Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 8209453, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8209453
Research Article

High Dimensional Variable Selection with Error Control

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Box 2717, Durham, NC 27710, USA

Received 3 April 2016; Accepted 25 May 2016

Academic Editor: Weiwei Zhai

Copyright © 2016 Sangjin Kim and Susan Halabi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. Erho, A. Crisan, I. A. Vergara et al., “Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, article e66855, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. J. Karnes, E. J. Bergstralh, E. Davicioni et al., “Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 190, no. 6, pp. 2047–2053, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. E. Ross, F. Y. Feng, M. Ghadessi et al., “A genomic classifier predicting metastatic disease progression in men with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy,” Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 64–69, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. E. Ross, K. Yousefi, E. Davicioni et al., “Utility of risk models in decision making after radical prostatectomy: lessons from a natural history cohort of intermediate and high-risk men,” European Urology, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 496–504, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. A. Klein, K. Yousefi, Z. Haddad et al., “A genomic classifier improves prediction of metastatic disease within 5 years after surgery in node-negative high-risk prostate cancer patients managed by radical prostatectomy without adjuvant therapy,” European Urology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 778–786, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. A. Sparano, R. J. Gray, D. F. Makower et al., “Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 373, no. 21, pp. 2005–2014, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Halabi, A. J. Armstrong, O. Sartor et al., “Prostate-specific antigen changes as surrogate for overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 31, pp. 3944–3950, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Halabi, C.-Y. Lin, W. Kevin Kelly et al., “Updated prognostic model for predicting overall survival in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 671–677, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Lee, J. Rahnenführer, M. Lang et al., “Robust selection of cancer survival signatures from high-throughput genomic data using two-fold subsampling,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e108818, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Fan and J. Lv, “Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 849–911, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Tibshirani, “Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Methodological, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 267–288, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Fan and R. Li, “Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 96, no. 456, pp. 1348–1360, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Fan and H. Peng, “Nonconcave penalized likelihood with a diverging number of parameters,” Annals of Statistics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 928–961, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C.-H. Zhang, “Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty,” Annals of Statistics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 894–942, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg, “Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 57, pp. 289–300, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Fan, R. Samworth, and Y. Wu, “Ultrahigh dimensional variable selection: beyond the linear model,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 10, pp. 1829–1853, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Pourahmadi, High-Dimensional Covariance Estimation: with High-Dimensional Data, John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  18. N. Städler, P. Bühlmann, and S. van de Geer, “l1-penalization for mixture regression models,” TEST, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 209–256, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. H. Li, “Censored data regression in high-dimension and low sample size settings for genomic applications,” in Statistical Advances in Biomedical Sciences: State of Art and Future Directions, A. Biswas, S. Datta, J. Fine, and M. Segal, Eds., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1st edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  20. T. Cai, J. Huang, and L. Tian, “Regularized estimation for the accelerated failure time model,” Biometrics. Journal of the International Biometric Society, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 394–404, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. B. A. Johnson, “Rank-based estimation in the l1-regularized partly linear model for censored outcomes with application to integrated analyses of clinical predictors and gene expression data,” Biostatistics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 659–666, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Zou, “The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 101, no. 476, pp. 1418–1429, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. H. Zou and T. Hastie, “Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 301–320, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus