Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 1209158, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1209158
Research Article

Whole Genome Amplification of Day 3 or Day 5 Human Embryos Biopsies Provides a Suitable DNA Template for PCR-Based Techniques for Genotyping, a Complement of Preimplantation Genetic Testing

1Laboratorio de Investigación y Diagnóstico Molecular, Instituto de Infertilidad y Genética, Ingenes, Ciudad de México, Mexico
2Departamento de Genética y Biología Molecular, Cinvestav-IPN, Ciudad de México, Mexico
3Departamento de Toxicología, Cinvestav-IPN, Ciudad de México, Mexico

Correspondence should be addressed to Esther López-Bayghen; xm.vatsevnic@nehgyabe

Received 22 January 2017; Revised 31 March 2017; Accepted 24 April 2017; Published 22 June 2017

Academic Editor: Peter J. Oefner

Copyright © 2017 Elizabeth Schaeffer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. T. Baird, J. Collins, J. Egozcue et al., “Fertility and ageing,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 261–276, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Mastenbroek, M. Twisk, J. van Echten-Arends et al., “In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. L.-J. Chang, C.-C. Huang, Y.-Y. Tsai et al., “Blastocyst biopsy and vitrification are effective for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1435–1444, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Hou, K. Wu, X. Shi et al., “Comparison of variations detection between whole-genome amplification methods used in single-cell resequencing,” GigaScience, vol. 4, no. 1, article no. 37, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Zong, S. Lu, A. R. Chapman, and X. S. Xie, “Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell,” Science, vol. 338, no. 6114, pp. 1622–1626, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Lauri, G. Lazzari, C. Galli et al., “Assessment of MDA efficiency for genotyping using cloned embryo biopsies,” Genomics, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Rechitsky, T. Pakhalchuk, G. San Ramos, A. Goodman, Z. Zlatopolsky, and A. Kuliev, “First systematic experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for single-gene disorders, and/or preimplantation human leukocyte antigen typing, combined with 24-chromosome aneuploidy testing,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 503–512, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Griffiths and B. Tiwari, “Primers for the differential amplification of the sex-determining region Y gene in a range of mammal species,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 405-406, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  9. D. Pomp, B. A. Good, R. D. Geisert, C. J. Corbin, and A. J. Conley, “Sex identification in mammals with polymerase chain reaction and its use to examine sex effects on diameter of day-10 or -11 pig embryos.,” Journal of animal science, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1408–1415, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. I. Hromadnikova, B. Houbova, D. Hridelova et al., “Replicate real-time PCR testing of DNA in maternal plasma increases the sensitivity of non-invasive fetal sex determination,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 235–238, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. M. Finning and L. S. Chitty, “Non-invasive fetal sex determination: impact on clinical practice,” Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 69–75, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. J. Fernández-Martínez, A. Galindo, A. Garcia-Burguillo et al., “Noninvasive fetal sex determination in maternal plasma: a prospective feasibility study,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 101–106, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Ennis and T. F. Gallagher, “A PCR‐based sex‐determination assay in cattle based on the bovine amelogenin locus,” Animal Genetics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 425–427, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Pfeiffer and B. Brenig, “X- and Y-chromosome specific variants of the amelogenin gene allow sex determination in sheep (Ovis aries) and European red deer (Cervus elaphus),” BMC Genetics, vol. 6, article 16, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Shadrach, M. Commane, C. Hren, and I. Warshawsky, “A rare mutation in the primer binding region of the amelogenin gene can interfere with gender identification,” Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 401–405, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Sun, Z. Fan, X. Weng et al., “Rapid detection of Down's syndrome using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting segmental duplications on chromosomes 21 and 11,” Gene, vol. 552, no. 2, pp. 272–276, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. D. Kong, N. Liu, X. J. Xu, Z. H. Zhao, and M. Jiang, “Screening of human chromosome 21 genes in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of individuals with Down syndrome,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1235–1239, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  18. T. Tsujie, M. Takemura, T. Kimura et al., “Rapid detection of trisomy 21 by gene dosage analysis using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 368–372, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Cedillo, A. Ocampo-Bárcenas, I. Maldonado, F. J. Valdez-Morales, F. Camargo, and E. López-Bayghen, “A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy,” Fertility Research and Practice, vol. 2, no. 13, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. E. Fragouli, S. Alfarawati, D. D. Daphnis et al., “Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 480–490, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. Fragouli, M. Katz-Jaffe, S. Alfarawati et al., “Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 875–887, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K.-H. Cui, G. M. Warnes, R. Jeffrey, and C. D. Matthews, “Sex determination of preimplantation embryos by human testis-determining-gene amplification,” The Lancet, vol. 343, no. 8889, pp. 79–82, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Zargari, M. R. Sadeghi, M. H. Shahhosseiny et al., “Fetal sex determination using non-invasive method of cell-free fetal dna in maternal plasma of pregnant women during 6th–10th weeks of gestation,” Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 201–206, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. G. Blagodatskikh, A. G. Nikitin, I. A. Seregin, K. A. Blagodatskikh, and V. V. Nosikov, “The use of DYS14 marker for sex determination,” Molekuliarnaia Biologiia, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 646–649, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Pascual and L. Borque de Larrea, “Valoracion de una reaccion en cadena de la polimerasa cuantitativa y fluorescente (QF-PCR) para el diagnostico rapido de aneuploidias,” Revista del Laboratorio Clinico, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 169–177, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. P. Chaturvedi, D. M. Gilkes, N. Takano, and G. L. Semenza, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-dependent signaling between triple-negative breast cancer cells and mesenchymal stem cells promotes macrophage recruitment,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 20, pp. E2120–E2129, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. Szibor, S. Hering, and J. Edelmann, “A new Web site compiling forensic chromosome X research is now online,” International Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 252–254, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Thompson, S. Zoppis, and B. McCord, “An overview of DNA typing methods for human identification: past, present, and future,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 830, pp. 3–16, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  29. T. Broquet and E. Petit, “Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3601–3608, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. R. Jacob, R. Saxena, and I. C. Verma, “Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal gender: utility of combining DYS14 and SRY,” Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 505–511, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. R. Khorram Khorshid, M. Zargari, M. R. Sadeghi, H. Edallatkhah, M. H. Shahhosseiny, and K. Kamali, “Early fetal gender determination using real-time PCR analysis of cell-free fetal DNA during 6th–10th weeks of gestation,” Acta Medica Iranica, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 209–214, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Kolialexi, G. Tounta, P. Apostolou et al., “Early non-invasive detection of fetal Y chromosome sequences in maternal plasma using multiplex PCR,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 34–37, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. H. E. White, C. L. Dent, V. J. Hall, J. A. Crolla, and L. S. Chitty, “Evaluation of a novel assay for detection of the fetal marker RASSF1A: facilitating improved diagnostic reliability of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e45073, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. S. Velarde-Félix, J. Salazar-Flores, G. Martínez-Cortés et al., “Deletion mapping and paternal origin of a Mexican AMELY negative male,” Legal Medicine, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 262–264, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Thangaraj, A. G. Reddy, and L. Singh, “Is the amelogenin gene reliable for gender identification in forensic casework and prenatal diagnosis?” International Journal of Legal Medicine, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 121–123, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. M. Chang, L. A. Burgoyne, and K. Both, “Higher failures of amelogenin sex test in an Indian population group,” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1309–1313, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Y. Yong, L. S. Gan, Y. M. Chang, and E. P. Yap, “Molecular characterization of a polymorphic 3-Mb deletion at chromosome Yp11.2 containing the AMELY locus in Singapore and Malaysia populations,” Human Genetics, vol. 122, no. 3-4, pp. 237–249, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  38. P. M. Stapleton, D. Lai, C. D. Millar, E. Wu, M. Andres, and D. R. Love, “Discovery of three related females who type XY at the amelogenin locus,” Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 577–579, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E. Margarit, A. Soler, A. Carrió et al., “Molecular, cytogenetic, and clinical characterisation of six XX males including one prenatal diagnosis,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 727–730, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. K. S. Reddy, “Clinical management of a rare de novo translocation 46,X,t(Y;15) (p11.2 approximately 11.3;q11.2).ish t(Y;15)(DYZ3+,AMELY+,SNRPN+;D15Z+) found prenatally,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 294–297, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Wang and M. V. Sauer, “In vitro fertilization (IVF): a review of 3 decades of clinical innovation and technological advancement,” Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 355–364, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. L. Y. Pylyp, L. O. Spinenko, N. V. Verhoglyad, and V. D. Zukin, “Chromosomal abnormalities in patients with oligozoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 729–732, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. Goodrich, X. Tao, C. Bohrer et al., “A randomized and blinded comparison of qPCR and NGS-based detection of aneuploidy in a cell line mixture model of blastocyst biopsy mosaicism,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1473–1480, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. Gutiérrez-Mateo, P. Colls, J. Sánchez-García et al., “Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 953–958, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. Munné, “Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy and translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization,” Current Genomics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 463–470, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus