Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 4357031, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4357031
Research Article

Fungicidal, Corrosive, and Mutational Effects of Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Combined with 1-Bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione

School of Life Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Qin Chen; nc.ude.uhs.ffats@ccniqnehc

Received 6 August 2017; Accepted 1 October 2017; Published 5 November 2017

Academic Editor: Carla Renata Arciola

Copyright © 2017 Bing Niu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. The disinfectants polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and 1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione (BCDMH) each have limitations. So far, their combined usage has not been examined. In this study, the fungicidal activity of combined disinfectant using PHMB and BCDMH, named PB, against Candida albicans was evaluated. Methods. Suspension quantitative fungicidal test and viable fungi count were used to test fungicidal effects against C. albicans. Coupon corrosion testing was used to evaluate disinfectants’ corrosive effects on stainless steel, copper, and aluminum. The mouse lymphoma assay was used to detect mutations induced by PB. Results and Discussion. Fungicidal activity of the combination of 40 mg/L PHMB and 40 mg/L BCDMH was comparable to, or even better than, those of 600 mg/L PHMB or 640 mg/L BCDMH alone. The combination of 400 mg/L PHMB and 400 mg/L BCDMH exhibited good fungicidal effects in field applications. The combination of 100 mg/L PHMB and 100 mg/L BCDMH did not have corrosive effects on stainless steel and no mutagenic effect was observed under the test conditions. Conclusions. The combination of PHMB and BCDMH has strong fungicidal effects and little metal corrosive and mutagenic effect and can be used as one suitable fungicide for wide household and industrial applications, including shipping containers.

1. Background

PHMB (polyhexamethylene biguanide) is a water-soluble cationic disinfectant with wide clinical, household, and industrial applications [13], despite its poor optimal antibacterial effect. BCDMH (1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione), an oxidative disinfectant with efficient bactericidal activity, could cause allergic contact dermatitis and form hypobromous acid (HBrO), a highly reactive disinfecting ingredient, restricting its continuous effect [4, 5]. The combination of disinfectants is one strategy to compensate for their individual shortcomings. For example, alcohol with chlorhexidine or alcohol with iodine can enhance bactericidal activity [6]. So far, the combination of PHMB and BCDMH is not well-characterized. Our previous studies have shown that the bactericidal activity of the combination of PHMB and BCDMH (PB) against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus was significantly greater than that of either PHMB or BCDMH alone [7]. Therapy for Candida infections is a challenge as one of the most cunning and adaptive organisms that exists [8]. Because PB is necessary to kill fungi as a new disinfectant, it can meet the needs of disinfectants in the application. Besides, the practical application environment is complex, and it is necessary to explore the efficacy of PB to kill fungi. To develop an efficient and comprehensive disinfectant, fungicidal effect needs to be considered. A variety of factors such as concentration, duration, ambient temperature, humidity, wind force, and light intensity could affect disinfectant efficiency in field application [911]. Valiente Moro et al. use 16S rRNA PCR to analyze bacteria community [12], and 18S rRNA PCR and Illumina high-throughput sequencing were used to analyze fungi community with PB treated in this paper.

An optimal disinfectant should not only exhibit efficient fungicidal activity but should also be minimally corrosive and nontoxic. It is usual for one disinfectant to have some disadvantage, for example, metal corrosion and mutagenicity. Port disinfection includes goods and container disinfection. Containers are typically made of aluminum and stainless steel; general corrosion can be investigated by coupon corrosion testing [13]. Sekine et al. studied the corrosive effects of acids on stainless steel and carbon steels based on weight loss [1416]. Disinfectant mutagenicity and toxicity were investigated using L5178Y tk+/− cells, which have been used to examine regulatory genotoxicity for over three decades and will continue to be a mainstay of internationally recommended testing batteries for the determination of in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity [17].

Therefore, we tried to use PHMB and BCDMH for combination and employed the methods mentioned above to attempt to find appropriate concentrations for experiment and practical applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Quantitative Suspension Test

Candida albicans ATCC 10231 derived from American Type Culture Collection was provided by the Shanghai Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau. A single colony was added to Sabouraud Dextrose Broth Medium (SDB) and cultured at 37°C for 18–24 h in shaking incubator. Cell suspensions were centrifuged at 3000 gravitational acceleration (abbreviation, 3000 g) for 5 min and washed twice with tryptone saline solution (TPS). The precipitate was resuspended in TPS to obtain a final concentration of 1 × 108 cfu/mL to 5 × 108 cfu/mL. The bacterial suspension was mixed with 3% bovine serum albumin (1 : 1), and 1 mL of the resulting cell suspension was mixed with 4 mL of a solution containing PHMB (Hangzhou LC-Chem Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China), BCDMH (Taixing Jiansheng Fine Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Taixing, China), or both (i.e., PB) and incubated for 3 min. Then, 0.5 mL of the above mixture was supplemented with 4.5 mL of neutralizer (6 g/L sodium thiosulfate, 2.5 g/L sodium sulfite, 5 g/L Tween 80, and 7 g/L lecithin in TPS) and incubated for 10 min. The neutralized solution was serially diluted (1 : 10) with TPS, and 1 mL of each dilution was mixed with 15 mL of molten (40–45°C) Sabouraud Dextrose Agar Medium (SDA) and poured in sterile Petri dishes. The dishes were incubated at 37°C until countable colonies appeared. Colonies were then counted.

2.2. Field Application
2.2.1. Container Surface Disinfection

Filter paper pads (1 × 1 cm) for field application were prepared by applying 10 μL of bacteria suspension (bacteria, 5 × 105 to 5 × 106 cfu/mL) onto one filter paper pad. Four paper pads were pasted on each side of a container (front, back, left, and right), and eight paper pads were pasted on goods package wooden boxes or paper or plastic cover. Then, 10x PB (1x PB indicates 10 mg/L PHMB + 10 mg/L BCDMH) was sprayed on the paper pads one time. The size of droplets, distance, amounts, and duration were 80–120 μm, 5–10 cm, ~100 mL/m2, and 3 min, respectively. Paper pads were torn down and were eluted with 10 mL neutralizer. The neutralized solution was serially diluted (1 : 10) with TPS and cultured using the plate culture method. The viable bacteria were calculated. For organic material inference test, the procedure was same as above, except that paper pads were prepared with bacteria suspension containing 10% bovine serum albumin. A diluted solution (220 mg/L dioctyldimethylammonium/didecyldimethylammonium, 200 mg/L naphthamine) from disinfectant U (U-lai Jie Chemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), a widely used port disinfectant, was used for comparison.

2.2.2. Analysis of Fungi Community Structures

Spray the surface with 10x PB solution and wait for 3 min, and then prepare three independent samples from three 5 cm × 5 cm surfaces by brushing surface with swabs and immersing in neutralizer solution. DNA was extracted from samples using the EZNA® Soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, US) and amplified with primer ITS1F (CTTGGTCATTTAGAG GAAGT AA) and primer 2043R (GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC) with a PCR system (ABI GeneAmp® 9700). The reaction conditions were 95°C for 3 min, 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 10 min, for 28–36 cycles. PCR operations were performed in triplicate using 20 μL mixtures containing 4 μL of 5x FastPfu Buffer, 2 μL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μL of each primer (5 μM), 0.4 μL of FastPfu Polymerase, and 10 ng of template DNA. Illumina high-throughput sequencing was performed by Shanghai Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

2.3. Coupon Corrosion Test

Stainless steel (the details could be referred to in support information S1 in Supplementary Material available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4357031), copper, and aluminum coupons were purchased from East China Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Huangyan, China. After treatment with anhydrous ethanol, cleaned metal coupons were dried in a 50°C incubator for 1 h and weighed three times when temperature dropped to room temperature. The metal coupons were hooked in 600 mL of disinfectant with concentrations of 1x PB and 10x PB and kept free of light for 72 h. Metal coupons hooked in water were used as controls. Then coupons were removed from solutions and washed with water. Metal coupons were placed in plates with filter paper and dried for 1 h in a 50°C incubator. Changes in metal coupon color and weight were recorded. The metal corrosion rate R (mm/a) was calculated as follows:where m is the weight of the metal before treatment (g), mt is the weight of the metal after treatment (g), S is the total surface area of the metal coupon (cm2), t is the treatment time (h), and d is the density of the metal coupon (kg/m3). S for one coupon in the test was 9.8017 cm2. The densities of stainless steel, copper, and aluminum were 7.93 g/cm3, 8.9 g/cm3, and 2.73 g/cm3, respectively.

2.4. Mouse Lymphoma Assay

The mouse lymphoma assay was performed using L5178Y tk+/− cloned cells, clone 3.7.2C (provided by the Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences) [18]. Cells were cultured as described by Fellows et al. [17]. Prior to testing, to remove spontaneous mutant cells, cells were treated for 24 h with THMG (RPMI (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) containing 3 mg/L thymidine, 5 mg/L hypoxanthine, 0.1 mg/L methotrexate, and 7.5 mg/L glycine) medium and then transferred to THG medium (not containing methotrexate) for 48 h. The THG medium was changed to RPMI 1640 medium, and cells were incubated for 72 h in a flask [18]. The PB concentrations were selected based on the criteria set in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guidelines, in which mutagenicity should be tested at concentrations causing high cytotoxicity (10–20% relative total growth for the maximum concentration). Mutant frequency determination was performed as described in OECD guideline for tk locus mutation assay [19]. Exogenous metabolizing systems with 2% S9 fraction were used in the test.

To determine cloning efficiency, cultures were plated into two 96-well plates at ~1.6 cells/well in RPMI 1640 medium containing 20% heat inactivated donor horse serum (DHS). To determine TFT resistance, cultures were plated into two 90-well plates at ~2000 cells/well in RPMI 1640 medium containing 20% DHS and 3 μg/mL TFT [17]. Plates were incubated for 12 days. Viability and mutant frequency were analyzed by calculating related indices, such as relative suspension growth (RSG), plate efficiency (PE0, PE2), relative survival rate (RS), and mutant frequency (MF) using standard methods [20].

3. Results

3.1. Effect of PB on C. albicans

Quantitative fungicidal tests were used to assess the effects of PB on C. albicans in a 3 min duration. As shown in Table 1, the fungicidal activity of the combined and individual disinfectants increased as the concentration increased. PB (4x) brought about log reduction (LR) = 5.18, larger than that by 600 mg/L PHMB (LR = 4.31) or that by 640 mg/L BCDMH (LR = 4.32).

Table 1: Fungicidal activity of PB.
3.2. Effect of PB on C. albicans and Fungal Communities in the Field

PB (10x) was sprayed onto filter paper pads pasted on different sides of a container. Table 2 shows that the logarithmic values of viable cells treated with 10x PB were lower than those of cells treated with the port disinfectant U, indicating PB is better than disinfectant U. Serum in C. albicans cell suspension, as one organic material, lowered LR fungicidal effect. Therefore, the presence of serum weakened the fungicidal activity of PB to a certain extent.

Table 2: LR of PB on C. albicans in field application.

Fungal communities on container surfaces before and after 10x PB treatment are summarized in Figure 1. The average proportion of Candida in the PB group was 5.36% and the average proportion in the CK group was 7.40%, suggesting significant differences in fungal communities before and after treatment. Community barplot analysis showed that there were 136 total fungi in the CK group and 64 fungi in the PB group on genus level, indicating that 10x PB has good fungicidal effect.

Figure 1: Effect of PB on community abundance on genus level.
3.3. PB Corrosive Effect on Metal

Stainless steel, copper, and aluminum coupons were soaked in 1x PB and 10x PB for 72 h. The surface changes are presented in Figure 2. The faces of stainless steel and aluminum coupons did not exhibit significant changes, and copper coupon face color became lighter, and the more concentrated the PB solutions were, the lighter they became.

Figure 2: Surface change of metal coupons.

The corrosion rates (R) of various metals are shown in Table 3. The metal coupons treated with 1x PB and 10x PB did not exhibit severe corrosion. PB (1x or 10x) had almost no corrosive effect on stainless steel coupons and PB (10x) had mild and moderate corrosive effects on aluminum and copper coupons, respectively; corrosion increased as PB concentration increased.

Table 3: Metal coupons corrosion of PB.
3.4. Mouse Lymphoma Assay

Mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells lacking spontaneous mutations were exposed to appropriate concentrations of PB (0.8~6.4 μg/mL PHMB + 0.8~6.4 μg/mL BCDMH) based on prescreening. RSG and other indicators were calculated according to cell or cell colony counts (Table 4). RSG, PE0, PE2, and RS decreased as the PB concentration increased, showing that PB has a certain level of toxicity on cells. MF of cells treated with various PB solutions did not differ significantly from that of cells treated with H2O, and no dose effect was observed, indicating that PB had no mutagenic effects under the test conditions.

Table 4: Effects of PB on mutant frequency of L5178Y cells.

4. Discussion

PB is a combined disinfectant established in our laboratory, and it is formed with PHMB and BCDMH. We have studied the PB bactericidal effects on E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (unpublished data), and S. aureus [7]. The related results showed that PB has relatively optimal bactericidal activity at relatively low concentration [7]. In this study, we try to examine its fungicidal, metal corrosive, and mutational effects. The results showed that, as expected, PB exhibited significant fungicidal effect against C. albicans and could produce high fungicidal activity only with PB weight which was 1/15 of PHMB weight or 1/16 of BCDMH weight when they were used alone, indicating combination of PHMB and BCDMH could promote bactericidal activity and could be used as one broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent.

Containers, as main transportation apparatus, undergo a range of environmental and biological contaminants during transport. They must be disinfected carefully to remove infectious disease microbial organisms before loading [2123]. Microbial communities can be affected by various natural factors, such as wind, moisture, or some environmental factors, such as agrochemical or antimicrobial agent residues. Our results showed that PB has strong effect on microbial community abundance, could obviously inhibit or extinct some microbial community, and change community composition; especially for fungi in the experiment, fungal community abundance was changed a lot. Although PB fungicidal effect was much better than that of port disinfectant U, it could not extinct all fungal communities. It is probably because some fungus was at spore phase. It is possible to disinfect all fungal communities by elevating PB concentration, or it is impossible to sterilize all fungal communities only with PB. It can be reached by combining PB with other disinfectants or physical factors such as UV, microwave, and plasma.

Corrosive effects of chemical disinfectants limit their application scope. Except for good disinfection effect, an optimal disinfectant should have no or little corrosive effect on containers, especially on metals that containers are made of. The results about metal corrosion indicated that PB has no corrosive effect on stainless steel and little corrosive effect on aluminum and copper, suggesting it can be used relatively safely in metal containers. If diluted PB solution (e.g., 5x) is used, it will be safer for metal containers.

For field application, disinfectants may be sprayed onto surfaces of goods and/or containers. It is requested for disinfectants to be nontoxic and have no mutagenic effect on human and livestock cells. Harmand used L5178Y cells to detect mutant of cells treated with PHMB (0~100 μg/mL) and found that both 50 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL PHMB had high toxicity to cells but had no mutant effects [24]. The question whether PHMB is still nontoxic and has no mutagenic effect when it is combined with BCDMH must be answered. Our results proved that addition of BCDMH did not produce additional mutagenicity.

In summary, PB has high fungicidal activity against C. albicans and is safe in field application and can be used as one substitute for typical port disinfectant.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest related to this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Bing Niu and Wan Huai contributed equally to the work.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key Technology Support Program of China (no. 2013BAD12B06) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (no. 2016YFD0501101).

References

  1. G. Müller, T. Koburger, and A. Kramer, “Interaction of polyhexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride (PHMB) with phosphatidylcholine containing o/w emulsion and consequences for microbicidal efficacy and cytotoxicity,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 201, no. 1-3, pp. 58–64, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Chindera, M. Mahato, A. Kumar Sharma et al., “The antimicrobial polymer PHMB enters cells and selectively condenses bacterial chromosomes,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 23121, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Ampawong and P. Aramwit, “A study of long-term stability and antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine, polyhexamethylene biguanide, and silver nanoparticle incorporated in sericin-based wound dressing,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1286–1302, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. G. Dalmau, M. Estela Martínez-Escala, and V. Gázquez, “Swimming pool contact dermatitis caused by 1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-dimethyl hydantoin,” Journal of Contact Dermatitis, vol. 66, no. 6, Article ID 3350339, pp. 335–339, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Yang, C. Schmalz, J. Zhou et al., “An insight of disinfection by-product (DBP) formation by alternative disinfectants for swimming pool disinfection under tropical conditions,” Water Research, vol. 101, pp. 535–546, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. A. Rutala and D. J. Weber, “Disinfection, sterilization, and antisepsis: An overview,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. e1–e6, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Huai, Z. Deng, and Q. Chen, “Bactericidal Activity and Physiological Effects of Combined Application of Poly-Hexamethylene Biguanide Hydrochloride and 1-bromo-3-chloro-5, 5-dimethylimidazolidine-2, 4-dione on Staphylococcus aureus,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Biological Engineering and Pharmacy 2016 (BEP 2016), Shanghai, China, December 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. E. H. Endo, D. A. Garcia Cortez, T. Ueda-Nakamura, C. V. Nakamura, and B. P. Dias Filho, “Potent antifungal activity of extracts and pure compound isolated from pomegranate peels and synergism with fluconazole against Candida albicans,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 161, no. 7, pp. 534–540, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Wang, V. Tian, N. Gu, C. Zhang, and J. Niu, “Study on synergistic effect of bactericidal effect of chlorine dioxide solution by surfactant,” Journal of Hygiene Research, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 282–285, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. M. Schneider, “New technologies and trends in sterilization and disinfection,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. S81–S86, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. A. Rutala and D. J. Weber, “Disinfection and sterilization: An overview,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. S2–S5, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Valiente Moro, J. Thioulouse, C. Chauve, P. Normand, and L. Zenner, “Bacterial taxa associated with the hematophagous mite Dermanyssus gallinae detected by 16S rRNA PCR amplification and TTGE fingerprinting,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. “Astm I. 1990. ASTM G31-72: Standard Practice for Laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing of Metals”.
  14. I. Sekine, S. Hatakeyama, and Y. Nakazawa, “Effect of water content on the corrosion behaviour of type 430 stainless steel in formic and acetic acids,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 915–920, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. K. Singh and A. K. Mukherjee, “Kinetics of mild steel corrosion in aqueous acetic acid solutions,” Journal of Materials Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 264–269, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. K. Singh, A. K. Mukherjee, and M. M. Singh, “Kinetics of mild steel corrosion in aqueous formic acid solutions,” Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 186–194, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. D. Fellows, A. Mcdermott, K. R. Clare, A. Doherty, and M. J. Aardema, “The spectral karyotype of L5178Y TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells clone 3.7.2C and factors affecting mutant frequency at the thymidine kinase (tk) locus in the microtitre mouse lymphoma assay,” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. I. Vasquez, M. Tarapoulouzi, N. Lambrianides et al., “Assessing the potential of pharmaceuticals and their transformation products to cause mutagenic effects: Implications for gene expression profiling,” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2753–2764, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Chemistry, “Test No. 476: In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test,” Oecd Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, vol. 1, no. 10, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Lloyd and D. Kidd, The Mouse Lymphoma Assay, Springer, NY, USA, 2012.
  21. S. Nijhawan, N. K. Jain, M. P. Sharma et al., “An economical endoscope disinfection container.,” Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 249-250, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Reiter, “The standardised freight container: Vector of vectors and vector-borne diseases,” Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. V. M. Walden, E.-A. Lamond, and S. A. Field, “Container contamination as a possible source of a diarrhoea outbreak in Abou Shouk camp, Darfur province, Sudan,” Disasters, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 213–221, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. U. Bernauer, “Opinion of the scientific committee on consumer safety (SCCS) - 2nd Revision of the safety of the use of poly(hexamethylene) biguanide hydrochloride or polyaminopropyl biguanide (PHMB) in cosmetic products,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 885-886, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus