Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 4059703, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4059703
Clinical Study

Success Rates of Pulpotomies in Primary Molars Using Calcium Silicate-Based Materials: A Randomized Control Trial

Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to Yeliz Guven; rt.ude.lubnatsi@nevugy

Received 5 June 2017; Revised 17 September 2017; Accepted 9 October 2017; Published 31 October 2017

Academic Editor: Giuseppina Nocca

Copyright © 2017 Yeliz Guven et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. B. Fuks, “Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy,” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 3, pp. 115–120, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD), “Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent tooth,” pp. 244–252, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  3. K. G. Vargas, A. B. Fuks, and B. Peretz, “Pulpotomy techniques: cervical (traditional) and partial,” Pediatric Endodontics: Current Concepts in Pulp Therapy for Primary and Young Permanent Teeth, pp. 51–70, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. Smaïl-Faugeron, F. Courson, P. Durieux, M. Muller-Bolla, A.-M. Glenny, and H. Fron Chabouis, “Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 8, Article ID CD003220, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P.-Y. Lin, H.-S. Chen, Y.-H. Wang, and Y.-K. Tu, “Primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1060–1077, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. D. Ruby, C. F. Cox, S. C. Mitchell, S. Makhija, P. Chompu-Inwai, and J. Jackson, “A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth,” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. International Agency for Research on Cancer, “IARC classifies formaldehyde as carcinogenic to humans,” 2004.
  8. C. Trairatvorakul and A. Koothiratrakarn, “Calcium hydroxide partial pulpotomy is an alternative to formocresol pulpotomy based on a 3-year randomized trial,” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 382–389, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. B. Fuks, G. Holan, J. M. Davis, and E. Eidelman, “Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: long-term follow up,” Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 19, pp. 327–330, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  10. L. Peng, L. Ye, X. Guo et al., “Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 751–757, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. P. Erdem, Y. Guven, B. Balli et al., “Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: A 24-month study,” Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 165–170, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Naik and A. M. Hegde, “Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy agent in primary molars: an in vivo study,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Peng, L. Ye, H. Tan, and X. Zhou, “Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: a meta-analysis,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. e40–e44, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Aeinehchi, S. Dadvand, S. Fayazi, and S. Bayat-Movahed, “Randomized controlled trial of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol for pulpotomy in primary molar teeth,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 261–267, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Shirvani and S. Asgary, “Mineral trioxide aggregate versus formocresol pulpotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1023–1030, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. DJ. Farsi, HM. El-Khodary, NM. Farsi, El. Ashiry EA, and MA. Yagmoor, “Sodium Hypochlorite Versus Formocresol and Ferric Sulfate Pulpotomies in Primary Molars: 18-month Follow-up,” Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 37, pp. 535–540, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  17. E. S. Junior, M. E. B. Vitcel, and L. B. Oliveira, “Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol,” European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 303–312, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Gupta, V. Rana, N. Srivastava, P. Chandna, and N. Marwah, “Laser pulpotomy- an effective alternative to conventional techniques: a 12 months clinicoradiographic study,” International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 8, pp. 18–21, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. P. Fernandes, N. Lourenço Neto, and N. C. Teixeira Marques, “Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of Low-Level Laser Therapy in vital pulp of primary teeth,” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 144–150, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. A. Soxman, “Vital pulp therapy for primary molars,” Handbook of Clinical Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry, pp. 51–57, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. Eidelman, D. Odont, G. Holan, and A. B. Fuks, “Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report,” Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Torabinejad, C. U. Hong, F. McDonald, and T. R. Pitt Ford, “Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 349–353, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. D. Santos, J. C. S. Moraes, E. B. Araújo, K. Yukimitu, and W. V. Valério Filho, “Physico-chemical properties of MTA and a novel experimental cement,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 443–447, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S.-J. Lee, M. Monsef, and M. Torabinejad, “Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 541–544, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Schmitt, J. Lee, and G. Bogen, “Multifaceted use of ProRoot MTA root canal repair material,” Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 326–330, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. M. Torabinejad, “Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): its history, composition, and clinical applications,” Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, vol. 36, pp. 247–252, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Camilleri, L. Formosa, and D. Damidot, “The setting characteristics of MTA Plus in different environmental conditions,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 831–840, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Ö. Malkondu, M. K. Kazandağ, and E. Kazazoğlu, “A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 160951, 10 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. O. A. E. S. El Meligy, S. Allazzam, and N. M. Alamoudi, “Comparison between biodentine and formocresol for pulpotomy of primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial,” Quintessence International, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 571–580, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Cuadros-Fernández, A. I. Lorente Rodríguez, S. Sáez-Martínez, J. García-Binimelis, I. About, and M. Mercadé, “Short-term treatment outcome of pulpotomies in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine: a randomized clinical trial,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1639–1645, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Nowicka, G. Wilk, M. Lipski, J. Kołecki, and J. Buczkowska-Radlińska, “Tomographic evaluation of reparative dentin formation after direct pulp capping with Ca(OH)2, MTA, Biodentine, and dentin bonding system in human teeth,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1234–1240, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Shayegan, C. Jurysta, R. Atash, M. Petein, and A. V. Abbeele, “Biodentine used as a pulp-capping agent in primary pig teeth,” Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. e202–e208, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. F. Schulz, D. G. Altman, and D. Moher, “CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e1000251, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. C. Huth, E. Paschos, N. Hajek-Al-Khatar et al., “Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques - Randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 1144–1148, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Parirokh and M. Torabinejad, “Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. B. S. Moretti, V. T. Sakai, T. M. Oliveira et al., “The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 547–555, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Sonmez, S. Sarı, and T. Çetinbaş, “A comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 950–955, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. Yildirim, F. Basak, O. M. A. Akgun, G. G. U. Polat, and C. Altun, “Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the effectiveness of formocresol, mineral trioxide aggregate, portland cement, and enamel matrix derivative in primary teeth pulpotomies: a two year follow-up,” The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. N. Farsi, N. Alamoudi, K. Balto, and A. Mushayt, “Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars,” Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 307–311, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. Noorollahian, “Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars,” British Dental Journal, vol. 204, no. 11, p. E20, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. Subramaniam, S. Konde, S. Mathew, and S. Sugnani, “Mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp capping agent for primary teeth pulpotomy: 2 year follow up study,” Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 311–314, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. B. Malekafzali, F. Shekarchi, and S. Asgary, “Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using two endodontic biomaterials. A 2-year randomised clinical trial,” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–193, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. M. Sushynski, C. M. Zealand, T. M. Botero et al., “Comparison of gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: A 6-to 24-month observation,” Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. e120–e128, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. C. Fernandez, S. S. Martínez, F. G. Jimeno, A. I. Lorente Rodríguez, and M. Mercadé, “Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of four dressing materials in pulpotomized primary molars: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up,” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 400–407, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. H. Togaru, R. Muppa, N. C. Srinivas, K. Naveen, V. K. Reddy, and V. C. Rebecca, “Clinical and radiographic evaluation of success of two commercially available pulpotomy agents in primary teeth: An in vivo study,” Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 557–563, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. Rajasekharan, L. C. Martens, J. Vandenbulcke, W. Jacquet, P. Bottenberg, and R. G. E. C. Cauwels, “Efficacy of three different pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a randomized control trial,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 215–228, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. B. Kusum, K. Rakesh, and K. Richa, “Clinical and radiographical evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine and propolis as pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth,” Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, vol. 40, no. 4, p. 276, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. K. Sirohi, M. Marwaha, A. Gupta, K. Bansal, A. Srivastava, and N. Marwah, “Comparison of clinical and radiographic success rates of pulpotomy in primary molars using ferric sulfate and bioactive tricalcium silicate cement: an in vivo study,” International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–151, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. P. Juneja and S. Kulkarni, “Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars,” European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 271–278, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. L. Papagiannoulis, “Clinical studies on ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy medicament in primary teeth,” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 126–132, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. P. J. Waterhouse, J. H. Nunn, and J. M. Whitworth, “An investigation of the relative efficacy of Buckley's Formocresol and calcium hydroxide in primary molar vital pulp therapy,” British Dental Journal, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 32–36, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. D. Tziafas, A. J. Smith, and H. Lesot, “Designing new treatment strategies in vital pulp therapy,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 77–92, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. M. Willard, “Radiographic changes following formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars.,” ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 414-415, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. B. N. Çelik and Ş. Sari, “Carious Exposure versus Mechanical Exposure for MTA Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 2753429, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. G. Holan, E. Eidelman, and A. B. Fuks, “Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol,” Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. N. L. Smith, N. S. Seale, and M. E. Nunn, “Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: A retrospective study,” Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 192–199, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. Watts and R. C. Paterson, “Pulpal response to a zinc oxide–eugenol cement,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 82–86, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus