Research Article

Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Table 3

Pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) values of the investigated variables in the Twin Block (TB) and activator-headgear (AH) groups.

TBAH
T1T2T1T2
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SD

NSBa131.0 ± 4.5130.9 ± 4.60.7520.065128.3 ± 5.1127.4 ± 5.00.0140.476
SNA80.1 ± 3.279.8 ± 3.60.1180.31581.8 ± 2.881.7 ± 2.70.4320.161
SNB74.2 ± 3.075.3 ± 3.3<0.0010.75176.2 ± 2.577.4 ± 2.5<0.0010.835
ANB5.9 ± 1.64.4 ± 1.7<0.0010.7515.7 ± 1.74.2 ± 1.7<0.0010.899
A-NPg4.9 ± 2.13.7 ± 2.3<0.0010.6614.2 ± 2.22.9 ± 2.4<0.0010.831
NL/NSL7.9 ± 2.97.6 ± 3.10.3590.1875.4 ± 2.55.2 ± 2.60.4200.165
MP/NSL35.2 ± 4.735.3 ± 5.20.9250.01933.3 ± 5.032.4 ± 4.70.0110.488
MP/NL27.3 ± 4.527.7 ± 4.80.4310.16227.9 ± 4.627.2 ± 4.60.0860.343
FA/NBa86.1 ± 3.486.3 ± 3.70.6140.10487.5 ± 3.787.8 ± 4.00.2990.212
UFH47.7 ± 3.049.3 ± 3.40.0010.59746.2 ± 4.846.7 ± 3.30.5340.128
LFH56.8 ± 4.559.9 ± 4.7<0.0010.78457.3 ± 5.758.8 ± 4.40.1540.288
UFH/LFH84.4 ± 8.082.8 ± 7.20.0140.47480.7 ± 4.979.6 ± 5.30.1570.286
Co-A81.0 ± 5.383.0 ± 4.30.0160.46783.0 ± 8.282.6 ± 4.20.7990.053
Co-Gn99.9 ± 6.1105.0 ± 6.3<0.0010.768102.6 ± 10.4105.1 ± 6.00.1620.283
Max Mand diff18.9 ± 3.122.0 ± 4.3<0.0010.74319.6 ± 3.622.4 ± 3.5<0.0010.784
−1/MP97.7 ± 7.4100.7 ± 7.40.0020.57295.5 ± 7.696.1 ± 6.40.4560.153
+1/NSL107.6 ± 7.1100.5 ± 6.4<0.0010.803110.1 ± 6.7102.7 ± 6.3<0.0010.772
−1/A-Pg angle22.0 ± 5.827.5 ± 5.2<0.0010.76521.0 ± 7.323.7 ± 5.10.0020.583
+1/A-Pg angle38.5 ± 5.528.9 ± 4.7<0.0010.89337.9 ± 5.627.5 ± 5.2<0.0010.867
−1/A-Pg distance0.3 ± 2.02.6 ± 1.7<0.0010.8750.0 ± 2.31.4 ± 2.0<0.0010.775
+1/A-Pg distance9.3 ± 1.96.4 ± 1.9<0.0010.9159.2 ± 2.05.6 ± 2.0<0.0010.861
Gl′-Sn-Pg′20.3 ± 5.318.2 ± 5.60.0020.58318.5 ± 5.816.4 ± 5.20.0020.586
Cm-Sn-Ls116.9 ± 11.9118.1 ± 10.20.5890.111107.7 ± 8.5113.8 ± 11.30.0050.533
Li-E0.1 ± 2.5−0.5 ± 2.50.1200.313−0.6 ± 3.5−1.5 ± 2.80.0200.455
Ls-E−0.5 ± 2.0−2.2 ± 2.0<0.0010.701−0.1 ± 2.2−1.9 ± 2.4<0.0010.823
Li-S1.1 ± 2.40.7 ± 2.30.3270.2000.7 ± 3.3−0.1 ± 2.80.0500.389
Ls-S1.3 ± .7−0.2 ± 1.6<0.0010.6612.0 ± 2.00.1 ± 2.2<0.0010.861
OJ9.0 ± 2.53.8 ± 1.8<0.0010.9569.2 ± 2.34.3 ± 1.9<0.0010.888

Paired samples -test.
Effect size calculated by using the formula . Cohen criteria for interpretation of effect size were used: = small effect size, 0.3–0.5 = medium, and >0.5 = large.