Research Article

Influence of Men’s Personality and Social Support on Treatment Decision-Making for Localized Prostate Cancer

Table 1

Differences in demographic, clinical, and personality characteristics by race and treatment choice.

VariableTotalBy raceBy treatment choice
(%)White
(%)
Black
(%)
-WW/AS
(%)
Radiation
(%)
Surgery
(%)
-

Age
 Mean (SD)61.0 (7.3)61.8 (6.5)60.1 (8.2)0.1464.6 (7.4)63.0 (6.9)59.4 (7.1)<0.01
 Less than 65102 (63.8)55 (61.8)47 (66.2)0.688 (50.0)28 (56.0)66 (70.2)0.12
 65 and greater58 (36.3)34 (38.2)24 (33.8)8 (50.0)22 (44.0)28 (29.8)
# of comorbidities
 034 (21.3)22 (24.7)12 (16.9)0.423 (18.8)4 (8.0)27 (28.7)0.02
 160 (37.5)31 (34.8)29 (40.8)4 (25.0)21 (42.0)35 (37.2)
 238 (23.8)23 (25.8)15 (21.1)6 (37.5)11 (22.0)21 (22.3)
 ≥328 (17.5)13 (14.6)15 (21.1)3 (18.8)14 (28.0)11 (11.7)
PSA level
 ≤466 (42.0)39 (44.3)27 (39.1)0.594 (26.7)23 (46.0)39 (42.4)0.61
 5–970 (44.6)40 (45.5)30 (43.5)7 (46.7)21 (42.0)42 (45.7)
 10–198 (5.1)3 (3.4)5 (7.2)2 (13.3)2 (4.0)4 (4.3)
 ≥2013 (8.3)6 (6.8)7 (10.1)2 (13.3)4 (8.0)7 (7.6)
Gleason score
 ≤680 (50.0)50 (56.2)30 (42.3)0.168 (50.0)30 (60.0)42 (44.7)0.04
 765 (40.6)33 (37.1)32 (45.1)4 (25.0)15 (30.0)46 (48.9)
 8–1015 (9.4)6 (6.7)9 (12.7)4 (25.0)5 (10.0)6 (6.4)
Tumor risk
 Low28 (18.3)17 (19.5)11 (16.7)0.795 (33.3)19 (42.2)4 (4.3)<0.01
 Intermediate44 (28.8)26 (29.9)18 (27.3)8 (53.3)15 (33.3)21 (22.6)
 High81 (52.9)44 (50.6)37 (56.1)2 (13.3)11 (24.4)68 (73.1)
Treatment started/received by survey
 Yes103 (64.4)63 (70.8)40 (56.3)0.085 (31.3)35 (70.0)63 (67.0)0.02
 No57 (35.6)26 (29.2)31 (43.7)11 (68.8)15 (30.0)31 (33.0)
Education
 ≤High school101 (63.5)47 (53.4)54 (76.1)<0.0111 (68.8)35 (70.0)55 (59.1)0.40
 >High school58 (36.5)41 (46.6)17 (23.9)5 (31.3)15 (30.0)38 (40.9)
Married/partnered
 Yes127 (80.4)79 (89.8)48 (68.6)<0.0112 (75.0)40 (81.6)75 (80.6)0.84
 No31 (19.6)9 (10.2)22 (31.4)4 (25.0)9 (18.4)18 (19.4)
Consulted family
 Yes85 (53.5)38 (43.2)47 (66.2)<0.016 (37.5)28 (56.0)51 (54.8)0.42
 No74 (46.5)50 (56.8)24 (33.8)10 (62.5)22 (44.0)42 (45.2)
Consulted friends
 Yes85 (53.5)48 (54.5)37 (52.1)0.883 (18.8)31 (62.0)42 (45.2)<0.01
 No74 (46.5)40 (45.5)34 (47.9)13 (81.3)19 (38.0)51 (54.8)
Consulted spouse/partner
 Yes120 (76.9)65 (74.7)55 (79.7)0.598 (57.1)38 (77.6)74 (79.6)0.20
 No36 (23.1)22 (25.3)14 (20.3)6 (42.9)11 (22.4)19 (20.4)
Physician seen
 Urologist only15 (9.2)11 (13.3)4 (6.8)0.473 (18.8)2 (4.3)10 (12.3)<0.01
 Urologist/PCP only59 (41.5)33 (37.3)26 (44.1)7 (43.8)5 (10.6)47 (58.0)
 Rad. onc. ± urologist/PCP70 (49.3)41 (49.4)29 (49.2)6 (37.5)40 (85.1)24 (29.6)
 Mean (SD)4.0 (0.8)3.9 (0.7)4.0 (0.9)0.444.1 (0.6)4.2 (0.5)3.9 (0.9)0.09
 Mean (SD)2.0 (0.8)1.9 (0.7)2.0 (0.9)0.421.8 (0.7)1.9 (0.7)2.0 (0.8)0.24
 Mean (SD)3.5 (1.1)3.1 (1.1)3.9 (1.1)<0.013.3 (1.2)3.6 (1.1)3.4 (1.2)0.97

values were calculated using chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for dichotomous data and -tests or ANOVA for continuous outcomes. risk level categorized using the American Urological Association endorsed D’Amico criteria: low indicates PSA level < 10, Gleason score ≤ 6, and clinical stage T1-2a; intermediate indicates PSA of 10–20, Gleason score of 7, and clinical stage T2b; high indicates PSA > 20, Gleason score ≥ 8, and clinical stage T2c-3a. on a scale of 1 to 5: 1, not at all true, and 5, completely true.