Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 2483264, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2483264
Review Article

Comparative Study of Elastic Network Model and Protein Contact Network for Protein Complexes: The Hemoglobin Case

1Center for Systems Biology, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
2Unit of Chemical-Physics Fundamentals in Chemical Engineering, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
3Environment and Health Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Roma, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Guang Hu; nc.ude.adus@gnauguh

Received 22 June 2016; Revised 17 November 2016; Accepted 20 December 2016; Published 22 January 2017

Academic Editor: Hesham H. Ali

Copyright © 2017 Guang Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. J. G. E. Pieters, M. B. Van Eldijk, R. J. M. Nolte, and J. Mecinović, “Natural supramolecular protein assemblies,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 24–39, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Perica, J. A. Marsh, F. L. Sousa et al., “The emergence of protein complexes: quaternary structure, dynamics and allostery,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 475–491, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. L. Nero, C. J. Morton, J. K. Holien, J. Wielens, and M. W. Parker, “Oncogenic protein interfaces: small molecules, big challenges,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 248–262, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. O. Keskin, N. Tuncbag, and A. Gursoy, “Predicting protein–protein interactions from the molecular to the proteome level,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 116, no. 8, pp. 4884–4909, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. E. Ahnert, J. A. Marsh, H. Hernández, C. V. Robinson, and S. A. Teichmann, “Principles of assembly reveal a periodic table of protein complexes,” Science, vol. 350, no. 6266, article no. 1331, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Aloy and R. B. Russell, “Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 188–197, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S.-Y. Park, T. Yokoyama, N. Shibayama, Y. Shiro, and J. R. H. Tame, “1.25 Å resolution crystal structures of human haemoglobin in the oxy, deoxy and carbonmonoxy forms,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 360, no. 3, pp. 690–701, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. D. Vesper and B. L. de Groot, “Collective dynamics underlying allosteric transitions in hemoglobin,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 9, no. 9, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Yuan, M. F. Tam, V. Simplaceanu, and C. Ho, “New look at hemoglobin allostery,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 1702–1724, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. S. Hub, M. B. Kubitzki, and B. L. de Groot, “Spontaneous quaternary and tertiary T-R transitions of human hemoglobin in molecular dynamics simulation,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1–11, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A.-L. Barabási and Z. N. Oltvai, “Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 5, pp. 101–113, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Csermely, “Creative elements: network-based predictions of active centres in proteins and cellular and social networks,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 569–576, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Böde, I. A. Kovács, M. S. Szalay, R. Palotai, T. Korcsmáros, and P. Csermely, “Network analysis of protein dynamics,” FEBS Letters, vol. 581, no. 15, pp. 2776–2782, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. M. Tirion, “Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 1905–1908, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. Bahar, A. R. Atilgan, and B. Erman, “Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential,” Folding and Design, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 173–181, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. R. Atilgan, S. R. Durell, R. L. Jernigan, M. C. Demirel, O. Keskin, and I. Bahar, “Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 505–515, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Hu, S. Michielssens, S. L. C. Moors, and A. Ceulemans, “The harmonic analysis of cylindrically symmetric proteins: a comparison of Dronpa and a DNA sliding clamp,” Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, vol. 34, pp. 28–37, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. P. Tiwari and N. Reuter, “Similarity in shape dictates signature intrinsic dynamics despite no functional conservation in TIM barrel enzymes,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 12, no. 3, Article ID e1004834, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. Fuglebakk, S. P. Tiwari, and N. Reuter, “Comparing the intrinsic dynamics of multiple protein structures using elastic network models,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects, vol. 1850, no. 5, pp. 911–922, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X.-Y. Li, J.-C. Zhang, Y.-Y. Zhu, and J.-G. Su, “Domain motions and functionally-key residues of l-alanine dehydrogenase revealed by an elastic network model,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 29383–29397, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Mahajan and Y.-H. Sanejouand, “On the relationship between low-frequency normal modes and the large-scale conformational changes of proteins,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 567, pp. 59–65, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Uyar, O. Kurkcuoglu, L. Nilsson, and P. Doruker, “The elastic network model reveals a consistent picture on intrinsic functional dynamics of type II restriction endonucleases,” Physical Biology, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID 056001, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. Kannan and S. Vishveshwara, “Identification of side-chain clusters in protein structures by a graph spectral method,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. 441–464, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Di Paola, M. De Ruvo, P. Paci, D. Santoni, and A. Giuliani, “Protein contact networks: an emerging paradigm in chemistry,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 1598–1613, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Hu, J. Zhou, W. Yan, J. Chen, and B. Shen, “The topology and dynamics of protein complexes: insights from intra-molecular network theory,” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 121–132, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. W. Yan, J. Zhou, M. Sun, J. Chen, G. Hu, and B. Shen, “The construction of an amino acid network for understanding protein structure and function,” Amino Acids, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1419–1439, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Di Paola and A. Giuliani, “Protein contact network topology: a natural language for allostery,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 31, pp. 43–48, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. H. Greene, “Protein structure networks,” Briefings in Functional Genomics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 469–478, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Cheng, H.-L. Fu, and D.-X. Cui, “Characteristics analyses and comparisons of the protein structure networks constructed by different methods,” Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–74, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. N. T. Doncheva, K. Klein, F. S. Domingues, and M. Albrecht, “Analyzing and visualizing residue networks of protein structures,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 179–182, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. K. Grewal and S. Roy, “Modeling proteins as residue interaction networks,” Protein and Peptide Letters, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 923–933, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. Vuillon and C. Lesieur, “From local to global changes in proteins: a network view,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 31, pp. 1–8, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. I. Bahar, T. R. Lezon, L.-W. Yang, and E. Eyal, “Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function,” Annual Review of Biophysics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 23–42, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. X. Zhang, T. Perica, and S. A. Teichmann, “Evolution of protein structures and interactions from the perspective of residue contact networks,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 954–963, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. De Ruvo, A. Giuliani, P. Paci, D. Santoni, and L. Di Paola, “Shedding light on protein-ligand binding by graph theory: the topological nature of allostery,” Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 165-166, pp. 21–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Hu, S. Michielssens, S. L. C. Moors, and A. Ceulemans, “Normal mode analysis of Trp RNA binding attenuation protein: structure and collective motions,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 2361–2371, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. Di Paola, C. B. M. Platania, G. Oliva, R. Setola, F. Pascucci, and A. Giuliani, “Characterization of protein–protein interfaces through a protein contact network approach,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 3, article 170, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. W. I. Karain and N. I. Qaraeen, “Weighted protein residue networks based on joint recurrences between residues,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 16, article 173, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E. Marcos, R. Crehuet, and I. Bahar, “Changes in dynamics upon oligomerization regulate substrate binding and allostery in amino acid kinase family members,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e1002201, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. O. Schueler-Furman and S. J. Wodak, “Computational approaches to investigating allostery,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 41, pp. 159–171, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. C. Xu, D. Tobi, and I. Bahar, “Allosteric changes in protein structure computed by a simple mechanical model: hemoglobin T R2 transition,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 333, no. 1, pp. 153–168, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Tekpinar and W. Zheng, “Coarse-grained and all-atom modeling of structural states and transitions in hemoglobin,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 240–252, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Davis and D. Tobi, “Multiple Gaussian network modes alignment reveals dynamically variable regions: the hemoglobin case,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 2097–2105, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Giuliani, L. Di Paola, and R. Setola, “Proteins as networks: a mesoscopic approach using haemoglobin molecule as case study,” Current Proteomics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 235–245, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. B. Caruso, A. Giuliani, and A. Colosimo, “Allosteric transitions of proteins studied by topological networks: a preliminary investigation on human haemoglobin,” Biophysics and Bioengineering Letters, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  46. L. Meireles, M. Gur, A. Bakan, and I. Bahar, “Pre-existing soft modes of motion uniquely defined by native contact topology facilitate ligand binding to proteins,” Protein Science, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1645–1658, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C. Chennubhotla and I. Bahar, “Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems: application to GroEL-GroES,” Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 2, article no. 36, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. C. Chennubhotla, Z. Yang, and I. Bahar, “Coupling between global dynamics and signal transduction pathways: a mechanism of allostery for chaperonin GroEL,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 287–292, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. K. V. Brinda and S. Vishveshwara, “A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 4159–4170, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Giuliani and L. Di Paola, “Protein as networks: will contact maps hold the promise to represent the ‘structural-formula’ of protein molecules?” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 17, no. 1, article 3, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. P. Paci, L. Di Paola, D. Santoni, M. de Ruvo, and A. Giuliani, “Structural and functional analysis of hemoglobin and serum albumin through protein long-range interaction networks,” Current Proteomics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 160–166, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. D. Santoni, P. Paci, L. Di Paola, and A. Giuliani, “Are proteins just coiled cords? Local and global analysis of contact maps reveals the backbone-dependent nature of proteins,” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 26–29, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. D. Ullman and M. Yannakakis, “High-probability parallel transitive-closure algorithms,” SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 100–125, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  54. G. Amitai, A. Shemesh, E. Sitbon et al., “Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 344, no. 4, pp. 1135–1146, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. R. Guimerà, M. Sales-Pardo, and L. A. N. Amaral, “Classes of complex networks defined by role-to-role connectivity profiles,” Nature Physics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. Tasdighian, L. Di Paola, M. De Ruvo et al., “Modules identification in protein structures: the topological and geometrical solutions,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 159–168, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. F. Cumbo, P. Paci, D. Santoni, L. Di Paola, and A. Giuliani, “GIANT: a cytoscape plugin for modular networks,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e105001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Krishnan, J. P. Zbilut, M. Tomita, and A. Giuliani, “Proteins as networks: usefulness of graph theory in protein science,” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. H. Li, S. Sakuraba, A. Chandrasekaran, and L.-W. Yang, “Molecular binding sites are located near the interface of intrinsic dynamics domains (IDDs),” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 2275–2285, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. U. Emekli, D. Schneidman-Duhovny, H. J. Wolfson, R. Nussinov, and T. Haliloglu, “HingeProt: automated prediction of hinges in protein structures,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1219–1227, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. L.-W. Yang and I. Bahar, “Coupling between catalytic site and collective dynamics: a requirement for mechanochemical activity of enzymes,” Structure, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 893–904, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. T. L. Rodgers, P. D. Townsend, D. Burnell et al., “Modulation of global low-frequency motions underlies allosteric regulation: demonstration in CRP/FNR family transcription factors,” PLoS Biology, vol. 11, no. 9, Article ID e1001651, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. C. Chennubhotla and I. Bahar, “Signal propagation in proteins and relation to equilibrium fluctuations,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1716–1726, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  64. A. Dutta and I. Bahar, “Metal-binding sites are designed to achieve optimal mechanical and signaling properties,” Structure, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1140–1148, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. B. M. Butler, Z. N. Gerek, S. Kumar, and S. B. Ozkan, “Conformational dynamics of nonsynonymous variants at protein interfaces reveals disease association,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 428–435, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. N. Kantarci, P. Doruker, and T. Haliloglu, “Cooperative fluctuations point to the dimerization interface of p53 core domain,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 421–432, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. A. Zen, C. Micheletti, O. Keskin, and R. Nussinov, “Comparing interfacial dynamics in protein-protein complexes: an elastic network approach,” BMC Structural Biology, vol. 10, article 26, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. Soner, P. Ozbek, J. I. Garzon, N. Ben-Tal, and T. Haliloglu, “DynaFace: discrimination between obligatory and non-obligatory protein-protein interactions based on the complex’s dynamics,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 11, no. 10, Article ID e1004461, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. O. K. Yusuff, J. O. Babalola, G. Bussi, and S. Raugei, “Role of the subunit interactions in the conformational transitions in adult human hemoglobin: an explicit solvent molecular dynamics study,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 116, no. 36, pp. 11004–11009, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. O. N. Yogurtcu, S. B. Erdemli, R. Nussinov, M. Turkay, and O. Keskin, “Restricted mobility of conserved residues in protein-protein interfaces in molecular simulations,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 3475–3485, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. E. Cukuroglu, H. B. Engin, A. Gursoy, and O. Keskin, “Hot spots in protein-protein interfaces: towards drug discovery,” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, vol. 116, no. 2-3, pp. 165–173, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. Chennubhotla, A. J. Rader, L.-W. Yang, and I. Bahar, “Elastic network models for understanding biomolecular machinery: from enzymes to supramolecular assemblies,” Physical Biology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. S173–S180, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. I. Bahar, A. R. Atilgan, M. C. Demirel, and B. Erman, “Vibrational dynamics of folded proteins: significance of slow and fast motions in relation to function and stability,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 2733–2736, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. P. Ozbek, S. Soner, and T. Haliloglu, “Hot spots in a network of functional sites,” PloS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e74320, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. C. B. M. Platania, L. Di Paola, G. M. Leggio et al., “Molecular features of interaction between VEGFA and anti-angiogenic drugs used in retinal diseases: a computational approach,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 6, p. 248, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  76. A. R. Atilgan, P. Akan, and C. Baysal, “Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. A. Del Sol, H. Fujihashi, D. Amoros, and R. Nussinov, “Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins,” Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. G. Bagler and S. Sinha, “Assortative mixing in protein contact networks and protein folding kinetics,” Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 1760–1767, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. G. Hu, W. Yan, J. Zhou, and B. Shen, “Residue interaction network analysis of Dronpa and a DNA clamp,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 348, pp. 55–64, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  80. F. Raimondi, A. Felline, M. Seeber, S. Mariani, and F. Fanelli, “A mixed protein structure network and elastic network model approach to predict the structural communication in biomolecular systems: The PDZ2 domain from tyrosine phosphatase 1E as a case study,” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2504–2518, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus