Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 6715295, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6715295
Research Article

Effect of Extracellular Matrix Membrane on Bone Formation in a Rabbit Tibial Defect Model

1Department of New Materials, Oscotec Inc., Seongnam-si 13488, Republic of Korea
2Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea

Received 13 October 2015; Revised 31 December 2015; Accepted 1 February 2016

Academic Editor: Costantino Del Gaudio

Copyright © 2016 Jin Wook Hwang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Fujihara, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna, “Guided bone regeneration membrane made of polycaprolactone/calcium carbonate composite nano-fibers,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 19, pp. 4139–4147, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. O. Moses, D. Vitrial, G. Aboodi et al., “Biodegradation of three different collagen membranes in the rat calvarium: a comparative study,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 905–911, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Ge, H. Feng, and L. Wang, “Application of a novel resorbable membrane in the treatment of calvarial defects in rats,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 2417–2429, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Z. Zhang, G. Li, and B. Shi, “Physicochemical properties of collagen, gelatin and collagen hydrolysate derived from bovine limed split wastes,” Journal of the Society of Leather Technologies and Chemists, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. F. Badylak and T. W. Gilbert, “Immune response to biologic scaffold materials,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 109–116, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Jardelino, E. R. Takamori, L. F. Hermida, A. Lenharo, I. I. Castro-Silva, and J. M. Granjeiro, “Porcine peritoneum as source of biocompatible collagen in mice,” Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 332–336, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. S. Weadock, E. J. Miller, E. L. Keuffel, and M. G. Dunn, “Effect of physical crosslinking methods on collagen-fiber durability in proteolytic solutions,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 221–226, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. O. Freytes, J. Martin, S. S. Velankar, A. S. Lee, and S. F. Badylak, “Preparation and rheological characterization of a gel form of the porcine urinary bladder matrix,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1630–1637, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Mendoza-Novelo, E. E. Avila, J. V. Cauich-Rodríguez et al., “Decellularization of pericardial tissue and its impact on tensile viscoelasticity and glycosaminoglycan content,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1241–1248, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. M. Noah, J. Chen, X. Jiao, I. Heschel, and N. Pallua, “Impact of sterilization on the porous design and cell behavior in collagen sponges prepared for tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 2855–2861, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. A. Abraham, J. Murray, K. Billiar, and S. J. Sullivan, “Evaluation of the porcine intestinal collagen layer as a biomaterial,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 442–452, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Ekaterina, Y. Kim, J.-Y. Kim, M.-R. Kim, S. O. Kim, and S.-J. Kim, “Histomorphometric study on healing of critical sized defect in rat calvaria using three different bovine grafts,” Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 276–281, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Arbeiter, N. Grabow, Y. Wessarges, K. Sternberg, and K.-P. Schmitz, “Suitability of porcine pericardial tissue for heart valve engineering: biomechanical properties,” Biomedical Engineering, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 882–883, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Dong, Y. Li, and X. Mo, “The study of a new detergent (octyl-glucopyranoside) for decellularizing porcine pericardium as tissue engineering scaffold,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 56–67, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. ASTM International, “Standard guide for characterization of type i collagen as starting material for surgical implants and substrates for tissue engineered medical products (TEMPs),” ASTM F2212-08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  16. S. B. Seif-Naraghi, M. A. Salvatore, P. J. Schup-Magoffin, D. P. Hu, and K. L. Christman, “Design and characterization of an injectable pericardial matrix gel: a potentially autologous scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2017–2027, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. E. Uygun, A. Soto-Gutierrez, H. Yagi et al., “Organ reengineering through development of a transplantable recellularized liver graft using decellularized liver matrix,” Nature Medicine, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 814–820, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus