BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 8201642 | 9 pages |

Human Endogenous Retroviruses-K (HML-2) Expression Is Correlated with Prognosis and Progress of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Academic Editor: Elena Grasselli
Received04 Sep 2016
Revised07 Nov 2016
Accepted22 Nov 2016
Published14 Dec 2016


Background. The association between human endogenous retroviruses-K (HERV-K) (HML-2) and human disease, including a variety of cancers, has been indicated. However, the function of HERV-K (HML-2) in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still remains largely unclear. Methods. We detected the expression of HERV-K (HML-2) in 84 HCC tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and analyzed its correlation with the clinical parameters. Result. The HEVR-K level was significantly increased in HCC compared with adjacent normal tissues () which was proved to be significantly associated with cirrhosis (), tumor differentiation (), and TNM stage (). Moreover, the high expression of HERV-K (HML-2) had a poorer overall survival than patients with lower expression by a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (). The multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the level of HERV-K (HML-2) was an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival rate of HCC patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of HERV-K (HML-2) expression in HCC (AUC = 0.729, 74.7% sensitivity, and 67.8% specificity). Conclusions. Our results suggested that upregulation of HERV-K (HML-2) in HCC patients was significantly related to cancer progression and poor outcome, indicating that HERV-K (HML-2) might be a novel candidate prognostic biomarker for HCC.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks the sixth most prevalent malignant tumors and the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide [1]. The development of HCC is a poly-stage process involving the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic mutation of regulatory genes, which causes aberrant expression of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor gene. Massive studies have identified a large amount of molecular biomarkers, which can be used for patient assessment in multiple clinical settings, including estimating risk of disease, screening for occult primary cancers, distinguishing benign from malignant findings or one type of malignancy from another, determining prognosis and prediction for patients who have been diagnosed with cancer, monitoring status of the disease, detecting recurrence, and determining response or progression to therapy [2]. Therefore, the identification of related novel molecular biomarkers of HCC could provide new methods for the diagnosis and therapy of this malignancy.

Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) constitute over 8% of human genome [3]. HERVs exist as DNA remnants of infection which happened in germ lineage cell of ancient human, expand as retrotransposons within the genome and more latterly as infections agents, and have been finally inherited through generations of human [4]. These HERVs are believed to be mostly noninfectious, replication-defective, and retroviral remnants transmitted as stable mendelian genes. Since discovered in the 1980s, HERVs have been associated with autoimmune diseases and cancer [5, 6]. Recently, HERV mRNA, HERV proteins, and even HERV particles in human diseases, especially in cancers, have been detected. Unlike many other HERV families which have defective sequences, the HERV-K (HML-2, Human mouse mammary tumor virus like-2) family represents the most intact retroviral genes with some having open and intact reading frames for viral proteins [7]. The HERV-K family are transcriptionally active in several human cancer tissues [8, 9]. However, the potential role of HERV-K in HCC has not been evaluated.

We aimed to evaluate the expression level of HERV-K (HML-2) in HCC patients and analyze its clinical relevance by a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and to detect its potential of serving as a biomarker for predicting HCC severity and prognostic in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Tissue Specimens and Clinical Features

84 patients (78 men and 6 women, mean age years) who were diagnosed with HCC and underwent surgery during 2012 to 2016 were involved in this study. None of them has received preoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Paired tissue specimens (tumor and adjacent normal tissues) histologically confirmed by experienced pathologists of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University were collected from the patients after informing consent. Within 30 minutes after surgery, fresh tissue specimens were frozen and stored at −80°C in RNAlater® RNA Stabilization Solution (Invitrogen, CA, USA) until use. Clinical and follow-up data were collected. The sixth edition of the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) classification system published by the International Union Against Cancer was used to define the tumor staging of HCC.

2.2. RNA Extraction and Reverse-Transcription

100 mg tissue specimens were used to extract RNA by the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was eluted with 40 μL RNase-free water. The concentration and purity of RNA were quantified by NanoDrop ND2000 (Thermo, CA, USA). 500 ng DNA-erased RNA was reverse transcribed in a final volume of 10 ul following the protocol of the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China): 37°C for 15 min and 85°C for 15 s, and then followed by storage at 4°C.

2.3. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) Analysis

For qRT-PCR, 2 μL diluted reverse-transcription products were mixed with 10 μL SYBR® Green real-time PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), 1 μL forward primer (10 μM), 1 μL reverse primer (10 μM), and 6 μL RNase-free water in a final volume of 20 μL. All reactions were run using the following protocol: one cycle at 95°C for 3 min and 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 61°C for 3 s, and 72°C for 30 s on CFX96™ Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). At the end of the reaction, the amplification curve and melting curve were analyzed. The presence of a single peak in the melting curve analysis was applied to validate the specificity of the PCR amplification. The expression of target RNA was normalized to the expression of 18S RNA. The HERV-K qPCR primers used are forward, 5′- ATTGGCAACACCGTATTCTGCT -3′; reverse, 5′- CAGTCAAAATATGGACGGATGGT -3′ [10]. The primers of 18S RNA were the following: forward: 5′- CAGCCACCCGAGATTGAGCA -3′ and reverse: 5′- TAGTAGCGACGGGCGGTGTG -3′. The relative expression of HERV-K was calculated by the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method ().

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) were applied to complete statistical analyses. The Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to check the normality of the distribution. The normally distributed numeric variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and evaluated by Student’s -test, while nonnormally distributed variables were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis Variance analysis. The categorical variables were analyzed using Chi square test. Kaplan-Meier test was used to estimate the impact of HERV-K level on the prediction of overall survival in HCC cases, and log-rank test was applied to analyze the statistical differences of different groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was assessed through multivariate analysis which contained the variables with a in univariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were designed to estimate the diagnostic value. For all analyses, a (two-tail) was considered statistically significant. Statistical significance was assigned at () or ().

3. Results

3.1. HERV-K (HML-2) Was Upregulated in HCC Tissue Specimens

The relative expression of HERV-K (HML-2) was detected and analyzed in 84 paired clinical HCC tissues and adjacent normal liver tissues. We found that the expression level of HEVR-K was significantly increased in HCC compared with adjacent normal tissues ( , Table 1, Figure 1(a)).

CharacteristicsHERV-K relative expression (−log)
Mean ± SD

 HCC845.94 ± 0.83
 Adjacent noncancerous liver846.49 ± 0.72
 Male785.95 ± 0.86
 Female65.84 ± 0.32
 <55405.84 ± 1.00
 ≧55446.02 ± 0.67
 Negative436.05 ± 0.69
 Positive415.82 ± 0.95
 Negative255.70 ± 1.18
 Positive596.03 ± 0.63
 High/moderate596.05 ± 0.68
 Low155.43 ± 1.23
 <10 cm536.01 ± 0.85
 ≧10 cm235.66 ± 0.76
Tumor nodes−0.7280.469
 Single665.91 ± 0.88
 Multi106.12 ± 0.61
TNM stage2.1440.035
 I~II346.12 ± 0.78
 III~IV425.72 ± 0.84
HBV DNA (IU/mL)0.8610.394
 <500175.90 ± 0.68
 ≧500345.68 ± 0.95
 Negative346.11 ± 0.65
 Positive145.39 ± 1.17
AFP (ng/mL)−0.1370.891
 <200415.93 ± 0.94
 ≧200355.95 ± 0.75
ALT (u/L)0.9580.341
 <46486.00 ± 0.76
 ≧46325.81 ± 0.96
AST (u/L)0.6420.523
 <46455.97 ± 0.66
 ≧46355.86 ± 1.04

Data are mean ± SD. and .
A paired -test was used with the analysis of the differences between HCC and adjacent noncancerous liver. Independent -tests were applied to the rest of data.
3.2. Correlation between HEVR-K and the Pathologic Features of HCC

The association of HERV-K with clinical features of 84 HCC patients was assessed as shown in Table 1 (). We found significant correlation between HERV-K and some pathologic data, such as differentiation, TNM stage, and cirrhosis (Figure 1(b)). However, either gender, age, tumor size, tumor nodes, or other clinical pathological information did not differ significantly with the highly expressed HERV-K (, Table 1).

3.3. High Expression of HERV-K Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with HCC

This cohort of 84 HCC patients was divided into low-expressed group (<5.96, ) and high-expressed group (≥5.96, ) according to the normalized median level of HERV-K (median = 5.96). The correlation between HERV-K expression and overall survival of HCC patients was investigated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. As shown in Figure 2, HCC patients with higher HERV-K expression had a tendency of shorter overall survival than those with lower HERV-K expression (low HERV-K, median: undefined; high HERV-K, median = 23; HR = 3.017, 95% CI = 1.563–5.820, and log-rank test: ). Univariate analysis indicated that tumor stage (III~IV versus I~II) and the expression level of HEVR-K (low versus high) were significantly associated with overall survival of HCC patients (, Table 2). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model also showed that the size of tumor, tumor stage, and HERV-K expression were independent favorable prognostic factors of HCC (, Table 2).

Factors⁢Univariate analysis⁢Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)

Gender841.542 (0.549–4.327)0.411
Age800.911 (0.492–1.685)0.766
Smoking831.266 (0.689–2.326)0.448
Alcoholism831.097 (0.561–2.142)0.787
Cirrhosis480.813 (0.362–1.826)0.616
Tumor number800.546 (0.194–1.535)0.251
ALT800.978 (0.528–1.812)0.944
AST801.013 (0.551–1.861)0.967
AFP761.463 (0.786–2.723)0.230
Differentiation741.866 (0.903–3.853)0.092
TNM (III~IV versus I~II)764.386 (2.009–9.575)<0.0013.660 (1.647–8.130)0.001
HERV-K expression (high low versus low high)843.017 (1.563–5.820)0.0012.121 (1.070–4.203)0.031

was considered statistically significant; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; AFP: α-fetoprotein; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis.
3.4. The Diagnostic Value of HERV-K in HCC

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of HERV-K expression. The area under the ROC curve () revealed that HERV-K could serve as a novel biomarker in HCC diagnosis (AUC = 0.729, 95% CI: 0.652–0.805, 74.7% sensitivity, 67.8% specificity, ). Moreover, the expression level of HERV-K also could have high specificity in screening liver cirrhosis (100% specificity) and high sensitivity (74.6% sensitivity) in discriminating the grade of differentiation for HCC. Meanwhile, the ROC curve indicated that HEVR-K conferred a sensitivity of 61.8% and a specificity of 69% in division of TNM stage (Figure 3).

4. Discussion

HCC has the character of imperceptible pathogenesis, rapid progress, poor prognosis, and high mortality rate, which lead to tumor invasiveness, frequent intrahepatic spread and extrahepatic metastasis, and frequent recurrence after resection [11]. Owing to the lack of an effective means of clinical diagnosis at the early stage, only 30–40% of patients with HCC can be candidates for potentially curative resection by which the 5–9% of overall 5-year survival rate can improve up to 69% [12, 13]. Decades of efforts have been spent on the searching of ideal biomarker for HCC [14]. Numerous biomarkers which extracted from tumor tissues or plasma have been indicated playing a vital role in predicting carcinogenesis, metastasis, and prognosis of HCC. Alpha fetal protein (AFP) was one of the conventional biomarkers for diagnosis of HCC clinically or monitoring the recurrence [15, 16]. However, the specificity of AFP is not high enough that the detection has frequently been reported poor in the early diagnosis or the metastasis prediction of HCC [17]. On purpose of increasing the diagnostic accuracy and enhancing the effectiveness of treatment of HCC, it is quite essential to explore the novel valid tumor biomarkers and detect the mechanism of carcinogenesis.

Human endogenous retroviruses are ancestral relics of germline throughout the process of evolution. Same with all the other retroviruses, HERVs have the genomic structure: 5′LTR-gag, pro, pol, and env-3′LTR. Long terminal repeats (LTRs) play roles as specifying promoter, enhancer, and polyadenylation signals that viruses insert their genetic sequences into host genomes. Without selective pressure on the host to maintain the viral DNAs or their components in intact condition, a combination of sequence mutations, deletions, and frame-shift errors over evolutionary time has led to the loss of partial of whole genomic segments which cause homologous recombination between the two LTRs that generates solitary LTRs [18]. In most cases, HEVRs are defective owing to the multiple termination codons and deletions, while the HERV-K (HML-2) represents the most intact ERV in human genome as it maintains the open and complete reading frames.

Most members of HERV family are largely repressed in most cells under normal condition as epigenetic silencing, including HERV-K [19]. The accumulated mutations in integrated proviruses have played a role in counteracting the activity of HML-2 elements [20, 21]. Besides, DNA and histone methylation or histone deacetylation are vital mechanism for the silence of HERV-K [22]. Methyl-CpG binding domain proteins could repress the transcriptional activities of HERV-K (HML-2) [23, 24]. The action of small RNAs, like microRNAs and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), might be another reason for the selective expression of HEVR-K [25].

Despite these mechanisms as mentioned above, HERVs have shown their pathogenic potential both as genes/gene products and as (more or less active) retroviruses in various human diseases including autoimmune disorders, neurological, infectious diseases, and cancer [26]. In comparison with healthy tissues, the higher expression of HERV-K in malignant diseases, like melanomas [27], ovarian cancer [28], breast cancer [29], prostate cancer [30], teratocarcinoma [31], have been investigated. Smoking or ultraviolet C could be the risk factors which may have an influence on the HERV-K expression [32, 33]. Global hypomethylation and regional hypermethylation are common mechanisms of aberrant expression of gene. The loss of methylation of HERV-K has been found in the elder which may indicate global hypomethylation or the loss of genome-wide methylation could cause the upregulation of HERV-K [34]. The enhanced activity of HERV-K has also been evaluated with several transcription factors. Fuchs et al. reported that the HERV-K transcription is mediated by the transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3 which are upregulated during oxidative stress and cause the gene regulation controlling multiple cellular process, like DNA damage, chromatin remodeling and proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of cell [35]. The long terminal repeat (LTR) of HERV-K plays a role of a TATA- and initiator element-independent promoter which has a variable transcription start site and contains four G-rich stretches playing a role of nucleosome free binding regions for Sp1 and Sp3 [35]. The increased expression of HERV-K is related to malignancies, especially hormone-associated cancers. That may demonstrate that HERV-K is susceptible to stimulation by hormones. HERV-K expression and particle release were first detected in cancers of androgen-regulated tissues such as germ cell tumors (GCT) [36]. In fact, HERV-K LTRs tend to obtain at least one putative binding site for androgen receptor, almost 800 bp upstream of the transcription start site [37]. However, more studies are needed to uncover the covert mechanism behind this phenomena.

HERV-K could be classified into two types: type 1 has 292 bp deletion leading the expression of an abnormal 9 kD nuclear protein named Np9 instead of a 14 kD protein Rec expressed by type 2 [38]. Although either of these two proteins has interacted with various cellular proteins leading to enhanced HERV expression, Rec protein can be enhanced by androgen stimulation and independently activate the androgen receptor cascade [39, 40]. Human small glutamine-rich tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein (hSGT) and testicular zinc finger protein (TZFP) are regulators which regulate the inactive but inducible AR in the cytoplasm [39, 40]. Combined with Rec, hSGT remarkably decreased the quantity of essential ligand for activating AR and the suppression of AR-induced transactivation mediated by TZFP, resulting in augmenting HERV-K proviruses [37, 39]. Another cellular factor, promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) protein interacted with Np9 and Rec, impairs the binding to c-myc, leading to the unbounded activity of c-myc, which in turn may lead to cancerogenic processes in germ cell tissues [41, 42].

Recently, several studies have spent efforts to uncover the molecular pathways underlying the aberrant expression of HERV-K in malignancies. It has been confirmed that the level of HERV-K is related to the status of MEK–ERK and p16INK4A–CDK4 pathways in melanoma cells [43]. The upregulated level of Np9 protein which is coded by type 1 HERV-K promoted the growth of leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo by not only activating ERK, AKT, and Notch1 pathways but also upregulating β-catenin essential for survival of leukemia stem cells [44]. In human breast cancer, the overexpressed HERV-K specifically increases Ras-induced ERK activation, which suggests that the oncogenic activity of Ras protein is propagated by activation of HERV-K Env protein [45]. While the role which this upregulated HERV-K would play in HCC and the underlying signaling pathways are still unknown, we assume that HERV-K could be related to the transformation and tumorigenesis of HCC through Ras signaling pathways due to the detection of activated Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway in HCC [46]. Of course, this hypothesis would be fully verified in our following work.

To directly evaluate the potential roles of HERV-K in the occurrence and progress of HCC, an elaborate experiment was conducted and a rigid analysis was performed. In the present study, we confirmed that HERV-K expression is significantly upregulated in HCC tissues in comparison with adjacent normal liver tissues. In addition, intriguingly, we discovered the correlation between irregular HERV-K expression level and clinicopathological parameters in HCC. The level of HERV-K was strongly correlated with the cirrhosis, histological grade, and tumor stage in HCC patients. Moreover, we demonstrated that patients with higher level of HERV-K tended to have a poorer overall survival than patients with lower expression. Noteworthy, besides TNM stage, HERV-K expression was an independent favorable prognostic factor for patient survival through multivariate cox regression analysis. These provided an evidence that the upregulation of HERV-K in HCC might promote an increased malignant phenotype and worse prognostic phenotype. Then, ROC curves confirmed the diagnostic value of HERV-K that HEVR-K had better diagnostic value for differentiating patients with HCC from the controls.

Despite the small sample size, our study was first to provide insights into the irregular expression of HERV-K in HCC and the relation between clinical features of HCC patients. We confirmed that HERV-K could be a good candidate of biomarker for diagnosis of HCC. Apparently, more additional studies are needed to be designed to explore the mechanism of HERV-K in human HCC which might shed new lights on the discovery of tumor associated antigen and the development of novel therapies for HCC further.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


The authors would like to thank Professor Feng Wang-Johanning (Center for Cancer and Metabolism, SRI International, Biosciences Division, Menlo Park, Ca 94025, USA) for constructive guidance.


  1. A. Forner, J. M. Llovet, and J. Bruix, “Hepatocellular carcinoma,” The Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9822, pp. 1245–1255, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. L. Henry and D. F. Hayes, “Cancer biomarkers,” Molecular Oncology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 140–146, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. S. Lander, L. M. Linton, B. Birren et al., “Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome,” Nature, vol. 409, no. 6822, pp. 860–921, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. Gifford and M. Tristem, “The evolution, distribution and diversity of endogenous retroviruses,” Virus Genes, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 291–315, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. Balada, M. Vilardell-Tarrés, and J. Ordi-Ros, “Implication of human endogenous retroviruses in the development of autoimmune diseases,” International Reviews of Immunology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 351–370, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Cegolon, C. Salata, E. Weiderpass, P. Vineis, G. Palù, and G. Mastrangelo, “Human endogenous retroviruses and cancer prevention: evidence and prospects,” BMC Cancer, vol. 13, article 4, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Mayer, M. Sauter, A. Racz, D. Scherer, N. Mueller-Lantzsch, and E. Meese, “An almost-intact human endogenous retrovirus K on human chromosome 7,” Nature Genetics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 257–258, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. O. Hohn, K. Hanke, and N. Bannert, “HERV-K(HML-2), the best preserved family of HERVs: endogenization, expression, and implications in health and disease,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 3, article 246, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. F. Downey, F. J. Sullivan, F. Wang-Johanning, S. Ambs, F. J. Giles, and S. A. Glynn, “Human endogenous retrovirus K and cancer: innocent bystander or tumorigenic accomplice?” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 1249–1257, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. Wang-Johanning, A. R. Frost, B. Jian, L. Epp, D. W. Lu, and G. L. Johanning, “Quantitation of HERV-K env gene expression and splicing in human breast cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1528–1535, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Yamashita and X. W. Wang, “Cancer stem cells in the development of liver cancer,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 1911–1918, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Zhou, L. Yu, X. Gao et al., “Plasma microRNA panel to diagnose hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 36, pp. 4781–4788, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. M. Liu, T.-J. Yao, W. Wang et al., “Circulating miR-15b and miR-130b in serum as potential markers for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study,” BMJ Open, vol. 2, Article ID e000825, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Shang, A. Plymoth, S. Ge et al., “Identification of osteopontin as a novel marker for early hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 483–490, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Yamashita, A. Kitao, O. Matsui et al., “Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and alpha-fetoprotein predict prognosis of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1674–1685, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Q. Shen, J. Fan, X. R. Yang, Y. Tan, W. Zhao, Y. Xu et al., “Serum DKK1 as a protein biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale, multicentre study,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 817–826, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Tang, R. Jiang, L. Deng, X. Zhang, K. Wang, and B. Sun, “Circulation long non-coding RNAs act as biomarkers for predicting tumorigenesis and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 4505–4515, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Lenz, “HERV-K HML-2 diversity among humans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 16, pp. 4240–4242, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. Bannert and R. Kurth, “Retroelements and the human genome: new perspectives on an old relation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 14572–14579, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Dewannieux, F. Harper, A. Richaud et al., “Identification of an infectious progenitor for the multiple-copy HERV-K human endogenous retroelements,” Genome Research, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1548–1556, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. N. Lee and P. D. Bieniasz, “Reconstitution of an infectious human endogenous retrovirus,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 3, no. 1, article e10, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Dewannieux and T. Heidmann, “Endogenous retroviruses: acquisition, amplification and taming of genome invaders,” Current Opinion in Virology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 646–656, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. Lavie, M. Kitova, E. Maldener, E. Meese, and J. Mayer, “CpG methylation directly regulates transcriptional activity of the human endogenous retrovirus family HERV-K(HML-2),” Journal of Virology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 876–883, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Stengel, U. Fiebig, R. Kurth, and J. Denner, “Regulation of human endogenous retrovirus-K expression in melanomas by CpG methylation,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 401–411, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Hanke, O. Hohn, and N. Bannert, “HERV-K(HML-2), a seemingly silent subtenant—but still waters run deep,” APMIS, vol. 124, no. 1-2, pp. 67–87, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Suntsova, A. Garazha, A. Ivanova, D. Kaminsky, A. Zhavoronkov, and A. Buzdin, “Molecular functions of human endogenous retroviruses in health and disease,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 72, no. 19, pp. 3653–3675, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Büscher, U. Trefzer, M. Hofmann, W. Sterry, R. Kurth, and J. Denner, “Expression of human endogenous retrovirus K in melanomas and melanoma cell lines,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 4172–4180, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. Wang-Johanning, J. Liu, K. Rycaj et al., “Expression of multiple human endogenous retrovirus surface envelope proteins in ovarian cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. Zhao, K. Rycaj, S. Geng et al., “Expression of human endogenous retrovirus type K envelope protein is a novel candidate prognostic marker for human breast cancer,” Genes and Cancer, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 914–922, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. Goering, K. Schmitt, M. Dostert et al., “Human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K(HML-2) activity in prostate cancer is dominated by a few loci,” Prostate, vol. 75, no. 16, pp. 1958–1971, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. N. Bhardwaj, M. Montesio, F. Roy, and J. M. Coffin, “Differential expression of HERV-K (HML-2) proviruses in cells and virions of the teratocarcinoma cell line tera-1,” Viruses, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 939–968, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. A. Wallace, R. F. Downey, C. J. Seufert et al., “Elevated HERV-K mRNA expression in PBMC is associated with a prostate cancer diagnosis particularly in older men and smokers,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2074–2083, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Reiche, G. Pauli, and H. Ellerbrok, “Differential expression of human endogenous retrovirus K transcripts in primary human melanocytes and melanoma cell lines after UV irradiation,” Melanoma Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 435–440, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. Jintaridth and A. Mutirangura, “Distinctive patterns of age-dependent hypomethylation in interspersed repetitive sequences,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 194–200, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. N. V. Fuchs, M. Kraft, C. Tondera, K.-M. Hanschmann, J. Löwer, and R. Löwer, “Expression of the Human Endogenous Retrovirus (HERV) group HML-2/HERV-K does not depend on canonical promoter elements but is regulated by transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3,” Journal of Virology, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 3436–3448, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Boller, H. Konig, M. Sauter et al., “Evidence that HERV-K is the endogenous retrovirus sequence that codes for the human teratocarcinoma-derived retrovirus HTDV,” Virology, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 349–353, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. Manghera and R. N. Douville, “Endogenous retrovirus-K promoter: a landing strip for inflammatory transcription factors?” Retrovirology, vol. 10, no. 1, article 16, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. V. Armbruester, M. Sauter, E. Krautkraemer et al., “A novel gene from the human endogenous retrovirus K expressed in transformed cells,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1800–1807, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  39. S. Kaufmann, M. Sauter, M. Schmitt et al., “Human endogenous retrovirus protein Rec interacts with the testicular zinc-finger protein and androgen receptor,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 1494–1502, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. Hanke, C. Chudak, R. Kurth, and N. Bannert, “The Rec protein of HERV-K(HML-2) upregulates androgen receptor activity by binding to the human small glutamine-rich tetratricopeptide repeat protein (hSGT),” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 556–567, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. U. M. Galli, M. Sauter, B. Lecher et al., “Human endogenous retrovirus rec interferes with germ cell development in mice and may cause carcinoma in situ, the predecessor lesion of germ cell tumors,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 19, pp. 3223–3228, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Denne, M. Sauter, V. Armbruester, J. D. Licht, K. Roemer, and N. Mueller-Lantzsch, “Physical and functional interactions of human endogenous retrovirus proteins Np9 and Rec with the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein,” Journal of Virology, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 5607–5616, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. Z. Li, T. Sheng, X. Wan, T. Liu, H. Wu, and J. Dong, “Expression of HERV-K correlates with status of MEK-ERK and p16INK4A-CDK4 pathways in melanoma cells,” Cancer Investigation, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1031–1037, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. Chen, Z. Meng, Y. Gan et al., “The viral oncogene Np9 acts as a critical molecular switch for co-activating β-catenin, ERK, Akt and Notch1 and promoting the growth of human leukemia stem/progenitor cells,” Leukemia, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1469–1478, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. F. Zhou, M. Li, Y. Wei et al., “Activation of HERV-K Env protein is essential for tumorigenesis and metastasis of breast cancer cells,” Oncotarget, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. M. Llovet, S. Ricci, V. Mazzaferro et al., “Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 4, pp. 378–390, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Weijie Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1263 Views | 348 Downloads | 13 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.