Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 8329513, 9 pages
Research Article

Functions of thga1 Gene in Trichoderma harzianum Based on Transcriptome Analysis

State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received 16 February 2016; Revised 22 May 2016; Accepted 19 July 2016

Academic Editor: Hongwei Wang

Copyright © 2016 Qing Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Trichoderma spp. are important biocontrol filamentous fungi, which are widely used for their adaptability, broad antimicrobial spectrum, and various antagonistic mechanisms. In our previous studies, we cloned thga1 gene encoding GαI protein from Trichoderma harzianum Th-33. Its knockout mutant showed that the growth rate, conidial yield, cAMP level, antagonistic action, and hydrophobicity decreased. Therefore, Illumina RNA-seq technology (RNA-seq) was used to determine transcriptomic differences between the wild-type strain and thga1 mutant. A total of 888 genes were identified as differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 427 upregulated and 461 downregulated genes. All DEGs were assigned to KEGG pathway databases, and 318 genes were annotated in 184 individual pathways. KEGG analysis revealed that these unigenes were significantly enriched in metabolism and degradation pathways. GO analysis suggested that the majority of DEGs were associated with catalytic activities and metabolism processes that encode carbohydrate-active enzymes, secondary metabolites, secreted proteins, or transcription factors. According to the functional annotation of these DEGs by KOG, the most abundant group was “secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism.” Further studies for functional characterization of candidate genes and pathways reported in this paper are necessary to further define the G protein signaling system in T. harzianum.

1. Introduction

Trichoderma is an important fungal genus, whose species exhibit favorable properties, such as diverse mechanisms of antagonistic action, a broad spectrum of activity in plant disease prevention and control, survival under unfavorable conditions, and environmental friendliness. Trichoderma harzianum is one of the most commercially used biofungicides, particularly T. harzianum T22 and T39 [1]. Growth, conidiation, secondary metabolism, and mycoparasitism are all important processes that contribute to biofungicidal property [2]. An enhanced understanding of the signal regulatory mechanism in T. harzianum is necessary to further explore the fungi’s extraordinary biocontrol potential.

G protein-mediated signal transduction system is an important transmembrane signaling system in eukaryotic cells. It plays a key role in the regulation of cellular reactions and the transmission of extracellular signals to cells. The role of G protein in the transmission of external stimuli has been studied in detail in genetic fungi models, such as Neurospora, Penicillium [3], and Aspergillus [4]. Heterotrimeric G protein is composed of ,  , and subunits; each subunit is encoded by independent genes. Among the G protein subunits, the Gα subunits were found more frequently and reported to regulate vegetative growth, conidiation, and the mycoparasitic responses in fungi [5]. However, current observations showed that a particular Gα subunit may have different functions in different fungal species [6]. Gα subunits are classified into three groups according to conserved motif sequences [7], and several subgroup GαI subunits from T. atroviride and T. virens have been studied [4, 7]. Gα from T. atroviride, tga1, was reported to negatively regulate conidiation but had no effect on hyphal growth [8]. TgaA is a homology gene of tga1 from T. atroviride, which does not influence growth and conidiation in T. virens. The ΔtgaA mutants grow normally and sporulate like the wild type but possess a reduced ability to colonize Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, whereas they are fully pathogenic against Rhizoctonia solani [4].

In our previous study, a subgroup I Gα gene (thga1) was cloned from the T. harzianum Th-33 genome. Results showed that THGA1 has the same amino acid sequence as that of TGA from T. atroviride but with different functions. Compared with the wild-type Th-33, the Δthga1 mutants changed significantly in biological characteristics and physicochemical properties. In particular, the hyphal growth rate dropped by about 40%, conidiophore branches became sparse, secondary branch and phialide numbers reduced, conidiation was delayed for about 20 h, and conidia yield declined by about 300-fold. In addition, the hydrophobicity of the mutants weakened, intracellular cAMP levels decreased by about 50%, and the inhibition of the mutant against plant pathogen of R. solani reduced significantly. The results showed that the thga1 gene positively affected the growth, conidial production, hydrophobicity, and antagonism of T. harzianum to R. solani.

The present study characterized the genes under- or overexpression in the mutant compared to WT associated with the Gα subunit, thga1, using next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) technology, to gain insight into the regulatory mechanism of Gα subunits thga1 in Th-33. This study is the first initiative to use RNA-seq for identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) to clarify the function of Gα in Trichoderma by genome-wide transcriptional analysis of hyphal cells of the wild-type Th-33 and its Δthga1 mutants. The results may reveal that Gα regulated a series of biological processes as well as new targets of thga1 function.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Culture Media

The wild-type T. harzianum Th-33 was isolated from soil samples in the Beijing region as described previously. The Δthga1 knockout mutant was created with hygromycin B resistance by homologous recombination and then purified by isolation of single conidia [9]. Mutant colony was identified by southern hybridization. The fungi were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 28°C for conidia production. The PDA medium was covered with cellophane for mycelia collection. Conidial suspensions were prepared by adding sterilized distilled water to the PDA plates. The conidial suspensions were inoculated on the PDA medium covered with cellophane and cultured for 32 h prior to conidia formation at the tip of the mycelia. The mycelia were then scraped off the cellophane, washed with cold distilled water, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground to a fine powder. Equal mixture of three biological samples was sequenced.

2.2. Preparation of the cDNA Library and Illumina Sequencing for Transcriptome Analysis

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The RNA quality and quantity were determined using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. The Qubit RNA Assay Kit was used for accurate quantification of the initial total RNA. After total RNA extraction and DNase I treatment, magnetic beads with oligo (dT) were used to isolate mRNA. The mRNA was mixed with the fragmentation buffer to promote fragmentation into short segments. Subsequently, cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase following the manufacturer’s protocol. The short fragments were connected with adapters. The suitable fragments were selected as templates for PCR amplification. During the QC steps, a 2100 Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA chip was used for quantification and qualification of the sample library. RNA libraries were sequenced by paired-end mode using an Illumina HiSeq2000 system.

2.3. Sequence Alignment

Clean reads were obtained after removal of low quality reads, reads with adaptors, and reads with unknown nucleotides larger than 5%. All reads were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and can be found under accession number SRS823675. The reads were mapped to the reference genome [10] of T. harzianum Th-33 using TopHat (Version: 2.0.11) program [11].

2.4. Expression Analysis

Expression values were obtained by calculating the fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads, and differential gene expression was analyzed using the Cufflinks program [12]. Genes differentially expressed with more than twofold changes and at values less than 0.05 were identified as DEGs. The threshold of the value in multiple tests was determined by the value for the false discovery rate (FDR) [13]. We used “FDR ≤ 0.001 and the absolute value of log2 fold change (log2 FC) ≥ 2” as the threshold to assess the significance of gene expression differences.

2.5. Functional Annotation of T. harzianum Transcriptome and Classification of DEGs

The T. harzianum transcriptomes were compared against amino acid sequences available at the UniProt database using BLASTx algorithm. For each query sequence, the associated hits were searched for their respective gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) results. The highest bit score was selected, with -value threshold of . Protein families were classified by searching the assembled transcripts against Pfam and InterProScan. Potential transmembrane domains of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) selected from InterProScan and Pfam analysis were predicted using transmembrane domain prediction tool TMHMM v2.0. GPCRs predicted to contain the seven-transmembrane domain were used for further analysis. We used the CAZy database to annotate the carbohydrate-active enzymes ( We annotated transcription factors (TFs) of DEGs based on protein sequence homology using the Fungal Transcription Factor Database ( The amino acid sequences of DEGs were further analyzed to predict secreted proteins. Sequences smaller than 70 amino acids were not considered for further analysis. The remaining sequences with positive SignalP prediction for signal peptide cleavage site at the N-terminal region between 10 and 40 amino acids, without any transmembrane region, were selected as the candidate secreted proteins. Secreted proteins with lengths less than 200 amino acids and cysteine content more than 4% of the protein were identified as small molecule cysteine-rich secreted proteins (SSCPs).

2.6. Validation of RNA-Seq Results by Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

To validate the expression profiles of the assembled genes obtained through sequencing data analysis, qRT-PCR was performed for selected genes. Genes were randomly selected, and four reference genes were used, namely, beta-tubulin 1, actin, transcription elongation factor, and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (UCE). Primers used in qRT-PCR were designed using Primer Express Software v2.0 (see S2 Table in Supplementary Material available online at Total RNA (2 μg) from each sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA in the presence of oligo (dT) primer in a volume of 12.5 μL. The synthesized cDNA was used as a template for qRT-PCR. Reactions were performed in the ABI StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Each reaction (20 μL) contained 10 μL of 2x SYBR Green PCR mix (QIAGEN), 1 μL of forward and reverse primers (10 pM/μL each), 1 μL of cDNA template, and 7 μL of nuclease-free water. PCR cycling conditions were 2 min at 95°C (1 cycle) and 10 s at 94°C, followed by 10 s at 60°C and a melting curve of 40 s at 72°C (40 cycles). PCR cycles for negative controls without templates were carried out concurrently. All qPCRs for each gene used three biological replicates, with three technical replicates per experiment. The average threshold cycle (Ct) was calculated using the method [14].

2.7. Availability of Supporting Data

Sequences have been deposited at the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of the NCBI under BioProject number PRJNA272748. Raw sequence reads can be found in

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Illumina Sequencing

We got 17 transformants with stable genetic characteristics. The homologous recombination events have been confirmed by southern hybridization. A probe corresponding to part of the thga1 gene coding region gave no signal on a southern blot of the deletion mutants, while the hygromycin resistance cassette was detected for the mutants but not for the wild type (data not shown). We selected one mutant with obvious phenotypic differences to be studied. Two cDNA libraries were constructed and subjected to Illumina deep sequencing. Approximately 2,838,821,746 and 3,242,007,080 bp clean reads were generated for the wild type and the mutant 1-1, respectively (Table 1). The reads were then compared against the genome of Th-33, which was sequenced and submitted to SRA ( The whole genome of Trichoderma harzianum Th-33 was sequenced on a Hiseq2500 instrument. A total of 196 scaffolds were assembled and 10849 genes were predicted with an average length of 1776 bp (GenBank number: PRJNA272949). The unigenes were used for transcriptome analysis in this study. The overall mapping rate was about 95%, indicating that subsequent analysis can be performed.

Table 1: Summary of Illumina transcriptome sequencing data for the strains included in this study.
3.2. DEGs Regulated by thga1

RNA-seq technology was used to investigate the transcriptional changes between the wild-type Th-33 and the mutant regulated by thga1. Comparisons between the gene expression of thga1 mutant and wild-type Th-33 showed that 888 genes were differentially expressed, including 427 upregulated and 461 downregulated genes. Among the 20 significantly upregulated genes (S1 Table), 13 genes exhibited defined functions, including six metabolism-related genes and two genes predicted to encode enzymes. Among the significantly downregulated genes (S1 Table), seven were metabolism-related genes and four were catalytic activity genes. The changes in expression were evidently connected to metabolism. Hence, thga1 might regulate a series of biological processes through metabolism.

3.3. Real-Time qRT-PCR Analyses

To verify the quality of the assembly, cDNA fragments of 15 randomly selected unigenes were amplified using unigene-specific primers (S2 Table) and then sequenced. Four reference genes (beta-tubulin 1, actin, transcription elongation factor, and UCE) were used as endogenous control. Among the reference genes, UCE remained constant in all treatments and showed the best performance in qRT-PCR analysis using Best Keeper program. Expression patterns of the tested genes are shown in Figure 1. Three genes with infinite fold changes in the RNA-seq results were not shown in the figure, as they cannot be shown in the bar chart. Expression patterns determined by real-time qRT-PCR were consistent with those obtained by RNA-seq, thereby confirming the accuracy of the RNA-seq results reported in this study.

Figure 1: Transcriptome validation. (a) DEG data in transcriptome analysis. The fold changes of the genes were calculated as the value of each 1-1/Th-33 comparison and are shown on the -axis. (b) The qRT-PCR analysis of gene expression data. Expression ratios of selected genes in 1-1 compared to Th-33.
3.4. Pathway Functional Enrichment Analysis of DEGs

In our research, 318 differentially expressed unigenes were assigned to 184 KEGG pathways. A summary of the findings is presented in S3 Table. Among the pathways identified, the metabolic pathways, especially the secondary metabolic pathways, were found to be the most active. “Bisphenol degradation” (27 unigenes, 8.49% of sequences), “aminobenzoate degradation” (27 unigenes, 8.49% of sequences), “chloroalkane and chloroalkene degradation” (25 unigenes, 7.86% of sequences), and “butanoate metabolism” (22 unigenes, 6.92% of sequences) were the dominant pathways (Figure 2). Thus, thga1 may affect growth, conidiation, and antagonism through metabolism. The DEG catalogue provided a comprehensive understanding of the gene transcription profiles of T. harzianum missing the thga1 gene and offered a valuable foundation for the screening of G protein-mediated pathways.

Figure 2: Pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs. The percentage of differentially expressed genes involved in KEGG pathways. Only the top 21 most abundant EC and KEGG pathways are represented.
3.5. GO Enrichment Analysis

Blast2GO [15] program was used for GO analysis. The program extracted the GO terms associated with the homologies identified by BLAST and returned a list of GO annotations, which were presented as hierarchical categories of increasing specificity. GO enrichment analyses were performed using Fisher’s exact test with multiple testing corrections and an FDR of 0.05. A total of 517 DEGs were categorized into 707 functional groups in three main categories, namely, “cellular component,” “molecular function,” and “biological process” (S4 Table and Figure 3). Some unigenes were assigned to multiple categories of GO terms, whereas others could not be assigned to a given GO term. In the biological process category, “metabolic process” (381, 73.69%), “cellular process” (201, 38.87%), “single-organism process” (115, 22.24%), “localization” (100, 19.34%), and “establishment of localization” (99, 19.15%) were the most abundant terms. In the molecular function category, genes associated with “catalytic activity” (351, 67.89%), “binding” (191, 36.94%), and “transporter activity” (54, 10.44%) were the most abundant. In the cell component category, “membrane” (124, 23.98%) and “membrane part” (100, 19.34%) were the most abundant terms. These findings indicated that the main changes in expression between the wild-type Th-33 and the thga1 mutant were those related to membrane parts, metabolic processes, and catalytic activities.

Figure 3: Gene ontology terms for differentially expressed genes. Most differentially expressed genes were grouped into three major functional categories: cellular component, molecular function, and biological process.
3.6. KOG Function Classification

DEGs were also searched against the KOG database for functional prediction and classification. Notably, out of 888 distinct DEGs, 463 could be functionally classified into 23 molecular families, which was consistent with the approximately 50% KOG annotation rate of the Frozen Gene Catalogue (S5 Table and Figure 4). The largest number of unigenes focused on “the general function of prediction (19.3%),” whereas the next largest groups were noted in “secondary metabolite biosynthesis (13.1%), transport, and catabolism (13.1%),” followed by “posttranslational modification; protein turnover; chaperones (8.1%),” “energy production and conversion (7.9%),” “carbohydrate transport and metabolism (7.0%),” “lipid metabolism (6.6%),” “amino acid transport and metabolism (6.1%),” and “signal transduction mechanisms (5.9%).” The three smallest groups were included in “chromatin structure and dynamics (0.37%),” “extracellular structures (0.37%),” and “coenzyme transport and metabolism (0.37%).” Genes involved in intermediary metabolism (i.e., of carbohydrates, amino acids, and lipids) comprised a significant portion within both up- and downregulated genes.

Figure 4: KOG function classification of the differentially expressed genes. J: translation; ribosomal structure; biogenesis. A: RNA processing and modification. K: transcription. L: DNA replication; recombination; repair. B: chromatin structure and dynamics. D: cell cycle control; cell division; chromosome partitioning. Y: nuclear structure. V: defense mechanisms. T: signal transduction mechanisms. M: cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis. N: cell motility. Z: cytoskeleton. W: extracellular structures. U: intracellular trafficking; secretion; vesicular transport. O: posttranslational modification; protein turnover; chaperones. C: energy production and conversion. E: amino acid transport and metabolism. F: nucleotide transport and metabolism. G: carbohydrate transport and metabolism. H: coenzyme transport and metabolism. I: lipid metabolism. Q: secondary metabolites biosynthesis; transport; catabolism. P: inorganic ion transport and metabolism. R: general function prediction only. S: function unknown.
3.7. Genes Related to G Protein Signal Pathway

G protein transduced signals received by the heptahelical GPCRs from outside the cell influence numerous regulatory pathways via their respective effectors, which in turn affect the activities of secondary messengers [16, 17]. Three Gα-coding genes, one beta, and one gamma subunit genes were found in the transcriptomes and the genome of Th-33, which corresponded well with the data of T. virens [18], Neurospora crassa [19], and many other filamentous fungi [6]. Thga1, the subgroup I Gα gene, was not expressed in the Δthga1 mutant. Another Gα gene, a subgroup II tgaB homologous gene in T. virens [4], exhibited downregulated expression (twofold), whereas the third Gα gene β and Gγ gene were not differentially expressed. These results showed that knockout of thga1 caused the downregulated expression of another Gα gene.

The signals transmitted through a heterotrimeric G protein signaling cascade originate from the activation of plasma membrane-localized GPCRs. The identification and characterization of GPCRs will provide insights into how Trichoderma communicates with G protein and downstream genes. Thirty-nine GPCRs or putative GPCR genes were found in the transcriptome of Th-33. Six of them were differentially expressed in the mutant (five of them belong to the PTH11-type; Table 2). PTH11-type GPCRs were reported to influence light responsiveness, glycoside hydrolase gene transcription, sexual development [20, 21], surface recognition, and pathogenicity [22]. PTH11 GPCR genes were reported to be upregulated in the mycoparasite Coniothyrium minitans during colonization of S. sclerotiorum [23]. In the current study, five PTH11-type GPCR-encoding genes were downregulated in the mutant. This observation was consistent with the phenomenon that the inhibitory effect of the mutant against R. solani decreased significantly compared with that of the wild-type Th-33.

Table 2: Differentially expressed genes related to the G protein signal pathway.

cAMP acts as a secondary messenger for morphogenic signals in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and it is generated by adenylate cyclase and degraded by phosphodiesterase [24]. In T. virens, the intracellular cAMP levels can be regulated by an adenylate cyclase gene, tac1 [25], and it has been reported to influence conidiation [26]. In Aspergillus nidulans, a Gα-subunit GanB mediates a rapid and transient activation of cAMP synthesis in response to glucose during the early period of germination [27]. In our previous study, intracellular cAMP levels in the Δthga1 mutant decreased by about 50% of that in the wild-type Th-33. According to the transcriptomes of the Δthga1 mutant and the wild-type Th-33, the adenylate cyclase-encoding gene was not expressed differentially, whereas the cAMP phosphodiesterase gene was found to be upregulated in the mutant. These findings indicated that the decrease in intracellular cAMP levels was caused by the increase in cAMP phosphodiesterase activity and not by the decrease in adenylate cyclase activity. This study showed that the G protein α subunit in Trichoderma may be involved in the mechanisms regulating intracellular cAMP levels.

3.8. Carbohydrate Activity Enzymes (CAZymes)

CAZymes in fungi are correlated with their nutritional modes and infection mechanisms [28]. Various CAZyme genes exist in the Th-33 genome, of which 66 differentially expressed CAZyme genes were identified in the Th-33 transcriptome, including 30 genes from the glycoside hydrolase family (GH), 14 from the auxiliary activity family, 13 from the carbohydrate esterase family, 7 from the glycosyltransferase family, and 2 from the carbohydrate-binding module family (S6 Table). In addition, the number of downregulated CAZyme genes (43 genes) in the mutant was greater than that of upregulated genes (23 genes) (Figure 5). The GH family has been described to play a central role in mycoparasitism in Trichoderma. For example, GH18 family is highly expanded in T. atroviride and T. virens during mycoparasitism [29]. GH16 was reported to be upregulated during the mycoparasitic reaction of T. atroviride against R. solani [30]. In the present study, the inhibition of the Δthga1 mutant T. harzianum against R. solani and Phytophthora capsici was reduced significantly, and the mycelia of Δthga1 could not cover and parasitize the pathogenic fungi’s mycelia in confrontation tests. The heterotrimeric G protein pathway is crucial in the interconnections of nutrient signaling in Trichoderma [21]. Results implied that the knockout of thga1 caused the decrease in the activities of the CAZymes, which consequently influenced nutrient condition, further retarded the growth rate, and decreased the mycoparasitic ability of Trichoderma.

Figure 5: Numbers of carbohydrate-active enzyme modules in the differentially expressed genes.
3.9. TFs

Twenty-nine TFs were identified in the Δthga1 mutant and compared with that of the wild-type Th-33. Of these TFs, 15 were upregulated and 14 were downregulated TFs (S7 Table). Among those differentially expressed TFs, the Zn2Cys6 family (53%) was the most dominant TF family, followed by the C2H2 zinc finger (31%) TF family (Figure 6). The functions of most TFs in fungi appear to be highly diverse and remain rather unclear. Of the known TF families, the Zn2Cys6 TF family comprises TFs that are fungal-specific and dominant [31]. These TFs are involved in primary and secondary metabolism, drug resistance, and meiotic development ( BglR, a Zn2Cys6-type TF in T. reesei, can increase the expression of the β-glucosidase gene [32]. C2H2 zinc finger in fungi is involved in pathogenicity, carbon catabolite repression, acetamide regulation, and differentiation of ascogenous or fruiting body. GipA in A. fumigatus was reported to be involved in secondary metabolic processes [33]. In A. nidulans, brlA defined the central regulatory pathway that controls conidiation-specific gene expression, but no orthologue of brlA in Trichoderma conidiophores currently exists [34]. TFs can control gene transcription rates and are key mediators of cellular function [35]. In the present report, differentially expressed TFs might play key roles in cell processes in Trichoderma under the control of the G protein signal pathway. Understanding the regulatory mechanisms of these TFs and their functions could provide valuable insight into the signal control pathways of cell processes in Trichoderma.

Figure 6: Percentage of different TFs in the DEGs.
3.10. Secretome of T. harzianum

A total of 137 genes were annotated as secreted proteins, including 51 upregulated and 86 downregulated genes among the DEGs. Secreted proteins play an important role in the process of cell signaling, cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis regulation, development, and other important biological processes. In Botrytis cinerea, bcg1 encodes α subunits of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins; the bcg1 null mutants differ in colony morphology from the wild-type strain, which do not secrete extracellular proteases [36]. SSCPs comprise one of the largest groups of proteins secreted by Trichoderma [29]. Hydrophobins, which are probably the most widely known SSCPs, are found on the outer surfaces of cell walls of hyphae and conidia. Trichoderma genomes encode an unusually large number of hydrophobins, possibly for the purpose of providing flexibility in surface properties needed for conidiation, mycoparasitism, and interaction with plant roots [2, 37]. In the present report, two SSCPs were found among the DEGs, and these genes were downregulated in the mutant strain, which might account for the phenomenon of reduced hydrophobicity in the mutant. This was in accordance with the report that G alpha subunit can mediate fungal conidiation and hydrophobin synthesis in Cryphonectria parasitica [38]. Furthermore, SSCPs were shown to be highly expressed in T. atroviride during colonization of R. solani, which suggested a potential role in mycoparasitism [30]. These genes may also explain the significant reduction in the inhibition of the mutant against the plant pathogen R. solani.

3.11. Secondary Metabolism

KOG functional classification of DEGs revealed that the number of genes involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism was 71, in which cytochrome P450s (CYPs) accounted for nearly 24% (S8 Table). CYPs play an important role in the physiology of fungi and are involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (SMs) and in detoxification [39]. Fungi produce a wide range of SMs that are not directly essential for growth and yet have important roles in signaling, asexual conidiation [40], and interactions with other organisms [4143]. Trichoderma spp. are a rich source of SMs, such as nonribosomal peptides, polyketides, terpenoids, and pyrones. Although a clear correlation exists between conidiation of the fungus and the secretion of antifungal metabolites in the T. atroviride parental strain, its type GαIII gene Δtga3 mutants were fully impaired in the production of peptaibols despite exhibiting a hypersporulating phenotype [5]. The results in the current report implied that thga1 regulated certain secondary metabolism processes, and analysis of SMs should be carried out for further identification.

4. Conclusion

Overall, this study identified transcripts that were possibly involved in several important molecular and cellular functions of T. harzianum. However, additional studies aimed at the functional characterization of the genes reported herein will aid in further defining the pathways mediated by G protein in T. harzianum. An enhanced understanding of the expression profiles of these genes could improve T. harzianum performance, either by predicting the regulation of the genes involved in sporulation or by improving their use in biotechnology processes.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 31371983).


  1. F. Vinale, E. L. Ghisalberti, K. Sivasithamparam et al., “Factors affecting the production of Trichoderma harzianum secondary metabolites during the interaction with different plant pathogens,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 705–711, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. K. Mukherjee, B. A. Horwitz, A. Herrera-Estrella, M. Schmoll, and C. M. Kenerley, “Trichoderma research in the genome era,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 51, pp. 105–129, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Hu, G. Liu, Z. Li, Y. Qin, Y. Qu, and X. Song, “G protein-cAMP signaling pathway mediated by PGA3 plays different roles in regulating the expressions of amylases and cellulases in Penicillium decumbens,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 58-59, pp. 62–70, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. K. Mukherjee, J. Latha, R. Hadar, and B. A. Horwitz, “Role of two G-protein alpha subunits, TgaA and TgaB, in the antagonism of plant pathogens by Trichoderma virens,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 542–549, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Omann and S. Zeilinger, “How a mycoparasite employs G-protein signaling: using the example of Trichoderma,” Journal of Signal Transduction, vol. 2010, Article ID 123126, 8 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. L. Li, S. J. Wright, S. Krystofova, G. Park, and K. A. Borkovich, “Heterotrimeric G protein signaling in filamentous fungi,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 61, pp. 423–452, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. A. Horwitz, A. Sharon, S.-W. Lu et al., “A G protein alpha subunit from Cochliobolus heterostrophus involved in mating and appressorium formation,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Reithner, K. Brunner, R. Schuhmacher et al., “The G protein α subunit Tga1 of Trichoderma atroviride is involved in chitinase formation and differential production of antifungal metabolites,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 749–760, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Z. Liu, Cloning and functional characterization of Thga1 gene of Trichoderma harzianum Th-33 [Thesis], Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013.
  10. Q. Sun, X. Jiang, L. Pang, L. Wang, and M. Li, “The genome sequence of Trichoderma harzianum Th-33,” Chinese Journal of Biological Control, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 205–214, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Kim, G. Pertea, C. Trapnell, H. Pimentel, R. Kelley, and S. L. Salzberg, “TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions,” Genome Biology, vol. 14, no. 4, article R36, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Trapnell, B. A. Williams, G. Pertea et al., “Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 511–515, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Benjamini and D. Yekutieli, “The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1165–1188, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. P. Y. Muller, H. Janovjak, A. R. Miserez, and Z. Dobbie, “Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR,” BioTechniques, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1372–1379, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Conesa and S. Götz, “Blast2GO: a comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics,” International Journal of Plant Genomics, vol. 2008, Article ID 619832, 12 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. E. Hamm, “The many faces of G protein signaling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 2, pp. 669–672, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. J. Neer, “Heterotrimeric C proteins: organizers of transmembrane signals,” Cell, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 249–257, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Gruber, M. Omann, and S. Zeilinger, “Comparative analysis of the repertoire of G protein-coupled receptors of three species of the fungal genus Trichoderma,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 1, article 108, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. A. Borkovich, L. A. Alex, O. Yarden et al., “Lessons from the genome sequence of Neurospora crassa: tracing the path from genomic blueprint to multicellular organism,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–108, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. D. Kulkarni, M. R. Thon, H. Pan, and R. A. Dean, “Novel G-protein-coupled receptor-like proteins in the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea,” Genome Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, p. R24, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Tisch and M. Schmoll, “Targets of light signalling in Trichoderma reesei,” BMC Genomics, vol. 14, no. 1, article 657, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. M. DeZwaan, A. M. Carroll, B. Valent, and J. A. Sweigard, “Magnaporthe grisea Pth11p is a novel plasma membrane protein that mediates appressorium differentiation in response to inductive substrate cues,” Plant Cell, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2013–2030, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Muthumeenakshi, S. Sreenivasaprasad, C. W. Rogers, M. P. Challen, and J. M. Whipps, “Analysis of cDNA transcripts from Coniothyrium minitans reveals a diverse array of genes involved in key processes during sclerotial mycoparasitism,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1262–1284, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. M. Byrne and C. S. Huffman, “Six git genes encode a glucose-induced adenylate cyclase activation pathway in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1095–1100, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Mukherjee, P. K. Mukherjee, and S. P. Kale, “cAMP signalling is involved in growth, germination, mycoparasitism and secondary metabolism in Trichoderma virens,” Microbiology, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 1734–1742, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. M. Steyaert, R. J. Weld, A. Mendoza-Mendoza, and A. Stewart, “Reproduction without sex: conidiation in the filamentous fungus Trichoderma,” Microbiology, vol. 156, no. 10, pp. 2887–2900, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Lafon, J.-A. Seo, K.-H. Han, J.-H. Yu, and C. D'Enfert, “The heterotrimeric G-protein GanB(α)-SfaD(β)-GpgA(γ) is a carbon source sensor involved in early cAMP-dependent germination in Aspergillus nidulans,” Genetics, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Z. Zhao, H. Liu, C. Wang, and J. R. Xu, “Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi,” BMC Genomics, vol. 14, no. 6, article 274, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  29. C. P. Kubicek, A. Herrera-Estrella, V. Seidl-Seiboth et al., “Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma,” Genome Biology, vol. 12, no. 4, article R40, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Atanasova, S. L. Crom, S. Gruber et al., “Comparative transcriptomics reveals different strategies of Trichoderma mycoparasitism,” BMC Genomics, vol. 14, no. 1, article 121, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. M. Babu, N. M. Luscombe, L. Aravind, M. Gerstein, and S. A. Teichmann, “Structure and evolution of transcriptional regulatory networks,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 283–291, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Nitta, T. Furukawa, Y. Shida et al., “A new Zn(II)2Cys6-type transcription factor BglR regulates β-glucosidase expression in Trichoderma reesei,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 388–397, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. J. Schoberle, C. K. Nguyen-Coleman, J. Herold et al., “A novel C2H2 transcription factor that regulates gliA expression interdependently with GliZ in Aspergillus fumigatus,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 10, no. 5, Article ID e1004336, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. J. Clutterbuck, “A mutational analysis of conidial development in Aspergillus nidulans,” Genetics, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 317–327, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. H. Son, Y.-S. Seo, K. Min et al., “A phenome-based functional analysis of transcription factors in the cereal head blight fungus, Fusarium graminearum,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e1002310, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. S. Gronover, D. Kasulke, P. Tudzynski, and B. Tudzynski, “The role of G protein alpha subunits in the infection process of the gray mold fungus Botrytis cinerea,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1293–1302, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Ribitsch, E. H. Acero, A. Przylucka et al., “Enhanced cutinase-catalyzed hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate by covalent fusion to hydrophobins,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 3586–3592, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. C. Segers, J. C. Regier, and D. L. Nuss, “Evidence for a role of the regulator of G-protein signaling protein CPRGS-1 in Gα subunit CPG-1-mediated regulation of fungal virulence, conidiation, and hydrophobin synthesis in the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1454–1463, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. Črešnar and Š. Petrič, “Cytochrome P450 enzymes in the fungal kingdom,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1814, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. K. Mukherjee, B. A. Horwitz, and C. M. Kenerley, “Secondary metabolism in Trichoderma—a genomic perspective,” Microbiology, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. Hoffmeister and N. P. Keller, “Natural products of filamentous fungi: enzymes, genes, and their regulation,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 393–416, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. N. P. Keller, G. Turner, and J. W. Bennett, “Fungal secondary metabolism—from biochemistry to genomics,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 937–947, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. Osbourn, “Secondary metabolic gene clusters: evolutionary toolkits for chemical innovation,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 449–457, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus