Eds., pp. 115–175, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  29. A. Teske, C. Wawer, G. Muyzer, and N. B. Ramsing, “Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria in a stratified fjord (Mariager Fjord, Denmark) as evaluated by most-probable-number counts and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA fragments,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1405–1415, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. W. Pfaffl, “A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, no. 9, article e45, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Sambrook and D. W. Russell, Molecular Cloning, a Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2001.
  32. R. H. Don, P. T. Cox, B. J. Wainwright, K. Baker, and J. S. Mattick, “‘Touchdown’ PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 19, no. 14, p. 4008, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. B. M. Long, G. J. Jones, and P. T. Orr, “Cellular microcystin content in N-limited Microcystis aeruginosa can be predicted from growth rate,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 278–283, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. G. Downing, C. S. Sember, M. M. Gehringer, and W. Leukes, “Medium N:P ratios and specific growth rate comodulate microcystin and protein content in Microcystis aeruginosa PCC7806 and M. aeruginosa UV027,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 468–473, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. B. Van de Waal, J. M. H. Verspagen, M. Lürling, E. Van Donk, P. M. Visser, and J. Huisman, “The ecological stoichiometry of toxins produced by harmful cyanobacteria: an experimental test of the carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis,” Ecology Letters, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1326–1335, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. A. Codd and A. M. Poon, “Cyanobacterial toxins,” in Biochemistry of the Algae and Cyanobacteria: Proceedings of the Phytochemistry Society of Europe, L. L. Rogers and J. R. Gallon, Eds., vol. 28, pp. 283–296, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1988.
  37. G. P. Horst, O. Sarnelle, J. D. White, S. K. Hamilton, R. B. Kaul, and J. D. Bressie, “Nitrogen availability increases the toxin quota of a harmful cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa,” Water Research, vol. 54, pp. 188–198, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. P. Botes, P. L. Wessels, H. Kruger et al., “Structural studies on cyanoginosins-LR, -YR, -YA and -YM, peptide toxins from Microcystis aeruginosa,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions, vol. 1, pp. 2747–2748, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  39. D. B. Van de Waal, G. Ferreruela, L. Tonk et al., “Pulsed nitrogen supply induces dynamic changes in the amino acid compositionand microcystin production of the harmful cyanobacterium Planktothrix agardhii,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 430–438, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H.-M. Oh, S. J. Lee, M.-H. Jang, and B.-D. Yoon, “Microcystin production by Microcystis aeruginosa in a phosphorus-limited chemostat,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 176–179, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K. Kameyama, N. Sugiura, H. Isoda, Y. Inamori, and T. Maekawa, “Effect of nitrate and phosphate concentration on production of microcystins by Microcystis viridis NIES 102,” Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 443–449, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Giani, D. F. Bird, Y. T. Prairie, and J. F. Lawrence, “Empirical study of cyanobacterial toxicity along a trophic gradient of lakes,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 2100–2109, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. Izydorczyk, T. Jurczak, A. Wojtal-Frankiewicz, A. Skowron, J. Mankiewicz-Boczek, and M. Tarczyńska, “Influence of abiotic and biotic factors on microcystin content in Microcystis aeruginosa cells in a eutrophic temperate reservoir,” Journal of Plankton Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 393–400, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. J. Lee, M.-H. Jang, H.-S. Kim, B.-D. Yoon, and H.-M. Oh, “Variation of microcystin content of Microcystis aeruginosa relative to medium N:P ratio and growth stage,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 323–329, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. W. M. Lewis, W. A. Wurtsbaugh, and H. W. Paerl, “Rationale for control of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus to reduce eutrophication of inland waters,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 45, no. 24, pp. 10300–10305, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. P. H. Brown, N. Bellaloui, M. A. Wimmer et al., “Boron in plant biology,” Plant Biology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 205–223, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. G. Surette, M. B. Miller, and B. L. Bassler, “Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Vibrio harveyi: a new family of genes responsible for autoinducer production,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1639–1644, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. I. Sharif, J. Gallon, C. J. Smith, and E. D. Dudley, “Quorum sensing in Cyanobacteria: N-octanoyl-homoserine lactone release and response, by the epilithic colonial cyanobacterium Gloeothece PCC6909,” ISME Journal, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1171–1182, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. C. Zhai, P. Zhang, F. Shen, C. Zhou, and C. Liu, “Does Microcystis aeruginosa have quorum sensing?” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 336, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. I. Blackburn, C. J. S. Bolch, G. J. Jones, A. P. Negri, and P. T. Orr, “Cyanobacterial blooms: why are they toxic?” in Managing Algal Blooms: Outcomes from the CSIRO Blue Green Algal Research Program, J. R. D. Davis, Ed., pp. 67–77, CSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, Australia, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  51. D. Schatz, Y. Keren, O. Hadas, S. Carmeli, A. Sukenik, and A. Kaplan, “Ecological implications of the emergence of non-toxic subcultures from toxic Microcystis strains,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 798–805, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Zhang, F. Kong, X. Tan, Z. Yang, H. Cao, and P. Xing, “Biochemical, morphological, and genetic variations in Microcystis aeruginosa due to colony disaggregation,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 663–670, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. H. P. Ginn, L. A. Pearson, and B. A. Neilan, “NtcA from Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806 is autoregulatory and binds to the microcystin promoter,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 76, no. 13, pp. 4362–4368, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. J. Harke and C. J. Gobler, “Global transcriptional responses of the toxic cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa, to nitrogen stress, phosphorus stress, and growth on organic matter,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, Article ID e69834, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. T. M. Kuniyoshi, E. Sevilla, M. T. Bes, M. F. Fillat, and M. L. Peleato, “Phosphate deficiency (N/P 40:1) induces mcyD transcription and microcystin synthesis in Microcystis aeruginosa PCC7806,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 65, pp. 120–124, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. A. Wood, A. Rueckert, D. P. Hamilton, S. C. Cary, and D. R. Dietrich, “Switching toxin production on and off: intermittent microcystin synthesis in a Microcystis bloom,” Environmental Microbiology Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 118–124, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. C. Dziallas and H.-P. Grossart, “Temperature and biotic factors influence bacterial communities associated with the cyanobacterium Microcystis sp,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1632–1641, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus