Saving the On-Scene Time for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: The Registered Nurses’ Role and Performance in Emergency Medical Service Teams

Lin, Ming-Wei; Wu, Che-Yu; Pan, Chih-Long; Tian, Zhong; Wen, Jyh-Horng; Wen, Jet-Chau

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5326962

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Limitations Discussion Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Cardiovascular Emergencies

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 5326962 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5326962

Saving the On-Scene Time for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients: The Registered Nurses’ Role and Performance in Emergency Medical Service Teams

Ming-Wei Lin,¹Che-Yu Wu,²Chih-Long Pan,³Zhong Tian,⁴Jyh-Horng Wen,⁵and Jet-Chau Wen^3,6

Academic Editor: Eric Chong

Received14 Sept 2016

Revised23 Nov 2016

Accepted19 Jan 2017

Published09 Feb 2017

Abstract

For out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, every second is vital for their life. Shortening the prehospital time is a challenge to emergency medical service (EMS) experts. This study focuses on the on-scene time evaluation of the registered nurses (RNs) participating in already existing EMS teams, in order to explore their role and performance in different EMS cases. In total, 1247 cases were separated into trauma and nontrauma cases. The nontrauma cases were subcategorized into OHCA (NT-O), critical (NT-C), and noncritical (NT-NC) cases, whereas the trauma cases were subcategorized into collar-and-spinal board fixation (T-CS), fracture fixation (T-F), and general trauma (T-G) cases. The average on-scene time of RN-attended cases showed a decrease of 21.05% in NT-O, 3.28% in NT-C, 0% in NT-NC, 18.44% in T-CS, 13.56% in T-F, and 3.46% in T-G compared to non-RN-attended. In NT-O and T-CS cases, the RNs’ attendance can notably save the on-scene time with a statistical significance ( and .017, resp.). Furthermore, the return of spontaneous circulation within two hours () rate in the NT-O cases was increased by 12.86%. Based on the findings, the role of RNs in the EMTs could save the golden time in the prehospital medical care in Taiwan.

1. Introduction

Emergency medical service (EMS) systems may differ depending on the strategies and the plans in the transportation model and the constitution of the EMS team in different countries [1, 2]. More specifically, for the EMS transportation, the Anglo-American model is based on the “patient to doctor” plan, whereas the Franco-German model is based on the “doctor to patient” plan [3–5]. Different transportation models will create different EMS teams, which may consist of emergency medical technicians (EMTs), nurses, and doctors for the prehospital patient care. In Taiwan, the EMS system follows the Anglo-American model, in which patients are transported to hospitals commonly by two EMTs (referred as 2T) [6, 7].

An EMS case can experience various prehospital time intervals [8], such as the response time [9, 10], the on-scene time [11, 12], and a transportation time. Many researchers emphasize shortening the prehospital EMS time in order to save the golden hours for the patient survival [13–20]. Moreover, the on-scene time will be highly affected by the constituent members of an EMS team, compared to the other time intervals, especially in different EMS models [21, 22].

In some countries, the registered nurses (RNs) had become part of the ambulance service [23]; however, the performance of the RNs in the EMS teams could not be evaluated adequately by a standard metric.

Although different EMS teams have been developed in diverse features for different countries, the performance evaluations of RNs in the EMS teams are still challenging the EMS experts, especially in the critical EMS cases such as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients [12].

This research focuses on the evaluation of the effects of the on-scene time by introducing one RN into the original EMS team which is formed by two EMTs. Additionally, it investigates the medical benefits of the saved on-scene time; for instance, the methods of the return of spontaneous circulation within two hours () and ED length of stay (LOS) are applied to analyze the clinical impact to the OHCA patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

A random participation of the RNs in the EMS teams for prehospital emergency care has been implemented since 2005 at the ChangHua Fire Bureau in Taiwan. In order to evaluate the effects of the RNs in the EMS system, the on-scene time has been analyzed as a primary index to estimate the differentials between these two teams.

The EMS team-attended RNs will receive 46-hour training and participate in programs related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), advance cardiac life support (ACLS), and emergency trauma practices. These courses are only offered to nursing personnel with the clinical experience of more than two years.

The RNs accompany two EMTs (referred as 2T1N) in prehospital emergency care from 16:00 to 22:00 in situ every day. When the on-duty RN attends an EMS case, a team of two EMTs (referred as 2T) will be responsible for the subsequent cases until the RN returns to the fire department. On the other hand, once the RN is available, the 2T1N will be teamed again. Accordingly, the participation of the RNs is random, regardless the severity of the EMS cases.

2.2. Setting and Selection of Participants

A total of 1375 EMS cases have been collected from the ChangHua Fire Bureau First Battalion Detachment in Taiwan for the period of August 2010 to January 2011; this is a single center study. The EMT keeps the records of dispatch time, scene arrival time, scene departure time, emergency department (ED) arrival time, and ED departure time [8, 9] as well as the patient information, conditions, scene treatments, and so on. In order to eliminate the outliers of the on-scene time of the two EMS teams, 2T and 2T1N, 128 collected cases (9%) which involve residents with difficult accessibility, drunks, and mentally disordered patients were excluded for the sake of undue bias of the on-scene time. The participation rate of the RNs is 55.81% in this study, while the ED time is defined as the time interval between patient arriving and departing from the EDs.

2.3. Data Collection and Processing

After the case screening, 1247 patients have been separated into the categories of trauma and nontrauma cases. The nontrauma cases are subcategorized into OHCA (NT-O), critical (NT-C) (OHCA excluded), and noncritical (NT-NC) cases, whereas the trauma cases are subcategorized into collar-and-spinal board fixation (T-CS), fracture fixation (T-F), and general trauma (T-G) cases. This assortment is based on the case records of the official EMS sheets provided by EMTs. The patient percentages of the NT-O, NT-C, NT-NC, T-CS, T-F, and T-G cases are 2%, 12%, 21%, 5%, 5%, and 55%, respectively. The on-scene time is defined as the period from the arrival of the ambulance at the scene until the vehicle leaves the scene [11]. During this time period, the EMS teams implement the prehospital first-aid care to the patients. Additionally, the dispatch time is the point where the EMTs are informed for their cases and depart; the scene arrival time is the point where the ambulance reaches the scene and the EMTs get off; the scene departure time is the point where the EMTs complete the patient transfer to the ambulance and the ambulance departs from the scene; the ED arrival time is the point where the ambulance reaches the ED; the ED departure time is point where the EMTs complete the patient handovers [8, 9]. Each time point can be traced and double-checked by the Global Positioning System (GPS) installed in the ambulances. Nevertheless, there are some slight differences of time records between the EMT run reports and the GPS data.

For OHCA cases, the return of spontaneous circulation within two hours () rate refers to the percentage of the OHCA patients who have recovered their pulses after the on-scene triage. All the ED data in this research are obtained from the Changhua Christian Medical Center which is responsible for the critical patients in central Taiwan.

2.4. Primary Data Analysis

All data are extracted from the records on the official EMS sheets, and the on-scene time is obtained from the ambulance scene-departing time minus scene-arriving time. The mathematic method of the arithmetic mean is applied in the average on-scene time calculation, while the statistical significance is determined by the -test or the -test with .

The rate of NT-O patients is expressed as the patients divided by the NT-O patients, including the patients therein.

3. Results

The patient flow diagram is shown in Figure 1. A total of 51 patients who live in residences with challenging accessibility are excluded from the 1375 EMS cases, because the on-scene time will be overly extended with significant deviations among the cases. For the same reason, drunks and mentally disordered patients, a total number of 77 are also excluded. After the exclusion of the 128 cases, the remaining 1247 EMS cases receive randomly first aid from 2T or 2T1N teams; more specifically, 551 cases were involved in the 2T teams, while 696 cases were involved in 2T1N teams. Moreover, the cases for both teams were subclassified into six categories of NT-O, NT-C, NT-NC, T-CS, T-F, and T-G, and the patient numbers are indicated as for 2T and as for 2T1N teams. Eventually, all the cases of the six categories are subjected to compare the on-scene time between 2T and 2T1N teams.

The average on-scene time of the 2T and 2T1N teams is 6.81 min (with a standard deviation of 2.19 min) and 5.9 min (with a standard deviation of 1.44 min), respectively. For the six types of the EMS cases, the average on-scene time of the NT-O, NT-C, NT-NC, T-CS, T-F, and T-G cases in 2T teams is 8.36 min, 6.41 min, 5.28 min, 9.00 min, 8.04 min, and 4.62 min, whereas in 2T1N teams it is 6.6 min, 6.20 min, 5.28 min, 7.34 min, 6.95 min, and 4.46 min, respectively (Table 1; Figure 2). If the average on-scene time of the 2T teams and the 2T1N teams is compared, a decrease of 1.76 min (21.05%; ) in NT-O, 0.21 min (3.28%; ) in NT-C, 0 min (0%; ) in NT-NC, 1.66 min (18.44%; ) in T-CS, 1.09 min (13.56%; ) in T-F, and 0.16 min (3.46%; ) in T-G cases is noticeable. According to the results of the paired -test for the average on-scene time of the two teams, only NT-O and T-CS cases have a statistical significance (). Regarding the differences of the average on-scene time between these two teams, the 95% of confidence interval in NT-O cases is between 0.36 and 3.16 min, while in T-CS cases it is between −0.26 and 2.44 min.

Figure 2

The average on-scene time of the six-categorized EMS cases in 2T and 2T1N teams. 2T, an EMS team with 2 emergency medical technicians; 2T1N, an EMS team with 2 emergency medical technicians and 1 nurse; NT-O, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in nontrauma cases; NT-C, critical patients in nontrauma cases; NT-NC, noncritical patients in nontrauma cases; T-CS, patients with collar-and-spinal board fixation in trauma cases; T-F, patients with fracture fixation in the trauma cases; T-G, general trauma cases.

As shown in Table 2, the rate of the NT-O cases is 7.14% in 2T teams and 20.00% in 2T1N. Furthermore, the 2T1N teams have an increase of 12.86% of rate compared to the 2T teams.

Additionally, in order to reveal the interactions between the on-scene time and the ED LOS in 2T and 2T1N teams in six-categorized cases, a statistical method of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) is adopted to perform the -test.

4. Limitations

The prime limitation of this research is the uncertain cohort of the 2T and the 2T1N teams. Equally important is the unpredictable situations both teams have to encounter in each EMS case. These limitations will cause internal errors while calculating the on-scene time.

Although the benefits of the attendances of the RNs in EMS can be estimated by using the on-scene time, the medical benefits of 2T1N teams to the patients in total could be evaluated by a comprehensive study, and it could focus on the patient aspects of the medical prognosis, the hospital days, and the survival rate.

Based on the EMS recordings, the cases are classified into six types; however some other types may be more important for understanding the real conditions of the participation of the RNs in the EMS teams.

5. Discussion

According to the findings of this research, the 2T1N teams appear to have more medical benefits in saving the on-scene time for EMS system compared to the 2T teams. The average on-scene time is min without attendances of RNs, whereas the average on-scene time is min with the attendances. The average on-scene time has a statistic significant decrease of 21.05% in NT-O and 18.44% in T-CS ( and , resp.). The reason for these discrepancies may be that the RNs can govern the cases, especially when ACLS and intravenous infusions for NT-O patients are needed while the EMTs are performing CPR. In addition to that, the RNs in 2T1N teams can give practical medical advices and decision-making during the on-scene emergency care [23]. Furthermore, the RNs can not only provide emergency medical serves of collar or spinal fixation apparatus to T-CS patients but also facilitate the immobilization of the injured portions for such cases. On the other hand, the NT-C, NT-NC, T-F, and T-G cases require less on-scene treatments, so the RNs in a 2T1N team may detract from effectiveness.

For the NT-O cases, the rate is 7.14% in 2T teams, while for the 2T1N it is 20.00%. The participation of the RNs reaches a 12.86% promotion in rate for OHCA patients, which shows that the saved on-scene time and the attendance of RNs could contribute to the real medical benefits of a life-saving purpose [24, 25].

For the sake of the high turnover rate of EMTs in this specific fire department, the study period is limited from August 2010 to January 2011 in order to minimize the effects of the EMT staff discrepancy. During this time period, all the EMTs are the same but may be under different compositions. The nursing staff cannot be controlled in this research, because the cooperative hospital has assigned the RNs programmatically for attending the EMS teams.

Based on the results, all the six-categorized cases show no statistical significance () between the on-scene time and the ED LOS whether the RNs are attended in the EMS teams or not. The above findings indicate that the ED LOS is an independent event [26] and it is not related to the on-scene time. Therefore, the medical advantages of the attendances of the RNs in the EMS teams should be noticeably evaluated by the methods which exclude the ED time. Nevertheless, the RNs in the EMS teams have a well-communicated practice to report the adequate on-scene physical examinations and triage while transferring the patients to the EDs [23, 27, 28].

Thus far, it remains a challenge to exclude completely the benefits of the RNs attendances in EMS teams from the manpower-added issues. However, the shortage of the on-scene time between the 2T1N and 2T teams is not a solid constant just by reviewing the results of the six-classified cases. The findings of this research may highlight not only the fact that the extra RNs are manpower-added advantages but also medical-based benefits [23, 28]. Based on the EMS practice, the RNs with rich clinical experiences can play a major role in on-scene triage, patient stabilization, leadership assumption, case reporting, decision-making, and first-aid treatment, especially in critical EMS cases [22, 23, 28].

For EMS cases, the on-scene time has a high impact in a compressed window of emergency medical care, while seconds could mean life or death. Therefore, the introduction and participation of RNs in the EMS teams show a plethora of EMS benefits by shortening the on-scene time in the NT-O and T-CS cases and reaching an obvious increase in rate for OHCA patients.

Competing Interests

All authors report no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Ming-Wei Lin, Chih-Long Pan and Che-Yu Wu conceived the study. This research was first designed by Che-Yu Wu and Ming-Wei Lin. Che-Yu Wu and Ming-Wei Lin collected the data and offered the experience of the real EMS act. Moreover, Jyh-Horng Wen and Zhong Tian altered some ideas and thoughts which were not realistic related to the EMS performance. Zhong Tian and Jyh-Horng Wen did their efforts in mathematical calculations and statistical evaluations. Ming-Wei Lin and Chih-Long Pan performed a literature review and drafted the initial manuscript. Jet-Chau Wen supervised all the details of this work. All authors contributed to revisions of this manuscript. Jet-Chau Wen takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology for the funding through Grants 105-2625-M-224-002. The authors would like to thank Mr. Spyros Schismenos for his great input in editing and finalizing the precision of the manuscript.

References

J. L. Arnold, “International emergency medicine and the recent development of emergency medicine worldwide,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Cone, E. Brooke Lerner, R. A. Band et al., “Prehospital care and new models of regionalization,” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1337–1345, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. F. Dick, “Anglo-American vs. Franco-German emergency medical services system,” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Dykstra, “International models for the practice of emergency care,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 208–209, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. VanRooyen, T. L. Thomas, and K. J. Clem, “International emergency medical services: assessment of developing prehospital systems abroad,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 691–696, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W.-C. Chiang, P. C.-I. Ko, H.-C. Wang et al., “EMS in Taiwan: past, present, and future,” Resuscitation, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 9–13, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Bullard, S.-J. Liaw, and J.-C. Chen, “Emergency medicine development in Taiwan,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 542–548, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Spaite, T. D. Valenzuela, H. W. Meislin, E. A. Criss, and P. Hinsberg, “Prospective validation of a new model for evaluating emergency medical services systems by in-field observation of specific time intervals in prehospital care,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 638–645, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. W. Meislin, J. B. Conn, C. Conroy, and M. Tibbitts, “Emergency medical service agency definitions of response intervals,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 453–458, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Mayer, “Emergency medical service: delays, response time and survival,” Medical Care, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 818–827, 1979.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. T. Pons, E. E. Moore, J. M. Cusick, M. Brunko, B. Antuna, and L. Owens, “Prehospital venous access in an urban paramedic system—a prospective on-scene analysis,” The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1460–1463, 1988.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Spaite, E. A. Criss, T. D. Valenzuela, and H. W. Meislin, “Developing a foundation for the evaluation of expanded-scope EMS: a window of opportunity that cannot be ignored,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 791–796, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Newgard, R. H. Schmicker, J. R. Hedges et al., “Emergency medical services intervals and survival in trauma: assessment of the “golden hour” in a North American prospective cohort,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 235.e4–246.e4, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bigdeli, D. Khorasani-Zavareh, and R. Mohammadi, “Pre-hospital care time intervals among victims of road traffic injuries in Iran. A Cross-Sectional Study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 10, article 406, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Funder, J. A. Petersen, and J. Steinmetz, “On-scene time and outcome after penetrating trauma: An Observational Study,” Emergency Medicine Journal, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 797–801, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Takahashi, S. Kohsaka, H. Miyata et al., “Association between prehospital time interval and short-term outcome in acute heart failure patients,” Journal of Cardiac Failure, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 742–747, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. O. Birk and L. O. Henriksen, “Prehospital interventions: on-scene-Time and ambulance-technicians' experience,” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 167–169, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-L. Pan, C.-W. Chiu, and J.-C. Wen, “Adaptation and promotion of emergency medical service transportation for climate change,” Medicine, vol. 93, no. 27, article 186, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-C. Tsai, J.-C. Wen, C.-M. Wu, and M.-H. Chen, “A research on the three-year performance of the regional emergency operation centers in Taiwan,” Natural Hazards, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 1109–1127, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-C. Wen, C.-C. Tsai, M.-H. Chen, and W.-T. Chang, “Operation of emergency operating centers during mass casualty incidents in Taiwan: a disaster management perspective,” Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 426–431, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Spaite, E. A. Criss, T. D. Valenzuela, H. W. Meislin, and J. Ross, “Analysis of prehospital scene time and survival from out-of-hospital, non-traumatic, cardiac arrest,” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B.-O. Suserud and H. Haljamäe, “Role of nurses in pre-hospital emergency care,” Accident and Emergency Nursing, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 145–151, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Soren and W. Linda, “Development of the pre-hospital emergency care, the registered nurses' role in the ambulance service—a swedish perspective,” Emergency Medicine: Open Access, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. B. Vukmir, “Survival from prehospital cardiac arrest is critically dependent upon response time,” Resuscitation, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 229–234, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Feero, J. R. Hedges, E. Simmons, and L. Irwin, “Does out-of-hospital EMS time affect trauma survival?” American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 133–135, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-L. Pan, C.-F. Chang, C.-W. Chiu et al., “What can emergency medicine learn from kinetics: introducing an alternative evaluation and a universal criterion standard for emergency department performance,” Medicine (United States), vol. 95, no. 11, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Burges Watson, R. Sanoff, J. E. MacKintosh et al., “Evidence from the scene: paramedic perspectives on involvement in out-of-hospital research,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 641–650, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. O. Suserud, K. A. Wallman-Cson, and H. Haljamäe, “Assessment of the quality improvement of prehospital emergency care in Sweden,” European Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 407–414, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Ming-Wei Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2072

Downloads

964

Citations