Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 3948360, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3948360
Review Article

Aβ Peptide Originated from Platelets Promises New Strategy in Anti-Alzheimer’s Drug Development

1School of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamon, PR, USA
2School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamon, PR, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Mikhail Y. Inyushin; ude.ebiraccu@nihsuyni.liahkim

Received 1 June 2017; Accepted 10 July 2017; Published 5 September 2017

Academic Editor: Xudong Huang

Copyright © 2017 Mikhail Y. Inyushin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide and its deposits in the brain are known to be implicated in the neurodegeneration that occurs during Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Recently, alternative theories views concerning both the source of this peptide and its functions have been developed. It has been shown that, as in all other known types of amyloidosis, the production of Aβ originates in blood cells or cells related to blood plasma, from which it can then spread from the blood to inside the brain, with the greatest concentration around brain blood vessels. In this review, we summarize research progress in this new area and outline some future perspectives. While it is still unclear whether the main source of Aβ deposits in AD is the blood, the possibility of blocking the chain of reactions that lead to constant Aβ release from the blood to the brain may be exploited in an attempt to reduce the amyloid burden in AD. Solving the problem of Aβ accumulation in this way may provide an alternative strategy for developing anti-AD drugs.

1. Introduction

It is known that Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, and it worsens over time. Current treatments cannot stop it from progressing, which emphasizes the desperate need for effective drugs. The hallmark of AD is pathological extracellular deposition of amyloid, which mainly consists of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide, in the brain tissue of patients, and there is evidence supporting the concept that an imbalance between production and clearance of Aβ peptides is a very early, often initiating, factor in AD (reviewed in: [1]). The damage to the neurons and internal neuronal tangle formation is only a consequence of this imbalance, in which the action of soluble Aβ peptide oligomers plays a very important role [13]. While there has been a gradual accumulation of knowledge about the Aβ pathway, which is driving significant pharmaceutical industry drug research [4], one of the principal questions that might affect the therapeutic landscape is still unresolved: Where does Aβ peptide production originate?

2. Aβ Peptide Source

The prevailing hypothesis is that brain cells are responsible for Aβ peptide overproduction. It is known that both astrocytes [5, 6] and neurons [5, 7] produce and release monomeric Aβ to the extracellular space, which may aggregate and form fibrils if they become concentrated in the micromolar (μM) range [8, 9]. It was shown that cultured human neurons with familiar AD-type mutations may, in only a few weeks, induce robust extracellular deposition of Aβ, including detergent-resistant plaques, in a human neural stem cell-derived three-dimensional (3D) culture system [10]. Neurons in this model have both amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin 1 mutations and thus showed significant increases in the ratio of pathogenic Aβ42 to Aβ40 peptides compared with non-AD control neurons [2, 11]. A specialized gel was added to the culture to retain and accumulate the released Aβ [10], and this is a necessary element of the model; otherwise the aggregation is absent. Some gel components may be seeding points that start the Aβ plaque formation, because it was shown that peptides favor self-aggregation over cross-seeding with nonhomologous sequences [12]. The process of aggregation and amyloid fibril growth may be facilitated by seeding with preformed β-sheet amyloid resulting from cellular uptake, concentration, and aggregation of Aβ within endosomes/exosomes [13]. After β-sheet formation is initiated, this process resembles the spread of crystallization or prion-like propagation [14]. For example, addition of Aβ seeds and the external Aβ peptide can provoke aggregation in pure neuronal cultures that normally do not produce Aβ plaques without the gel. It was shown that while no Aβ deposition was observed in hippocampal neuronal cultures of postnatal APP transgenic (APP-tg) mice, Aβ deposition emerged when cultures were treated once with brain extract from aged APP-tg mice and the culture medium was continuously supplemented with additional synthetic Aβ [15]. These results confirmed that brain cells could supply enough Aβ to produce not only damaging oligomers but also the aggregated forms present in AD patients.

Recently, an alternative view has been developed. It was proposed that beta amyloidosis is developed from Aβ peptides (or from the Aβ seeds) that spread to the brain from the blood as in other common forms of amyloidosis, such as light-chain immunoglobulin amyloidosis, transthyretin amyloidosis, or reactive systemic amyloidosis. Can Aβ peptide come from blood? Previously, it was shown that platelets have relatively high concentrations of APP, which is mostly contained within alpha granules, and the alpha granule content is liberated upon platelet degranulation [1620]. Practically all of the APP residing in blood plasma (~7 ng/ml) is thought to derive from platelets [16]. Platelets are also the primary source of Aβ peptide in human blood (~90%) [21], and this secreted peptide is similar to that found in the senile plaques of AD patients and is similarly increased in vivo by the presenilin 1 and presenilin 2 and APP mutations linked to familial AD [22]. The activated platelets in AD retain greater amounts of APP [23] while showing more platelet adhesion and thrombus formation [24]. In our recently published work we showed that Aβ peptide can be detected by immunocytochemistry in and around the blood vessels in the brain after experimental thrombosis and that this peptide is released from platelets [25]. We have also shown that during clot formation the density of platelets in the lumen of the thrombotic vessel is significantly increased (more than 300–500 times), thus allowing a massive release of Aβ peptide (directly or cleaved from released APP) at the site of clot formation [25]. It was known previously that microinfarcts are closely related to AD pathology [2628], and there is a correlation with intracranial vessel arteriosclerosis [29, 30] in which microclots are chronically being formed in brain blood vessels during arteriosclerosis [31, 32].

It seems also that, compared with brain cells, in which APP is known to be bound to the cellular membrane during processing with successive secretases to produce the Aβ peptide, platelets use a somewhat distinct mechanism by releasing full-length APP. As shown by western blots and carboxyl-terminal and amino-terminal APP radioimmunoassay, activated platelets released a sedimentable full-length APP with the carboxyl-terminal epitope as well as a soluble APP lacking the carboxyl-terminal epitope (still containing Aβ, according to its molecular weight) [16]. During platelet degranulation some granules and dense bodies or their contents appear to be extruded into a serpentine system of lipid channels that is continuous with the platelet membrane [33]. It is also known that the material from alpha granules after the release from platelets forms a coating on the surface of the platelet [34]. Recently, specialized extracellular lipid vesicles (exosomes, microvessels, or microparticles) were found be emitted by platelets. These exosomes participate in the processing of many proteins (reviewed in [35]), but specifically it was shown that β-cleavage occurs in early endosomes, and the products are secreted from the cells in association with exosomes [36]. Interestingly, when platelets contact each other in the clot after aggregation, they change the Aβ production mechanism. It has been shown that platelets at high density secrete mainly Aβ ending at residue 40 (Aβ40) as a final product, while the Aβ42 level is not affected by cell density [37]. Alternatively, brain endothelial cell enzymes can cleave the platelet-released APP, forming Aβ, especially if activated platelets adhere directly to the endothelial cells [38].

To summarize, previous work has shown that platelets in blood vessels may (1) release full-length APP, (2) simultaneously process the released APP inside microvessels/exosomes (that have lipid membranes), (3) liberate Aβ as a final product, and (4) increase its specific production in case of being densely concentrated, as inside a thrombus. In addition, (5) APP may also be processed by the endothelial cells to generate Aβ.

Recently, the concept of very specialized membrane-bound β-/γ-secretases and the mechanism of APP processing were challenged, and it was suggested instead that there is a multiplicity of these proteins and mechanisms [39]. The available literature supports the possibility that APP processing to produce Aβ occurs upon cleavage in endosomes/exosomes, not in external membranes. It was shown that these microvesicles (microparticles) may contain enzymes of the cathepsin B family, a group of proteolytic enzymes whose cysteine or thiol groups are involved in the cleavage of substrates ([40], also in the book ed. [41]). The cysteine protease cathepsin B has been identified as a powerful β-secretase, and its inhibition reduces Aβ production from the precursor APP [4244].

Alternatively, platelets have been shown to produce the initial seed of the aggregated Aβ, which can be spread to the brain [45]. It was shown that Aβ stimulates the integrin receptor in platelets, leading to the release of ADP and the protein clusterin, and this protein promoted β-sheet folding and the formation of fibrillar Aβ aggregates. The same authors have also shown that in transgenic AD model mice the antiplatelet agent clopidogrel (an ADP receptor [P2Y1, 2] blocker) reduced the amount of clusterin in the circulation and the incidence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) [45]. In a transgenic mouse model of AD, platelets were found to be the major contributors to CAA, which then formed a shield of insoluble Aβ around brain blood vessels [46]. Interestingly, another antiplatelet drug, cilostazol, with a completely different mechanism of action that reduces platelet reactivity and degranulation, also reduced Aβ-induced cognitive deficits associated with Aβ accumulation [4750], while aspirin, which reduces platelet aggregation but has no effect on degranulation, has no effect [51]. These results suggest that the degranulation of platelets is very important in AD development.

Production of Aβ in both brain and blood is beyond doubt. This fact led us to the hypothesis that both mechanisms of Aβ peptide production are important in the development of AD [25]. As a first step, there must be accumulation (aggregation) of platelets due to the response to some still-unknown septic or aseptic cause. According to this hypothesis, the Aβ peptide converted from APP and released from platelets (Figure 1, red arrows) spreads to the endothelium first and then to the perivascular space (Figure 1, green) and accumulates in the basal lamina. Another flow of Aβ peptide released from brain cells (Figure 1, black arrows) needs to pass the astrocyte barrier to reach the same perivascular space. Both brain- and blood-derived Aβ peptide may overwhelm the capacity of the existing clearance system.

Figure 1: Beta-Amyloid from blood and from brain. Blood vessel lumens are shown in red, while perivascular space with basal lamina are shown in green on the sketch.

3. The Perivascular Space Paradigm

Perivascular spaces are present around small as well as large blood vessels, in which case they are also known as Virchow-Robin spaces, forming the glymphatic perivascular system [52]. The main function of the glymphatic system is brain clearance: there is a constant flow along the perivenular and periarterial vascular spaces, from smaller to larger vessels [52, 53], and this flow increases during sleep [54]. The perivascular space extends only a few microns from small vessels (see Figure 1), but in bigger vessels it may extend a few millimeters. It is formed between the astrocytic end-feet enwrapping blood vessels (also known as the glia limitans, and the antibodies against aquaporin 4, the end-feet marker, can delimit its border) and the endothelium. In small vessels the perivascular space is known to be filled with basal lamina, a soft gel that consists of laminin, fibronectin, tenascin, collagens, and proteoglycans, which separates the astrocytic end-feet and endothelium cell layers and does not prevent the passage of macromolecules [55, 56]. In arterioles, the space between the end-foot and the endothelium includes also the smooth muscle cell layer. It is important to note that the accumulation of amyloid deposits follows a decreasing gradient from the inside of the vessel to the brain, not vice versa. It was shown that, during the development of AD angiopathy, amyloid accumulates initially in the perivascular space inside the basal lamina [5759]. As the disease progresses, amyloid deposits extend into the smooth muscle cell layer in arterioles, leading to its loss. With end-stage disease, amyloid appears to spread to adjacent neuropil-forming dysphoric vessels [59] and produces complete disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Analyzing this data, it seems that amyloid moves from inside the blood vessel to the brain. Interestingly, amyloid deposits do not accumulate in the venous system. It may be important that elevated blood pressure in arteries drives the Aβ peptide from the lumen to the perivascular space, or alternatively it may be important that cerebral arterial pulsations drive the exchange of Aβ peptide in the perivascular space with fluids in the brain parenchyma [60]. In any case, the flow along the glymphatic system was shown to be very important for amyloid clearance [52, 53]. In a transgenic mouse model (APPswe/PS1dE9), it was shown that thrombotic cerebrovascular lesions induced a rapid transient increase in amyloid plaque burden and amyloid angiopathy in the area immediately surrounding the infarcted area [59]. The authors [61] suggested that this most probably happens due to interference with amyloid clearance pathways. On the other hand, we showed that thrombosis in wild-type mouse brains produces a massive release of APP from platelets, which is converted to Aβ [25]. These results suggest that both brain-derived and blood-derived Aβ peptide may be important and that platelets are the key players.

4. Not Only the Brain May Be Affected by Aβ Amyloid Deposits

4.1. Eye Retina and Crystal Lens

These deposits include retinal and lens amyloid accumulation, retinal nerve fiber layer loss, and retinal vascular changes [62].

4.2. Skeletal Muscle Myopathy

Aβ-containing structures as well as epitopes containing APP were described in some cases of inclusion-body myositis, the collection of diseases that are characterized by the vacuoles and filamentous inclusions in muscle fibers [63, 64]. Using electron microscopy, it was found that Aβ-immunoreactive structures were often in proximity to cytoplasmic tubulofilament inclusions (CTFs), but CTFs themselves never contained Aβ immunoreactivity [63]. Also, in some affected muscle cells Aβ-immunoreactive accumulations extended beyond the cell boundary, while in the majority of cases they were localized inside the cell (mainly near the sarcolemma boundary, but also deeply in the interior of the cell). Some Aβ-positive accumulations in the myocytes did not contain amyloid in β-pleated sheets, and this was hypothesized to be an early sign in the development of the myopathy [63]. Later, the fact that Aβ-immunoreactive accumulations can be found mainly inside the myocytes led many authors to the hypothesis that diseased muscle cells have the intrinsic genetic ability to produce augmented quantities of APP and Aβ during myositis (reviewed in [65]). In contrast, it was shown by the authors of the original discovery that inclusion-containing cells cultured from inclusion-body myositic muscle do not accumulate APP and can be restored to normality and easily innervated [66]. The same group also suggested that, during the course of the disease, the blood might produce Aβ and APP during inclusion-body myositis and all other inflammatory myopathies, as they found that human muscle macrophages express APP and have all the necessary machinery for its production.

4.3. Myocardium

While the heart may be affected by many diseases related to protein misfolding in myocardium tissue, new studies have shown that some cases of idiopathic cardiomyopathy are related to AD-associated presenilin gene variants [67]. Also, using modern imaging, proteomics, and echocardiographic methods, it was shown that patients with AD have diastolic dysfunction. Aβ40 and Aβ42 were present in the hearts of many patients with heart problems, but their expression was significantly increased in AD [68].

4.4. Skin

Amyloid protein deposit immunoreactivity was described many years ago in and around the endothelium of dermal blood vessels in aged AD patients and controls and was proposed as a marker of the disease in AD patients [69]. But another study found that skin accumulation of Aβ around blood vessels was unrelated to the severity of symptoms in AD patients, occurring also in some healthy subjects [70]. Interestingly, Aβ protein was also detected in the skin of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis but not in controls [71]. In any case, it was very important that Joachim et al., 1989 [69], pointed out that the source of amyloid deposits in the skin and other organs was probably derived from a common circulating precursor, the blood. We have also shown that Aβ peptide can be found in and around skin blood vessels in mice after the experimental photothrombosis in the skin, as revealed by immunostaining, but not in normal skin [72]. These findings implicate thrombosis-related mechanisms as a probable source of this immunoreactivity.

Aβ in the skin may have implications for the development of vaccine against Aβ to cure AD, as patients with compromised clotting, like thrombophilia, thrombophlebitis, or similar diseases, could have additional inflammation problems. It is known that the development of the ACC-011AD vaccine (Elan-Wyeth Corp.) was halted due to patients developing skin lesions, which were suspected to be cases of blood vessel inflammation [73].

It is now clear that not only the brain but also other organs can be affected by Aβ, and the amount of deposition in these organs may be related or not to the severity of AD. As proposed by others [68], AD may be viewed either as a systemic disease or as a metastatic disorder, possibly leading to multiple organ failure.

5. Amyloid Deposits in AD Brain Contain Relatively Large Amounts of Other Proteins from Blood Plasma

Amyloid aggregates in AD may be of different types, with different solubilities in conventional solvents or detergents and different resistances to proteolysis. Plaques can be Congo Red-positive misfolded amyloid aggregates between the neurons, which typically have low solubility [4, 7476], and there can be relatively soluble Aβ aggregates that typically appear as clusters of 10–20 nM ovoid structures [77]. The depositions in close proximity and around arteries (CAA) are also mainly insoluble. The major component of the AD deposits is the Aβ peptide, but there are also minor components that may affect solubility. One of the components, serum amyloid P component (AP), is a normal plasma constituent [78] produced by liver, and its concentration in blood plasma has been shown to be about 5-fold elevated in AD [79]. Besides its role in AD, AP is also a component of β-sheet-containing plaques in other types of amyloidosis, such as light-chain immunoglobulin amyloidosis or reactive systemic amyloidosis. AP reduces solubility and also prevents proteolysis of amyloid deposits, but since it is not itself an enzyme inhibitor, it is protective only when bound to the deposits [80]. This implies that blood components participate in the formation of many brain amyloid aggregates in AD. Why then is it not possible that the Aβ peptide is itself (at least partially) derived from blood?

We need to mention here that some other minor components of AD deposits definitely come from the brain: it was shown that the synaptic vesicle protein synuclein 1 or its components are visible in AD plaques as well [81].

6. Why Are Platelets Activated in the AD Brain?

The systemic view of AD may be explained by systemic release of Aβ, but in any case the most severe symptoms are developed in the brain. Why is the brain the target of Aβ release in AD if there is no traumatic thrombosis? And why are only some parts of the brain affected?

It is well known that the different parts of the brain are not affected equally, at least according to the density and distribution of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. During development, the disease primarily affects the entorhinal cortex [8284], which is a major input and output structure of the hippocampal formation (affected in the next stage of the disease) but is also known to convey olfactory information [85, 86]. It was shown that the olfactory bulb is also definitely affected and may be affected even before the cortex [87, 88]. It was proposed that the olfactory tracts might provide a portal for entry into the brain of any putative pathogenic agent(s) that might be responsible for the induction of senile plaques and/or neurofibrillary tangles [88]. This led to the old theory of an infectious etiology for AD and the association with different brain viruses, bacteria, or prions (reviewed in [89, 90]). The evidence for human transmission of Aβ pathology and CAA after the treatment of children with human cadaver-derived growth hormone was reported, and it was suggested that this was an example of the prion-like spread of AD [91].

Recently, another explanation has been proposed. It was shown that Aβ release may be a specific defense against septic agents. If such agents are transmitted to the brain, the body responds by releasing Aβ peptide to kill them. If this defense mechanism is somehow compromised, it has been suggested that this may lead to overproduction of the Aβ peptide.

7. The Antimicrobial Effect and Aβ Peptide Oligomers

The antimicrobial effect of the Aβ peptide is clearly established. Its activity against different viruses has been shown [9295] as well as its strong antibiotic activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and yeast [9597]. This allows one to suggest that Aβ oligomers are a hitherto-unrecognized antimicrobial agent that functions as a normal component of the innate immune system [95]. Two different mechanisms have been proposed to explain this Aβ function: (i) the trapping of bacteria and (ii) pore-forming antibiotic activity.

(i) It was shown that the development of Aβ protofibrils can prevent pathogen adhesion to host cells, thus explaining the protective effect of Aβ against Salmonella bacterial infection [97]. It was shown that Salmonella bacterial infection of the brains of transgenic 5XFAD mice resulted in rapid seeding and accelerated Aβ deposition, which closely colocalized with the invading bacteria. This evidence led the authors to suggest that any infectious or sterile inflammatory stimuli could drive amyloidosis [97].

(ii) It has been shown that Aβ peptide oligomers perforate cell membranes and form (at low concentrations) tetrameric channels permeable to K+ ions. At higher concentrations they form giant multilevel Ca++-permeable pores, which are mainly hexamers [98100]. An excess of Ca++ permeability through these pores leads to cell death, as it induces unrestricted calcium flux into the cell, leading to dyshomeostasis [99].

There is a similarity of the Aβ peptide oligomer pore-forming effect with that of other peptide antibiotics (e.g., cecropin A or nystatin) that kill target cells by formation of large pores in the membrane [101103]. This led us to hypothesize that Aβ peptide released from platelets or cleaved from platelet-released APP works effectively as a natural antibiotic during clot formation following injury or platelet degranulation in response to other septic or aseptic (inflammatory) stimuli [25].

8. What Is a New and Alternative Strategy to Fighting AD?

While the Aβ hypothesis is driving the majority of current research on AD, the development of effective drugs against the disease has stalled. These drugs are directed against Aβ, its precursor APP, or the β- and γ-secretase enzymes from the known Aβ pathway. Knowledge about this pathway is driving significant pharmaceutical industry drug research [4], and while current drugs help mask the symptoms of AD, they do not treat the underlying disease or delay its progression. None of the Aβ‐targeted phase 3 clinical trials in AD has shown a statistically significant benefit in achieving its prespecified clinical endpoints [1]. Several of these trials against Aβ and γ-secretases had to be halted because of side effects that may not have been target related [104, 105].

Analysis of the literature suggests a new approach that takes into account not only brain-derived but also blood-derived Aβ and proposes that platelets are the key players. We further suggest an alternative strategy in which AD is treated through the reduction (inhibition) of pathologically excessive release of Aβ (through APP) by platelets. A breakthrough AD drug must treat the underlying disease and stop or delay the cell damage that eventually leads to the worsening of symptoms.

9. Platelets and Their Receptors That Induce Aβ Release Are Involved in AD

It is known that normal or pathological platelet activation may take place after attachment and adhesion events or as the effect of many other activation factors, such as thromboxane A2, the ADP/ATP ratio, thrombin, platelet-activating factor (PAF), collagen, and many others. The activation pathways are usually mediated by specific receptors, some of which are shown in Figure 2. Platelet-activation signaling pathways have been known for many years, and over time it has become clear that there is a complex and sophisticated signaling and amplification network (reviewed in [106]). The specific pathways that are most important in the pathological activation related to AD are not known, and this needs to be studied.

Figure 2: Activation of different types of receptors induces degranulation of platelets.

In Figure 2, we show a few of the many receptors that activate platelets and their possible relation to AD.

Thromboxane A2 (TxA2) Prostanoid G Protein-Coupled Receptors with Two Alternatively Spliced Isoforms (α and β). TxA2 receptor antagonists have been shown to block iPF2αIII-induced increases in Aβ secretion [107, 108].

Glycoprotein VI (GPVI) Collagen Receptor. Honokiol (extracted from magnolia), a specific antagonist of collagen receptor glycoprotein VI, which is expressed on human platelets [109], was shown to attenuate Aβ-induced memory impairment, which was attributed to its antioxidant activity [110].

Proteinase-Activated Receptors (PARs). These members of the G protein-coupled receptor family are usually activated by thrombin in platelets. Activation of PARs may result in AD pathogenesis (reviewed by [111]).

Purinergic ATP-ADP G Protein-Coupled Receptors (P2X, P2Y). It was shown that clopidogrel (a P2Y1, 2 ADP receptor blocker) significantly reduced the incidence of CAA [45]. Using selective purinergic receptor agonists and antagonists in vitro and in AD animal models it was shown that these receptors represent novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of AD [112].

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptors. The progression of dementia in AD patients with fast cognitive decline was shown to be correlated with the levels of activated glycoprotein IIb-IIIa complex and P-selectin [113].

It is especially interesting that the ADP and TxA2 receptors both signal via the specific G protein Gq. Temporal elimination of Gq greatly inhibits functioning of both these receptors. It was shown that agonists (activating ligands) of retinoid X nuclear hormone receptors (RXRs) bind directly to Gq and very effectively inhibit platelet aggregation, due to dysfunction of the ADP and TxA2 receptors, but only weakly affect functioning of collagen (GP VI) receptors [114]. This is definitely a nongenomic effect because the lack of a nucleus in these cells [114]. On the other hand, it was shown that oral administration of the RXR agonist bexarotene to a mouse model of AD resulted in enhanced clearance of soluble Aβ within hours. The Aβ intraneuronal amyloid deposit area was reduced more than 50% within just 72 hours. Furthermore, bexarotene stimulated the rapid reversal of cognitive, social, and olfactory deficits and improved neural circuit function [115, 116].

10. Conclusions

Analyzing the literature, we agree with Schmaier [117] that results concerning APP and Aβ peptide structure and function suggest that AD is in part a thrombohemorrhagic disorder and conclude that platelets and their activation mechanisms are most probably involved. Moreover, these insights give us hope for an alternative strategy in anti-AD drug development focused on newly discovered blood-related pathways of Aβ release and aggregation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

Mikhail Y. Inyushin and Lilia Y. Kucheryavykh designed the study; Mikhail Y. Inyushin, Priscila Sanabria, Legier Rojas, Yuriy Kucheryavykh, and Lilia Y. Kucheryavykh performed the study and analyzed data; Mikhail Y. Inyushin and Legier Rojas wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NIH/NIMHD Grant SC2GM111149 to Mikhail Y. Inyushin, NIH/NIMHD SC2GM102040 Grant to Lilia Y. Kucheryavykh, and NIH/NIMHD Grant 5G12MD007583 to Priscila Sanabria and to Mikhail Y. Inyushin.

References

  1. D. J. Selkoe and J. Hardy, “The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 595–608, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. H. Choi, Y. H. Kim, L. Quinti, R. E. Tanzi, and D. Y. Kim, “3D culture models of Alzheimer's disease: A road map to a "cure-in-a-dish",” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 11, no. 1, article no. 75, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Z. X. Wang, L. Tan, J. Liu, and J. T. Yu, “The Essential Role of Soluble Aβ Oligomers in Alzheimer’s Disease,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1905–1924, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. W. V. Graham, A. Bonito-Oliva, and T. P. Sakmar, “Update on alzheimer's disease therapy and prevention strategies,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 413–430, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Busciglio, D. H. Gabuzda, P. Matsudaira, and B. A. Yankner, “Generation of β-amyloid in the secretory pathway in neuronal and nonneuronal cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 2092–2096, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. E. Shepherd, S. Bowes, D. Parkinson, M. Cambray-Deakin, and R. C. A. Pearson, “Expression of amyloid precursor protein in human astrocytes in vitro: Isoform-specific increases following heat shock,” Neuroscience, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 317–325, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Simons, B. De Strooper, G. Multhaup, P. J. Tienari, C. G. Dotti, and K. Beyreuther, “Amyloidogenic processing of the human amyloid precursor protein in primary cultures of rat hippocampal neurons,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 899–908, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Lomakin, D. B. Teplow, D. A. Kirschner, and G. B. Benedeki, “Kinetic theory of fibrillogenesis of amyloid β-protein,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 15, pp. 7942–7947, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. O. Tjernberg, A. Pramanik, S. Björling et al., “Amyloid β-peptide polymerization studied using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–62, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. H. Choi, Y. H. Kim, M. Hebisch et al., “A three-dimensional human neural cell culture model of Alzheimer's disease,” Nature, vol. 515, no. 7526, pp. 274–278, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. E. Tanzi and L. Bertram, “Twenty years of the Alzheimer's disease amyloid hypothesis: a genetic perspective,” Cell, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 545–555, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Ganesan, M. Debulpaep, H. Wilkinson et al., “Selectivity of aggregation-determining interactions,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 427, no. 2, pp. 236–247, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. X. Hu, S. L. Crick, G. Bu, C. Frieden, R. V. Pappu, and J.-M. Lee, “Amyloid seeds formed by cellular uptake, concentration, and aggregation of the amyloid-beta peptide,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 48, pp. 20324–20329, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. C. Watts and S. B. Prusiner, “β-Amyloid Prions and the Pathobiology of Alzheimer’s Disease,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. Novotny, F. Langer, J. Mahler et al., “Conversion of synthetic Aβ to In Vivo active seeds and amyloid plaque formation in a hippocampal slice culture model,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 18, pp. 5084–5093, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. I. Bush, R. N. Martins, B. Rumble et al., “The amyloid precursor protein of Alzheimer's disease is released by human platelets,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, pp. 15977–15983, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. E. Van Nostrand, A. H. Schmaier, J. S. Farrow, and D. D. Cunningham, “Protease nexin-II (amyloid β-protein precursor): A platelet α-granule protein,” Science, vol. 248, no. 4956, pp. 745–748, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. N. Rosenberg, F. Baskin, J. A. Fosmire et al., “Altered amyloid protein processing in platelets of patients with Alzheimer disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 139–144, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Baskin, R. N. Rosenberg, L. Iyer, L. Hynan, and C. M. Cullum, “Platelet APP isoform ratios correlate with declining cognition in AD,” Neurology, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1907–1909, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Padovani, L. Pastorino, B. Borroni et al., “Amyloid precursor protein in platelets: A peripheral marker for the diagnosis of sporadic AD,” Neurology, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 2243–2248, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Chen, N. C. Inestrosa, G. S. Ross, and H. L. Fernandez, “Platelets Are the Primary Source of Amyloid β-Peptide in Human Blood,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 96–103, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Scheuner, C. Eckman, M. Jensen et al., “Secreted amyloid β-protein similar to that in the senile plaques of Alzheimer's disease is increased in vivo by the presenilin 1 and 2 and APP mutations linked to familial Alzheimer's disease,” Nature Medicine, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 864–870, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. A. Davies, H. J. Long, K. Sgro et al., “Activated Alzheimer disease platelets retain more beta amyloid precursor protein,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. I. Canobbio, C. Visconte, B. Oliviero et al., “Increased platelet adhesion and thrombus formation in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1863–1871, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Y. Kucheryavykh, J. Dávila-Rodríguez, D. E. Rivera-Aponte et al., “Platelets are responsible for the accumulation of β-amyloid in blood clots inside and around blood vessels in mouse brain after thrombosis,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 128, pp. 98–105, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. E. Kövari, F. R. Herrmann, P. R. Hof, and C. Bouras, “The relationship between cerebral amyloid angiopathy and cortical microinfarcts in brain ageing and Alzheimer's disease,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 498–509, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. Saito and M. Ihara, “New therapeutic approaches for Alzheimer's disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 6, article no. 290, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Saito and M. Ihara, “Interaction between cerebrovascular disease and Alzheimer pathology,” Current Opinion in Psychiatry, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 168–173, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. H. Dolan, B. Crain, J. Troncoso, S. M. Resnick, A. B. Zonderman, and R. J. OBrien, “Atherosclerosis, dementia, and alzheimer disease in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging cohort,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 231–240, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. Lathe, A. Sapronova, and Y. Kotelevtsev, “Atherosclerosis and Alzheimer - Diseases with a common cause? Inflammation, oxysterols, vasculature,” BMC Geriatrics, vol. 14, no. 1, article no. 36, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. Holvoet and D. Collen, “Thrombosis and atherosclerosis,” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 320–328, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. Badimon and G. Vilahur, “Thrombosis formation on atherosclerotic lesions and plaque rupture,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 276, no. 6, pp. 618–632, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. G. White, “Exocytosis of secretory organelles from blood platelets incubated with cationic polypeptides.,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 41–54, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. G. L. Dale, “Coated-platelets: An emerging component of the procoagulant response,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 2185–2192, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. H. Kalra, G. P. C. Drummen, and S. Mathivanan, “Focus on extracellular vesicles: introducing the next small big thing,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 2, article 170, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. Rajendran, M. Honsho, T. R. Zahn et al., “Alzheimer's disease β-amyloid peptides are released in association with exosomes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 30, pp. 11172–11177, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Casoli, G. Di Stefano, B. Giorgetti et al., “Release of β-amyloid from high-density platelets: Implications for Alzheimer's disease pathology,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1096, pp. 170–178, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. A. Davies, A. M. Billingslea, H. J. Long et al., “Brain endothelial cell enzymes cleave platelet-retained amyloid precursor protein,” Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 341–350, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Chen, “The maze of APP processing in Alzheimer's disease: where did we go wrong in reasoning?” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 9, article 186, pp. 1–10, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Verderio, C. Cagnoli, M. Bergami et al., “TI-VAMP/VAMP7 is the SNARE of secretory lysosomes contributing to ATP secretion from astrocytes,” Biology of the Cell, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 213–228, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. Harrison, C. Gardiner, and I. Sargent, Eds., Extracellular Vesicles in Health and Disease, CNC Press, Boca Raton, Fl, USA, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. V. Hook, T. Toneff, M. Bogyo et al., “Inhibition of cathepsin B reduces beta-amyloid production in regulated secretory vesicles of neuronal chromaffin cells: evidence for cathepsin B as a candidate beta-secretase of Alzheimer's disease,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 386, no. 12, pp. 931–940, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. V. Y. H. Hook, M. Kindy, T. Reinheckel, C. Peters, and G. Hook, “Genetic cathepsin B deficiency reduces β-amyloid in transgenic mice expressing human wild-type amyloid precursor protein,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 386, no. 2, pp. 284–288, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. G. R. Hook, J. Yu, N. Sipes, M. D. Pierschbacher, V. Hook, and M. S. Kindy, “The cysteine protease cathepsin B is a key drug target and cysteine protease inhibitors are potential therapeutics for traumatic brain injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 515–529, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. Donner, K. Fälker, L. Gremer et al., “Platelets contribute to amyloid-b aggregation in cerebral vessels through integrin αIIbβ3-induced outside-in signaling and clusterin release,” Science Signaling, vol. 9, no. 429, article no. ra52, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. N. S. Gowert, L. Donner, M. Chatterjee et al., “Blood platelets in the progression of Alzheimer's disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e90523, pp. 1–16, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. H. Arai and T. Takahashi, “A combination therapy of Donepezil and Cilostazol for patients with moderate Alzheimer disease: Pilot follow-up study,” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 353-354, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. H. Park, J. H. Kim, S. S. Bae et al., “Protective effect of the phosphodiesterase III inhibitor cilostazol on amyloid β-induced cognitive deficits associated with decreased amyloid β accumulation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 408, no. 4, pp. 602–608, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. T. Maki, Y. Okamoto, R. O. Carare et al., “Phosphodiesterase III inhibitor promotes drainage of cerebrovascular β-amyloid,” Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 519–533, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. S. Saito, S. Kojima, N. Oishi, R. Kakuta et al., “A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial for cilostazol in patients with mild cognitive impairment: The COMCID study protocol,” Alzheimer's & Dementia (NY): Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 250–257, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. Y. Hattori, T. Maki, S. Saito, Y. Yamamoto, K. Nagatsuka, and M. Ihara, “Influence of Low-Dose Aspirin on Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy in Mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1037–1045, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Nedergaard, “Garbage truck of the brain,” Science, vol. 340, no. 6140, pp. 1529-1530, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. J. M. Tarasoff-Conway, R. O. Carare, R. S. Osorio et al., “Clearance systems in the brain - Implications for Alzheimer disease,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 457–470, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. L. Xie, H. Kang, Q. Xu et al., “Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain,” Science, vol. 342, no. 6156, pp. 373–377, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. R. L. Heimark, “Cell-cell adhesion of molecules the blood-brain barrier,” in The Blood-brain Barrier: Cellular and Molecular Biology, W. M. Pardridge, Ed., pp. 88–106, Lippincott-Raven, New York, NY, USA, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. M. Y. Inyushin, A. Huertas, Y. V. Kucheryavykh et al., “L-DOPA uptake in astrocytic endfeet enwrapping blood vessels in rat brain,” Parkinson's Disease, vol. 2012, Article ID 321406, 8 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. M. C. Herzig, D. T. Winkler, P. Burgermeister et al., “Aβ is targeted to the vasculature in a mouse model of hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 954–960, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. E. McGowan, F. Pickford, J. Kim et al., “Aβ42 is essential for parenchymal and vascular amyloid deposition in mice,” Neuron, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 191–199, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. G. J. Zipfel, H. Han, A. L. Ford, and J.-M. Lee, “Cerebral amyloid angiopathy progressive disruption of the neurovascular unit,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. S16–S19, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. J. Iliff, M. Wang, D. M. Zeppenfeld et al., “Cerebral arterial pulsation drives paravascular CSF-Interstitial fluid exchange in the murine brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 46, pp. 18190–18199, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. Garcia-Alloza, J. Gregory, K. V. Kuchibhotla et al., “Cerebrovascular lesions induce transient β-amyloid deposition,” Brain, vol. 134, no. 12, pp. 3694–3704, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. P. van Wijngaarden, X. Hadoux, M. Alwan, S. Keel, and M. Dirani, “Emerging ocular biomarkers of Alzheimer disease,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. V. Askanas, W. K. Engel, and R. B. Alvarez, “Light and electron microscopic localization of β-amyloid protein in muscle biopsies of patients with inclusion-body myositis,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. V. Askanas, R. B. Alvarez, and W. K. Engel, “β‐Amyloid precursor epitopes in muscle fibers of inclusion body myositis,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 551–560, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. A. Greenberg, “How citation distortions create unfounded authority: Analysis of a citation network,” BMJ (Online), vol. 339, no. 7714, pp. 210–213, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. McFerrin, W. K. Engel, and V. Askanas, “Cultured inclusion-body myositis muscle fibers do not accumulate β- amyloid precursor protein and can be innervated,” Neurology, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2184–2187, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. D. Gianni, A. Li, G. Tesco et al., “Protein aggregates and novel presenilin gene variants in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.,” Circulation, vol. 121, no. 10, pp. 1216–1226, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. L. Troncone, M. Luciani, M. Coggins et al., “Aβ Amyloid Pathology Affects the Hearts of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: Mind the Heart,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 68, no. 22, pp. 2395–2407, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. C. L. Joachim, H. Mori, and D. J. Selkoe, “Amyloid β-protein deposition in tissues other than brain in Alzheimer's disease,” Nature, vol. 341, no. 6239, pp. 226–230, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. O. Heinonen, H. Soininen, S. Syrjänen et al., “β-amyloid protein immunoreactivity in skin is not a reliable marker of alzheimer's disease: An autopsy-controlled study,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 799–804, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. S. Ono, S. Matsuno, N. Shimizu, S. Shoji, and A. Tamaoka, “Amyloid β protein in skin of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” Lancet, vol. 351, no. 9107, pp. 956-957, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. G. V. Guillama, L. Y. Kucheryavykh, J. Dávila-Rodríguez et al., “Beta-amyloid peptide in blood clots,” in Proceedings of VI Meeting of the Physiol, pp. 7-8, Puerto Rico, 2017.
  73. C. Hollingsworth, “Elan-wyeth alzheimer's trial suspended due to skin lesion,” BioWorld International, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 6, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  74. D. A. Kirschner, C. Abraham, and D. J. Selkoe, “X-ray diffraction from intraneuronal paired helical filaments and extraneuronal amyloid fibers in Alzheimer disease indicates cross-β conformation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 503–507, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. D. J. Selkoe, “Alzheimer's disease: genes, proteins, and therapy,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 741–766, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. H. A. D. Keage, R. O. Carare, R. P. Friedland et al., “Population studies of sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy and dementia: A systematic review,” BMC Neurology, vol. 9, article no. 3, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. T. J. Esparza, N. C. Wildburger, H. Jiang et al., “Soluble amyloid-beta aggregates from human Alzheimer's disease brains,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 38187, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. T. Duong, E. C. Pommier, and A. B. Scheibel, “Immunodetection of the amyloid P component in Alzheimer's disease,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 429–437, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. E. Nishiyama, N. Iwamoto, M. Kimura, and H. Arai, “Serum amyloid P component level in alzheimer's disease,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 256–259, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. G. A. Tennent, L. B. Lovat, and M. B. Pepys, “Serum amyloid P component prevents proteolysis of the amyloid fibrils of Alzheimer disease and systemic amyloidosis.,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 4299–4303, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. A. Iwai, E. Masliah, M. Yoshimoto et al., “The precursor protein of non-Aβ component of Alzheimer's disease amyloid is a presynaptic protein of the central nervous system,” Neuron, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 467–475, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. H. Braak and E. Braak, “Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 239–259, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. A. Delacourte, N. Sergeant, D. Champain et al., “Nonoverlapping but synergetic tau and APP pathologies in sporadic Alzheimer's disease,” Neurology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 398–407, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. C.-Y. Yeh, B. Vadhwana, A. Verkhratsky, and J. J. Rodríguez, “Early astrocytic atrophy in the entorhinal cortex of a triple transgenic animal model of Alzheimer's disease,” ASN Neuro, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 271–279, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. A. M. M. C. Habets, F. H. Lopes Da Silva, and W. J. Mollevanger, “An olfactory input to the hippocampus of the cat: Field potential analysis,” Brain Research, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 47–64, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. C. B. Canto, F. G. Wouterlood, and M. P. Witter, “What does the anatomical organization of the entorhinal cortex tell us?” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2008, Article ID 381243, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. T. G. Ohm and H. Braak, “Olfactory bulb changes in Alzheimer's disease,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 365–369, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. D. M. A. Mann, C. M. Tucker, and P. O. Yates, “Alzheimer's disease: An olfactory connection?” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. F. Mawanda and R. Wallace, “Can infections cause alzheimer's disease?” Epidemiologic Reviews, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 161–180, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. M. Sochocka, K. Zwolińska, and J. Leszek, “The infectious etiology of Alzheimer's Disease,” Current Neuropharmacology, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. Z. Jaunmuktane, S. Mead, M. Ellis et al., “Evidence for human transmission of amyloid-β pathology and cerebral amyloid angiopathy,” Nature, vol. 525, no. 7568, pp. 247–250, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. M. R. White, R. Kandel, S. Tripathi et al., “Alzheimer's associated β-Amyloid protein inhibits influenza a virus and modulates viral interactions with phagocytes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 7, Article ID e101364, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. K. Bourgade, H. Garneau, G. Giroux et al., “β-Amyloid peptides display protective activity against the human Alzheimer’s disease-associated herpes simplex virus-1,” Biogerontology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. W. J. Lukiw, J. G. Cui, L. Y. Yuan et al., “Acyclovir or Aβ42 peptides attenuate HSV-1-induced miRNA-146a levels in human primary brain cells,” NeuroReport, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 922–927, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. S. J. Soscia, J. E. Kirby, K. J. Washicosky et al., “The Alzheimer's disease-associated amyloid β-protein is an antimicrobial peptide,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 3, Article ID e9505, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. P. Papareddy, M. Mörgelin, B. Walse, A. Schmidtchen, and M. Malmsten, “Antimicrobial activity of peptides derived from human ß-amyloid precursor protein,” Journal of Peptide Science, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 183–191, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. D. K. V. Kumar, H. S. Choi, K. J. Washicosky et al., “Amyloid-β peptide protects against microbial infection in mouse and worm models of Alzheimer's disease,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 8, no. 340, Article ID 340ra72, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. N. Arispe, E. Rojas, and H. B. Pollard, “Alzheimer disease amyloid β protein forms calcium channels in bilayer-membranes: blockade by tromethamine and aluminum,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 567–571, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. M. Kawahara, N. Arispe, Y. Kuroda, and E. Rojas, “Alzheimer's disease amyloid β-protein forms Zn2+-sensitive, cation- selective channels across excised membrane patches from hypothalamic neurons,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 67–75, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. H. Lin, R. Bhatia, and R. Lal, “Amyloid β protein forms ion channels: implications for Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 2433–2444, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. M. Y. Inyushin, Y. Y. Tsytsarev, A. Y. Ignashchenkova, and D. N. Lenkov, “Use of artificial ion channels for quasi-intracellular recording of cerebral cortex neuron activity,” Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 702–707, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. J. Harder, J. Bartels, E. Christophers, and J. M. Schröder, “A peptide antibiotic from human skin,” Nature, vol. 387, no. 6636, p. 861, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. R. E. W. Hancock and D. S. Chapple, “Peptide Antibiotics,” Antimicrob Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1317–1323, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  104. B. De Strooper, “Lessons from a failed γ-secretase Alzheimer trial,” Cell, vol. 159, no. 4, pp. 721–726, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. E. Karran and J. Hardy, “A critique of the drug discovery and phase 3 clinical programs targeting the amyloid hypothesis for Alzheimer disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 185–205, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. B. Estevez and X. Du, “New Concepts and Mechanisms of Platelet Activation Signaling,” Physiology (Bethesda), vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 162–177, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. D. W. Shineman, B. Zhang, S. N. Leight, D. Pratico, and V. M.-Y. Lee, “Thromboxane receptor activation mediates isoprostane-induced increases in amyloid pathology in Tg2576 mice,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 18, pp. 4785–4794, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. J. H. Soper, S. Sugiyama, K. Herbst-Robinson et al., “Brain-penetrant tetrahydronaphthalene thromboxane A2-prostanoid (TP) receptor antagonists as prototype therapeutics for Alzheimers disease,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 928–940, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. T. Lee, C. Chang, W. Lu et al., “Honokiol as a specific collagen receptor glycoprotein VI antagonist on human platelets: Functional ex vivo and in vivo studies,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, article 40002, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. Y. K. Lee, I. S. Choi, J. O. Ban et al., “4-O-methylhonokiol attenuated β-amyloid-induced memory impairment through reduction of oxidative damages via inactivation of p38 MAP kinase,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 476–486, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. R. Matěj, Z. Rohan, K. Holada, and T. Olejár, “The contribution of proteinase-activated receptors to intracellular signaling, transcellular transport and autophagy in Alzheimer's disease,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 2–12, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. L. T. Woods, D. Ajit, J. M. Camden, L. Erb, and G. A. Weisman, “Purinergic receptors as potential therapeutic targets in Alzheimer's disease,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 104, pp. 169–179, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. K. Stellos, V. Panagiota, A. Kögel, T. Leyhe, M. Gawaz, and C. Laske, “Predictive value of platelet activation for the rate of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease patients,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1817–1820, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. L. A. Moraes, K. E. Swales, J. A. Wray et al., “Nongenomic signaling of the retinoid X receptor through binding and inhibiting Gq in human platelets,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 3741–3744, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. P. E. Cramer, J. R. Cirrito, D. W. Wesson et al., “ApoE-directed therapeutics rapidly clear β-amyloid and reverse deficits in AD mouse models,” Science, vol. 335, no. 6075, pp. 1503–1506, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. M. M. Mariani, T. Malm, R. Lamb et al., “Neuronally-directed effects of RXR activation in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, article 42270, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  117. A. H. Schmaier, “Alzheimer disease is in part a thrombohemorrhagic disorder,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 991–994, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar