Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3805073, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3805073
Research Article

Monitoring Leiomyoma Response to Uterine Artery Embolization Using Diffusion and Perfusion Indices from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

1Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
2Department of Interventional Oncology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
3School of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
4School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
5GE Healthcare China, Shanghai 201203, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yan Zhou; moc.liamtoh@5741eralc and Shiteng Suo; moc.liamg@ousths

Received 9 December 2016; Revised 7 July 2017; Accepted 25 July 2017; Published 27 August 2017

Academic Editor: Jiang Du

Copyright © 2017 Mengqiu Cao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Okolo, “Incidence, aetiology and epidemiology of uterine fibroids,” Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 571–588, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. D. Baird, D. B. Dunson, M. C. Hill, D. Cousins, and J. M. Schectman, “High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: Ultrasound evidence,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 100–107, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. C. Buttram Jr. and R. C. Reiter, “Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 433–445, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Zimmermann, D. Bernuit, C. Gerlinger, M. Schaefers, and K. Geppert, “Prevalence, symptoms and management of uterine fibroids: an international internet-based survey of 21,746 women,” BMC Women's Health, vol. 12, no. 1, Article ID 6, 11 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. C. Goodwin, S. Vedantham, B. McLucas, A. E. Forno, and R. Perrella, “Preliminary experience with uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroids,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 517–526, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. C. Goodwin, B. McLucas, M. Lee et al., “Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata midterm results,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1159–1165, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. P. Deshmukh, C. F. Gonsalves, F. F. Guglielmo, and D. G. Mitchell, “Role of MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas before and after embolization,” Radiographics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. E251–E281, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. S. Toor, K. T. Tan, M. E. Simons et al., “Clinical Failure after Uterine Artery Embolization: Evaluation of Patient and MR Imaging Characteristics,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 662–667, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Liapi, I. R. Kamel, D. A. Bluemke, M. A. Jacobs, and H. S. Kim, “Assessment of response of uterine fibroids and myometrium to embolization using diffusion-weighted echoplanar MR imaging,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Ananthakrishnan, G. Macnaught, L. Hinksman, H. Gilmour, K. P. Forbes, and J. G. Moss, “Diffusion-weighted imaging in uterine artery embolisation: Do findings correlate with contrast enhancement and volume reduction?” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 85, no. 1019, pp. e1046–e1050, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Faye, O. Pellerin, R. Thiam et al., “Diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluation of uterine arterial embolization of fibroids,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1739–1747, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Kirpalani, J. Chong, N. Yang et al., “Diffusion-weighted imaging properties of uterine fibroids pre- and post-uterine fibroid embolisation,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 1620–1625, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Le Bihan, E. Breton, D. Lallemand, M.-L. Aubin, J. Vignaud, and M. Laval-Jeantet, “Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 497–505, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Lewin, L. Fartoux, A. Vignaud, L. Arrivé, Y. Menu, and O. Rosmorduc, “The diffusion-weighted imaging perfusion fraction f is a potential marker of sorafenib treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A pilot study,” European Radiology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 281–290, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. Joo, J. M. Lee, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi, “Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging for monitoring the therapeutic efficacy of the vascular disrupting agent CKD-516 in rabbit VX2 liver tumors1,” Radiology, vol. 272, no. 2, pp. 417–426, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Harman, Ş. Zeteroǧlu, H. Arslan, M. Şengül, and Ö. Etlik, “Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging signal and contrastenhancement characteristics on post-embolization volume reduction of uterine fibroids,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 427–435, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. A. Yushkevich, J. Piven, H. C. Hazlett et al., “User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability,” NeuroImage, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1116–1128, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M.-Q. Cao, S.-T. Suo, X.-B. Zhang et al., “Entropy of T2-weighted imaging combined with apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of uterine leiomyoma volume response after uterine artery embolization,” Academic Radiology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 437–444, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Luciani, A. Vignaud, M. Cavet et al., “Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging-pilot study,” Radiology, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 891–899, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Suo, N. Lin, H. Wang et al., “Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of breast cancer at 3.0 tesla: comparison of different curve-fitting methods,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 362–370, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Koh and D. J. Collins, “Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 1622–1635, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. M. Kirby, D. Burrows, E. Haider, Z. Maizlin, and M. Midia, “Utility of MRI before and after uterine fibroid embolization: Why to do It and what to look for,” CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 705–716, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Iima and D. Le Bihan, “Clinical intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion MR imaging: Past, present, and future,” Radiology, vol. 278, no. 1, pp. 13–32, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Le Bihan and R. Turner, “The capillary network: a link between IVIM and classical perfusion,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 171–178, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Burbank, “Childbirth and myoma treatment by uterine artery occlusion: Do they share a common biology?” Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 138–152, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. M. DeSouza and A. D. Williams, “Uterine arterial embolization for leiomyomas: Perfusion and volume changes at MR imaging and relation to clinical outcome,” Radiology, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 367–374, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Federau, S. Sumer, F. Becce et al., “Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion imaging in acute stroke: Initial clinical experience,” Neuroradiology, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 629–635, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Suo, M. Cao, W. Zhu et al., “Stroke assessment with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 320–328, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Sasaki, K. Yamada, and Y. Watanabe, “Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study,” Radiology, vol. 249, no. 2, pp. 624–630, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. B. Rosenkrantz, M. Oei, J. S. Babb, B. E. Niver, and B. Taouli, “Diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen at 3.0 Tesla: Image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility compared with 1.5 Tesla,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 128–135, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Barbieri, O. F. Donati, J. M. Froehlich, and H. C. Thoeny, “Comparison of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Parameters across MR Imagers and Field Strengths: Evaluation in Upper Abdominal Organs,” Radiology, vol. 279, no. 3, pp. 784–794, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. Cui, H. Dyvorne, C. Besa, N. Cooper, and B. Taouli, “IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver at 3.0T: comparison with 1.5t,” European Journal of Radiology Open, vol. 2, pp. 123–128, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus