Review Article

Scientific Evidence for Different Options for GDM Screening and Management: Controversies and Review of the Literature

Table 1

Criteria for GDM screening and diagnosis.

Population to screenTime to screenTestNumber of abnormal values required for diagnosisFasting glucose (mg/dL)1 hour after loading (mg/dL)2 hours after loading (mg/dL)3 hours after loading (mg/dL)

ACOG 2013
C&C [4]
Selective screeningFirst visitTwo-Step, 3 h, 100 g≥295180155140
ACOG 2013 NDDG [4]Selective screeningFirst visitTwo-Step, 3 h, 100 g≥2105190165145
ADA
2015 [9]
Universal screening24–28 weeksOne-Step, 2 h, 75 g≥295180155Not required
ADA
2015 [9]
Universal screeningFirst visitTwo-Step, 3 h, 100 g≥295180155140
ADIPS 2013 [52]Selective screening24–28 weeksOne-Step, 2 h, 75 g≥192180153Not required
CDA
2013 [10]
Universal screeningFirst visitTwo-Step, 2 h, 75 g≥295191160Not required
FIGO
2013 [5]
Universal screening24–28 weeksOne-Step, 2 h, 75 g≥192180153Not required
IADPSG 2010 [7]Universal screening24–28 weeksOne-Step, 2 h, 75 g≥192180153Not required
NICE
2015 [11]
Selective screening24–28 weeksOne-Step, 2 h, 75 g≥1101Not required140Not required
WHO
2013 [8]
Universal screening24–28 weeksOne-Step, 2 h, 75 g≥192180153Not required

ACOG: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; ADA: American Diabetes Association; ADIPS: Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society; CDA: Canadian Diabetes Association; C&C: Carpenter and Coustan; FIGO: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; IADPSG: International Association of Diabetes Pregnancy Study Group; NICE: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; NDDG: National Diabetes Data Group; WHO: World Health Organization.