BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 6106029 | 15 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6106029

Comparative Genomics of H. pylori and Non-Pylori Helicobacter Species to Identify New Regions Associated with Its Pathogenicity and Adaptability

Academic Editor: Wen-Jun Li
Received21 Jul 2016
Revised17 Sep 2016
Accepted11 Oct 2016
Published18 Dec 2016

Abstract

The genus Helicobacter is a group of Gram-negative, helical-shaped pathogens consisting of at least 36 bacterial species. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), infecting more than 50% of the human population, is considered as the major cause of gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer. However, the genetic underpinnings of H. pylori that are responsible for its large scale epidemic and gastrointestinal environment adaption within human beings remain unclear. Core-pan genome analysis was performed among 75 representative H. pylori and 24 non-pylori Helicobacter genomes. There were 1173 conserved protein families of H. pylori and 673 of all 99 Helicobacter genus strains. We found 79 genome unique regions, a total of 202,359bp, shared by at least 80% of the H. pylori but lacked in non-pylori Helicobacter species. The operons, genes, and sRNAs within the H. pylori unique regions were considered as potential ones associated with its pathogenicity and adaptability, and the relativity among them has been partially confirmed by functional annotation analysis. However, functions of at least 54 genes and 10 sRNAs were still unclear. Our analysis of protein-protein interaction showed that 30 genes within them may have the cooperation relationship.

1. Introduction

H. pylori is a Gram-negative, spiral-shaped epsilon-proteobacterium. It colonizes 50% of the world’s human population, even as high as 80% in developing countries, making it one of the most successful pathogens [1, 2]. This bacterium can cause gastrointestinal disease, such as gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, gastric adenocarcinoma, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [35]. As research continues, a great number of non-pylori Helicobacter species (NPHS) inhabiting in a wide variety of human beings, mammals, and birds have been found [6]. Until now, there are at least 36 species of the Helicobacter genus that have been studied (http://www.bacterio.net/helicobacter.html).

The Helicobacter genus strains have been detected in more than 142 vertebrate species [7]. Among them, H. pylori is the major pathogenic bacterium in human beings. Besides H. pylori, some NPHS were also found to associate with human body function disorders [8]. For instance, H. heilmannii, H. winghamensis, H. pullorum, and H. canis were considered as causative agent of stomach and intestinal diseases [911].

Many genome regions of H. pylori, involved in the mechanism of pathogenesis and adaption to the host environment, have been identified and studied. The well-known Cag-pathogenicity island, an approximately 40 kb DNA region that encodes type IV secretion system (T4SS) and effector molecule cancer-associated gene toxin (cagA), has been proved to play a significant role in pathogenicity [12, 13]. The urea enzymes encoded by urease gene cluster can catalyze the hydrolysis of urea to ammonium and carbon dioxide. It is an influential colonization factor and contributes to gastric acid resistance [14]. Vacuolating cytotoxin (VacA) is a pore-forming toxin that implicates in altering host cell biology, including autophagy, apoptosis, cell vacuolation, and inhibition of T-cell proliferation [1517].

In the past two decades, the whole genome of H. pylori and NHPS have been widely sequenced, which give us a more open field of version to study its pathogenicity and adaption mechanism. Previous studies indicated that H. pylori has a high rate of gene recombination and unusual genetic flexibility, and those traits were considered to be helpful for the adaption to the dynamic environment [18, 19]. Even though massive virulence factors of them have been studied, the mechanisms that the essential genome components of H. pylori lead to its large scale epidemic and gastrointestinal environment adaptation within human beings remain to be further elucidated.

In this study, comparative analysis of whole genome was made to reveal general character and characteristics of Helicobacter genus [20]. H. pylori and NHPS genomes that are available on public databases were used in the analysis. We intended to identify potential regions of H. pylori genomes that are responsible for its epidemicity and adaptability. In addition, comparative genome analysis among Helicobacter genus species can give a comprehensive insight into the genomic diversity in each species and help us to understand the relationship well among them.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Selection and Management

Helicobacter genus involves at least 36 species, while H. pylori is given more prominence for medicine. There are multiple complete genomes of them available on public databases, and the genomic data was acquired from NCBI FTP site (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/) in this study. 99 genomes were selected, including 75 complete H. pylori genomes and 24 NPHS genomes, which belong to 19 species (released at the analysis time). To ensure the accuracy and consistency of initial data, chromosome, plasmids, and scaffolds of each candidate strain were concatenated by sequence “NNNNNCATTCCATTCATTAATTAATTAATGAATGAATGNNNNN” to establish a pseudochromosome for further analysis [21].

In order to get the accordance dataset and avoid contradiction that was caused by difference of the gene prediction method applied in different projects, a single gene finding program, Glimmer version 3.02 [22], was used to predict open reading frames (ORFs). The ORFs were removed while their start or end position was inside the sideward sequence. The predicted results and raw databases information were corroborated to one another. And the program RNAmmer-1.2 [23] was used to predict full length of rRNA gene sequences. The size, GC content, number of genes, source, and other characteristics of all selected genomes were listed in Table 1.


OrganismSize (bp)GC ()ScaffoldsPlasmidsCDSrRNAtRNANatural host

H. acinonychis str. Sheeba155758838.17111706636Cheetah, tiger
H. ailurogastricus157840447.05901633336Feline
H. bilis ATCC 43879253052134.7902728336Mice
H. bilis WiWa255965934.681702751940Mice
H. bizzozeronii CIII-1180753445.66111998636Dog, cat
H. canadensis MIT 98-5491162384533.69101624940Barnacle, geese, rodent
H. canis NCTC 12740193282344.82101914639Dogs
H. cetorum MIT 00-7128196011134.53111897638dolphin, whale
H. cetorum MIT 99-5656184779035.54111852636dolphin, whale
H. cinaedi CCUG 18818 ATCC BAA-847224013038.34102510639Human
H. cinaedi PAGU611210140238.55112329639Human
H. felis ATCC 49179167268144.51101776536Cat, dog, rabbit, cheetah
H. fennelliae MRY12-0050215564737.94902503338Human
H. heilmannii ASB1.4180460147.38102113741Human
H. hepaticus ATCC 51449179914635.93101863337Mice
H. himalayensis strain YS1182993639.89101896639Marmota himalayana
H. macacae MIT 99-5501236952840.41402669639Macaques
H. mustelae 12198157809742.47101745638Ferret
H. pametensis ATCC 51478143506640.081101432838Pig, bird
H. pullorum 229313-12169179934.566001754336Poultry
H. pullorum MIT 98-5489195166733.584402105336Poultry
H. suis HS1163529239.9113601814538Pig, macaque
H. typhlonius192083238.85102109639Mouse
H. winghamensis ATCC BAA-430169021634.742101742336human liver
H. pylori 2017154823839.3101595336Human
H. pylori 2018156283239.29101604336Human
H. pylori 26695-1CH166730238.87101667736Human
H. pylori 26695-1CL166723938.87101667736Human
H. pylori 26695-1166763838.87101667736Human
H. pylori 26695-1MET166730338.87101669736Human
H. pylori 26695166786738.87101681736Human
H. pylori 29CaP166715938.81101704736Human
H. pylori 35A156665538.87101583636Human
H. pylori 51158995438.77101606636Human
H. pylori 52156882638.94101578636Human
H. pylori 7C163127639.01111627736Human
H. pylori 83161742638.72101634636Human
H. pylori 908154966639.3101605336Human
H. pylori Aklavik117163612538.73121607636Human
H. pylori Aklavik86150793039.21121487636Human
H. pylori B38157675839.16101582736Human
H. pylori B8168002938.78111673636Human
H. pylori BM012A166042538.88101679736Human
H. pylori BM012B165906038.88101676736Human
H. pylori BM012S166046938.88101683736Human
H. pylori BM013A160423338.96101584736Human
H. pylori BM013B160421238.96101586736Human
H. pylori Cuz20163544938.86101616636Human
H. pylori ELS37166987638.88111676636Human
H. pylori F16157539938.88101593636Human
H. pylori F30157969338.8111582636Human
H. pylori F32158146138.86111587636Human
H. pylori F57160900638.73101619636Human
H. pylori G27166301338.87111672736Human
H. pylori Gambia9424171246839.12111694636Human
H. pylori Hp238158647338.7101616536Human
H. pylori HPAG1160573639.07111595636Human
H. pylori HUP-B14160758439.04111597636Human
H. pylori India7167591838.9101664636Human
H. pylori J166165056138.93101630636Human
H. pylori J99164383139.19101629636Human
H. pylori Lithuania75164067338.87111659636Human
H. pylori ML1162981538.69101701636Human
H. pylori ML2156212538.92101764636Human
H. pylori ML3163533438.64111744436Human
H. pylori NY40169691738.81101751636Human
H. pylori OK113161661738.73101649636Human
H. pylori OK310159543638.77111595636Human
H. pylori oki102163321238.81101630636Human
H. pylori oki112163792538.81101635636Human
H. pylori oki128155382638.97101565636Human
H. pylori oki154159970038.8101626636Human
H. pylori oki422163485238.83101641636Human
H. pylori oki673159505838.82101623636Human
H. pylori oki828160034538.8101618636Human
H. pylori oki898163487538.83101612636Human
H. pylori P12168403838.79111688636Human
H. pylori PeCan18166068539.02101629636Human
H. pylori PeCan4163826938.91111622636Human
H. pylori Puno120163776238.9111617636Human
H. pylori Puno135164613938.82101616636Human
H. pylori Rif1166788338.87101678736Human
H. pylori Rif2166789038.87101674736Human
H. pylori Sat464156757039.09111553636Human
H. pylori Shi112166345638.77101651636Human
H. pylori Shi169161690938.86101593636Human
H. pylori Shi417166571938.77101623636Human
H. pylori Shi470160854838.91101612636Human
H. pylori SJM180165805138.9101640636Human
H. pylori SNT49161083039111599636Human
H. pylori SouthAfrica20162290338.57101701636Human
H. pylori SouthAfrica7167982938.42111689636Human
H. pylori UM032159353738.82101613636Human
H. pylori UM037169279438.89101708636Human
H. pylori UM066165804738.62101651636Human
H. pylori UM298159454438.82101618636Human
H. pylori UM299159456938.82101617636Human
H. pylori v225d159560438.94111608636Human
H. pylori XZ274165654438.57111798736Human

Note: (1) associated with gastric disease in humans.
(2) Latin name, genome size, GC-content, scaffolds number, plasmid number, information of genes, and natural host are listed.
2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of 16S rRNA

In order to better understand the phylogenetic relationships among Helicobacter species, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the 16S rRNA genes obtained from the 99 genomes. In addition, Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter fetus were used as outgroup. Multiple sequence alignment of 101 16S rRNA genes was performed using MAFFT version 7.123b [24]. The phylogenetic tree was inferred by the Neighbor-Joining method [25] using MEGA7 [26]. To estimate the consensus tree, 1000-bootstrap resampling was done.

2.3. Cluster Analysis of Core and Pan Genome

Orthologous group analyses were performed with software OrthoMCL version 2.0.9 [27], which could generate a similarity matrix normalized by species representation relationship of sequences, and it was then grouped using the Markov Clustering Algorithm (MCL) [28]. All-against-all BLASTP comparisons were used to get pair sequences of protein dataset in OrthoMCL at start. An -value cutoff of and the aligned sequence length longer than the coverage of 50% of a query sequence was chosen to perform OrthoMCL.

A family matrix, which was generated from the genome pairwise comparison of the gene contents of any two genomes, was visualized. The gene families obtained from the OrthoMCL were used to get core and pan genome datasets. The number of unique genes and gene families for each individual species relative to other 98 genomes was calculated and visualized with bar graph.

2.4. Functional Classification of the Core and Accessory Genome

The dataset was combined into three groups: 75 H. pylori genomes alone, 24 NPHS genomes alone, and all the tested 99 Helicobacter genomes. For core and accessory genome of three groups, functional annotation and category were analyzed by performing BLASTP program against database Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs, 2014 update, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/), respectively [29, 30]. The percentage of each function category was illustrated by bar chart. All the heatmap and bar were plotted by R (https://www.r-project.org/).

2.5. Unique Regions Analysis of H. pylori

Each of the genomes was aligned to H. pylori 26695 using BLASTN program. Then, the genome regions shared by at least 80% of the H. pylori meanwhile lacked in NHPS were detected by a Perl script. The genomic lengths of unique regions only greater than 200 bp were considered. If the genomic length between each adjacent unique regions is less than 300 bp, it was regarded as a part of unique region. DOOR (Database for prOkaryotic OpeRons) [31] was used to predicate operons of H. pylori 26695 genome. Virulence factor database (VFDB) [32], COG database [29], InterProScan [33], and nonredundant (NR) protein database [34] were used to annotate and predict the functions of these genes within the target region. Furthermore, pfam [35], KEGG [36], GO [37], and TrEMBL [38] were used to discover more about the putative function of the hypothetical proteins of them.

Small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) are ubiquitous regulators existing in all living organisms. They can impact various biological processes via interacting with mRNA targets or binding to regulatory proteins [39, 40]. RNAspace.org (http://RNAspace.org/), which is a comprehensive prediction and annotation tool of ncRNA [41], was used to predict ncRNA of H. pylori. Then, the particular ones contained by unique regions of H. pylori (URHP) were detected.

The analysis results were virtualized by BLAST ring image generator (BRIG) [42]. Five H. pylori strains, 26695, Cuz-20, J99, PeCan4, and SouthAfrica7, were drawn on the inner rings to represent the H. pylori species. URHP were drawn on the outer ring and twenty-four NHPS were drawn between them.

2.6. Protein-Protein Interaction Network Analysis of URHP Proteins

To better understand the role of URHP proteins in the H. pylori adaption and pathogenicity, protein-protein interaction network analysis of URHP proteins was carried out using Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING version 10.0) [43]. The STRING database (http://string-db.org/) is a comprehensive database that could provide a strict assessment and integration of protein-protein interactions, including physical as well as functional interrelationships.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Genome Statistics and Features

H. pylori was discovered by Warren and Marshall in 1983 and proved to be the pathogen that caused gastritis [44]. Then, the important pathogen strain H. pylori 26695 genome was completely sequenced in 1997 [45]. Altogether, ninety-nine genomes were used in this study and listed in Table 1, including 75 complete H. pylori genomes and 24 NPHS genomes, and plasmids were identified within 27 genomes (Table 1). The NPHS, which can be classified into 20 Helicobacter species, includes 11 completed genomes. Average genome size of all strains is 1,689,380 bp, ranging from 1,435,066 bp (H. pametensis ATCC 51478) to 2,559,659 bp (H. bilis WiWa). The genomes are relatively small and compact compared with other bacteria, which may indicate a specific adaptation for their obligate pathogenic lifestyles [46, 47]. This genus has a low GC content, whose average GC content is 38.91%, ranging from 33.58% (H. pullorum MIT 98-5489) to 47.38% (H. heilmannii ASB1.4). The average number of protein coding sequences predicted is 1,730, ranging from 1,432 (H. pametensis ATCC 51478) to 2,751 (H. bilis WiWa).

The hosts of this genus species have great variety. All the H. pylori strains and H. cinaedi, H. fennelliae, H. heilmannii, and H. winghamensis were originally isolated from humans. The natural hosts of H. canis, H. bizzozeronii, H. Canadensis, H. felis, H. pullorum, and H. suis are mammals or birds, including pig, cat, dog, and geese. At the same time, the above six NHPS were also found to associate with gastric disease in humans [4851]. H. acinonychis, H. ailurogastricus, H. bilis, H. cetorum, H. hepaticus, H. himalayensis, H. macacae, H. mustelae, H. pametensis, and H. typhlonius were isolated from nonhuman sources only, which had not been reported in human infection before [5254].

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of 16S rRNA

Helicobacter genus species have a wide range of hosts. However, H. pylori is one of the most prevalent pathogenic bacteria that comigrated and evolved with human beings all around the world [55]. Each Helicobacter species has its own specific or broad hosts or even only survives in several host’s organs [56], suggesting that each one of them has developed a balance of adaption with its hosts. In order to better understand the pattern of evolution in this genus, a phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA has been constructed for 99 Helicobacter species with Campylobacter fetus and Campylobacter jejuni as outgroup. After multiple alignments, the common gaps and missing data were masked. In the final dataset, there were 1,489 bp of each aligned sequence. As shown in Figure 1, H. acinonychis and H. cetorum, whose nature hosts are cats and aquatic mammals, respectively, are the closest species to H. pylori, and H. pylori strains have a very close relationship among them.

3.3. Homologous Proteome Analysis by Pairwise Comparisons

The whole predicted proteins (proteome) of each strain used in this study were compared to estimate the amount of proteins they shared. The homolog between any two different proteomes ranged from 43.71% (H. heilmannii ASB 1.4 versus H. bilis ATCC 43879) to 99.87% (H. pylori BM013A versus H. pylori BM013B), while it is generally to be above 80% within the H. pylori strains (Figure 2). The results also showed that H. acinonychis (average 81.7%) and H. cetorum (average 75.59%) had the highest similarity with H. pylori. The relationships shown by the homologous analysis are consistent when compared with the phylogenetic tree. The internal homology against its own proteome ranged from 1.45% (H. pullorum 229313-12) to 9.52% (H. heilmannii ASB1.4) with average 3.50%, which indicates that this genus’s strains have a low redundancy in their genome composition.

3.4. Core-Pan Genome Analysis

The core genome, which is responsible for the basic life processes and major phenotypic characteristics, is composed of the gene families that are shared by all the Helicobacter species strains. The pan genome is the overall gene families existing in any Helicobacter species strain. The pan genome size of 75 H. pylori genomes is 4,409 with an average of about 39 new gene families extended with followed addition of genome. The increasing speed of pan genome size is almost the same with previous analysis of Ali et al., and their sample size is 39 genomes [57]. For 24 NPHS genomes along, the pan genome size is 12,010, including 4,412 singleton genes. When all NPHS and H. pylori genomes were used, the pan genome size was rapidly increased to 14,686, including 8,243 singleton genes. It is more than thrice the size of 75 H. pylori pan genome size. The above pan genome analytic results suggest that the genomes of Helicobacter genus species are open and have diversity. Nevertheless, the core genome size is relatively stable. There are 1,173 gene families shared by all the H. pylori genomes, which represent more than 74% of their average gene family contents (~1,565). For all the NPHS genomes along, the core genome size is 682, which is almost the same with the size (673) for all H. pylori with NPHS genomes together. It is interesting that there is an obvious difference between the core genome size of H. pylori and NPHS. This may indicate that those unique gene families shared by H. pylori strains are very relevant to their adaption to unique living environment, pathogenicity, and epidemic.

Estimation of the size of unique genes and gene families for each individual species relative to all 99 genomes was simultaneously carried out (Figure 3). H. macacae MIT 99-5501 has the largest number of unique genes and gene families, which are 1,016 and 964, respectively. It accounts for 38.07 percent of its gene contents. The number of unique genes of H. pylori is relatively few. This may be due to the fact that too many H. pylori genomes were compared with each other. For example, H. pylori BM013A genome and H. pylori BM013B genome exhibit a high degree of similarity, so only few unique genes exist between them. For all the NHPS, the average number of unique genes and gene families are 325 and 303. It once again implies the obvious genomic plasticity among Helicobacter species living in different habits and possessing diverse lifestyles.

3.5. COG Category of Core Genome and Accessory Genome

The core genome and accessory genome of 99 Helicobacter strains were composed of 673 and 14,013 protein families, separately. For 75 H. pylori genomes along, the core genome and accessory genome sizes were 1,173 and 3,236, as well as 682 and 11,328 for 24 NPHS genomes along. According to COG category analysis of the above six datasets, possible functions of their gene clusters were identified and subdivided into 23 subcategories. The unassigned gene clusters were put into the same class with function unknown (Figure 4). For three core genome datasets, more than 90% protein clusters were assigned to COG function category. Nevertheless, average 28.1% protein clusters were assigned for three accessory datasets, suggesting that there are still a plenty of proteins without clear biological functions that need to be studied.

In line with what we expected, the significant protein clusters belonging to core genome were assigned to the groups of housekeeping functions. For core genome of 99 Helicobacter strains, translation, ribosomal structure, biogenesis (category J), and cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (category M) take up 17.26% and 9.65%, respectively, and the percentages are far more than accessory genome. On the contrary, for functional subcategories extracellular structures (category W), mobilome, prophages, transposons (category X), and defense mechanisms (category V), the proportion of accessory genome is greater than core genome. Most of these protein clusters closely related to the interaction of strains and their living environment [5860]. For instance, type IV pilus (TFP) assembly proteins (category W) are important components of TFP pilus which help H. pylori colonization [61]; multiple transposase genes (category X) which can cause antibiotic resistance and transposition are also important to create genetic diversity within species and adaptability to dynamic living conditions [62]; ABC-type multidrug transport system proteins (category V) are used to drug resistance [63] and so on. In addition, the poorly characterized part accounting for more than 70% may be involved in specific adaptations that help Helicobacter species survive in novel environments.

3.6. Identification of H. pylori Unique Regions

A reasonable hypothesis often made in studying bacteria evolution is that the numerous host specific adaptation that a bacterial species displays will be correlated with its specific regions and genes [64]. In this study, seventy-nine sequence segments, total length of 202,359 bp, about 12.4% of the H. pylori genome, were identified as unique regions. These regions are shared by H. pylori strains but absent from NHPS. The lengths of the unique regions range from 211 bp to 27,269 bp and median length is 1,502. A total of 155 genes are contained in them. Functional annotation of the above genes was performed by VFDB, COG database, InterProScan, and NR database, respectively. Furthermore, the results were integrated (Table S1, in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6106029) and classified into different function categories (Figure 5). Besides, a total of 28 sRNAs within the URHP were identified (Table S2).

In the circular graph, the largest H. pylori unique region named UR_26 containing 28 genes can be observed obviously. Average about two genes were contained in each unique region. However, about 82.3% unique regions contain two genes or less. Operons, as the basic units of transcription and cellular functions, have been proved that they are extensively existing in H. pylori genome [65]. Within H. pylori, sixty unique genes, more than three quarters, are contained in nineteen unique polycistrons. Twenty-three polycistrons are located partly in URHP, in addition to seventy-one monocistrons (Table S1). The known acid induction of H. pylori adaptability and virulence operons, such as cag-pathogenicity island, transcriptional regulator (tenA), catalase, and membrane protein (hopT), are included in them [6567]. These results indicate that H. pylori can regulate the expression of those unique genes by control of operons depending on environmental conditions.

A total of 101 genes could get the certain functional annotation within the URHP, compared to the above 4 databases. Unique region UR_26 represents the T4SS, which can deliver effector protein cancer-associated gene toxin (cagA) into gastric epithelial cells. It is reported that T4SS plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer [12, 60]. Besides T4SS, a plenty of genes, which have been proved strongly to correlate to pathogenicity and adaption, are contained in the unique regions. For instance, membrane proteins babB/hopT, sabB/hopO, and sabA/hopP, and so forth are involved in cell adhesion. These genes facilitate colonization of H. pylori and increase immune response, resulting in enhanced mucosal inflammation [6870]; abundant restriction-modification (RM) system proteins have large effects on gene expression and genome maintenance. They give H. pylori the ability to adapt to dynamic environmental conditions during long-term colonization [71]; ABC transporters, MFS transporter, sugar efflux transporter, short-chain fatty acids transporter, and so forth, which are important virulence factors because they play roles in nutrient uptake and secretion of toxins and antimicrobial agents, are important for their interactions with complicated and changeable environments [7274]. Even though pfam, KEGG, GO, and TrEMBL databases were used for functional annotation, the other 54 genes still cannot get the clear function information, accounting for nearly a third of all URHP genes.

Noncoding small RNAs act as posttranscriptional regulators that fine-tune important physiological processes in pathogens to adapt dynamic, intricate environment [75, 76]. To investigate the regulatory roles of the putative unique sRNAs, we mapped them to the genome of H. pylori 26695 [76]. Eighteen of them have matches with genes, unexpectedly (Table S2). Ten sRNAs (SR1, SR2, SR6, SR15, SR20, SR21, SR22, SR23, SR13, and SR25) match perfectly with the known acid induction genes, including eight membrane proteins, DNA polymerase III subunits gamma, tau, and adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase [67, 77]. Besides, SR5 matches with HcpA, which is considered as a virulence factor to trigger the release of a concerted set of cytokines to active the inflammatory response [78]. The small CRISPR RNAs SR7 and SR18 are guides of the CRISPR-Cas system, which was reported as potential participants in bacteria stress responses and virulence [79].

Altogether, it has been proved that the close associations exist between most of the operons, genes, or sRNAs within URHP and adaptability or virulence of H. pylori. However, some of them cannot get the certain functional information via current databases, which indicates that our genetic knowledge is still incomplete to explain pathogenicity and adaption mechanism of H. pylori fully and these function unknown genes need to be further studied.

3.7. Protein-Protein Interaction Network Analysis

The 155 URHP genes and 54 genes with unknown functions of H. pylori were analyzed using STRING to build protein-protein interaction map, respectively. As shown in Figure S1, a total of 125 genes were assigned into an independent interaction network. It is easy to find two main protein-protein interaction groups: one is well-known cag-pathogenicity island, and the other takes succinyl-CoA-3-ketoacid CoA transferase (encoded by scoA and scoB of operon UO_54), acetone carboxylase (encoded by C694_03570, C694_03590, and C694_03595 of operon UO_55), and acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (encoded by C694_03555 of operon UO_54) as the center of the interaction map. The second main protein-protein interaction group genes are involved in acetone metabolism. Brahmachary et al. proved that those genes play an important role in survival and colonization of the H. pylori in gastric mucosa [80, 81]. Figure 6 shows a possible protein-protein interaction map of the 54 URHP function unknown genes. Thirty proteins were targeted to two divided interaction maps. One includes 18 proteins; the other includes 12 ones. These genes may have synergistic effect on surviving characteristics of H. pylori. They could be used as the most possible proteins to further explore the common pathogenic behavior of this pathogen.

4. Conclusions

H. pylori is an age-old pathogenic microorganism that has infected more than half of the population with strong adaptability. In this study, we presented a comparative genomics analysis of 75 representative H. pylori complete genomes and 24 NHPS ones. Pan genome analysis showed that both all Helicobacter genus strains and only H. pylori species had an open and diverse genome, which may be the result of the different strains that cope with their specific living conditions. However, the core genome is conserved relatively higher. We found 1173 conserved protein families for 75 H. pylori strains and 673 for all the 99 Helicobacter genus strains. The regions and genes, which are conserved among H. pylori genomes but absent from NHPS genomes, were considered as potential targets that were associated with H. pylori pathogenicity and adaptation. Functional annotation of 155 genes within 79 URHP indicated that most of them are well-known pathogenic and adaptive associated ones, such as cag-pathogenicity island, babB, sabB, and ABC transporter, whereas there are still 54 genes of which the biological functions remain unclear. Protein-protein interaction network analysis showed that 30 of them could be assigned to two different interaction networks. Besides, the functional analysis of the operons and sRNAs which were unique to H. pylori also showed the intimate association between these genomic structures and its pathogenicity and adaptation. All the URHP, especially those components whose functions remain unclear, could be as potential candidates for further studying and deeply understanding the mechanism of widespread epidemics and pathogenicity in H. pylori. In addition, the analysis tools and pipeline used in this study could be as a reference applied to other species.

Abbreviations

MALT:Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue
NPHS:Non-pylori Helicobacter species
T4SS:Type IV secretion system
cagA:Cancer-associated gene toxin
VacA:Vacuolating cytotoxin
ORFs:Open reading frames
COGs:Clusters of Orthologous Groups
VFDB:Virulence factor database
NR:Nonredundant
URHP:Unique regions of H. pylori
DOOR:Database for prokaryotic operons
sRNAs:Small noncoding RNAs
BRIG:BLAST ring image generator.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

The authors consider that De-Min Cao and Qun-Feng Lu contributed equally to this work. De-Min Cao, Yan-Qiang Huang, and Hong-Kai Bi conceived and designed the study. De-Min Cao and Qun-Feng Lu collected the data and performed the analysis. De-Min Cao, Ju-Ping Wang, Song-Bo Li, and Yu-Li Chen wrote the manuscript with the assist of all authors. All authors read and approved the final paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Key Laboratory of Microbial Infection Research in Western Guangxi (Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities), Guangxi Key Discipline Fund of Pathogenic Microbiology (no. 16), Key Laboratory Fund of Colleges and Universities in Guangxi (no. Gui Jiao Ke Yan 6), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31460023), Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (no. 2014GXNSFAA118206), and Special Fund for Public Welfare Research and Capacity Building in Guangdong Province (no. 2014A020212288).

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information includes: Table S1, Unique regions of H. pylori (URHP) and function annotations of relative genes; Table S2, sRNAs shared by all H. pylori but absent from NHPS; Fig. S1 Protein-protein interaction networks of 155 URHP genes.

  1. Supplementary Material

References

  1. S. Suerbaum and C. Josenhans, “Helicobacter pylori evolution and phenotypic diversification in a changing host,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 441–452, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Kennemann, X. Didelot, T. Aebischer et al., “Helicobacter pylori genome evolution during human infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 12, pp. 5033–5038, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. G. Kusters, A. H. M. Van Vliet, and E. J. Kuipers, “Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 449–490, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Zhang, L. Moise, and S. F. Moss, “H. pylori vaccines: why we still don't have any,” Human Vaccines, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1153–1157, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Parsonnet, G. D. Friedman, D. P. Vandersteen et al., “Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric carcinoma,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 325, no. 16, pp. 1127–1131, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Gueneau and S. Loiseaux-De Goër, “Helicobacter: molecular phylogeny and the origin of gastric colonization in the genus,” Infection, Genetics & Evolution, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 215–223, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. D. Schrenzel, C. L. Witte, J. Bahl et al., “Genetic characterization and epidemiology of helicobacters in non-domestic animals,” Helicobacter, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 126–142, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Smet, B. Flahou, I. Mukhopadhya et al., “The other helicobacters,” Helicobacter, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. Nikin, B. Bogdanovic, B. Kukic, I. Nikolic, and J. Vukojevic, “Helicobacter heilmannii associated gastritis: case report,” Archive of Oncology, vol. 19, no. 3-4, pp. 73–75, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Van Den Bulck, A. Decostere, M. Baele et al., “Identification of non-Helicobacter pylori spiral organisms in gastric samples from humans, dogs, and cats,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2256–2260, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. L. Melito, C. Munro, P. R. Chipman, D. L. Woodward, T. F. Booth, and F. G. Rodgers, “Helicobacter winghamensis sp. nov., a novel Helicobacter sp. isolated from patients with gastroenteritis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 2412–2417, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. E. Frick-Cheng, T. M. Pyburn, B. J. Voss, W. H. Mcdonald, M. D. Ohi, and T. L. Cover, “Molecular and structural analysis of the Helicobacter pylori cag Type IV secretion system core complex,” mBio, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–80, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. Tohidpour, “CagA-mediated pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 93, pp. 44–55, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Mora and S. Arioli, “Microbial urease in health and disease,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 10, no. 12, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. L. Cover and S. R. Blanke, “Helicobacter pylori VacA, a paradigm for toxin multifunctionality,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 320–332, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. Yahiro, M. Satoh, M. Nakano et al., “Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (LRP1) mediates autophagy and apoptosis caused by Helicobacter pylori VacA,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 37, pp. 31104–31115, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. Lerat and H. Ochman, “Recognizing the pseudogenes in bacterial genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 3125–3132, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. W. Fischer, U. Breithaupt, B. Kern, S. I. Smith, C. Spicher, and R. Haas, “A comprehensive analysis of Helicobacter pylori plasticity zones reveals that they are integrating conjugative elements with intermediate integration specificity,” BMC Genomics, vol. 15, no. 1, article 310, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. P. Haley and J. A. Gaddy, “Helicobacter pylori: genomic insight into the host-pathogen interaction,” International Journal of Genomics, vol. 2015, Article ID 386905, 8 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. Medini, C. Donati, H. Tettelin, V. Masignani, and R. Rappuoli, “The microbial pan-genome,” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 589–594, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Tettelin, V. Masignani, M. J. Cieslewicz et al., “Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial ‘pan-genome’,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 39, pp. 13950–13955, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. L. Delcher, D. Harmon, S. Kasif, O. White, and S. L. Salzberg, “Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 27, no. 23, pp. 4636–4641, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Lagesen, P. Hallin, E. A. Rødland, H.-H. Stærfeldt, T. Rognes, and D. W. Ussery, “RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 3100–3108, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Katoh and D. M. Standley, “MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 772–780, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. N. Saitou and M. Nei, “The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.,” Molecular biology and evolution, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 406–425, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. Kumar, G. Stecher, and K. Tamura, “MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1870–1874, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Li, C. J. Stoeckert Jr., and D. S. Roos, “OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes,” Genome Research, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2178–2189, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Dongen, “A cluster algorithm for graphs,” in Information Systems [INS], pp. 1–40, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. Y. Galperin, K. S. Makarova, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin, “Expanded Microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. D261–D269, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. L. Tatusov, M. Y. Galperin, D. A. Natale, and E. V. Koonin, “The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. Mao, P. Dam, J. Chou, V. Olman, and Y. Xu, “DOOR: a database for prokaryotic operons,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, supplement 1, pp. D459–D463, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. Lerat and H. Ochman, “Ψ-Φ: Exploring the outer limits of bacterial pseudogenes,” Genome Research, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2273–2278, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. P. Jones, D. Binns, H.-Y. Chang et al., “InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification,” Bioinformatics, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1236–1240, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. D. Pruitt, T. Tatusova, and D. R. Maglott, “NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. D61–D65, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. D. Finn, A. Bateman, J. Clements et al., “Pfam: The protein families database,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. D222–D230, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. Ogata, S. Goto, K. Sato, W. Fujibuchi, H. Bono, and M. Kanehisa, “KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. Ashburner, C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake et al., “Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology,” Nature Genetics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. E. Camon, M. Magrane, D. Barrell et al., “The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Project: implementation of GO in SWISS-PROT, TrEMBL, and InterPro,” Genome Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 662–672, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. E. Westhof, “The amazing world of bacterial structured RNAs,” Genome Biology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 79–82, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. Storz and D. Haas, “A guide to small RNAs in microorganisms,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 93–95, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M.-J. Cros, A. De Monte, J. Mariette et al., “RNAspace.org: an integrated environment for the prediction, annotation, and analysis of ncRNA,” RNA, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1947–1956, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. N.-F. Alikhan, N. K. Petty, N. L. Ben Zakour, and S. A. Beatson, “BLAST ring image generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons,” BMC Genomics, vol. 12, article no. 402, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. D. Szklarczyk, A. Franceschini, S. Wyder et al., “STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. D447–D452, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. R. Warren and B. Marshall, “Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis,” The Lancet, vol. 321, no. 8336, pp. 1273–1275, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J.-F. Tomb, O. White, A. R. Kerlavage et al., “The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori,” Nature, vol. 388, no. 6642, pp. 539–547, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Bryant, C. Chewapreecha, and S. D. Bentley, “Developing insights into the mechanisms of evolution of bacterial pathogens from whole-genome sequences,” Future Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1283–1296, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. N. A. Moran, “Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens,” Cell, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 583–586, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. F. E. Dewhirst, C. Seymour, G. J. Fraser, B. J. Paster, and J. G. Fox, “Phylogeny of Helicobacter isolates from bird and swine feces and description of Helicobacter pametensis sp. nov.,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 553–560, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. Waldenström, S. L. W. On, R. Ottvall, D. Hasselquist, C. S. Harrington, and B. Olsen, “Avian reservoirs and zoonotic potential of the emerging human pathogen helicobacter canadensis,” Applied & Environmental Microbiology, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 7523–7526, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. V. B. Young, C.-C. Chien, K. A. Knox, N. S. Taylor, D. B. Schauer, and J. G. Fox, “Cytolethal distending toxin in avian and human isolates of Helicobacter pullorum,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 620–623, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. Kersulyte, M. Rossi, and D. E. Berg, “Sequence divergence and conservation in genomes of Helicobacter cetorum strains from a dolphin and a whale,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e83177, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. P. Marini, S. Muthupalani, Z. Shen et al., “Persistent infection of rhesus monkeys with ‘Helicobacter macacae’ and its isolation from an animal with intestinal adenocarcinoma,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 961–969, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Frank, C. Dingemanse, A. M. Schmitz et al., “The complete genome sequence of the murine pathobiont helicobacter typhlonius,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, article 1549, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. F. Haesebrouck, F. Pasmans, B. Flahou et al., “Gastric helicobacters in domestic animals and nonhuman primates and their significance for human health,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 202–223, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. D. Falush, T. Wirth, B. Linz et al., “Traces of human migrations in Helicobacter pylori populations,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5612, pp. 1582–1585, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. T. P. Mikkonen, R. I. Kärenlampi, and M.-L. Hänninen, “Phylogenetic analysis of gastric and enterohepatic Helicobacter species based on partial HSP60 gene sequences,” International Journal of Systematic & Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 753–758, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. Ali, A. Naz, S. C. Soares et al., “Pan-genome analysis of human gastric pathogen H. pylori: comparative genomics and pathogenomics approaches to identify regions associated with pathogenicity and prediction of potential core therapeutic targets,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 139580, 17 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. C. H. Schilling, M. W. Covert, I. Famili, G. M. Church, J. S. Edwards, and B. O. Palsson, “Genome-scale metabolic model of Helicobacter pylori 26695,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 16, pp. 4582–4593, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. J. Guillemin and N. R. Salama, “Helicobacter pylori functional genomics,” Methods in Microbiology, vol. 33, pp. 291–319, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. D. N. Sgouras, T. T. H. Trang, and Y. Yamaoka, “Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection,” Helicobacter, vol. 20, pp. 8–16, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. So, “Pilus retraction powers bacterial twitching motility,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6800, p. 98, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. R. K. Aziz, M. Breitbart, and R. A. Edwards, “Transposases are the most abundant, most ubiquitous genes in nature,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 13, pp. 4207–4217, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. Lubelski, W. N. Konings, and A. J. M. Driessen, “Distribution and physiology of ABC-type transporters contributing to multidrug resistance in bacteria,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 463–476, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. T. Lefébure and M. J. Stanhope, “Evolution of the core and pan-genome of Streptococcus: positive selection, recombination, and genome composition,” Genome Biology, vol. 8, no. 5, article R71, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. C. M. Sharma, S. Hoffmann, F. Darfeuille et al., “The primary transcriptome of the major human pathogen Helicobacter pylori,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7286, pp. 250–255, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. D. S. Merrell, M. L. Goodrich, G. Otto, L. S. Tompkins, and S. Falkow, “pH-regulated gene expression of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 3529–3539, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. Y. Wen, E. A. Marcus, U. Matrubutham, M. A. Gleeson, D. R. Scott, and G. Sachs, “Acid-adaptive genes of Helicobacter pylori,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 5921–5939, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. D. T. Pride, R. J. Meinersmann, and M. J. Blaser, “Allelic variation within Helicobacter pylori babA and babB,” Infection & Immunity, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 1160–1171, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. Mahdavi, B. Sondén, M. Hurtig et al., “Helicobacter pylori sabA adhesin in persistent infection and chronic inflammation,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5581, pp. 573–578, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. R. Rad, M. Gerhard, R. Lang et al., “The Helicobacter pylori blood group antigen-binding adhesin facilitates bacterial colonization and augments a nonspecific immune response,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 6, pp. 3033–3041, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. Y. Furuta, H. Namba-Fukuyo, T. F. Shibata et al., “Methylome diversification through changes in DNA methyltransferase sequence specificity,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e1004272, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. K. Hendricks and H. L. T. Mobley, “Helicobacter pylori ABC transporter: effect of allelic exchange mutagenesis on urease activity,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 179, no. 18, pp. 5892–5902, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  73. N. Yan, “Structural advances for the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporters,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 151–159, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. A. L. Davidson and J. Chen, “ATP-binding cassette transporters in bacteria,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 73, pp. 241–268, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. Á. D. Ortega, J. J. Quereda, M. Graciela Pucciarelli, and F. García-del Portillo, “Non-coding RNA regulation in pathogenic bacteria located inside eukaryotic cells,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 4, article no. 162, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. B. Xiao, W. Li, G. Guo et al., “Identification of small noncoding RNAs in Helicobacter pylori by a bioinformatics-based approach,” Current Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 258–263, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. S. Bury-Moné, J.-M. Thiberge, M. Contreras, A. Maitournam, A. Labigne, and H. De Reuse, “Responsiveness to acidity via metal ion regulators mediates virulence in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 623–638, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. L. Deml, M. Aigner, J. Decker et al., “Characterization of the Helicobacter pylori cysteine-rich protein A as a T-helper cell type 1 polarizing agent,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 4732–4742, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. R. Louwen, R. H. J. Staals, H. P. Endtz, P. Van Baarlen, and J. Van Der Oost, “The role of CRISPR-cas systems in virulence of pathogenic bacteria,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 74–88, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. P. Brahmachary, G. Wang, S. L. Benoit, M. V. Weinberg, R. J. Maier, and T. R. Hoover, “The human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori has a potential acetone carboxylase that enhances its ability to colonize mice,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 1, article 14, pp. 1–8, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. M.-J. Zhang, F. Zhao, D. Xiao et al., “Comparative proteomic analysis of passaged Helicobacter pylori,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 482–490, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 De-Min Cao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1596 Views | 730 Downloads | 8 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.