Reliability of the Footscan® Platform System in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of without Top-Layer and with Top-Layer Protocols

Table 7

Comparison of the CA (cm²) in the 10 masked zones between the WOT and WT protocols.

Zone	WOT	WT		AD	PD (%)
T1	15.5 ± 2.4	15.8 ± 3.4	0.343	−0.3	−1.9
T2–5	16.0 ± 3.2	13.2 ± 4.7	<0.001	2.8	17.5
M1	13.3 ± 2.6	12.4 ± 2.5	<0.001	0.9	6.8
M2	11.6 ± 1.5	11.1 ± 2.4	0.022	0.5	4.3
M3	12.5 ± 1.1	11.9 ± 1.4	0.001	0.6	4.8
M4	9.8 ± 1.2	9.2 ± 1.3	<0.001	0.6	6.1
M5	12.8 ± 1.9	12.8 ± 2.0	0.611	0.0	0.0
MF	38.4 ± 7.7	38.4 ± 8.8	0.896	0.0	0.0
MH	21.8 ± 2.4	22.6 ± 2.7	0.087	−0.8	−3.7
LH	19.3 ± 2.1	19.9 ± 1.9	0.452	−0.6	−3.1

; values are expressed as means ± standard deviation; CA: contact area, WOT: without top-layer, WT: with top-layer, AD: absolute differences, PD: percentage differences, T1: hallux, T2–5: toes 2–5, M1: first metatarsal, M2: second metatarsal, M3: third metatarsal, M4: fourth metatarsal, M5: fifth metatarsal, MF: midfoot, MH: medial heel, and LH: lateral heel.